Sunday, July 3, 2022

Nemmers Assists In A Felony Dismissal And 3 Misdemeanor Dismissals For State Of Minnesota Vs Jeremy James Boles Case No.: 72-CR-20-85, 72-CR-20-81, 72-CR-20-83, & 72-CR-20-172? Imagine How Quickly These Cases Could Have Been Dismissed If Boles Wasn't Actively Trying To Sabotage His Own Case?

Felony Dismissal For State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles Case No.: 72-CR-20-85

State Of Minnesota Vs Jeremy James Boles Case No.: 72-CR-20-85

03/23/2020 E-filed Comp-Order for Detention Index # 1

08/12/2021 Order-Evaluation for Competency to Proceed (Rule 20.01) Index # 51 (Judicial Officer: Donley, Amber )

03/17/2022 Found Competent (Judicial Officer: Donley, Amber )

06/20/2022 Order for Dismissal Index # 67 (Judicial Officer: Winters, Jody L. )
06/20/2022 Notice of Filing of Order Index # 68
06/23/2022 CANCELED Settlement Conference (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber) Dismissed
06/27/2022 Returned Mail Index # 69
06/28/2022 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber)
Dismissed

Misdemeanor Dismissals For State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles Case No.: 72-CR-20-81, 72-CR-20-83, & 72-CR-20-172

State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles Case No.: 72-CR-20-81

03/21/2020 Citation E-Filed

06/23/2022 Settlement Conference (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber)
Result: Held On the Record
06/23/2022 Proposed Order or Document Index # 41
06/23/2022 e-Service BOLES, JEREMY JAMES Served 06/23/2022
06/23/2022 Order for Dismissal Index # 42 (Judicial Officer: Donley, Amber )
06/28/2022 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber)
Dismissed

State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles Case No.: 72-CR-20-83

03/21/2020 Citation E-Filed

06/23/2022 Settlement Conference (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber)
Result: Held On the Record
06/23/2022 Proposed Order or Document Index # 38
06/23/2022 e-Service BOLES, JEREMY JAMES Served 06/23/2022
06/23/2022 Order for Dismissal Index # 39 (Judicial Officer: Donley, Amber )
06/28/2022 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber)
Dismissed


State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles Case No.: 72-CR-20-172

06/04/2020 E-filed Comp-Summons Index # 1

06/23/2022 Settlement Conference (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber)
Result: Held On the Record
06/23/2022 Proposed Order or Document Index # 38
06/23/2022 e-Service Boles, Jeremy James Served 06/23/2022
06/23/2022 Order for Dismissal Index # 39 (Judicial Officer: Donley, Amber )
06/28/2022 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber)
Dismissed

 

Do you want to read the complaint that Boles filed against his attorney?

https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch Minnesota Court Records Online (MCRO) Case Details Case Number:72-CR-20-85 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs JEREMY JAMES BOLES 08/10/2021 Correspondence 15 pages

Final Instructions That Forced The Misdemeanor Dismissals?

06-22-22

John G. Dillon Assistant State Public Defender 237 Mackubin St. St. Paul MN, 55102 (612) 703-8648

Re: Stop Sabotaging My Criminal Cases & Get My Phone From Henderson

Emailed to: keithswenson49@gmail.com, randy_tiegs@hotmail.com, sellnerconstruction@gmail.com, amyhardel1@gmail.com, jabld@frontiernet.net, chenderson165@mchsi.com, lionnews00@gmail.com, John.Dillon@pubdef.state.mn.us, amber.donley@courts.state.mn.us, karen.messner@courts.state.mn.us

You and your fellow public pretender Wesley Harvey have helped to make life a living hell for the last 2+ years. Neither you nor Harvey have made any real attempts to get Case Nos. 72-CR-20-81, 72-CR-20-83, 72-CR-20-172, 72-CR-20-85 dismissed1,2,3. I have reason to suspect that the only reason why the felony case, 72-CR-20-85, was dismissed was because of the intervention of Mr. Terry Nemmers. While backstabbing Harvey was conspiring with Sibley County Attorney Donald E. Lannoye4,5,6 to make sure that I was smeared with a malicious competency hearing, Mr. Nemmers was helping me to toss a monkey wrench into that same malicious competency hearing.

What have you actually accomplished in my case? Have you gotten my phone back from either Henderson City Attorney Jason Moran or Henderson Chief of Police Dimitri Ikonitski? You haven’t, have you? How am I supposed to go to trial or even have a chance at winning at trial without the exculpatory evidence that is on my phone? You know what I do have? I have a damning audio recording of you making it perfectly clear to me that you have no intention of obtaining my phone aka my exculpatory evidence from the City of Henderson until you have secured my convictions in Case Nos. 72-CR-20-81, 72-CR-20-83, and72-CR-20-172. Let me make this perfectly clear to you. I want my phone, today! Not tomorrow! Not next week! Today! Do I make myself perfectly clear?

According the City of Henderson’s City Attorney’s Brady/Giglio policy, it is misconduct for Henderson Chief of Police Dimitri Ikonitski to illegally withhold my phone from me. Consider this my misconduct7,8,9 complaint against Henderson Chief of Police Dimitri Ikonitski for illegally withholding my phone from me. You are directed to make this complaint known to the City of Henderson’s City Administrator Lon Berberich.  My next instruction to you is to obtain the City of Henderson’s findings and bills for services rendered from the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension for the handwriting analysis that they did to determine

Page 1 of 5

whether or not I forged Anthony Cermak’s name to any document. Because I did not forge10,11,12,13 Cermak’s name to any document it has caused me to have reason to suspect that Henderson City Attorney Jason Moran and Henderson Chief of Police Dimitri Ikonitski are counting on Cermak to lie on the witness stand in Case Nos. 72-CR-20-81, 72-CR-20-83, and 72-CR-20-172.  My third instruction is that I want those investigator files emailed to me immediately. Those are the files that I have repeatedly told Harvey that I wanted sent to me. I do not want a summary of the files,  I want the actual documents and the actual audio files. I want to see and hear what information the investigator obtained from Myron Cermak.  My final instruction to you is for you to get Case Nos. 72-CR-20-81, 72-CR-20-83, and 72-CR-20-172 dismissed, today!. All you want to do is continue to make my life a living hell be forcing me to go to these completely unnecessary settlement conferences. You know perfectly well that I do not have the money nor the resources to waste going to the 06-23-22 Settlement conferences. If you refuse to get my cases dismissed, then I want to see and hear Anthony Cermak engage in perjury on the witness stand during trial. Make this know to the court! Do I make myself perfectly clear? Good! Get it done!   _____________________________________________________________ 

Jeremy Boles      iisokrutoo@gmail.com

Footnotes:

1. Case No. 72-CR-20-81 State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles, Date of Incident: 03/11/2020 03/21/2020 Citation E-Filed 06/23/2022 Settlement Conference (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber) 06/28/2022 Jury Trial (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber) Case No. 72-CR-20-83 State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles, Date of Incident: 03/11/2020 03/21/2020 Citation E-Filed 06/23/2022 Settlement Conference (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber) 06/28/2022 Jury Trial (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber) Case No. 72-CR-20-172 State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles, Date of Incident: 05/24/2020 06/04/2020 Citation E-Filed 06/23/2022 Settlement Conference (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber) 06/28/2022 Jury Trial (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber) 

Page 2 of 5

Case No. 72-CR-20-85 State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles, Date of Incident: 03/21/2020     03/23/2020 E-filed Comp-Order for Detention Index # 1 08/12/2021 Order-Evaluation for Competency to Proceed (Rule 20.01) Index # 51 (Judicial Officer: Donley, Amber ) 02/17/2022 Rule 20 Evaluation Report Index # 59 03/17/2022 Found Competent (Judicial Officer: Donley, Amber ) 06/16/2022 Motion to Dismiss Index # 65 06/20/2022 Order for Dismissal Index # 67 (Judicial Officer: Winters, Jody L. ) 06/23/2022 CANCELED Settlement Conference (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber) Dismissed 06/28/2022 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber) Dismissed

2. THE COURT: We are here for an omnibus hearing today. Mr. Dillon? MR. DILLON: Your Honor, thank you. At this time we'd like to set this matter on for a trial and a preceding settlement conference, submit probable cause on the record.  THE COURT: All right. I'll review that complaint. I think we can get some dates and times.  THE CLERK: How far out are you looking? I mean, I know February -- do you want to go into March? MR. DILLON: March is not good right now. Is April available? THE CLERK: Okay, let's look here. It would be -- April 27th would be the jury trial. And for settlement conference should -- do you want that in February or March? MR. DILLON: Let's do March. THE CLERK: Okay. How about March 11th at 1:00 p.m. MR. DILLON: That's fine. THE COURT: The Court has reviewed the complaint and notes that there is probable cause to support the charges. Mr. Lannoye, anything further? MR. LANNOYE: No, Your Honor. THE COURT: All right. Mr. Dillon, anything further? MR. DILLON: No, Your Honor. Thank you. THE COURT: Okay. Thank you. This hearing is concluded. Mr. Boles, you can disconnect. (Whereupon, the matter concluded.) Transcript of the Proceedings – Omnibus Hearing December 10, 2020. Appearances Donald E. Lannoye, Assistant County Attorney, appeared for and on behalf of the Plaintiff. John G. Dillon, Assistant Public Defender, appeared for and on behalf of the Defendant. 03/30/2021 Transcript 4 pages Case Details Case Number: 72-CR-20-85 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch 

3. 08/10/2021 Correspondence RE: Public Defender John G. Dillon Conspiring With Prosecutor To Sabotage Case No. 72-CR-20-85, 72-CR-20-81, 72-CR-20-83 and 72-CR-20-172. Index # 46 08/10/2021 Correspondence 15 pages Case Details Case Number: 72-CR-20-85 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch 

4. On February 4, 2022, I spoke with the prosecutor, Mr. Lannoye, who informed me he requested the evaluation of Mr. Bole’s competency to proceed because it appeared Mr. Boles believed people were out to get him and that was making the process difficult for his attorney. Page 7 of 8 John R. Anderson, Ph.D., LP Senior Clinical Forensic Psychologist Regional Psychological Services Confidential Forensic Evaluation Report (Rule 20.01) Date: February 16, 2022 Name: Jeremy James Boles DOB: February 1, 1978 Case: 72-CR-20-85. Jeremy James Boles 72-CR-20-85 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 2/17/2022 8:17 AM

