Echo Press editor (Forum Communications Company, right?) Al Edenloff hates justice, doesn't he? He does, doesn't he?
Lion News: DNR's Capt. Gutierrez Illegally Withholds CO Osborne's Illegal Home Invasion Audio?
Lion News: DNR's Lt. Mike Shelden Won't Answer if CO Osborne Capable Of Illegal Home Invasion?
Lion News: DNR's Lt. Mike Shelden Illegally Withholds CO Osborne's Illegal Home Invasion Audio?
Lion News: DNR's CO Landmark's Testimony Proves Missing Evidence In Johnson's 21-CR-13-51?
Lion News: DNR Major Salto Doesn't Want To Investigate CO Osborne's Destruction Of Evidence?
Edenloff spews his vile hatred of justice in the rag called The Echo Press, doesn't he? He does, doesn't he?
Edenloff's hatred of justice has been used in the past to rig Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson, hasn't it? It has, hasn't it?
The Echo Press Editorial Board would like to acknowledge that a story in Friday’s issue regarding animal cruelty charges was not appropriately presented. The story and a letter to the editor contained comments and reactions from the owner of the dog that was killed but did not include comments from the person who was accused. Our coverage did not strike the fair and balanced reporting that we strive to achieve with every story we print. Echo Press Editorial: Newspaper story fell short – Echo Press Editorial Board members, Tara Bitzan, Editor, Jody Hanson, Publisher, and Al Edenloff, News Editor. Echo Press and Forum Communications Company Posted on May 18, 2015 at 2:44 p.m.
Edenloff's hatred of justice is currently being used to rig Case No. 21-CR-15-786 State of Minnesota vs Roger Duane Rosengren, isn't it? It is, isn't it?
An Alexandria man convicted in the 2004 death of his 4-month-old daughter is now considered innocent until proven guilty pending another trial. … Sabo explained their petition was “based on a claim that we had discovered new evidence in the case specifically related to our concern about what the original medical examiner said.” … After the court hearing, Judge Irvine granted Hansen a new trial in an order filed July 13. Irvine’s order discussed the complex medical evidence surrounding Avry’s death and addressed risk factors associated with positional asphyxia. … “When you become a lawyer, you agree to abide by certain rules,” Larson said in a statement released July 29. “One such rule states that attorneys in criminal cases cannot go to the media and plead their case if it is going to obviously influence potential jurors. Additionally, a prosecutor has a heightened duty to ensure that justice is served in every case – not a client, not a cause: justice alone.” By: Alexandria Echo Press. Published August 05, 2011, 12:00 AM.
Corrupt local officials know that they can rely on hater Edenloff to aid and abet in their obstruction of justice, don't they? They do, don't they?
It has been stated of witnesses in court that what they say is not as important as how they say it. Unfortunately, an anxious, rambling, absent-minded witness who is telling the truth is less likely to believed than a lying witness who comes across as confident, unyielding, and certain. The witness must appreciate what lawyers have known for years: the courtroom is a stage where attorney's carefully direct a drama wherein witnesses unfold their story before the jury's eyes. The jury represents the audience of this production and the witnesses become players. In this carefully constructed arena, the witness needs to fit the jury's image of someone who is telling the truth. Fred E. Inbau, John E. Reid, Joseph P. Buckley, Brian C. Jayne, Criminal Interrogation and Confessions, 4th Ed., page 454.
Edenloff aids and abets the corrupt local official's obstruction of justice by being a excellent stenographer & cheerleader for the corrupt local official's malicious prosecutions, doesn't he? He does, doesn't he?
In the case of Ronald Johnson, corrupt Conservation Office Shane Osborne went to hack Edenloff to get his help to cover up an illegal search and an illegal home invasion, didn't he? He did, didn't he?
Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou? This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not. So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her. John 8:5-7 King James Version (KJV)
As a good stenographer, cheerleader, and hater of justice Edenloff knew that the best was to rig the case against Johnson was to only talk about the fish Johnson allegedly had in his possession and avoid like the plague how corrupt Conservation Office Shane Osborne obtained the evidence, right? That's right, isn't it?
