Lion News: Sarah Brodkorb's Perjured Testimony In Frivolous & Malicious SLAPP suit VS. Diane Ristau? Malicious Publicity Stunt To Promote Pulp Fiction Spun By Perjurer Hubby MinnPost Hack Michael Brodkorb?

Context Okay?

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609.48
609.48 PERJURY.
Subdivision 1. Acts constituting.
Whoever makes a false material statement not believing it to be true in any of the following cases is guilty of perjury and may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 4:
(1) in or for an action, hearing or proceeding of any kind in which the statement is required or authorized by law to be made under oath or affirmation;

Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. Exodus 20:16 King James Version (KJV)

A little more context okay?

Officers conducting all criminal investigations will, whenever possible, record oral victim and witness statements in lieu of written statements. Statement evidence obtained during an initial investigation can be very powerful evidence in determining the course of an investigation; ultimately impacting charging decisions and convictions. Policy Duluth Police Department 325 Duluth PD Policy Manual http://www.duluthmn.gov/media/304979/release_20171106_t124845_duluth_pd_policy_manual.pdf

Preliminary statement of Sarah Brodkorb:

Eagan Police Department 3830 Pilot Knob Rd Eagan, MN 55122 651) 675- 5700 Case #: EA18004549 Incident #: EA18004549

On 8/13/18 at 23:12 I was dispatched to 4136 Countryview Dr. to a report of a possible harassment issue. I was met at the door by Sarah Brodkorb and her husband, Michael Brodkorb. Sarah and Micheal showed me a picture that had been taken at the outlet mall in Eagan on Saturday by an unknown person. The photo had been posted to a Twitter account with the name of Jane Johnson, @johnsonmedia2. Famous Footwear. The photo was of Sarah and her daughter at the register at Neither Sarah nor her daughter appear to know that the photo was taken. In checking her receipt, Sarah was able to tell me that she was at the register at Famous Footwear on 8/11/ 18 at 12: 58: 33. The photo is captioned " Sarah # mbrodkorb # missinginminnesota spending money received from David Rucki via stolen from # grazzinirucki caught trust and Minneasota. evavoid" Micheal and Sarah believe that whoever took this photo is in some way connected to Sandra Grazzini Rucki. ... Micheal covered this story as a journalist and is also writing a book about the incident. Micheal mentioned that he has been harassed by this group of people for some time. ... I spoke with Sarah regarding her day at the mall. She said that she never noticed anything unusual that day. She said they went from Famous Footwear to the food court and had lunch. From there they went to the Asic' s store, then Old Navy and then left the area. She didn' t notice anything else that appeared noteworthy at the time. Micheal and Sarah are concerned for their safety at this point. This case status should be considered open/active with Investigations to follow up. SUPPLEMENT SPIESS/ 133 DANIEL 33133 33133 33133 2018SPIESS, 08/17/ 08/15/18, 1028 hours:

Printed On 10/24/2018 Page 3, 4 of 7 Printed By VASQUEZ, LYNN (emphasis added)

The perjury comes from when Sarah maliciously changes her 8-13-18 testimony from no commotion to commotion, doesn't it? It does, doesn't it?

Sarah Brodkorb - Direct Examination - Page 18.

DIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MR. HANSEN:
Q. Ms. Brodkorb, without giving your address, are you a resident
of Dakota County?
A. Yes.
Q. And I want to direct your attention to the date of the incident in question here, specifically these pictures that have been previously introduced and accepted as exhibits. Where were you and what were you doing when these pictures
were taken?
A. Yes. It was Saturday, August 11th. I was back-to-school shopping with my children at the Eagan Outlet Mall, these photos specifically at the Famous Footwear.
Q. And at the time this picture was taken, could you tell the Court if you -- what occurred nearby while you were at the ...

September 26, 2018 SLAPP suit hearing for Sarah Beth Brodkorb, Michael Brodkorb, and O/B/O Minor Children (AB, BB, EB), Petitioners, and Diane Kathleen Ristau, Respondent. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS File No. 19AV-CV-18-2159. Dakota County Minnesota.

Sarah Brodkorb - Direct Examination - Page 19.

DIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MR. HANSEN:
Q. ... checkout?
A. Yes. As we were checking out, I recalled a -- what I would say a commotion.
I'm going to use my hands. To the right of me there is an area, very small area, where there was a display of socks and other things from a footwear store. And there was a commotion of people trying to get back there and kind of -- you know, you could tell something was going on. I didn't know exactly what was going on, but definitely remember there being a commotion specifically as I was checking out. It was in an odd location.
Q. In hindsight, when you connect that commotion with this photo, is it your belief that the commotion was related to the taking of this photo?
A. Absolutely.
Q. So, in other words, somebody was trying to posture to take a picture?
A. Yes.