5. Mr. Boles outlined a defense strategy and described feeling confident that he would be able to prove his case if he were to go to trial. He described the charges being dismissed as the best possible outcome

Page 3 of 5

in his case. When asked, he refused to consider the worst possible outcome in his case because he believed he was innocent. He conveyed that he does not trust the “system” and that he had concerns about receiving a fair trial related to the prosecution not providing recorded interviews of witnesses. He described his belief that he would be able to show the truth in trial. Mr. Boles stated he has been shown “firsthand that things are not being done legally” and he referenced a previous psychological evaluation conducted by an unlicensed psychologist (who was supervised by a licensed psychologist) who was later reprimanded for practicing without a license. Page 6 of 8. John R. Anderson, Ph.D., LP Senior Clinical Forensic Psychologist Regional Psychological Services Confidential Forensic Evaluation Report (Rule 20.01) Date: February 16, 2022 Name: Jeremy James Boles DOB: February 1, 1978 Case: 72-CR-20-85. Jeremy James Boles 72-CR-20-85 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 2/17/2022 8:17 AM

6. In sum, although his interpersonal style may be guarded and somewhat rigid, it is my opinion that Mr. Boles maintains the ability to consult with a reasonable degree of rational understanding with defense counsel and that he has the capacity to understand the criminal proceedings and participate in the defense. Page 7 of 8 John R. Anderson, Ph.D., LP Senior Clinical Forensic Psychologist Regional Psychological Services Confidential Forensic Evaluation Report (Rule 20.01) Date: February 16, 2022 Name: Jeremy James Boles DOB: February 1, 1978 Case: 72-CR-20-85. Jeremy James Boles 72-CR-20-85 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 2/17/2022 8:17 AM

7. 11. Professional Conduct of Police Officers Policy Law enforcement effectiveness depends upon community respect and confidence. Conduct which detracts from this respect and confidence is detrimental to the public interest and should be prohibited. The policy of this department is to investigate circumstances, which suggest an officer has engaged in unbecoming conduct, and impose disciplinary action when appropriate. Rules 1 Peace officers shall not knowingly exceed their authority in the enforcement of the law. 2 Peace officers shall not knowingly disobey the law or rules of criminal procedure in such areas as interrogation, arrest, detention, and searches. Seizures, use of informants and preservation of evidence. Except where permitted in the performance of duty under proper authority. 3 Peace officers shall not knowingly restrict the freedom of individuals, whether by arrest or detention, in violation of the Constitutions and laws of the United States and the State of Minnesota. Peace officers, whether on or off duty, shall not knowingly commit any criminal offense under any laws of the United States or any state or local jurisdiction in which the officer is present. Number: Policy Manual 10.00 Effective Date: January 2020 Subject: Officer Conduct & Discipline Reference: MSS 626.8457. Henderson, MN Police Department Mailing: PO Box 125, Henderson, MN 56044 Location: 600 Main St, Henderson, MN 56044 Chief Dmitri Ikonitski Effective Date: January 2020 Distribution: All personnel City of Henderson Henderson Police Department Policy Manual 

8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJsR1i9xxFo  Lion News: Henderson Chief Ikonitski illegally Withholds Myron Cermak’s Statement From Boles? 133 views Nov 30, 2021 https://lionnews00.blogspot.com/2021/08/jeremy-boles-asks-kevin-j-kajer-chief.html  Lion News: Henderson Chief Ikonitski illegally Withholds Myron Cermak’s Statement From Boles?

9. 2. Upon  execution of this policy, the Chief Law Enforcement Officer (County Sheriff or Police Chief) and Chief Administration Officer (Administratively, clerk) for each City and County will search the respective agency’s records any instance of SUSTAINED MISCONDUCT THAT RESULTED IN DISCIPLINE of any law enforcement employee, including the chief law enforcement officer, that relates to the following categories: A. False reports. B. Misconduct that reflects on truthfulness C. Racial, religious or personal bias. D. Promises, offers or inducement, including grants of immunity E. Mishandling of evidence or property

Page 4 of 5

F. Excessive Force G. Criminal convictions H. Harassment I. Inappropriate access to or dissemination of government data. J. Pending criminal charges K. Other sustained actions that clearly reflect on credibility. Joint Policy Regarding Brady/Giglio Information

10.  Jeremy James Boles (02/01/1978) turned in information to Assistant Sibley County Public Defender John Dillon, who then turned the information over to Henderson City Attorney Jones provided several documents to the police department which included a copy of a lease agreement that indicates that it was signed by Anthony James Cermak (05/31/1996) as the property owner, and Boles and Erica Marie Stufflebeam (06/13/1980) as tenants to the property (208 S 3rd St) on 08/01/2019; an email from Excel Energy in regards to setting up an account dated on 09/24/2019; two hand written notes; and what appears to be a Facebook messenger conversation between Cermak and Boles. Attorney Jones asked that we follow up on the authenticity of the lease, if there was ever a termination of the lease, and if any rent was paid. I then contacted Cermak and asked if he would be willing to give another statement on the matter and he advised that he would. Cermak provided a written and recorded statement. See attached written statement. Supplemental Report ICR: 20000371 Title: 702 Report Last Modified: 12-14-2020 2017 Created By: Alex Schmidt Henderson Police Department.

11. I asked Cermak what his interpretation of these documents were, and he advised that this never happened and made a comment that his signature was forged Supplemental Report ICR: 20000371 Title: 702 Report Last Modified: 12-14-2020 2017 Created By: Alex Schmidt Henderson Police Department.

12. This report will be forwarded to the Sibley County Attorney's Office for review and possible charges in accordance to MN statute for aggravated forgery 609.625 subd. 1(1) against Jeremy Boles. Supplemental Report ICR: 20000371 Title: 702 Report Last Modified: 12-14-2020 2017 Created By: Alex Schmidt Henderson Police Department.

13. Questioned Documents The Questioned Documents section offers examination services in the areas of signature, handwriting, and hand printing identification; typewriter identification; indented writing; inks; papers; mechanical impressions; photocopier identification; alterations and obliterations; reconstruction of documents that have been burned or otherwise damaged; and the identification of counterfeit documents. Minnesota Department Of Public Safety Bureau Of Criminal Apprehension Forensic Science Service 2003 Annual Report https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/bca-divisions/forensic-science/Documents/2003%20Minnesota%20BCA%20Forensic%20Science%20Service%20Annual%20Report.pdf  14. File contents belong to the client and must be turned over to the client upon request. OPINION 13: COPYING COSTS By William J. Wernz, Director Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility Reprinted from Bench & Bar of Minnesota (August 1989) http://lprb.mncourts.gov/articles/Articles/Opinion%2013-%20Copying%20Costs%20%28Lawyers%20Professional%20Responsibility%20Board%20Opinion%20No.%2013%29.pdf

Page 5 of 5

More to come ... 

Related Links:

Where Oh Where Is The Zoom Meeting ID Number & Passcode For The 05-07-21 Contested Omnibus Hearing For Rigged Case No. 72-CR-20-85 State Of Minnesota Vs Jeremy James Boles? It's That Corrupt First Judicial District Again, Isn't It? Doesn't Corrupt Judicial Officer Amber Donley Want You To See Public Pretender Dillon Sabotage Bole's Contested Omnibus Hearing? UPDATE: Boles Received Zoom Instructions After Nemmers? Zoom Data Arrives At Friday, May 7, 2021, 11:38 AM? Less Than A 2 Hour Notice, Right? Nemmers Received His On May 7, 2021, 8:16 AM, Right?

Jeremy Boles Asks Kevin J. Kajer, Chief Administrator & State of Minnesota Board Of Public Defense Board Members Le, Darris & Haugen: Why Is Public Defender John Dillon Sabotaging Case Nos. 72-CR-20-85, 72-CR-20-81, 72-CR-20-83 And 72-CR-20-172 State Of Minnesota Vs Jeremy James Boles? FYI Boles' Messerich Complaint Filed As 08/10/2021 Correspondence To Judge Index # 46?

Boles Files Complaint Against Backstabbing Public Pretender Dillon With First Judicial District Chief Judicial Officer Messerich? Boy This Sounds Just Like Complaint Hartger Filed Against Her Backstabbing Public Pretenders Shea And Baker In Rigged Case No. 19HA-CR-19-2768, Doesn't It? It Rigged Case Nos. 72-CR-20-85, 72-CR-20-81, 72-CR-20-83 And 72-CR-20-172, Isn't It? It Is, Isn't It?

Who Wants The Zoom Instructions For Rigged Case No. 72-CR-20-85 State Of Minnesota Vs Jeremy James Boles? Poor Jeremy Is Being Stabbed In The Back By His Public Pretender Dillon, Isn't He? Corrupt Judicial Officers Only Give Zoom Instructions The Day Before Hearings? And Corrupt City of Henderson City Administrator Lon Berberich, Corrupt Sibley Co. Sheriff Pat Nienaber, Corrupt Sibley Co. Administrator John Glisczinski And Corrupt Sibley Co. Attorney David E. Schauer Are All Harassing Poor Jeremy James Boles Over Readily Available, Free, Electronic Public Data? It's That Corrupt First Judicial District Again, Isn't It? It Is, Isn't It?

Oooops! Did Nemmers Wreck All The Rigged Cases For The Fugitive Defective Detective Jessica "The Conspiracy Theorist Who Cried Wolf" Hartger? Nemmers Tosses A Monkey Wrench Into These Rigged Case By Asking For Zoom Instructions? Magically & Mysteriously Hartger's Wrong Address Wiped From Register Of Actions For Rigged Case 19HA-CR-19-2768? Doesn't Corrupt Court Want To Issue A Warrant For Hartger In Colorado? Hey Look Did Corrupt Lakeville Chief Of Police Jeff Long Cough Up My Data? Long Really Hates Me, Doesn't He?

Hey How About We Ask Corrupt Dakota Co. Attorney Jimmy "Sovereign Citizen" Backstrom For Some Chapter 13 Data For The Fugitive Defective Detective Jessica "The Conspiracy Theorist Who Cried Wolf" Hartger? Oh And Let's Get An Update From The Corrupt City Of Burnsville On The Magically & Mysteriously Missing Hartger Data, Shall We?

