Lion News: July 2022

Felony Dismissal For State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles Case No.: 72-CR-20-85

State Of Minnesota Vs Jeremy James Boles Case No.: 72-CR-20-85

03/23/2020 E-filed Comp-Order for Detention Index # 1

08/12/2021 Order-Evaluation for Competency to Proceed (Rule 20.01) Index # 51 (Judicial Officer: Donley, Amber )

03/17/2022 Found Competent (Judicial Officer: Donley, Amber )

06/20/2022 Order for Dismissal Index # 67 (Judicial Officer: Winters, Jody L. )
06/20/2022 Notice of Filing of Order Index # 68
06/23/2022 CANCELED Settlement Conference (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber) Dismissed
06/27/2022 Returned Mail Index # 69
06/28/2022 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber)
Dismissed

Misdemeanor Dismissals For State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles Case No.: 72-CR-20-81, 72-CR-20-83, & 72-CR-20-172

State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles Case No.: 72-CR-20-81

03/21/2020 Citation E-Filed

06/23/2022 Settlement Conference (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber)
Result: Held On the Record
06/23/2022 Proposed Order or Document Index # 41
06/23/2022 e-Service BOLES, JEREMY JAMES Served 06/23/2022
06/23/2022 Order for Dismissal Index # 42 (Judicial Officer: Donley, Amber )
06/28/2022 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber)
Dismissed

State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles Case No.: 72-CR-20-83

03/21/2020 Citation E-Filed

06/23/2022 Settlement Conference (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber)
Result: Held On the Record
06/23/2022 Proposed Order or Document Index # 38
06/23/2022 e-Service BOLES, JEREMY JAMES Served 06/23/2022
06/23/2022 Order for Dismissal Index # 39 (Judicial Officer: Donley, Amber )
06/28/2022 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber)
Dismissed

State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles Case No.: 72-CR-20-172

06/04/2020 E-filed Comp-Summons Index # 1

06/23/2022 Settlement Conference (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber)
Result: Held On the Record
06/23/2022 Proposed Order or Document Index # 38
06/23/2022 e-Service Boles, Jeremy James Served 06/23/2022
06/23/2022 Order for Dismissal Index # 39 (Judicial Officer: Donley, Amber )
06/28/2022 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber)
Dismissed

Do you want to read the complaint that Boles filed against his attorney?

https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch Minnesota Court Records Online (MCRO) Case Details Case Number:72-CR-20-85 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs JEREMY JAMES BOLES 08/10/2021 Correspondence 15 pages

Final Instructions That Forced The Misdemeanor Dismissals?

06-22-22

John G. Dillon Assistant State Public Defender 237 Mackubin St. St. Paul MN, 55102 (612) 703-8648

Re: Stop Sabotaging My Criminal Cases & Get My Phone From Henderson

Emailed to: keithswenson49@gmail.com, randy_tiegs@hotmail.com, sellnerconstruction@gmail.com, amyhardel1@gmail.com, jabld@frontiernet.net, chenderson165@mchsi.com, lionnews00@gmail.com, John.Dillon@pubdef.state.mn.us, amber.donley@courts.state.mn.us, karen.messner@courts.state.mn.us

You and your fellow public pretender Wesley Harvey have helped to make life a living hell for the last 2+ years. Neither you nor Harvey have made any real attempts to get Case Nos. 72-CR-20-81, 72-CR-20-83, 72-CR-20-172, 72-CR-20-85 dismissed1,2,3. I have reason to suspect that the only reason why the felony case, 72-CR-20-85, was dismissed was because of the intervention of Mr. Terry Nemmers. While backstabbing Harvey was conspiring with Sibley County Attorney Donald E. Lannoye4,5,6 to make sure that I was smeared with a malicious competency hearing, Mr. Nemmers was helping me to toss a monkey wrench into that same malicious competency hearing.

What have you actually accomplished in my case? Have you gotten my phone back from either Henderson City Attorney Jason Moran or Henderson Chief of Police Dimitri Ikonitski? You haven’t, have you? How am I supposed to go to trial or even have a chance at winning at trial without the exculpatory evidence that is on my phone? You know what I do have? I have a damning audio recording of you making it perfectly clear to me that you have no intention of obtaining my phone aka my exculpatory evidence from the City of Henderson until you have secured my convictions in Case Nos. 72-CR-20-81, 72-CR-20-83, and72-CR-20-172. Let me make this perfectly clear to you. I want my phone, today! Not tomorrow! Not next week! Today! Do I make myself perfectly clear?

