It looks like I threw a monkey wrench into not one, not two, not three but six DNR criminal cases, doesn't it? It does, doesn't it?
CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1798 State of Minnesota vs Anthony Emmons
CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1800 State of Minnesota vs Clifford Emmons
CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1801 State of Minnesota vs Gregory Emmons
CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1802 State of Minnesota vs Ryan Emmons
CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1803 State of Minnesota vs Amanda Wright
CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1804 State of Minnesota vs Chad Wright
09/28/2015 Arraignment (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Robertson, Sally Ireland) 08/31/2015 Reset by Court to 09/28/2015
Six DNR criminal cases that the DNR is trying in the court of public opinion/media, right? That's right, isn't it?
Mr. Karpan: I do have one request. Um, I've not asked for this before, I'm not sure how to handle it, but the Department of Natural Resources as they've done in the past has seen fit to do a press release, and officer Osborne has answered questions for the newspaper. My client – all the facts of the case are in the Echo Press, on the radio and in sporting magazines. Not only are there quotes in there that aren't - - I mean I know the State has a right to release incident data I think it's called.
Under Chapter 13.82, investigative data is not to be released. Well, there are pictures allegedly of my client's fish all over the Echo Press. Everybody in town is talking about it. I don't know if I'll have to make a change of venue motion eventually. I'll have to see how this plays out in a few months.
But under 13.82, there's no way the DNR is supposed to be releasing pictures of evidence to the newspaper. It prejudices my client. It prejudices all of us. It makes it impossible to get a fair trail. So I'm asking the Court to order the Department of Natural Resources to not discuss this case any further until it's done.
The Court: Mr. Hochsprung?
Mr. Hochsprung: Your Honor, I did not authorize the Department of Natural Resources to disclose anything to the paper. Um, I can talk with Mr. Osborne or whoever about that, but I don't have any information about that. State of Minnesota vs. Ronald Wayne Johnson Rule 5/ Rule 8 Hearing. Court File No. 21-CR- 13-51. February 11, 2013.
The DNR rigs the court case by submitting confidential criminal investigative data to the lap dog media, don't they? They do, don't they? That's what the DNR did in the case of Ronald Johnson's rigged Case No. 21-CR-13-51, isn't it? It is, isn't it?
Partial view of confiscated over limit sunfish and crappie fillets. Six licensed anglers from Indiana face nearly $3,400 in restitution and fines of about $1,000 each for being 676 fish over the limit on a Minnesota lake. MN DNR Photo - Charged with misdemeanor fishing violations in Becker County were Clifford Emmons, 78; Anthony Emmons, 54; Gregory Emmons, 58; Ryan Emmons, 32; Chad Wright, 42, and Amanda Wright, 40, all of Bedford, Indiana. They are scheduled to appear in court on Aug. 31. “This is a serious example of catching and keeping an over-limit of fish,” said Conservation Officer Bill Landmark of Moorhead. “This is a real loss for the people who enjoy fishing Becker County lakes,” said Col. Ken Soring, DNR Enforcement director. Six Indiana anglers caught with 676 fish over the limit By BRAINERD DISPATCH and Forum Communication Company on Aug 17, 2015 at 12:53 p.m.
The lap dog media are just stenographers and cheerleaders for the corrupt local officials, aren't they? They are, aren't they?
“I think they were aware they were over the limit, but not how much over the limit they were,” Landmark said. The group had visited the resort four or five times in the past, he said. Reached by phone, one of the party, Clifford Emmons, 78, of Bedford, Ind., said he had no comment. “What’s there to say? We took too many fish,” he said tiredly. Becker County fishing party was 676 fish over limit By Nathan Bowe / Forum News Service INFORUM and Forum Communications Company on Aug 10, 2015 at 3:52 p.m.
The Brainerd Dispatch (Forum Communication Company) was more than willing to print the confidential pictures of the fish allegedly caught by the Emmons & Wright families, weren't they? They were, weren't they? No questions asked, right?