Corrupt City Of Burnsville Continues To Harass Nemmers Over Jessica "The Conspiracy Theorist Who Cried Wolf" Hartger Data? You Remember That Jessica Is the Defective Detective, Don't You? Is The Motive For The Harassment Burnsville Officer/Detective Klingfus' Perjured Statement About "Imminent Harm"? Klingfus Wasn't Concerned About 04-11-20 "Imminent Harm" If The Complaint Wasn't Signed Until 10-17-20, Right? Isn't Cody Myers Using 609.26 Depriving Another Of Custodial Or Parental Rights To Bait Defective Detective Jessica Into A Violation Trap?

The Defective Detective Jessica "The Conspiracy Theorist Who Cried Wolf" Hartger Targets The Wrong Woman For Harassment? Defective Detective Hartger Almost Earns Another Criminal Harassment Complaint? Oh And All Eight (8) Dakota County Warrants Are All Still Active, Aren't They? Nemmers' Intervention Is Still Keeping Defective Detective Hartger Out Of Jail, Isn't It? UPDATE: Defective Detective Jessica Continues With Her Smear Campaign On Nemmers & Her Abused Husband? Did I Forget To Update You On The 11-05-20 Conspiracy Theory Free Zoom Hearing For 19HA-CR-19-2768?

How About We Request The Burnsville Data For The Warrant (19AV-CR-20-8547, Right?) For Jessica "The Conspiracy Theorist Who Cried Wolf" Hartger? Maybe Burnsville Personnel Can Explain How Fugitive Hartger Has Managed To Avoid Arrest For Eight (8) Active Warrants? We All Know The Real Reason Is The Intervention Of Nemmers, Don't We? We Do, Don't We?

How Is It Possible That Jessica "The Conspiracy Theorist Who Cried Wolf" Hartger Has Been Able To Avoid Arrest (Again, Right?) From 10-19-20 Until Today's Date? It's Because Of Nemmers' Intervention (Again, Right?), Isn't it? Let's Ask Hamline University For Some Of Hartger's Fugitve Data, Shall We? Bonus Round: Why Oh Why Does Ken Hartger's Estranged Wife Jessica Want To Sabotage Ken's Case No. 27-CR-20-4801? Did I Forget To Mention That Lakeville Police Have A Well-Documented History Of Stalking Fugitive Jessica Well Outside Their Jurisdiction? Let's Ask For The Zoom Meeting ID Number & Password For The 11-05-20 3:00 PM Remote Hearing For Case No. 19HA-CR-19-2768, Shall We?

Can You Guess Whose Big Stupid Mouth Earned Her Eight (8) Active Warrants For Her Arrest? Did You Guess Jessica "The Conspiracy Theorist Who Cried Wolf" Hartger? Maybe Jessica Shouldn't Have Spent All Her Time Running Smear Campaigns On Nemmers? Maybe Jessica Will Finally Get Help For Her Paranoia? Paranoia Induced By Daily Marijuana Use - Illicit Adderall Drug Use & Crazy Conspiracy Theories, Right? Bonus Round: Would You Like To See The Washington County Computer-Aided Dispatch Report & Incident Report (Redacted & Unredacted) For The Last Round Of Warrants For Jessica "The Conspiracy Theorist Who Cried Wolf" Hartger?

Whatever Happened To Nemmers' Data Request For The False Police Report Filed By Corrupt Dakota Co. Judicial Officer Ann Offerman Vs Jessica Hartger AKA Jessica Cook DOB: 01/15/1992? Will Hartger File A Counter-Criminal Complaint? Why The Continued Harassment Over Public Data For Corrupt Dakota County Judicial Officer Ann Offerman's False Police Report Against Jessica Hartger AKA Jessica Cook?

Hey Should We Debunk The Trumped Up Charges And The Rigged Case Against Jessica Hartger AKA Jessica Cook? It's Rigged Case Case No. 19HA-CR-19-2768, Isn't It? Watch For The Mystery Woman Who Magically & Mysteriously Stays At The Door, Okay? And Make Sure You See That Corrupt Lakeville Police Chief Jeff Long's Officers Make No Attempt To Verify Jessica's Alibi, Okay?

What Happens When The Person Who Claims To Want Help Can't Work The Plan But Can Only Run Her Big Stupid Mouth? The "Know-It-All-Know-Nothing" Gets Another Warrant Issued, Right? Did You Guess Jessica Hartger AKA Jessica Cook For Rigged Case No. 19HA-CR-19-2768?

Ken Hartger's Complaint To Judicial Officer Robben? City Of Eden Prairie’s & Prosecutor’s Willful Refusal To Comply With Mn Statute 13.82 & Dept. of Administration’s Advisory Opinion 18-005 In Regard To Subject Data AKA Criminal Investigative Data AKA Discovery For Case No. 27-CR-20-4801 State of Minnesota vs Kenneth John Hartger? How About We Ask Robben To Put His Crooked Officers Of The Court Under Oath In Regard To The Fraudulent $321.93 Bill? Hey Did You Know That Chief Judicial Officer Toddrick Barnette's Staff Member Charles Rooney Acknowledged Receipt Of Hartgers' Complaint?

Dare To Compare How Many Times Jessica Hartger Has Been Arrested Since Nemmers' Intervention As Opposed To The Incompetent Bungler Michael "The Hack" Volpe's Intervention? Hartger Has Been Arrested Zero Times In Rigged Case No. 19HA-CR-19-2768 By Dakota County's Corrupt LEO Since Nemmers' Intervention, Hasn't She?

Dakota Co. Creates An Intelligence Report On Jessica Hartger For Daring To Send Some Emails To Corrupt Dakota Co. Judicial Officer Offerman? Intelligence Report Admits That Hartger Did Absolutely Nothing Wrong, Doesn't It?


Evidence Shows That Corrupt Dakota Co. Judicial Officer Offerman Conspired With Dakota Co. Assist. Co. Attorney Monnens & Apple Valley Det. Becker & Corrupt Dakota Co. Judicial Officer Knutson To File False Police Report & Subsequent Phony Arrest Warrant For Jessica Hartger? Eden Prairie Responsible Authority/City Clerk Kathleen Porta Refuses To Explain/Justify In Signed Document Fraudulent Retaliatory Bill Of $321.93 For Hartger Data? It Looks Like There Is A Huge Cover-Up For Eden Prairie Police Personnel Exacting Street Justice & Payback On Jessica Hartger For Dakota County Judicial Officers David Knutson & Ann Offerman, Right? Kenneth's & Jessica's Informed Consent Submissions Toss Monkey Wrenches Into Cover-Up?

Update: Eden Prairie Police Greg Weber Lurking & Skulking On Lion News For 3 Minutes 37 Seconds On 06-19-20 With IP Address 156.142.95.179? Weber Gawking At Pic About Eden Prairie Police Personnel Exacting Street Justice & Payback On Jessica Hartger For Dakota County Judicial Officers David Knutson & Ann Offerman? Oh Dakota Co. Deputy Scheffknecht Says Offerman Filed False Police Report Against Jessica Hartger, Didn't He? So Evidence Of EPPD Street Justice & Payback On Hartger, Right? 3 Minutes Long Enough To File Share Damning Data To Nemmers On 06-19-20, Right? Corrupt Chief Weber Attempts "Payback" & "Street Justice" On Nemmers With Retaliatory Fraudulent Bill?

Eden Prairie Police Personnel Exacting Street Justice & Payback On Jessica Hartger For Dakota County Judicial Officers David Knutson & Ann Offerman? Why Oh Why Didn't EPPD Confirm The Warrant Before They Broke Out Hartger's Car Window? To Teach Hartger A Street Justice Lesson, Right?

Incompetent Bungler Michael "The Hack" Volpe's Latest Victim Jessica Danielle Cook AKA Jessica Danielle Hartger Lands In The Dakota County Jail? Did Nemmers' FOIA Requests To Kent Co. Sheriff Michelle LaJoye-Young & Kent Co. Prosecuting Attorney Christopher R. Becker Expedite Extradition?

Incompetent Bungler Michael "The Hack" Volpe Succeeds In Getting His Latest Victim Jessica Danielle Cook AKA Jessica Danielle Hartger Arrested? You Remember "The Hack" Volpe From His Sabotaging Of The High-Profile Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Case, Don't You? Oh And Don't Forget "The Hack" Volpe Helped To Sabotage All Of Dede Evavold's Cases Also, Didn't He? Run Away - Do Not Walk Away - Run Away From Hack Volpe And His Fellow Fanatic Karen Possessky, Okay?

Incompetent Bungler Michael "The Hack" Volpe Succeeds In Getting A Warrant Issued For His Latest Victim Jessica Danielle Cook AKA Jessica Hartger? You Remember "The Hack" Volpe From His Sabotaging Of The High-Profile Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Case, Don't You? Oh And Don't Forget "The Hack" Volpe Helped To Sabotage All Of Dede Evavold's Cases Also, Didn't He? Hack Volpe's Fellow Fanatic Karen Possessky Speaks?

Lion News: Nemmers Exposes Michael “Hack” Volpe’s & Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s Smear Campaign?

Thursday, June 23, 2022

Is Hubbard County Sgt. Christenson Trying To Shield Minnesota Hooved Animal Rescue Foundation President Drew Fitzpatrick And/Or Minnesota Animal Humane Society Humane Agent Amanda Oquist From A Legitimate Investigation? Isn't There A Laugh Track That Is Supposed To Go Along With This Crazy Incident Report ICR# 22005116?