According the City of Henderson’s City Attorney’s Brady/Giglio policy, it is misconduct for Henderson Chief of Police Dimitri Ikonitski to illegally withhold my phone from me. Consider this my misconduct7,8,9 complaint against Henderson Chief of Police Dimitri Ikonitski for illegally withholding my phone from me. You are directed to make this complaint known to the City of Henderson’s City Administrator Lon Berberich. My next instruction to you is to obtain the City of Henderson’s findings and bills for services rendered from the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension for the handwriting analysis that they did to determine

Page 1 of 5

whether or not I forged Anthony Cermak’s name to any document. Because I did not forge10,11,12,13 Cermak’s name to any document it has caused me to have reason to suspect that Henderson City Attorney Jason Moran and Henderson Chief of Police Dimitri Ikonitski are counting on Cermak to lie on the witness stand in Case Nos. 72-CR-20-81, 72-CR-20-83, and 72-CR-20-172. My third instruction is that I want those investigator files emailed to me immediately. Those are the files that I have repeatedly told Harvey that I wanted sent to me. I do not want a summary of the files, I want the actual documents and the actual audio files. I want to see and hear what information the investigator obtained from Myron Cermak. My final instruction to you is for you to get Case Nos. 72-CR-20-81, 72-CR-20-83, and 72-CR-20-172 dismissed, today!. All you want to do is continue to make my life a living hell be forcing me to go to these completely unnecessary settlement conferences. You know perfectly well that I do not have the money nor the resources to waste going to the 06-23-22 Settlement conferences. If you refuse to get my cases dismissed, then I want to see and hear Anthony Cermak engage in perjury on the witness stand during trial. Make this know to the court! Do I make myself perfectly clear? Good! Get it done! _____________________________________________________________

Jeremy Boles iisokrutoo@gmail.com

Footnotes:

1. Case No. 72-CR-20-81 State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles, Date of Incident: 03/11/2020 03/21/2020 Citation E-Filed 06/23/2022 Settlement Conference (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber) 06/28/2022 Jury Trial (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber) Case No. 72-CR-20-83 State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles, Date of Incident: 03/11/2020 03/21/2020 Citation E-Filed 06/23/2022 Settlement Conference (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber) 06/28/2022 Jury Trial (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber) Case No. 72-CR-20-172 State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles, Date of Incident: 05/24/2020 06/04/2020 Citation E-Filed 06/23/2022 Settlement Conference (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber) 06/28/2022 Jury Trial (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber)

Page 2 of 5

Case No. 72-CR-20-85 State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles, Date of Incident: 03/21/2020 03/23/2020 E-filed Comp-Order for Detention Index # 1 08/12/2021 Order-Evaluation for Competency to Proceed (Rule 20.01) Index # 51 (Judicial Officer: Donley, Amber ) 02/17/2022 Rule 20 Evaluation Report Index # 59 03/17/2022 Found Competent (Judicial Officer: Donley, Amber ) 06/16/2022 Motion to Dismiss Index # 65 06/20/2022 Order for Dismissal Index # 67 (Judicial Officer: Winters, Jody L. ) 06/23/2022 CANCELED Settlement Conference (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber) Dismissed 06/28/2022 CANCELED Jury Trial (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Donley, Amber) Dismissed

2. THE COURT: We are here for an omnibus hearing today. Mr. Dillon? MR. DILLON: Your Honor, thank you. At this time we'd like to set this matter on for a trial and a preceding settlement conference, submit probable cause on the record. THE COURT: All right. I'll review that complaint. I think we can get some dates and times. THE CLERK: How far out are you looking? I mean, I know February -- do you want to go into March? MR. DILLON: March is not good right now. Is April available? THE CLERK: Okay, let's look here. It would be -- April 27th would be the jury trial. And for settlement conference should -- do you want that in February or March? MR. DILLON: Let's do March. THE CLERK: Okay. How about March 11th at 1:00 p.m. MR. DILLON: That's fine. THE COURT: The Court has reviewed the complaint and notes that there is probable cause to support the charges. Mr. Lannoye, anything further? MR. LANNOYE: No, Your Honor. THE COURT: All right. Mr. Dillon, anything further? MR. DILLON: No, Your Honor. Thank you. THE COURT: Okay. Thank you. This hearing is concluded. Mr. Boles, you can disconnect. (Whereupon, the matter concluded.) Transcript of the Proceedings – Omnibus Hearing December 10, 2020. Appearances Donald E. Lannoye, Assistant County Attorney, appeared for and on behalf of the Plaintiff. John G. Dillon, Assistant Public Defender, appeared for and on behalf of the Defendant. 03/30/2021 Transcript 4 pages Case Details Case Number: 72-CR-20-85 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