V. Principle Two Conservation Officers shall refrain from any conduct in an official capacity that detracts from the public’s faith in the integrity of the criminal justice system. B. Rules 3. Conservation Officers shall truthfully, completely, and impartially report, testify, and present all evidence, including exculpatory evidence, in all matters of an official nature. A-4-99, Conduct unbecoming a Conservation Officer. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Enforcement Division, Page 3.
Hater of justice Edenloff knows that we live in the age of technology, doesn't he? He does, doesn't he?
III. RESPONSIBILITIES: A. Members. 5. Under NO circumstances may a member personally sell, transfer, or distribute copies of audio or video recordings without permission, except under subpoena or directive of the prosecuting attorney. Requests for recordings should be referred to the District/Section Commander. Copies of recordings may not be released if they are part of an ongoing investigation, except under subpoena or directive of the prosecuting attorney. Page 2 of 4. GENERAL ORDER: Effective: March 25, 2009; Number: 09-30-023; Subject: AUDIO/VIDEO RECORDING EQUIPMENT; Reference: General Order 10-025, CALEA 41.3.8, 83.2.2; Special Instructions: Rescinds General Order 08-30-023 Distribution: A,B,C,F.
So it would make sense that if hater of justice Edenloff was actually doing his advertised job of being "fair and balanced," then you would expect hater of justice Edenloff to ask if there was any audio of the conversation between Osborne and Johnson, wouldn't you? You would, wouldn't you?
VI. Contents of Law Enforcement Reports Officers preparing law enforcement reports shall include: 1. The summary shall be sufficiently detailed to enable the reader to form an accurate mental impression of the events being described. 2. The summary shall include exculpatory as well as inculpatory evidence. A-13-06, Written Reporting Requirements and Guidelines, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Enforcement Division, Page 3,4.
That would be a reasonable question to ask after receiving pictures . . . aka as confidential Chapter 13.82 Criminal Investigative data . . . from corrupt Osborne, wouldn't it? It would, wouldn't it?
Subd. 7. Criminal investigative data. Except for the data defined in subdivisions 2, 3, and 6, investigative data collected or created by a law enforcement agency in order to prepare a case against a person, whether known or unknown, for the commission of a crime or other offense for which the agency has primary investigative responsibility are confidential or protected nonpublic while the investigation is active.13.82 COMPREHENSIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT DATA. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=13.82
You know the confidential and nopublic pictures that are not to be released to the public while the case is active, right? That's right, isn't it?
Hater of justice Edenloff, being a so-called journalist, is trained in the law concerning data practice and defamation, isn't he? He is, isn't he?
Hater of justice Edenloff knew that the evidence/pictures that Osborne illegally released to him were from an active criminal case, didn't he?
4. Conservation Officers, whether on or off duty, shall not knowingly commit any criminal offense under any laws of the United States or any state or local jurisdiction in which the officer is present, except where permitted in the performance of duty under proper authority. A-4-99, CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER Page 2.
So that means that hater of justice Edenloff knowingly, willing and intentionally printed evidence/pictures were confidential and nopublic, didn't he? He did, didn't he?
And as planned all the other stupid haters of justice in corrupt Douglas County were only talking about the pictures of the fish instead of how corrupt CO Obsborne obtained the pictures of the fish, weren't they? They were, weren't they?
And to further aid and abet the corrupt local officials not a single word has been printed in the rag called the Echo Press about CO Osborne illegally invading Johnson's home, has there? There hasn't, has there?
And there certainly hasn't been a single word printed in the rag called the Echo Press about CO Osborne tampering with Johnson's audio statement, has there? There hasn't, has there?
How was the audio tampered with you ask? The initial part of the conversation where CO Osborne would be stating the data, time and preliminary investigation of Ronald Wayne Johnson is being illegally withheld, isn't it? It is, isn't it?
The part where CO Osborne allegedly obtained probable cause and permission to search Ronald Johnson's home and freezers, right? That's right, isn't it?