 

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: jfrieden@co.hubbard.mn.us,
sparks@co.hubbard.mn.us,
Cory Aukes caukes@co.hubbard.mn.us
date: Jun 23, 2022, 8:20 AM
subject: Nemmers' Chapter 13.04 Subject Data Missing For ICR# 22005116 And Incorrect Data In Hubbard County Sheriff's Sgt Troy Christenson's Incident Report ICR# 22005116 That Needs To Be Corrected
mailed-by: gmail.com

Cory Aukes, Hubbard Sheriff 218-732-3331 & Jonathan Frieden, County Attorney 218-732-4133:

Would you please immediately correct the incorrect data in this crazy incident report ICR# 22005116 that was filed by your Troy Christenson, Sergeant Sheriff Firearms Instructor ERU Team 218-732-2276 Badge: 5110?
Missing subject data for Nemmers:

1. 05-30-22 call to Hubbard County Dispatch and computer-aided dispatch report.
2. 05-30-22 recorded statement of Terry Nemmers made by Sgt Christenson on either squad audio/video, body camera video, personal audio recorder or cell phone application.
3. 05-31-22 recorded statement of Terry Nemmers made by Sgt Christenson on either squad audio/video, body camera video, personal audio recorder or cell phone application.
4. 06-07-22 & 06-09-22voicemails left by Nemmers for Hubbard County Chief Deputy Scott Parks
5. 06-14-22 recorded statement of Terry Nemmers made by Sgt Christenson on either squad audio/video, body camera video, personal audio recorder or cell phone application.
6. Emails sent to Hubbard County on 05-30-22, 06-01-22, 06-06-22 and 06-14-22
Instances in ICR# 22005116 where the name of the emaciated horse called "Archie" that is in the possession of Minnesota Hooved Animal Rescue Foundation President Drew Fitzpatrick is magically and mysteriously renamed "Doc"
1. Terry advised of a horse by the name of Doc the Humane Society removed from a Hubbard County resident in March 2022.
2. Along with complaint that animal Humane Society investigator Amanda Oquist falsely impersonating self as a peace officer Terry stated the Humane Society was also taking part in releasing information to the public specific to an ongoing criminal investigation reference horse name Doc.
3. Terry asked if the Hubbard County Sheriff’s office was going to investigate possible animal neglect on the owner of the horse named Doc.
4. I advised Amanda of complaint received and asked Amanda if she could send a copy of her investigation specific to horse named Doc that was voluntarily surrendered in March 2022 by a Hubbard County resident.
5. I asked Amanda if she was familiar with that investigation and if she could advise if charges of animal cruelty/neglect were appropriate on the owner of the horse name Doc.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. DIdn't Sgt. Christenson take any screenshots of my blog posts on his visits to my blog, Lion News? Is that why Sgt. Christensen magically and mysteriously states in ICR# 22005116: "Digital evidence: None."? Isn't it part of Sgt. Christenson' employment with Hubbard County to gather, to save and to preserve evidence that he observed on my blog, Lion News? Hmm? Inquiring minds want to know, don't they?
P.S.S. Isn't Sgt. Christenson a trainer observer? Did your trainer observer Sgt. Christenson "intentionally forget" what he saw and read on blog, Lion News? Hmm? Inquiring minds really want to know, don't they?
P.S.S.S. Does Sgt. Christenson have any known drug or alcohol problems? How about a recent stroke or head injury? Can you think of any reason why oh why Sgt. Christenson would call the palimnio "Archie" a completely different name ("Doc") (5) five separate and distinct times?
P.S.S.S.S. How about we resolve these issues before I bring up all the other problems with ICR# 22005116?
P.S.S.S.S.S. Did you notice that I don't even need the Hubbard County Sheriff's Office policy and procedure manuals that you are currently illegally withholding from me to toss a monkey wrench into this crazy ICR# 22005116?
P.S.S.S.S.S.S. This wouldn't be some crazy stunt by Sgt. Christenson to shield Minnesota Hooved Animal Rescue Foundation President Drew Fitzpatrick and/or Minnesota Animal Humane Society Humane Agent Amanda Oquist from a legitimate investigation, would it? Isn't there a laugh track that is supposed to go along with this incident report?

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=318666630299060&set=a.317027157129674 Minnesota Hooved Animal Rescue Foundation March 4 · Archie is a palomino gelding who is our newest intake from an owner surrender case in Hubbard County. He arrived at Anoka Equine Veterinary Services today and is now getting the care he needs. (Thank you to Investigator Oquist from Animal Humane Society of Minnesota)! Watch for updates!

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.04 Subd. 4. Procedure when data is not accurate or complete. (a) An individual subject of the data may contest the accuracy or completeness of public or private data. To exercise this right, an individual shall notify in writing the responsible authority describing the nature of the disagreement. The responsible authority shall within 30 days either: (1) correct the data found to be inaccurate or incomplete and attempt to notify past recipients of inaccurate or incomplete data, including recipients named by the individual; or (2) notify the individual that the authority believes the data to be correct. Data in dispute shall be disclosed only if the individual's statement of disagreement is included with the disclosed data. The determination of the responsible authority may be appealed pursuant to the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act relating to contested cases. Upon receipt of an appeal by an individual, the commissioner shall, before issuing the order and notice of a contested case hearing required by chapter 14, try to resolve the dispute through education, conference, conciliation, or persuasion. If the parties consent, the commissioner may refer the matter to mediation. Following these efforts, the commissioner shall dismiss the appeal or issue the order and notice of hearing. (b) Data on individuals that have been successfully challenged by an individual must be completed, corrected, or destroyed by a government entity without regard to the requirements of section 138.17.After completing, correcting, or destroying successfully challenged data, a government entity may retain a copy of the commissioner of administration's order issued under chapter 14 or, if no order were issued, a summary of the dispute between the parties that does not contain any particulars of the successfully challenged data.

B. PRINCIPLE TWO Peace officers shall refrain from any conduct in an official capacity that detracts from the public’s faith in the integrity of the criminal justice system.
b) Peace officers shall not knowingly make false accusations of any criminal, ordinance, traffic or other law violation. This provision shall not prohibit the use of deception during criminal investigations or interrogations as permitted under law.
c) Peace officers shall truthfully, completely, and impartially report, testify and present evidence, including exculpatory evidence, in all matters of an official nature. Professional Conduct Of Peace Officers Model Policy Mn Stat 626.8457
https://dps.mn.gov/entity/post/model-policies-learning-objectives/Documents/Professional-Conduct-of-Peace-Officers-Model-Policy.pdf

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/1205.0900/ 1205.0900 AUTHORITY OF THE RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 13.02 to 13.06, the responsible authority shall have the authority to: A. implement the act and these rules in each entity; B. make good faith attempts to resolve all administrative controversies arising from the entity's practices of creation, collection, use, and dissemination of data; § C. prescribe changes to the administration of the entity's programs, procedures, and design of forms to bring those activities into compliance with the act and with this chapter; D. take all administrative actions necessary to comply with the general requirements of the act, particularly Minnesota Statutes, section 13.04, and this chapter; and E. where necessary, direct designees to perform the detailed requirements of the act and this chapter under the general supervision of the responsible authority. Statutory Authority: MS s 13.07 Published Electronically: July 13, 2007

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609.43 609.43 MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE. A public officer or employee who does any of the following, for which no other sentence is specifically provided by law, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both: (1) intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law; or ... (4) in the capacity of such officer or employee, makes a return, certificate, official report, or other like document having knowledge it is false in any material respect.

Initial Search: https://www.google.com/ ISP: State Of Minnesota Platform / Resolution: Desktop / 1920x1080 IP Address: 156.99.241.125 — OS: Win10 Location: [United States] Park Rapids, Minnesota, United States Browser: Chrome 102.0 Host Name: (no host name found for 156.99.241.125) Total Sessions: 3 Total Visitors: 1 Navigation Paths Export Expand AllCollapse All Session #3 3 Page Views https://www.google.com/ Jun 6 03:00:24 PM Lion News https://www.google.com/ 03:00:24 PM Lion News https://www.google.com/ 03:00:24 PM Lion News Session #2 3 Page Views https://www.google.com/ May 31 09:59:28 AM Lion News https://www.google.com/ 09:59:28 AM Lion News https://www.google.com/ 09:59:28 AM Lion News Session #1 7m 34s 5 Page Views https://www.google.com/ May 30 02:30:13 PM Lion News https://www.google.com/ 02:30:13 PM Lion News https://www.google.com/ 02:30:13 PM Lion News lionnews00.blogspot.com/ 02:37:47 PM Lion News: Will Minnesota Humane Society Humane Agent Amanda Oquist Be Allowed To Impersonate A Peace Officer During The High-Profile Trial For Case No. 13-CR-19-1031 State of Minnesota vs Carmen Marie Burth? It's ICR: 22-019955, Isn't It? Did Nemmers' Complaint Toss A Monkey Wrench Into Trial? Serg lionnews00.blogspot.com/ 02:37:47 PM Lion News: Will Minnesota Humane Society Humane Agent Amanda Oquist Be Allowed To Impersonate A Peace Officer During The High-Profile Trial For Case No. 13-CR-19-1031 State of Minnesota vs Carmen Marie Burth? It's ICR: 22-019955, Isn't It? Did Nemmers' Complaint Toss A Monkey Wrench Into Trial? Serg

Initial Referrer: Referring url for session #1 is no longer available in your detailed log ISP: State Of Minnesota Platform / Resolution: Desktop / 1280x720 IP Address: 136.234.16.119 — OS: Win10 Location: [United States] Park Rapids, Minnesota, United States Browser: Firefox 101.0 Host Name: (no host name found for 136.234.16.119) Total Sessions: 1 Total Visitors: 1 Navigation Paths Export Session #1 3 Page Views https://www.google.com/ Jun 14 02:07:24 PM Lion News https://www.google.com/ 02:07:24 PM Lion News https://www.google.com/ 02:07:24 PM Lion News

2. Upon execution of this policy, the Chief Law Enforcement Officer (County Sheriff or Police Chief) and Chief Administration Officer (Administratively, clerk) for each City and County will search the respective agency’s records any instance of SUSTAINED MISCONDUCT THAT RESULTED IN DISCIPLINE of any law enforcement employee, including the chief law enforcement officer, that relates to the following categories:
A. False reports.
B. Misconduct that reflects on truthfulness
C. Racial, religious or personal bias.
D. Promises, offers or inducement, including grants of immunity
E. Mishandling of evidence or property
F. Excessive Force
G. Criminal convictions
H. Harassment
I. Inappropriate access to or dissemination of government data.
J. Pending criminal charges
K. Other sustained actions that clearly reflect on credibility. Sibley County Attorney's Office Joint Policy Regarding Brady/Giglio Information.

More to come. . . 

Related links:

What Is The Status Of My Chapter 13 Data Request For ICR 22-005116 Data? Is Animal Humane Society Humane Agent Amanda Oquist Allowed To Impersonate A Peace Officer Or Government Officials In Hubbard County? How About Illegal Property Searches?

Why Oh Why Doesn't Hubbard Co. Sgt Troy Christenson Want To Find Out The Name Of The Owner Of The Horse That Looks Like A Skeleton? Its That Really Really Really Skinny Horse That Is Referenced In ICR 22-005116, Isn't It? Is Sgt Christenson Afraid That Owner Will State That Minnesota Animal Humane Society Humane Investigator Amanda Oquist Was Impersonating A Peace Officer During The "Voluntary Surrender" Of "Archie" The Emaciated Horse?