3. 08/10/2021 Correspondence RE: Public Defender John G. Dillon Conspiring With Prosecutor To Sabotage Case No. 72-CR-20-85, 72-CR-20-81, 72-CR-20-83 and 72-CR-20-172. Index # 46 08/10/2021 Correspondence 15 pages Case Details Case Number: 72-CR-20-85 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Jeremy James Boles https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch

4. On February 4, 2022, I spoke with the prosecutor, Mr. Lannoye, who informed me he requested the evaluation of Mr. Bole’s competency to proceed because it appeared Mr. Boles believed people were out to get him and that was making the process difficult for his attorney. Page 7 of 8 John R. Anderson, Ph.D., LP Senior Clinical Forensic Psychologist Regional Psychological Services Confidential Forensic Evaluation Report (Rule 20.01) Date: February 16, 2022 Name: Jeremy James Boles DOB: February 1, 1978 Case: 72-CR-20-85. Jeremy James Boles 72-CR-20-85 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 2/17/2022 8:17 AM

5. Mr. Boles outlined a defense strategy and described feeling confident that he would be able to prove his case if he were to go to trial. He described the charges being dismissed as the best possible outcome

Page 3 of 5

in his case. When asked, he refused to consider the worst possible outcome in his case because he believed he was innocent. He conveyed that he does not trust the “system” and that he had concerns about receiving a fair trial related to the prosecution not providing recorded interviews of witnesses. He described his belief that he would be able to show the truth in trial. Mr. Boles stated he has been shown “firsthand that things are not being done legally” and he referenced a previous psychological evaluation conducted by an unlicensed psychologist (who was supervised by a licensed psychologist) who was later reprimanded for practicing without a license. Page 6 of 8. John R. Anderson, Ph.D., LP Senior Clinical Forensic Psychologist Regional Psychological Services Confidential Forensic Evaluation Report (Rule 20.01) Date: February 16, 2022 Name: Jeremy James Boles DOB: February 1, 1978 Case: 72-CR-20-85. Jeremy James Boles 72-CR-20-85 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 2/17/2022 8:17 AM

6. In sum, although his interpersonal style may be guarded and somewhat rigid, it is my opinion that Mr. Boles maintains the ability to consult with a reasonable degree of rational understanding with defense counsel and that he has the capacity to understand the criminal proceedings and participate in the defense. Page 7 of 8 John R. Anderson, Ph.D., LP Senior Clinical Forensic Psychologist Regional Psychological Services Confidential Forensic Evaluation Report (Rule 20.01) Date: February 16, 2022 Name: Jeremy James Boles DOB: February 1, 1978 Case: 72-CR-20-85. Jeremy James Boles 72-CR-20-85 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 2/17/2022 8:17 AM

7. 11. Professional Conduct of Police Officers Policy Law enforcement effectiveness depends upon community respect and confidence. Conduct which detracts from this respect and confidence is detrimental to the public interest and should be prohibited. The policy of this department is to investigate circumstances, which suggest an officer has engaged in unbecoming conduct, and impose disciplinary action when appropriate. Rules 1 Peace officers shall not knowingly exceed their authority in the enforcement of the law. 2 Peace officers shall not knowingly disobey the law or rules of criminal procedure in such areas as interrogation, arrest, detention, and searches. Seizures, use of informants and preservation of evidence. Except where permitted in the performance of duty under proper authority. 3 Peace officers shall not knowingly restrict the freedom of individuals, whether by arrest or detention, in violation of the Constitutions and laws of the United States and the State of Minnesota. Peace officers, whether on or off duty, shall not knowingly commit any criminal offense under any laws of the United States or any state or local jurisdiction in which the officer is present. Number: Policy Manual 10.00 Effective Date: January 2020 Subject: Officer Conduct & Discipline Reference: MSS 626.8457. Henderson, MN Police Department Mailing: PO Box 125, Henderson, MN 56044 Location: 600 Main St, Henderson, MN 56044 Chief Dmitri Ikonitski Effective Date: January 2020 Distribution: All personnel City of Henderson Henderson Police Department Policy Manual

