Thursday, October 31, 2013

Washington Co. Attorney Peter Orput Given Another Opportunity To Illegally Withhold Public Data For Druggie Deputy Ricky Harry Gruber? Case no. 82-CR-13-789, 03/01/2013 – Order for Booking – More Proof Of Sweetheart Deal?

Will Washington Co. Attorney Petey Orput use this data request that I have submitted today as another opportunity to engage in criminal misconduct?

Minnesota Statutes,13.09 Penalties. Any person who willfully violates the provisions of this chapter or any rules adopted under this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor. Willful violation of this chapter by any public employee constitutes just cause for suspension without pay or dismissal of the public employee.

Minnesota Statutes, 609.43 Misconduct of Public Officer or Employee. (1) intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law.

We'll find out, won't we?
However, I don't think that Washington Co. Attorney Petey Orput will be as brave as he was before, do I?

Why would I think that?

Simple. Washington Co. Attorney Petey Orput just lost an ally in the criminal conspiracy, didn't he?

Who caved in? The lawless District 10 – Washington county court caved in, didn't they?

The lawless District 10 – Washington county court threw Washington Co. Attorney Petey Orput under the bus, didn't they?  The lawless District 10 – Washington county court did that to hopefully preserve a little bit of their tarnished reputation, didn't they? They did, didn't they? So Petey won't be so cocky now, will he? He won't, will he?

More to come . . .

Related links:

Sheriff Hutton Illegally Withholding Public Data On Druggie Deputy Gruber - Sweetheart Deal For Gruber At Rigged Trial? Conflict Of Interest With Washington Co. Attorney Pete Orput As Prostituting Attorney?

Washington Co. Court Staff Too Busy Watching Lion News To Process Data Request For the Rigged Trial Of Washington Co. Druggie Deputy Ricky Harry Gruber - Case No. 82-CR-13-789?