Who Wants To Request ICR 22-005116? Do You Want To Find Out If Minnesota Humane Society Humane Agent Amanda Oquist Was Impersonating A Peace Officer In Hubbard County? Do You Want To Find Out If Minnesota Hooved Animal Rescue Foundation Executive Director Drew Fitzpatrick Was Trying An Animal Cruelty Case In The Court Of Public Opinion For Hubbard Co. Attorney Frieden And Sheriff Aukes? Let's Find Out, Shall We? It's ICR 22-005116, Isn't It? FYI: Did You Know That Sgt Christenson Was Caught Lurking & Skulking On My Blog After Claiming He Wasn't Receiving My Emails?

Is Minnesota Humane Society Humane Agent Amanda Oquist Impersonating A Peace Officer In Hubbard County? Is Minnesota Hooved Animal Rescue Foundation Executive Director Drew Fitzpatrick Trying An Animal Cruelty Case In The Court Of Public Opinion For Hubbard Co. Attorney Frieden And Sheriff Aukes? Let's Find Out, Shall We? It's ICR 22-005116, Isn't It?

Will Minnesota Humane Society Humane Agent Amanda Oquist Be Allowed To Impersonate A Peace Officer During The High-Profile Trial For Case No. 13-CR-19-1031 State of Minnesota vs Carmen Marie Burth? It's ICR: 22-019955, Isn't It? Did Nemmers' Complaint Toss A Monkey Wrench Into Trial? Sergeant Berg Says Trial Continued But No New Trial Date Set?

Who Wants To Toss A Monkey Wrench Into Case No. 13-CR-19-1031 State Of Minnesota Vs Carmen Marie Burth? North Branch Chief Of Police Daniel Meyer, Assistant Chisago County Attorney Kathryn Jean Kelly And Chisago County Attorney Janet Reiter Are Trying Burth's Case In The Court Of Public Opinion, Aren't They? Animal Humane Society's Pistol Packing Humane Agent Keith Streff And Anoka Equine Veterinary Services Dr. Zach Loppnow Are Aiding & Abetting In The Conspiracy, Aren't They? You Want To See How Nonprofits Conspire With LEO To Steal Your Horses?

Transcripts For Case No 46-CV-19-1224 Goldmount Veterinary Center PA Vs Watonwan Co Animal Humane Society Not On The Register Of Actions But Hidden In Affidavit In Support Of The AHS’s Motion For A New Trial Or In The Alternative Remittitur? You Want To Read The Transcripts For The Testimony Of Pistol Packing AHS Humane Agent Keith Streff, Don't You? Did Anyone Ask Streff On The Witness Stand Why He Wasn't Trying To Impersonate A Peace Officer During The Trial? FYI: Did You Know That Streff Was Forced To Wear "Street Clothes" As A Result Of Nemmers' Complaint?

Let's Ask Joseph A. Gangi, Attorney for Michael Johnson, If Johnson Plans On Reporting Pistol Packing AHS Agent Keith Streff To LEO For Impersonating A Peace Officer, Shall We? Armed Minnesota Animal Humane Society Humane Agent Keith Streff Wearing A Pistol In Case No 83-CR-18-513 State Of Minnesota Vs Michael Charles Johnson? A Monkey Wrench For Case No. 46-CV-19-1224 Goldmount Vs Watonwan Co And AHS?

Let's Ask Martin County Sheriff Markquart If Armed Minnesota Animal Humane Society Humane Agent Keith Streff Will Be Allowed To Impersonate A Peace Officer In His Jurisdiction, Shall We? Hey How About We Ask Watonwan County Sheriff Bergeman Why The Pistol Packing Streff Was Allowed To Impersonate A Peace Officer In His Jurisdiction? Will Streff Get Permission To Influence the Jury With His Pistol In The June 28, 2021 Through July 2, 2021 Trial for Court File 46-CV-19-1224 Goldmount Veterinary Center, P.A. Vs Watonwan County, Animal Humane Society?

Armed Minnesota Animal Humane Society Humane Agent Keith Streff Wearing A Firearm In Case No. 83-CR-18-513 State Of Minnesota Vs Michael Charles Johnson? Will AHS Agent Streff Show Up Armed At June 28‐June 30th, 2021 & July 1– July 2, 2021 Jury Trial for Court File 46-CV-19-1224 Goldmount Veterinary Center, P.A. Vs Watonwan County, Animal Humane Society? Has Streff Ever Been Accused Of Impersonating An Officer? Let's Ask AHS Attorney Freitag, Okay? Should We Tell The St. James Plaindealer & The Martin County Star Editors About Watonwan Co. Attorney Lindee's Illegal Withholding Of Public Data? Lindee Knows That The Chapter 13 Data Will Toss A Monkey Wrench Into 46-CV-19-1224, Doesn't He




Friday, June 17, 2022

Did Southwest Minnesota State University Director Of Public Safety Mike Munford Engage In Perjury During The High-Profile Criminal Case Of Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State Of Minnesota Vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar? It's ICR 228804, Isn't it?

https://rumble.com/v18taou-the-perjury-filing-of-southwest-minnesota-state-public-safety-director-mich.html The Perjury Filing of Southwest Minnesota State Public Safety Director Michael Munford

Eric Wallen, Lyon Co. Sheriff  06-17-22
611 West Main Street
Marshall, MN 56258
(507) 537-7666
ericwallen@co.lyon.mn.us

Hand-delivered on 06-17-22

This is my formal criminal complaint against Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety Mike Munford (Hereinafter Munford) for making multiple perjured 1 statements during the 05-04- 22 Court Trial of Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar. Munford also admitted on the witness stand to being in the possession of digital images of myself and the individuals who accompanied me to SMSU on 02-04-21. Those digital images were subject to Brady disclosure requirements. The digital images were exculpatory because they indicated that I was in possession of the medical exemptions for my daughters who attended SMSU. Munford gave multiple conflicting 2,3,4 answers during his sworn testimony about whether he was made aware of the medical exemptions. Munford also made conflicting sworn statements in regard to who took the digital images. Furthermore, I had not received those exculpatory digital images 5 from either City of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross or City of Marshall Director of Public Safety Jim Marshall prior to nor during the 02-04-21 trial.

On 02-04-21 both Munford and Marshall Police Officer Alicia Popowski #219 were made aware of the “doctor’s note” aka medical exemption that Larvita McFarquhar (hereinafter McFarquhar) had obtained for her daughters. At the 1:52 mark (1:50-1:53/21:25) of the body camera video entitled “Determan 1.mp4” McFarquhar can be seen clearly displaying the medical exemption to both Munford and Popowski.

She has every right to be in class. She has a doctor’s note. [Note: Larvita McFarquhar shows doctor’s note aka medical exemption to Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety Mike Munford and Marshall Police Officer Popowski] 1:50-1:53/21:25 Determan 1.mp4 LLarvita Published September 13, 2021 https://rumble.com/vmglhz-determan-1.mp4.html
Page 1 of 14


Both the body camera video and the transcript of the body camera video indicate the presence of both Munford and Popowski when McFarquhar is displaying the “doctor’s note” aka medical exemption.

Prior to this encounter, I personally showed Munford the doctor’s note aka medical exemption for my daughter. Below is the transcript of the interaction with Munford: Mike Mumford: Obey the rules of the university.

Larvita McFarquhar: We already obeyed the rules.

Mike Mumford: Obey the rules of the university.

Larvita McFarquhar: See what happens is you weren’t even in the class he still came. Mike Mumford: Yes. Yes, she has no mask. And everybody has to mask up on our campus

Larvita McFarquhar: You see this right here?

Mike Mumford: Ma’am I’m not.

Larvita McFarquhar: I have a doctor’s note.

Mike Mumford: That’s that’s she could wear a shield, also.

Larvita McFarquhar: No. Her doctor said she can’t wear a shield or a face covering. And I’ve shown you this. And I’ve shown it to you to the ADA Mike Mumford: At this point, my conversation with you is over. And I’m looking to have you removed and [unintelligible]. 1:22-2:01 / 4:52 https://rumble.com/v11d4a8-exhibit-one-mike-mumford.html Page 2 of 14

Exhibit one Mike Mumford LLarvita Published April 17, 2022 10 Views 1 rumble Mufford telling us that those students have a right to their education and basically my daughter doesn’t because she is not wearing a face covering. Prior to me giving notice to Munford of my daughter’s “doctor’s note” aka medical exemption digital image and/or video was taken of myself and the individuals who accompanied me to SMSU on 02-04- 21.

Page 3 of 14

At the :56 minute mark; the :59 minute mark, and the 1:01 minute mark of the video entitled “Exhibit one Mike Mumford” you can see Munford taking pictures or running video of myself and theindividuals who accompanied me to SMSU on 02-04-21. It should also be noted that the video entitled “Exhibit one Mike Mumford” was published on my Rumble account over two (2) weeks prior (April 17, 2022) to the the 05-04-22 court trial. Which means that City of Marshall City Attorney Dennis

Page 4 of 14


Simpson, Assistant City of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross or City of Marshall Director of Public Safety Jim Marshall had ample time to verify whether or not Munford was telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth about the incident on 02-04-21 prior to his testimony while under oath on 05-04-22. I bring this up this point since I have incident reports that indicate that Lyon County law enforcement has monitored my social media sites in the past. So, neither City of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson nor Assistant City of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross nor even City of Marshall Director of Public Safety Jim Marshall can say that they were unaware of what actually happened on 02-04-21 at SMSU.

During the 05-04-22 Court Trial of Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar Munford testified to the following:

1. Munford testified that he did not see the medical exemption documents for McFarquhar’s daughters. Munford insists that MacFarquhar only mentioned the exemptions 7,8,9,10 .

2. Munford testified that he vaguely remembers McFarquhar discussing the medical exemption documents for McFarquhar’s daughters. However, Munford doesn’t recall seeing medical exemption documents for McFarquhar’s daughters 11,12,13 .

3. Munford testified that he even has memory problems when it comes to discussing his interactions with the Marshall Police 14 .

4. Munford testified that pictures of McFarquhar were taken on 02-04-21. However, Munford denies taking the pictures himself 15. .

5. Munford testified that pictures of McFarquhar were taken on 02-04-21. However, Munford doesn’t recall who took the pictures 16 .