8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJsR1i9xxFo Lion News: Henderson Chief Ikonitski illegally Withholds Myron Cermak’s Statement From Boles? 133 views Nov 30, 2021 https://lionnews00.blogspot.com/2021/08/jeremy-boles-asks-kevin-j-kajer-chief.html Lion News: Henderson Chief Ikonitski illegally Withholds Myron Cermak’s Statement From Boles?

9. 2. Upon execution of this policy, the Chief Law Enforcement Officer (County Sheriff or Police Chief) and Chief Administration Officer (Administratively, clerk) for each City and County will search the respective agency’s records any instance of SUSTAINED MISCONDUCT THAT RESULTED IN DISCIPLINE of any law enforcement employee, including the chief law enforcement officer, that relates to the following categories: A. False reports. B. Misconduct that reflects on truthfulness C. Racial, religious or personal bias. D. Promises, offers or inducement, including grants of immunity E. Mishandling of evidence or property

Page 4 of 5

F. Excessive Force G. Criminal convictions H. Harassment I. Inappropriate access to or dissemination of government data. J. Pending criminal charges K. Other sustained actions that clearly reflect on credibility. Joint Policy Regarding Brady/Giglio Information

10. Jeremy James Boles (02/01/1978) turned in information to Assistant Sibley County Public Defender John Dillon, who then turned the information over to Henderson City Attorney Jones provided several documents to the police department which included a copy of a lease agreement that indicates that it was signed by Anthony James Cermak (05/31/1996) as the property owner, and Boles and Erica Marie Stufflebeam (06/13/1980) as tenants to the property (208 S 3rd St) on 08/01/2019; an email from Excel Energy in regards to setting up an account dated on 09/24/2019; two hand written notes; and what appears to be a Facebook messenger conversation between Cermak and Boles. Attorney Jones asked that we follow up on the authenticity of the lease, if there was ever a termination of the lease, and if any rent was paid. I then contacted Cermak and asked if he would be willing to give another statement on the matter and he advised that he would. Cermak provided a written and recorded statement. See attached written statement. Supplemental Report ICR: 20000371 Title: 702 Report Last Modified: 12-14-2020 2017 Created By: Alex Schmidt Henderson Police Department.

11. I asked Cermak what his interpretation of these documents were, and he advised that this never happened and made a comment that his signature was forged Supplemental Report ICR: 20000371 Title: 702 Report Last Modified: 12-14-2020 2017 Created By: Alex Schmidt Henderson Police Department.

12. This report will be forwarded to the Sibley County Attorney's Office for review and possible charges in accordance to MN statute for aggravated forgery 609.625 subd. 1(1) against Jeremy Boles. Supplemental Report ICR: 20000371 Title: 702 Report Last Modified: 12-14-2020 2017 Created By: Alex Schmidt Henderson Police Department.

13. Questioned Documents The Questioned Documents section offers examination services in the areas of signature, handwriting, and hand printing identification; typewriter identification; indented writing; inks; papers; mechanical impressions; photocopier identification; alterations and obliterations; reconstruction of documents that have been burned or otherwise damaged; and the identification of counterfeit documents. Minnesota Department Of Public Safety Bureau Of Criminal Apprehension Forensic Science Service 2003 Annual Report https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/bca-divisions/forensic-science/Documents/2003%20Minnesota%20BCA%20Forensic%20Science%20Service%20Annual%20Report.pdf 14. File contents belong to the client and must be turned over to the client upon request. OPINION 13: COPYING COSTS By William J. Wernz, Director Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility Reprinted from Bench & Bar of Minnesota (August 1989) http://lprb.mncourts.gov/articles/Articles/Opinion%2013-%20Copying%20Costs%20%28Lawyers%20Professional%20Responsibility%20Board%20Opinion%20No.%2013%29.pdf