September 26, 2018 SLAPP suit hearing for Sarah Beth Brodkorb, Michael Brodkorb, and O/B/O Minor Children (AB, BB, EB), Petitioners, and Diane Kathleen Ristau, Respondent. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS File No. 19AV-CV-18-2159. Dakota County Minnesota.

That pesky context again, okay?

Definition of commotion
1 : a condition of civil unrest or insurrection The commotion was finally brought to an end and peace was restored. ...
4a : an agitated disturbance : to-do the commotion caused by the president's visit b : noisy confusion : agitation The commotion backstage had brought the play to a stop. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/commotion

Sarah Brodkorb - Direct Examination - Page 19-20.

DIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MR. HANSEN:

Q. Ms. Brodkorb, I'm showing you what's been marked for identification as Exhibit 3. Will you describe to the Court what that is.
A. Yes. It's a picture. I am standing at the register with one of my children. We were checking out for the shoes that were to be purchased. I was clearly looking behind me. My daughter seems to be looking possibly in the direction of where the commotion was because that would have been the exact direction where there was a couple people who were -- like I said, it appeared to be some commotion. They were trying to get through. They were -- it was a production.

September 26, 2018 SLAPP suit hearing for Sarah Beth Brodkorb, Michael Brodkorb, and O/B/O Minor Children (AB, BB, EB), Petitioners, and Diane Kathleen Ristau, Respondent. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS File No. 19AV-CV-18-2159. Dakota County Minnesota.

Sorry, but more context, okay?

Definition of production
1a : something produced : product
b
(1) : a literary or artistic work
(2) : a work presented to the public (as on the stage or screen or over the air)
c : something exaggerated out of proportion to its importance
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/production

A production occurs when a perjurer makes all sorts of wild and outrageous claims without providing a single shred of corroborating evidence, doesn't it? It does, doesn't it?

Sarah Brodkorb - Direct Examination - Page 22.

DIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MR. HANSEN:

Q. How has this incident made you feel?
A. Extremely anxious. My anxiety has been extremely high. I am fearful out in public, especially with my children. I feel I have to look behind me constantly, be on a lookout whether I'm at a store shopping, Target, the grocery store, State Fair. If someone randomly looks at me, I'm now concerned that maybe they're trying to take a photo of me or my children. I've had to take time off of work because of my fear. And I am working with my doctors because of the anxiety that I've been dealing with.
Q. Do you feel intimidated by this incident?
A. Yes.

September 26, 2018 SLAPP suit hearing for Sarah Beth Brodkorb, Michael Brodkorb, and O/B/O Minor Children (AB, BB, EB), Petitioners, and Diane Kathleen Ristau, Respondent. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS File No. 19AV-CV-18-2159. Dakota County Minnesota.

What corroborating evidence did perjurer Sarah Brodkorb magically and mysteriously intentionally "forget" to bring to court? Perjurer Sarah Brodkorb magically and mysteriously intentionally "forget" to bring the documentation to prove perjurer Sarah Brodkorb took time off from work for anxiety, right? That's right, isn't it?

Perjurer Sarah Brodkorb magically and mysteriously intentionally "forget" to bring perjurer Sarah Brodkorb's documentation proving a diagnosis of anxiety, right? Medical records, prescriptions, and doctor's orders for time off of work for anxiety, right? That's right, isn't it?

Sarah Brodkorb - Cross Examination - Page 23-24
CROSS-EXAMINATION
BY MS. MOORE:

Q. So, Ms. Brodkorb, you -- it's clear you were at Famous Footwear at the Eagan Outlet on August 11th; is that right?
A. Correct.
Q. And you just testified that you noticed a commotion in the store that day; is that correct?
A. Yes.
Q. So directing your attention to the exhibit in front of you, any one of the exhibits that shows your picture, say Exhibit 3 just to be specific, you were looking back; correct?
A. Correct.
Q. And the photo appears to come from an angle that is more toward the front?
A. Correct.
Q. In other words, you are not looking in the direction of the person taking the picture; correct?
A. That is correct. I was looking at my other daughter.
Q. Okay. So is the commotion behind you where you're looking?
A. No. My daughter was behind me. I was looking at my daughter. The commotion is ahead of me where my other daughter is focused.
Q. Okay. But the commotion was back by the socks; correct?
A. That is correct.
Q. Okay. So presumably whoever was taking this picture was in
front of you at this --
A. Correct.

