Just received a phone call at about 12:15 pm today from Tim Salisbury, didn't I? Apparently John Lom's letter must have caused the crooks at Itasca County's County Attorney's office to have a severe loosening of their bowels and bladders, mustn't it? The letter prompted a response to Salisbury in which the assistant county attorney (The County Attorney couldn't leave the bathroom, right?) stated that "no dash cam video exists" for the trumped up traffic stop, didn't it?
One needs to ask: "Does the dog eat every single dash cam video of Itasca County deputy Kyle Curtiss or just the ones which contain incriminating evidence against him, huh?"
Maybe the "Good Ol' Boys" at the Itasca County Sheriff's department can fabricate some work orders and notices to the factory about the so-called faulty safety device, huh? Or maybe the "dog" ate them, too?
A spoliator of evidence in a legal action is an individual who neglects to produce evidence that is in her possession or control. In such a situation, any inferences that might be drawn against the party are permitted, and the withholding of the evidence is attributed to the person's presumed knowledge that it would have served to operate against her. West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2.
Original Post: 06-03-13
When John Lom heard that Itasca County's deputy Kyle Curtiss was the guy who ticketed Tim Salisbury, he wanted to know if his so-called faulty dash cam video was working on that occasion, didn't he? Apparently lawless Itasca County uses the same old, tired, "the dog at my home work" excuse for when they "mysteriously" don't have dash cam video, don't they? They claim it is "malfunctioning," don't they? Only the dupes and dopes would buy that lame excuse more than once, wouldn't they?
Lion News: Itasca Co. Chief Deputy Deutsch Harasses Salisbury Over Dash Cam Video & MDT Data?
Lion News: Itasca Co. Attorney "Good Ol' Boy #1" Muhar Is Withholding Evidence From Salisbury?
Here & Here!
Background on Tim Salisbury: Here!