6. Munford testified that he was following MSMU’s COVID-19 policy 17,18,19,20 . 

Munford’s sworn testimony about not seeing the medical exemption for my daughter is incompatible with the video evidence that I posted on my Rumble channel on September 13, 2021 and April 17, 2022. The videos entitled “Determan 1.mp4” and “Exhibit one Mike Mumford” provide clear, precise and unquestionable evidence that Munford did know about the medical exemptions for my daughters on 02-04-21. Which means that Munford repeatedly engaged in perjured testimony when he testified that he did not see the medical exemptions or when he testified that he did not recall seeing the medical exemptions during the 05-04-22 court trial.

The video entitled “Exhibit one Mike Mumford” also provides clear, precise and unquestionable evidence that it was Munford who was taking pictures/video of myself and the individuals who accompanied me to SMSU on 02-04-21. Which means that Munford repeatedly provided perjured testimonty during the 05-04-22 court trial when he testified that he either did not take the pictures/video or didn’t not recall who took pictures/video of myself and the individuals who accompanied me on 02-04-21.

In order for Munford to testify that he was following MSMU’s COVID-19 policies it required Munford to lie under oath about not seeing the medical exemptions and also to lie under oath about not taking the pictures/video of myself and individuals who accompanied me to SMSU on 02-04-21. Southwest Minnesota State University’s 600-12 Civil Disturbance or Demonstrations policy 21 make it clear that photographic evidence is to be provide to local law enforcement. Yet, the digital images/video of myself and the people who accompanied me on 02-04-21 was not provided to me through my Chapter 13 Subject Data Request that I submitted to the City of Marshall.

Means-Motive-Opportunity

Clearly Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety Mike Munford is of the mindset

Page 5 of 14

that he and SMSU President Kumara Jayasuriya are entitled to think and act like they are above the law. This is clearly evidenced by SMSU President Jayasuriya not wearing a mask during the COVID- 19 pandemic when it benefited him personally 22 . Obviously this situation that I created with my daughter’s medical exemption could have been easily handle months prior to the incident of 02-04-21. All SMSU President Jayasuriya had to do was get an adverse medical examiner to give a medical opinion that my daughter’s medical exemption was not valid. But, Jayasuriya chose not to do that. Or Jayasuriya could have taken myself and my daughters to court to have my daughter’s medical exemptions invalidated. Yet, again Jayasuriya chose not to do that. Instead Jayasuriya and Munford decided to bully and intimidate their way through the situation.

Apparently, the plan that SMSU President Jayasuriya and SMSU Director of Public Safety Mike Munford hatched was to defame/discredit me and silence me by having me trespassed from SMSU. This plan would only work if Munford lied to the Marshall police about not seeing the medical exemptions for my daughters. And since Munford was willing to lie to the police about not seeing the medical exemption fo rmy daughters, then it only follows that Munford was willing to illegally withhold the exculpatory digital images/video from me that he took of myself and the individuals who accompanied me to SMSU on 02-04-21.

It would appear that I threw a monkey wrench into both SMSU President Jayasuriya’s and SMSU Director of Public Safety Munford’s plans by demanding 23,24 that I receive all my evidence in my criminal case. My demand for my evidence and my demand for sanctions placed a huge spotlight on City of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross or City of Marshall Director of Public Safety Jim Marshall. And that spotlight called Simpson’s, Gross’s and Marshall integrity and willingness to abide by the laws of the land into question. Of course, it is a matter of the public record that Judicial Officer Patrick Rohland’s willful refusal to rule on my demands for sanctions. And it was highly suspicious that Judicial Officer Patrick Rohland didn’t want to have a evidentiary hearing. This made me begin to think that this was all coordinated to ensure that I would be found guilty at trial – at a trial by ambush.

I became even more suspicious of Judicial Officer Patrick Rohland when he just ignored my criminal complaint 25,26 that I filed into the court record. It was becoming even more clear that everyone in positions of power were looking for that Lisa Hanson moment 27, 28, 29 where they could say that I am the bad person for not following the rules. Even if it meant those people in positions of power needed to use a sledge hammer to pound that square peg into that round hole.

My little Facebook Live chat 30 with Lyon County Sheriff Eric Wallen helped me to realize that Wallen really had no problem with City of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross or City of Marshall Director of Public Safety Jim Marshall thinking and acting like they were above the law. However, my complaint that filed with Lyon County Sheriff Eric Wallen apparently had a major negative impact on the credibility of Wallen. Simpson, Gross and Marshall. Apparently, the hit on Wallen’s, Simpson’s, Gross’ and Marshall’s reputation was so bad that the 911 call 31 that I reported to Wallen as being illegally withhold from me by Simpson, Gross and Marshall was magically and mysteriously provided to me on April 22, 2022.

It would seem that Simpson, Gross and Marshall began to have serious doubts that a jury would believe Munford’s ridiculous testimony. I came to that logical conclusion after getting the offer from the prosecutor to drop the disorderly conduct charge in exchange for a bench trial. After hearing Munford’s ridiculous testimony it made sense to me why Simpson, Gross and Marshall only want Judicial Officer Patrick Rohland to hear the case. Only someone who wanted me to be found guilty would blindly believe Munford. And since Judicial Officer Patrick Rohland apparently had no problem with trial by ambush then the verdict was easy to predict.

Page 6 of 14

Of course, the roadblocks that Judicial Officer Patrick Rohland’s court reporter 32,33 placed in my way to prevent me from obtaining the transcript for Munford’s testimony were also easy to predict.

With all that being said, I am filing this legitimate complaint not because I believe that you will actually do a thorough investigation of Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety Mike Munford’s perjured testimony during the 05-04-22 bench trial. I would have to have confidence in you and your Sheriff’s office to do that. In fact, I have absolutely no confidence in you or your sheriff’s office. I am simply I am filing this legitimate complaint to prove to the world that you have no intention of doing a serious and thorough investigation of SMSU Public Safety Director Mike Munford’s perjured testimony during the 05-04-22 bench trial.

____________________________________________

Larvita McFarquhar 106 E. Railroad St. Lynd, Minnesota 56157 

Footnotes:

1. 609.48 Perjury. § Subdivision 1. Acts constituting. Whoever makes a false material statement not believing it to be true in any of the following cases is guilty of perjury and may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 4: (1) in or for an action, hearing or proceeding of any kind in which the statement is required or authorized by law to be made under oath or affirmation; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609.48

2. The “liar liar” technique, when stripped to its barest essentials involves the following progression: (1) Get the defendant to say that a prior inconsistent statement is true. (2) Get the defendant to say that she knew it was untrue when she made it. (3) Get the defendant to admit that she lied. George R. Dekle, Sr, Prosecution Principles: A Clinical Handbook (Thompson/West:2007), Page 283.

3. The witness will appear dishonest in one of three ways – either the testimony will be illogical, internally inconsistent or incompatible with other evidence. George R. Dekle, Sr, Prosecution Principles: A Clinical Handbook (Thompson/West:2007), Page 166.

4. Truthful Subject Offer Confident and Definitive Responses. Deceptive Subject May Offer Qualified Responses. A truthful denial will stand on its own, and it will be clear that the subject is accepting full responsibility within his response. ... A second category of qualifying phrases is a memory qualifiers, which blame memory. Because memory does not exist in a measurable sense and, of course, cannot be seen, a deceptive subject may reduce anxiety by blaming a poor memory. He realizes that it is impossible to prove what a person did or did not remember at a particular point in time. Some common phrases within this category include the following: ... “I can't recall whether” Page 87. Inbau, Fred E., Reid, John E., Buckley Joseph P., Jayne, Brian C. Essentials of the Reid Technique: Criminal Interrogation and Confessions.

5. The prosecutor in a criminal case shall: (d) make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and, in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense and to the tribunal all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor, except when the prosecutor is relieved of this responsibility by a protective order of the tribunal; Minnesota Court Rules Professional Rules Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.8 Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/pr/subtype/cond/id/3.8/

6. Transcript – Determan Radio “inaudible”

Munford: This is the Mother. The Mother is disrupting.

Defendant: How dare you tell her to disobey me.

Page 7 of 14


Munford: The Mother is disrupting our classes. She was given a notice of trespass yesterday. She has failed to abide by it.

Defendant: No don’t get to talk to me daughter who is underage without permission and how dare you tell her to disobey me!

Munford: I would like for you guys to remove her. Defendant: How dare you tell her to disobey me!

Popowski: So I will have you just back up for me please sir. So would it be okay if I just talk to you if we just go talk on the other side by the doors please?

Defendant: Please please have her go back to her class she has every right to be in class. Munford: She can’t.

Defendant: She has every right to be in class. She has a doctor’s note. [Note: Larvita McFarquhar shows doctor’s note aka medical exemption to Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety Mike Munford and Marshall Police Officer Popowski] She has the executive orders.

Popowski: Okay.

Defendant: I will talk to you, but she has to be in that class.

Popowski: Okay and I will be happy to see what I can do to help you with that, but at this point in time I’m going to say that all four of us can go to the doors and we can have a civilized conversation about this and I can try to help figure out what’s going on. Okay. So let’s start with that Okay? 42-CR-21-98 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 9/15/2021 8:58 AM 09/15/2021 Case Details Case Number:42-CR-21-98 Case Title:State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar Discovery Disclosure 1 page https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

7. Q: So, when a child tells you that she has a disability, which we clearing show in the evidence, that she has a disability and a doctor’s note stating that she has an exemption why, would you call that part of the ADA? A: Ma’am, I, uh, you’re referring to documents I’m unaware of. Cross Examination of Mike Munford Q: Larvita Elena McFarquhar A: Mike Munford, Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety. Page 12. Partial Transcript Of Proceedings File No. 42-CR-21-98 Larvita Elena McFarquhar Court Trial May 4, 2022. Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar 6/09/2022 Transcript 44 pages https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

8. Q: No, just I want you to just tell me what, on that day, when she walked into the door, after you knew that she had an exemption, what did you say to her?

A: Well, let me ask you this quick, I haven’t seen any exemption, I was not aware of any exemption and my uh, course of action was then at the time to ask her to don the protective gear. Cross Examination of Mike Munford Q: Larvita Elena McFarquhar A: Mike Munford, Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety. Page 15. Partial Transcript Of Proceedings File No. 42-CR-21-98 Larvita Elena McFarquhar Court Trial May 4, 2022. Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar 6/09/2022 Transcript 44 pages https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

9. Q: On May, May, I keep saying May, I’m so sorry. On February 3 rd you stated that her daughter hasn’t met, uh, that you stated that Larvita McFarquhar stated that she was on campus to support her daughter and that her daughter has a medical condition that prevents her from wearing a mask. Did you make that statement?