Subd. 7. Criminal investigative data. Except for the data defined in subdivisions 2, 3, and 6, investigative data collected or created by a law enforcement agency in order to prepare a case against a person, whether known or unknown, for the commission of a crime or other offense for which the agency has primary investigative responsibility are confidential or protected nonpublic while the investigation is active. 13.82 COMPREHENSIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT DATA. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=13.82
In fact, Detroit Lakes Newspaper Editor Nathan Bowe (Forum Communication Company) was surprised in our Friday, August 28, 2015 phone conversation that I would even question the DNR's procedures, wasn't he? He was, wasn't he?
VI. Contents of Law Enforcement Reports Officers preparing law enforcement reports shall include: 1. The summary shall be sufficiently detailed to enable the reader to form an accurate mental impression of the events being described. 2. The summary shall include exculpatory as well as inculpatory evidence. A-13-06, Written Reporting Requirements and Guidelines, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Enforcement Division, Page 3,4.
The one thing that Detroit Lakes Newspaper Editor Nathan Bowe (Forum Communication Company) really wanted to know was if I had spoken to the Emmons & Wright families, wasn't it? It was, wasn't it?
V. Principle Two Conservation Officers shall refrain from any conduct in an official capacity that detracts from the public’s faith in the integrity of the criminal justice system. B. Rules 3. Conservation Officers shall truthfully, completely, and impartially report, testify, and present all evidence, including exculpatory evidence, in all matters of an official nature. A-4-99, Conduct unbecoming a Conservation Officer. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Enforcement Division, Page 3.
And my response was that I didn't want to answer that question, wasn't it? It was, wasn't it?
Editor Nathan Bowe was worried that I had some inside information, wasn't he? He was, wasn't he? Something that Bowe knew that the corrupt local officials would want him to find out about, right? That's right, isn't it?
I had informed Editor Nathan Bowe that I had a copy of Incident Report # 15010037 for the alleged incident on Upper Cormorant Lake, didn't I? I did, didn't I? I also informed him about the informed consent form that I had received from the DNR, didn't I? I did, didn't I?
Just by reading the incident reports you could see that there were all sorts of problems case, couldn't you? You could, couldn't you? You could if you weren't a stenographer and a cheerleader for the corrupt local official, right? That's right, isn't it?
One of the most glaring problems with the case is the lack of technology in the case, isn't it it? It is, isn't it?
There are four (4) DNR officers on the case, aren't there? There are, aren't there?
Yet, the incident reports indicate only one (1) audio recording, doesn't it? It does, doesn't it? Where are the other (3) three, huh? Hidden? Destroyed?
450.5.2 SURREPTITIOUS USE OF THE PORTABLE RECORDER Minnesota law permits an individual to surreptitiously record any conversation in which one party to the conversation has given his/her permission (Minn. Stat. § 626A.02). Members of the Office may surreptitiously record any conversation during the course of a criminal investigation in which the member reasonably believes that such a recording will be lawful and beneficial to the investigation. Portable Audio/Video Recorders - Mower County Sheriff's Office Policy Manual, page 317.
This DNR "sting" wasn't a spur of the moment operation, was it? It wasn't, was it? So where are the other (3) three audio recordings, huh?
This sounds like the two (2) officers in the case of Ronald Johnson's rigged Case No. 21-CR-13-51, doesn't it? It does, doesn't it?
Two (2) officers but only part of an audio recording, right? That's right, isn't it?
The part that is mysterious missing is the part that allegedly grants the corrupt DNR officer permission to search, right? That's right, isn't it?
Will that be the case here? That might be a little harder this time, right?
Why you ask? Because this time I have the primary DNR officer William Landmark explaining to me the proper procedure for audio recording, don't I? I do, don't I? Excerpts are found here, aren't they?
Lion News: DNR's CO Landmark's Testimony Proves Missing Evidence In Johnson's 21-CR-13-51?
Lion News: DNR Major Salto Doesn't Want To Investigate CO Osborne's Destruction Of Evidence?
Another glaring problem with the allegedly legal searches and seizures are two (2) different accounts of how permission was obtained to search Anthony Emmons', isn't it? It is, isn't it?
CO William Landmark's account of how CO Joseph Stattleman's account of how he gained permission to search Anthony Simmons' cabin is backed up by an audio recording, is it? It is, isn't it?
What happened to CO Joseph Stattleman's audio recording? Hmm? Destroyed? Disappeared?
And, of course, the real troubling part of the incident report is that according to Landmark's report Stattleman was already in the cabin when he asked permission to search the cabin, right? That's right, isn't it?
Must be why there is no mention of anyone in the incident report signing a voluntary consent to search form, huh?
And if this fairy tale had gone exactly how it was portrayed in the conflicting accounts, then why not get a signed voluntary consent to search, huh?
If the the Emmons & Wright families were as cooperative as the conflicting accounts say, then why didn't the the Emmons & Wright families sign a voluntary consent to search form, huh?
Getting the suspect to sign a voluntary consent to search form is part of the DNR's proper procedure, isn't it? It is, isn't it?
Yet, there is no mention of the voluntary consent to search in the conflicting accounts, is there? There isn't, is there?
Sounds suspicious, doesn't it? It does, doesn't it?
So Editor Nathan Bowe should have had plenty of reason to be suspicious of the DNR's conflicting accounts without ever speaking to the Emmons & Wright families, right? That's right, isn't it?
Editor Nathan Bowe was informed that he should be contacting the DNR and the the Emmons & Wright families about these problems with the case before the Monday, August 31, 2015, arraignment, wasn't he? He was, wasn't he?
And even though Editor Nathan Bowe had the incident reports and the consent to search form sent to him on Friday, August 28, 2015 at 2:20pm, Editor Nathan Bowe didn't acknowledge receipt of the incriminating documents until Saturday, August, 29, 2015 at 1:44pm, did he? He didn't, did he?
I thought that was suspicious, didn't I? I did, didn't I?
Especially, when this would have the potential to be a front page story about a scandal that involved the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, right? That's right, isn't it?
What was even more suspicious was the fact that Editor Nathan Bowe was on my website on Saturday, August, 29, 2015 at 1:44pm until Saturday, August, 29, 2015 at 1:44pm until 8:31pm looking at links for "Good Ol Boy" Jacobs Tellers of the rag called the Fergus Falls Journal & Fergus Falls City Council Member Timothy Rundquist victim of "Culpable Negligence", wasn't it? It was, wasn't it?
How could Editor Nathan Bowe be calling the DNR or the Emmons & Wright families if he was playing on my blog for so long, huh? He couldn't, right?
The real reason I called Editor Nathan Bowe was to make sure that Bowe's "good ol boy" buddies at the DNR and at the corrupt Becker county attorney's office knew that I hadn't quit, wasn't it? It was, wasn't it?
You can't trust the lap dog media, can you? You can't, can you? Just like you can't trust any arrest, prosecution or conviction in lawless Becker county, right? That's right, isn't it?
More to come . . .
Related links:
Echo Press Editor (Forum Communications Company, Right?) Al Edenloff Conspired With Corrupt DNR Officer Shane Osborne To Rig Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson? Court Documents Reveal Corrupt Editor Edenloff Knowingly Willingly & Intentionally Published Confidential Chapter 13.82 Criminal Investigative Data? Former Corrupt Douglas Co. Attorney & Current Corrupt Defense Attorney Chris Karpan Filing A Loony Appeal That Doesn't Address Illegal Search By His Buddy DNR Officer Osborne? No Surprise, Right?
DNR Invades Ronald Wayne Johnson's Home Without Probable Cause? Johnson Is A Victim Of DNR Home Invasion, Isn't He? Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson Maliciously Prosecuted By Chad "The Felon" Larson? "The Felon" Larson Has A Well-Documented History Of Covering Up Illegal Home Invasions, Doesn't He? Sounds Like Pope Co Home Invasion Of Nemmers' Home, Doesn't It? DNR's CO Shane Osborne Tampered With Audio To Cover Up Home Invasion?
Scandal Alert! “Sweetheart” Prosecution Of Former Becker Co. Sheriff Timothy Michael Gordon Case No. 03-CR-14-98? Golden Parachute Plea Deal Includes No Felony Charges? Becker Co. Attorney Gretchen Thilmony's IP Address All Over Lion News? Special Prosecutor Stearns Co. Attorney Janelle P. Kendall Has History Of Rigging Criminal Cases, Doesn't She? Brooten's City Attorney Robert Stoneburner Getting Kendall's Special Treatment In Case# 73-CR-13-7510?