Officers conducting all criminal investigations will, whenever possible, record oral victim and witness statements in lieu of written statements. Statement evidence obtained during an initial investigation can be very powerful evidence in determining the course of an investigation; ultimately impacting charging decisions and convictions. It is not necessary to advise a victim or witness that their statement is being recorded. Officers should use discretion when determining the best method of recording depending on the circumstances of the event. Adoption Date: 2015/03/16 Preliminary Investigation/Required Reports - page 154 http://www.duluthmn.gov/media/326959/RELEASE_20150316_T181919_Duluth_PD_Policy_Manual.pdf
Proper procedure requires that it exists, doesn't it? It does, doesn't it?
B. Rules 2. Conservation Officers shall not knowingly disobey the law or rules of criminal procedure in such areas as interrogation, arrest, detention, searches, seizures, use of informants, preservation of evidence, and use of force. A-4-99, CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER Page 2.
However, the rulebooks and the laws are thrown out the window by the corrupt local officials and the haters of justice like hack Al Edenloff, aren't they? They are, aren't they?
Officers must be able to articulate specific facts, circumstances, and conclusions that support reasonable suspicion or probable cause for investigative detentions, pedestrian and vehicle stops, arrests, nonconsensual searches, and property seizures. A-14-01, IMPARTIAL POLICING Page 3.
The whole purpose of the corrupt courts in Douglas county is to find you guilty, isn't it? It is, isn't it? That's why all the illegal withholding of evidence, the tampering with evidence and the perjured testimony used to rig the malicious court case is ignored by all the corrupt judges, the corrupt cops, the corrupt prosecuting attorneys, the corrupt defense attorneys and the corrupt hacks like Edenloff, isn't it? It is, isn't it?
Speaking of corrupt prosecuting attorneys and corrupt defense attorney who hate justice, I was looking into the appeal filed by Johnson's backstabbing defense attorney & former Douglas County Attorney Chris Karpan, wasn't I? I was, wasn't I?
And according to court records for Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson, Karpan only plans on basing his appeal on this Rule 5/8 hearing where he is complaint about Osborne illegally releasing confidential Chapter 13.82 Criminal Investigative data to hack Al Edenloff, isn't he? He is, isn't he?
Karpan only requested the transcript for the Rule 5/8 hearing, didn't he? He did, didn't he?
Corrupt Karpan didn't request a transcript from the 12/03/2013 Contested Omnibus [(10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Battey, David R.) 09/27/2013 Reset by Court to 12/03/2013 Result: Held], did he? He didn't, did he?
So that means that corrupt Karpan doesn't want to challenge the illegal home invasion nor the illegal search by his buddy corrupt CO Shane Osborne, doesn't it? It does, doesn't it?
Did you know that Johnson's backstabbing defense attorney & former Douglas County Attorney Chris Karpan has a history of playing basketball with corrupt CO Shane Osborne? Sounds like Karapn is playing a different kind of ball with corrupt CO Shane Osborne, doesn't it? It does, doesn't it?
Ronald Wayne Johnson told me that corrupt Karpan was against sending Johnson's highly edited audio statement to a forensic scientist, didn't he? He did, didn't he?
Karpan had told Johnson that sending Johnson's highly edited audio statement to a forensic scientist would get his buddy corrupt CO Shane Osborne into trouble, hadn't he? He had, hadn't he?
So know you know why the loony appeal is only based on corrupt CO Shane Osborne's illegal release of the confidential Chapter 13.82 Criminal Investigative data to corrupt hater of justice Echo Press editor (Forum Communications Company, right?) Al Edenloffand not on the illegal search and the audio statement that has been tampered with, don't you? You do, don't you?
It is just one more reason not to trust any arrest, prosecution and conviction in lawless Douglas county, isn't it? It is, isn't he?
More to come . . . .
DNR Invades Ronald Wayne Johnson's Home Without Probable Cause? Johnson Is A Victim Of DNR Home Invasion, Isn't He? Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson Maliciously Prosecuted By Chad "The Felon" Larson? "The Felon" Larson Has A Well-Documented History Of Covering Up Illegal Home Invasions, Doesn't He? Sounds Like Pope Co Home Invasion Of Nemmers' Home, Doesn't It? DNR's CO Shane Osborne Tampered With Audio To Cover Up Home Invasion?