A: If that’s written, I, yes, ma’am I did.

Q: Did you or did you not just say that you were not aware that Saphi had a medical condition, that she could not wear a face mask?

A: I, I alluded to the fact that I, I never saw documentation to that fact. I’ve only heard from you. Cross Examination of Mike Munford Q: Larvita Elena McFarquhar A: Mike Munford, Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety. Page 33-34. Partial Transcript Of Proceedings File No. 42-CR-21-98 Larvita Elena McFarquhar Court Trial May 4, 2022. Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar 6/09/2022 Transcript 44 pages

Page 8 of 14


https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch 

10. Q: If you do not have, if you do not have the authority to deny or accept an exemption, how can you stop someone from enting-entering a building when they have an exemption?

GROSS: Objection, vague and--

THE COURT: On what authority did you stop them from entering the building?

A: Well, again, I go back to, and at the best I can answer your question is my initial conversation with you when you said you had an exemption, I, I encourage you to reach out to our disability services to, to, to make that known so they could have went through the proper paperwork and made that known to my office and my staff. I was going to give you an example, we have people-- Re-Cross Examination of Mike Munford. Q: Larvita Elena McFarquhar A: Mike Munford, Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety. Page 40. Partial Transcript Of Proceedings File No. 42-CR-21-98 Larvita Elena McFarquhar Court Trial May 4, 2022. Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar 6/09/2022 Transcript 44 pages https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch 

11. Q: Good morning, Mr. Munford.

A: Good morning.

Q: Um, would you please state for the record what does your trespassing order state on there, please?

A: Can I look at it?

GROSS: Objection, Your Honor that’s not into evidence and he was not the author of that (inaudible) trespass.

MCFARQUHAR: Yes, he was. THE COURT: Well, l-let’s, did you write that trespass order?

MUNFORD: I, yes, I, I did, I did sign, I did sign it and I put the reason why.

THE COURT: Okay, and is it the trespass order that he issued, I want to make sure I understand the question, so I can evaluate the uh, objection, is it the trespass order that he issued to you telling you not to return to the property, is that what you’re referring to? (inaudible response)

THE COURT: Okay. Um, I’m going to allow the question.

A: Could you repeat your question, ma’am? Q: Would you please um, would you please, sorry, would you please tell me what is on the trespass order that you put down?

A: Yes, ma’am, I will. It says here, “Failure to wear protective mask as stipulated by SMSU.”

Q: Thank you. On uh, Febr-February 3rd when you came up to the, the school and then we went downstairs to talk for like 15 minutes, did we, did I or did I not tell you that I had an exemption and Saphi had an exemption, I had a binder that showed the constitution that mandate exemption, my doctor’s exemption, we talked about her continuing (inaudible).

A: I vaguely do remember your discussing that I, but I, I don’t recall ever seeing any paperwork.

Q: I gave the paperwork to SMSU personally (inaudible) it started and Saphi also um, carried around a binder that that she’ll clearly state that she had mask exemption, that she had followed the ADA, that the, and the constitution and the mandate that she carried around with her and she did, and I did take it and I showed it to you that day. Cross Examination of Mike Munford Q: Larvita Elena McFarquhar A: Mike Munford, Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety. Pages 10-11. Partial Transcript Of Proceedings File No. 42-CR-21-98 Larvita Elena McFarquhar Court Trial May 4, 2022. Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar 6/09/2022 Transcript 44 pages https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch 

12. Q: So, when Saphi McFarquhar informed you that she has a disability that she has an exemption from her doctor, from her god, from the mandate itself, from the constitution herself, what did you tell her? GROSS: Objection, Your Honor, the disability status of someone other than Ms. McFarquhar would be irrelevant.

Page 9 of 14


THE COURT: I mean, well I’m going to overrule the irrelevant one, um, was it presented to you that way?

MUNFORD: I don’t recall that, and if someone would have presented that to me, my first response would have been we have a disability service officer that I would, would have asked them to, to visit, to schedule an appointment um, because that’s something I don’t deal with uh, from my position. So, if someone has a uh, a disability, uh, uh, that would be what I would have instructed them to do connect with our disabilities office and, and, if they needed some type of uh, of, of uh, assistance or aid then they would have got it from that office. Cross Examination of Mike Munford Q: Larvita Elena McFarquhar A: Mike Munford, Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety. Page 13. Partial Transcript Of Proceedings File No. 42-CR-21-98 Larvita Elena McFarquhar Court Trial May 4, 2022. Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar 6/09/2022 Transcript 44 pages https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

13. Q: Did you do all the things that you just said when she came to you and I came to you and said we had a disability?

A: I’m, I, I don’t recall. I don’t recall that. Cross Examination of Mike Munford Q: Larvita Elena McFarquhar A: Mike Munford, Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety. Page 13-14. Partial Transcript Of Proceedings File No. 42-CR-21-98 Larvita Elena McFarquhar Court Trial May 4, 2022. Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar 6/09/2022 Transcript 44 pages https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

14. Q: Even after I had said to you that we have a disability over and over again, what we-was your comment

A: I don’t recall.

Q: Mask up.

A: Mask up. Cross Examination of Mike Munford Q: Larvita Elena McFarquhar A: Mike Munford, Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety. Page 13-14. Partial Transcript Of Proceedings File No. 42-CR-21-98 Larvita Elena McFarquhar Court Trial May 4, 2022. Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar 6/09/2022 Transcript 44 pages https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch 

15. Q: Do you recall me mentioning uh, um, that my daughter has a disability?

A: I, yes, I do.

Q: Do you recall mention-me mentioning that my daughter has an exemption?

A: To, vaguely I do, but again, I go back to say my directions to you and your daughter at the time, and it would still be today, is that we have a um, disability service people that know those rules, those laws, that I asked you to uh, see, to go see, to make a scheudle with so we could take care of that.

Q: You just, before told me that you did not mention that, for me to go to the ADA rights counselor?

A: I, I don’t think that’s the case. I think I’ve always said my, my action would have been and, and would have been to ask you to see our disability services. 

MCFARQUHAR: I object. Can I object?

THE COURT: Yeah, you disagree, I think is what you mean to say. Uh,-- 

MCFARQUHAR: Yeah, because he just contradicted himself.

THE COURT: And the testimony what the testimony is. I’m taking notes.

MCFARQUHAR: Okay. Cross Examination of Mike Munford Q: Larvita Elena McFarquhar A: Mike Munford, Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety. Page 31-32. Partial Transcript Of Proceedings File No. 42-CR-21-98 Larvita Elena McFarquhar Court Trial May 4, 2022. Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar 6/09/2022 Transcript 44 pages https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

14. Q: What do you recall after the sec-the second incident being upstairs, when the police were called? A: Oh, you’re talking about the second incident. I recall meeting you in the hallway with your daughter and, if I’m not mistaken, that was uh, someone from the media there, and-- 

Page 10 of 14

Q: Abigail-- A: --are we talking about the same timeframe, I think?

Q: Yep, mm-hmm.

A: Um, in my converation was again to don the mask uh, for your daughter and for you it was that uh, to uh, that I called the police department to have you removed from campus, if I recall collectly, that was my course of action. Cross Examination of Mike Munford Q: Larvita Elena McFarquhar A: Mike Munford, Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety. Page 17. Partial Transcript Of Proceedings File No. 42-CR-21-98 Larvita Elena McFarquhar Court Trial May 4, 2022. Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar 6/09/2022 Transcript 44 pages https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

15. Q: Were there any recordings made?

A: None that I’m aware of. Q: On your phone, when you took out your phone to record us, was it recording?

A: I think what you mea-what you’re talking about is pictures. We took pictures.

Q: You took pictures? Now you said I’m going to record you because you’re recording me?

A: We wasn’t recording and I don’t re-recall saying that. Cross Examination of Mike Munford Q: Larvita Elena McFarquhar A: Mike Munford, Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety. Page 28. Partial Transcript Of Proceedings File No. 42-CR-21-98 Larvita Elena McFarquhar Court Trial May 4, 2022. Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar 6/09/2022 Transcript 44 pages https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

16. Q: Mr. Munford, did you provide L-the Court’s, Larvita McFarquhar with your pictures that you took on the date of 2/4?

GROSS: Objection, asked and answered, he’s, he indicated he did not take any.

THE COURT: Well,--

MCFARQUHAR: He said he took pictures. 

GROSS: Or, that, that’s not relevant for him providing it to the Court.

THE COURT: Um, that’s true, it wouldn’t normally get provided to the Court, but I’ll allow the question, uh, did you provide those to the, Mr. Gross?

A: Um, I, I don’t recall, I don’t if he requested pictures from me or, or any of that, but I do have the pictures attached to the report that uh, that we made uh, that we provided at our, at our campus. So,--

Q: Who did you--

A: --the pictures we took that day, the pictures I’m re-referring to, the pictures we took to notify our staff that you had been trespassed. So, we’d have reference to that uh, that (inaudible).

Q: When were those pictures taken? A: It would have been on the, the, uh, the 3 rd or the 4 th --

Q: Who took--

A: --of February.

Q: --those pictures?

A: I think you said I did. I’m not, I don’t recall, but I know it was somebody from my department, whether I took ‘em or, or one of my staff members took ‘em, but it would have been by my authority that they were taken.

Q: Who else was there, from your staff on 2/4/21? A: I, I’m so sorry, I don’t recall that.

Q: Because I clearly in my data request, I asked for all evidence from SMSU to be given to me.

GROSS: Outside the scope of these proceedings, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Alright. Did you, did you see, when you came up to look at that, did you see the photographs?

MCFARQUHAR: No, I did not.

THE COURT: Okay. Do you want to see them?

MCFARQUHAR: Yes, I do.

Page 11 of 14

THE COURT: Uh, can you show the photographs to Ms. McFarquhar that are.

A: Now, this is, well--

THE COURT: Maybe my, maybe I misunderstood. You said you that you had the photos perhaps somewhere--

MUNFORD: We have photographs that I used in, in the office of the public safety department where it has her picture and the pictures of the other people that were trespassed, I’m sorry, I don’t have that on me, but that was an internal document for our office to refer back to trespass notice.