September 26, 2018 SLAPP suit hearing for Sarah Beth Brodkorb, Michael Brodkorb, and O/B/O Minor Children (AB, BB, EB), Petitioners, and Diane Kathleen Ristau, Respondent. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS File No. 19AV-CV-18-2159. Dakota County Minnesota.

Sarah Brodkorb - Cross Examination - Page 27-28
CROSS-EXAMINATION
BY MS. MOORE:

Q. I am handing you a four-page document that is part of the police report.
You can see there that that is the narrative that Officer Lejcher typed up after meeting with you and your husband?
A. Uh-huh.
Q. You can also see there that he describes what you told him. I will direct you to page 4 of 6, first full paragraph. Can you read that, please.
A. "I spoke with Sarah regarding her day at the mall. She said she never noticed anything unusual that day. She said they went from Famous Footwear to the food court and had lunch. From there they went to the Asic's [sic] store, then Old Navy and then left the area. She didn't notice anything else that appeared noteworthy at the time."
Q. So you didn't feel the necessity to tell the responding officer that you heard and saw a commotion at the store?
A. I did report that to the officer.
Q. So you're saying that the officer didn't include that --
A. It's possible.
Q. -- material piece of information?
A. It's possible, but I did tell that to the officer. I even showed him roughly the amount of space that was in that area and why it was odd that somebody was in that area because it was so small and awkward for somebody to go into that area and cause the commotion that they did. I didn't realize at the time there was a photo being I thought it was just some people who were shopping and act- -- not acting as odd, but it was a commotion. There was multiple people who went there. So I did share that with -- with the officer. But didn't go into the report, I can't explain why.

September 26, 2018 SLAPP suit hearing for Sarah Beth Brodkorb, Michael Brodkorb, and O/B/O Minor Children (AB, BB, EB), Petitioners, and Diane Kathleen Ristau, Respondent. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS File No. 19AV-CV-18-2159. Dakota County Minnesota.

Another dose of context? Perjurer Sarah Brodkorb's testimony defies logic, doesn't it? It does, doesn't it? Which means perjurer Sarah Brodkorb's perjured testimony fails the LIE Principle, right? That's right, isn't it?

... LIE Principle. (L) When the defendant takes the witness stand and proclaims his innocence, he's Lying. You did your job in the charging stage. You believe in your case. You do not prosecute the innocent. Well, if the defendant says he is innocent, then he must be lying. You must believe this with all your heart and nerve and sinew. If you ever begin to think maybe the defendant is telling the truth, then you can be assured that the jury is having the same thoughts. (I) If he is lying, then his story will be Illogical. If the truth is that he is guilty. Then his lie about his innocence must be fatally flawed. (E) You can Exploit the illogic. If the jury can see the implausibility, then they will not believe the story. The LIE Procedure How do you exploit the implausibility” You follow the LIE Procedure: (L) Listen. You must, at all costs listen to the defendant's story. You cannot sit there fretting about what questions you are going to ask. You must listen, and listen intently. (I) If you listen intently enough, you can Identify the illogic. You sit there and you hear it, and all your being shouts to you, “That doesn't make sense!” (E) Now that you have identified the illogic, you must Expose it. You strip all extraneous data from the illogic and make it impossible for the jury to miss. George R. Dekle, Sr, Prosecution Principles: A Clinical Handbook (Thompson/West:2007), Page 270.

Remember: Perjurers look behind themselves when a commotion is occurring in front of them, right? That's perjurer logic, isn't it? It is, isn't it?

Sarah Brodkorb - Cross Examination - Page 28
CROSS-EXAMINATION
BY MS. MOORE:

Q. Sure. But you did indicate that you -- no. Strike that. So going back to August 11th then, the commotion is in front where your daughter is looking in this picture?
A. Yes.
Q. You are clearly looking behind?
A. Correct.
Q. You didn't notice Ms. Ristau taking a photo?
A. I did not notice a photo being taken of me.
Q. Thank you.

September 26, 2018 SLAPP suit hearing for Sarah Beth Brodkorb, Michael Brodkorb, and O/B/O Minor Children (AB, BB, EB), Petitioners, and Diane Kathleen Ristau, Respondent. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS File No. 19AV-CV-18-2159. Dakota County Minnesota.

Lion News

Wednesday, December 5, 2018

Sarah Brodkorb's Perjured Testimony In Frivolous & Malicious SLAPP suit VS. Diane Ristau? Malicious Publicity Stunt To Promote Pulp Fiction Spun By Perjurer Hubby MinnPost Hack Michael Brodkorb?

Followers

Blog Archive

Contact Information: