from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: cathy.celander@courts.state.mn.us,
pierce@bevcomm.net
date: Aug 3, 2021, 8:14 AM
subject: Transcripts For Case No 46-CV-19-1224 Goldmount Veterinary Center PA Vs Watonwan Co Animal Humane Society Not On The Register Of Actions But Hidden In Affidavit In Support Of The AHS’s Motion For A New Trial Or In The Alternative Remittitur
mailed-by: gmail.com
Cathy Celander, Court Administrator 507-238-3290 & Amy Yackley, Court Reporter Phone: 507-238-3283:
Why aren't the individual transcripts for Agent Keith Streff, Watonwan County Attorney Steven Lindee, Dr. Kittleson, Dr. Kathleen Jost, Dr. Martinson found on the Register of Actions for Case No 46-CV-19-1224 Goldmount Veterinary Center PA Vs Watonwan Co Animal Humane Society/ Why are those transcripts only exclusively found hidden in the Declaration Of Katherine B. Freitag In Support Of The Animal Humane Society’s Motion For A New Trial Or In The Alternative Remittitur for Case No. 46-CV-19-1224 Goldmount Veterinary Center, P.A. vs Watonwan County, Animal Humane Society? When are the transcripts going to be logged into the system for Case No 46-CV-19-1224? Or don't you want the public to have access to the original transcripts? Is the plan to make sure those transcripts are not accessible via the Minnesota Court Records Online (MCRO) website?
FYI: Did you know that a similar situation occurred in the high-profile criminal case for Nisswa Mayor Frederick Henry Heidmann? Did you know that was only resolved after the District Court Administrator and the MN Board on Judicial Standards were contacted? Did you guess that I contacted both the District Court Administrator and the MN Board on Judicial Standards?
Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
State Of Minnesota County Of Hubbard ) ) ss ) Katherine B. Freitag, being first duly sworn upon oath, deposes and states as follows: 1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in Minnesota, and I am the attorney of record for Defendant Animal Humane Society in this matter. 2. Attached hereto are true and correct copies of the following documents: Exhibit A. True and correct copies of trial transcript pages for Agent Keith Streff cited in AHS’s Memorandum in Support of Animal Humane Society’s Motion for a New Trial or in the Alternative Remittitu4 Exhibit B. True and correct copies of trial transcript pages for Steven Lindee cited in AHS’s Memorandum in Support of Animal Humane Society’s Motion for a New Trial or in the Alternative Remittitur Exhibit C. True and correct copies of trial transcript pages for Dr. Kittleson cited in AHS’s Memorandum in Support of Animal Humane Society’s Motion for a New Trial or in the Alternative Remittitur Exhibit D. True and correct copies of trial transcript pages for Dr. Kathleen Jost cited in AHS’s Memorandum in Support of Animal Humane Society’s Motion for a New Trial or in the Alternative Remittitur. Declaration Of Katherine B. Freitag In Support Of The Animal Humane Society’s Motion For A New Trial Or In The Alternative Remittitur for Case No. 46-CV-19-1224 Goldmount Veterinary Center, P.A. vs Watonwan County, Animal Humane Society
THE RECORD Testimony of Supervisory Humane Agent Keith Streff – Trial Transcript pp. 119-202, 303-367 Testimony of Watonwan County Attorney Steven Lindee – Trial Transcript pp. 187-206 Testimony of Dr. Kittleson – Trial Transcript pp. 211-273 Testimony of Dr. Kathleen Jost – Trial Transcript pp. 383-391 Testimony of Dr. Martinson – Trial Transcript pp. 392-406. Page 2. Memorandum Of Law In Support Of The Animal Humane Society’s Motion For A New Trial Or In The Alternative For Remittitur for Case No. 46-CV-19-1224 Goldmount Veterinary Center, P.A. vs Watonwan County, Animal Humane Society
Case No. 18-CR-20-2969 State of Minnesota vs Frederick Henry Heidmann
05/04/2021 Memorandum Index # 70
06/01/2021 Transcript Index # 77
Argument I. Procedural Failures The Defendant reincorporates his numerous pending motions with regard to the inadequacy of the complaint. The State failed to rebut or even make mention of the fact the Court ordered a formal complaint within 2 weeks to be served and filed by the State. To date, the State has conceded multiple times that their first bite at the apple was fatally flawed and failed to meet this ordered deadline; “The State, first of all, freely acknowledges that the December 28th, 2020, Complaint did contain procedural defects.” (Transcript P.12) C ASE N O . 18-CR-20-2969 State of Minnesota vs Frederick Henry Heidmann
More to come ...
Related Links:
Armed Minnesota Animal Humane Society Humane Agent Keith Streff Wearing A Firearm In Case No. 83-CR-18-513 State Of Minnesota Vs Michael Charles Johnson? Will AHS Agent Streff Show Up Armed At June 28‐June 30th, 2021 & July 1– July 2, 2021 Jury Trial for Court File 46-CV-19-1224 Goldmount Veterinary Center, P.A. Vs Watonwan County, Animal Humane Society? Has Streff Ever Been Accused Of Impersonating An Officer? Let's Ask AHS Attorney Freitag, Okay? Should We Tell The St. James Plaindealer & The Martin County Star Editors About Watonwan Co. Attorney Lindee's Illegal Withholding Of Public Data? Lindee Knows That The Chapter 13 Data Will Toss A Monkey Wrench Into 46-CV-19-1224, Doesn't He