Complaint Filed In Rigged Otter Tail County Court Case 56-CR-12-2353 (State of Minnesota vs Richard Willmar Rapatt)
Why Should Richard Rapatt Appeal A Case ( Rigged Otter Tail County Court Case 56-CR-12-2353 ) When He Was Convicted On Perjured Testimony? Michael Ray Hansen Was Granted A New Trial In The Interest Of Justice When He Was Found Out To Be A Victim Of Perjury - Seventh Judicial District Court File 23-KX-04-1222 - Filed July 13, 2011
Adam Harringa, Associate Publisher/Editor Fergus Falls Daily Journal Isn't Concerned About Public Safety? Rigging Criminal Trials In Otter Tail County Is A Public Safety Issue, Isn't It?
Related links:
Minnesota Sheriff's Association "Lawyers Up" After MSA'S (Unlicensed?) Lawyer Richard Hodsdon Sends Incriminating Email? Hodsdon Has Aided & Abetted Washington Co. Sheriff Hutton In The Illegal Withholding Of Free Electronic Data, Hasn't He? $5,031.00 Subscription For Lexipol? Did MSA Teach Otter Tail Co. Sheriff Brian Schlueter How To Commit Data Practice Crimes? Sheriff Brian Schlueter Making Wild & Outrageous Claims Nemmers Has To Get Copyright Waiver For Free Electronic Lexipol Policy Manual, Isn't He? Adam Harringa Of Fergus Falls Daily Journal Will Be Dumb Lap Dog Media That Won't Bark About This Data Dodge Either, Won't He?
Will Washington County Attorney Pete Orput Rig High-Profile Murder Case For Byron Smith (Case No. 49-CR-12-1882) Like He Did For High-Profile Drug Case Of Washington Co. Deputy Ricky Harry Gruber (Case No. 82-CR-13-789)? Sheriff William Hutton & Orput Retaliate Against Nemmers By Illegally Withholding Deputy Gruber's Public Data? Morrison County Sheriff Michel Wetzel Tries To Defraud Nemmers Out Of $85.00? Wetzel Complaint Filed!
Sheriff Hutton Illegally Withholding Public Data On Druggie Deputy Gruber - Sweetheart Deal For Gruber At Rigged Trial? Conflict Of Interest With Washington Co. Attorney Pete Orput As Prostituting Attorney?
Washington Co. Court Staff Too Busy Watching Lion News To Process Data Request For the Rigged Trial Of Washington Co. Druggie Deputy Ricky Harry Gruber - Case No. 82-CR-13-789?
Washington Co. Attorney Peter Orput Given Another Opportunity To Illegally Withhold Public Data For Druggie Deputy Ricky Harry Gruber? Case no. 82-CR-13-789, 03/01/2013 – Order for Booking – More Proof Of Sweetheart Deal?
Jacob Tellers, Fergus Falls Journal Stupid Enough To Get Suckered By Lt. Tiffani Nielson's Extortion Scam For Free Electronic Public Data? Nemmers Not Stupid Enough To Pay $7.75 For Free Fergus Falls Timothy Rundquist "Suicide By Cop" Data? Tellers Admits Nemmers Correct That Free Data Should Be Free? Minnesota Newspaper Association's Lisa Hills . . . Aka So-Called Fourth Pillar Of Government Not Interested In Looking Out For Members Nor For You? Update: Editor Adam Harringa Doesn't Want To Say If Paper's Credit Card Was Used To Purchase Free Data In Free Data Scam? Harringa Comes Back To Lion News For Second Look?
Otter Tail Co. Sheriff Brian Schlueter & Co. Attorney David Hauser Conspiring To Defraud Nemmers Out Of Large Sum Of Money For Free Electronic Data? Certified Snail Mail Scam Thwarted By Nemmers' Calls To Commissioners? Fraudulent Bill's Wild & Outrageous Price Of $200 Slashed To Wild & Outrageous Price Of $100? Schlueter & Hauser Concoct Loony Copyright Scam? Electronic Policy & Procedure Manual Will Prove Schlueter & Hauser Rigging Open Court Case? Ip Address 156.99.174.209 Indicates Schlueter & Hauser Lurking and Skulking To Find Case Details? Update: More Lurking & Skulking After More Calls To Commissioners? Leixipol Contract Says Public Data Not Subject To Copyright?