Q: Did you or did not clearly just state we did not take pictures? A: No ma’am, if I did I misspoke. I said we took pictures, but I didn’t take--

Q: I said you. GROSS: Asked and answered, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Yeah, he did answer the question--

MCFARQUHAR: He just contradicted himself.

THE COURT: --that it, uh, he, he a-as I recall the testimony and you can correct me if I’m wrong that either it was you, you don’t recall if it was you or it was somebody in your department--

MUNFORD: Yes. THE COURT: --but it was taken at your direction? MUNFORD: Yes. Cross Examination of Mike Munford Q: Larvita Elena McFarquhar A: Mike Munford, Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety. Page 30-32. Partial Transcript Of Proceedings File No. 42-CR-21-98 Larvita Elena McFarquhar Court Trial May 4, 2022. Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar 6/09/2022 Transcript 44 pages https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

17. Q: So, who gave you the authority on the campus of SMSU?

A: The s-my employment is that I enforce the policies and procedures of the university that I run a comprehensive security department that, that uh, that uh, uh, is, is dedicated to the safety and the uh, further ation of life on our campus. Cross Examination of Mike Munford

Q: Larvita Elena McFarquhar A: Mike Munford, Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety. Page 20. Partial Transcript Of Proceedings File No. 42-CR-21-98 Larvita Elena McFarquhar Court Trial May 4, 2022. Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar 6/09/2022 Transcript 44 pages https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch 

18. Q: Mr. Munford, you don’t make the policies for M-SMSU University, do you?

A: No, I do not.

Q: You just enforce them in your uh, role as the director of public safety? A: Yes, sir.

Q: You’re not the one that grants exclusions or exemptions from the mask policy?

A: That is correct, sir.

Q: And you’re not an expert on ADA matters or any other disability-- MCFARQUHAR: Objection--

Q: --or discrimination matters, is that correct?

A: That is correct.

THE COURT: W-We’ve established that already, go ahead.

Q: Um, and on February 3 rd or 4 th was Ms. McFarquhar exempted from the SMSU mask policy?

A: She, she was not exempt. Q: Okay. GROSS: No further questions, Your Honor. Re-Direct Examination of Mike Munford. Q: Matthew Gross, Marshall City Attorney. A: Mike Munford, Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety. Page 39. Partial Transcript Of Proceedings File No. 42-CR-21-98 Larvita Elena McFarquhar Court Trial May 4, 2022. Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar 6/09/2022 Transcript 44 pages https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

19. Q: Do you have the authority to give Larvita McFarquhar an exemption?

Page 12 of 14

GROSS: Asked and answered, Your Honor.

THE COURT: Um, I’m going to allowed the question. Do you yourself have the authority to grant exemptions?

A: No, ma’am.

Q: Do you have the right to deny an exemption? 

A: No, ma’am. Re-Cross Examination of Mike Munford. Q: Larvita Elena McFarquhar A: Mike Munford, Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety. Page 39. Partial Transcript Of Proceedings File No. 42-CR-21-98 Larvita Elena McFarquhar Court Trial May 4, 2022. Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar 6/09/2022 Transcript 44 pages https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

20. THE COURT: We’re limited to those three (3) issues, uh, doesn’t make the policies, doesn’t grant or deny exceptions, and not a medical or disability expert on the ADA. So, on those issues uh, that you’re kind of limited on re-direct on those issues.

MCFARQUHAR: I’m sorry, can you repeat the three (3) issues?

THE COURT: That he doesn’t make the policies, uh, that he does not grant exemptions and or deny exemptions, I’ve let you ask that question, um, and that he’s not a medical or an ADA expert. Re- Cross Examination of Mike Munford. Q: Larvita Elena McFarquhar A: Mike Munford, Southwest Minnesota State University Director of Public Safety. Page 41. Partial Transcript Of Proceedings File No. 42-CR-21-98 Larvita Elena McFarquhar Court Trial May 4, 2022. Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar 6/09/2022 Transcript 44 pages https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

21. Non-violent disruptive demonstrations A. In the event that a demonstration blocks access to University facilities or interferes with the operation of the University: i. Demonstrators will be asked to terminate the disruptive activity by the Public Safety Director or his designee ii. The Director will consider having a photographer or video camera available for verification/documentation purposes and notify Marshall PD of the situation iii. Key University and student leaders will be asked to go to the area and persuade the demonstrators to desist iv. The President or his designee will go to the area and ask the demonstrators to leave or to discontinue the disruptive activities v. If the demonstrators persist in the disruptive activity, they will be appraised that failure to discontinue the specified action within a determined length of time may result in disciplinary action including suspension or expulsion and/or possible intervention by civil authorities vi. Efforts should be made to secure positive identification of demonstrators in violation to facilitate later testimony, including photos or video tape if advisable vii. After consultation with President’s cabinet and University legal counsel, the need for intervention of civil authorities will be determined viii. If intervention by civil authorities is deemed appropriate, the demonstrators should be informed. Upon arrival of the Marshall Police, the remaining demonstrators will be warned of the intention to arrest. Southwest Minnesota State University 600-12 Civil Disturbance or Demonstrations policy

22. Exhibits for Demand for Sanctions & Dismissal & Removal. 11/30/2021 Motion to Dismiss 79 pages 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch Larvita McFarquhar: I don’t understand. When do people like you get involved when people are doing the wrong thing?

23. Demand for Sanctions & Dismissal. 09/15/2021 Correspondence 4 pages 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch 

24. Demand for Sanctions & Dismissal & Removal 11/30/2021 Motion to Dismiss 3 pages 42-CR-21- 98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch 

25. Formal criminal complaint. 12/06/2021 Other Document 6 pages Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch 26. ICR# 21-17510. 12/06/2021 Other Document 1 page Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title:

Page 13 of 14

State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch 

27. THE COURT: But, Ms. Hanson, you don't get to decide that you're the governor and you don't have to follow the rules that the rest of society has to follow. That's not your role. And if you think you have that role -- which you pretty well made it clear -- you got to understand the law applies to you; it applies to everybody equally. Page 13-14. State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, vs. Melissa Lynn Hanson, Defendant. Transcript Of Proceedings December 9, 2021 Sentencing Hearing Court File No. 24-CR- 21-137 Case Number: 24-CR-21-137 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Melissa Lynn Hanson. 01/25/2022 Transcript 21 pages https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

28. THE COURT: And you were making money so you could -- you could roll in the dough because the suckers down the street had closed their bar. You played them for the fool, didn't you? THE DEFENDANT: No, I did not. THE COURT: No. No. I'm not -- I'm not asking a response. Page 14. State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, vs. Melissa Lynn Hanson, Defendant. Transcript Of Proceedings December 9, 2021 Sentencing Hearing Court File No. 24-CR- 21-137 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Melissa Lynn Hanson. 01/25/2022 Transcript 21 pages https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

29. THE COURT: So, I mean, you kind of cut the line here, Ms. Hanson, in the sense that you wanted to decide how you were going to live your life. Agreed-upon rules of law are ignored in your world; you decide what you want to do, and then you're going to fight tooth and nail to explain yourself and justify your behaviors. You're going to criticize me; you have before, and you will in the future. Page 17. State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, vs. Melissa Lynn Hanson, Defendant. Transcript Of Proceedings December 9, 2021 Sentencing Hearing Court File No. 24-CR-21-137 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Melissa Lynn Hanson. 01/25/2022 Transcript 21 pages https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

30. Lyon County Sheriff Eric Wallen: You see in Minnesota the whole. We are not constitutional sheriffs. We’re. Our position is established by state statute and and state laws in Minnesota. It’s not established by the constitution. The state of Minnesota could abolish the sheriff’s offices if they want. And just take the laws off the books. They’re not going to but they could. So were are not as you say constitutional sheriffs. Were not. We don’t get involved in those situations What other police departments do is they handle their own matters. And, if you do have issues with how they handle those matters that is why they have city councils and the mayor and city administrator and things like that. 11:10-11:57/39:59 https://rumble.com/v143w05-marshall-sheriff-states-i-do-not-follow-the-constitution..html Marshall Sheriff states "I do not follow the Constitution". LLarvita Published May 9, 2022 113 Views It shows Larvita McFarquhar trying to get the necessary evidence that she requested nearly a year ago and at the pre-trial hearing a week prior. Filmed on Tuesday, May 3, 2022

31. State Of Minnesota District Court Fifth Judicial District Criminal Division File Numberz42—CR-21- 98 County Of Lyon State of Minnesota, Affidavit of Service by Mail Plaintiff, vs. Larvita Maria Elena McFarquhar, Defendants, Erika L. Meulebroeck, being first sworn, says that on April 22, 2022, she served the attached following document(s): o DVD — 911 call on the following person by US mail: Larvita Maria Elena McFarquhar 106 E Railroad Street Lynd, MN 56157 Sworn/affirmed before me on: April 22, 2022. l... Meulebroeck, Affiant Ngtary Public Jessica Lynn Hennen Notary Public - Minnesota My Gmnmifiiw Expires Jan. 31. 2025 Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar 04/22/2022 Affidavit of Mailing 1 page Case Number: 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

32. Transcript for Appeal – Perjured Testimony. 05/27/2022 Other Document 14 pages. 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

33. Transcript for Appeal – Perjured Testimony. 05/23/2022 Other Document 7 pages. 42-CR-21-98 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Larvita Marie Elena McFarquhar https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

Page 14 of 14

More to come ...

Related links:

Who Wants A Copy Of The Public Portion Of Larvita McFarquhar's ICR 21-17510 For Her Criminal Complaint Against City Of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross And Director Of Public Safety Jim Marshall? Let's Submit A Chapter 13 Data Quest, Shall We? It's Still Rigged Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State Of Minnesota Vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar, Isn't It?

McFarquhar Tosses A Monkey Wrench Into Rigged Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State Of Minnesota Vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar By Filing A Criminal Complaint Against City Of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross And Director Of Public Safety Jim Marshall? It's ICR 21-17510, Isn't It? 12-13-21 Pre-trial Gets Booted Way Way Way Back To 04-18-22?

Demand For Sanctions & Dismissal In Rigged Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State Of Minnesota Vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar? Nemmers' Intervention Puts An End To Ridiculous "Sovereign Citizen" Paperwork AKA "Patriot Paperwork"? Nemmers' Intervention Also Turns The Tables On The Corrupt City Of Marshall and Corrupt Southwest Minnesota State University (SMSU), Doesn't It?