This is a high-profile case that proves that only certain people have to follow the law, isn't it? It is, isn't it?
Lion News: Dakota Co. Attorney Backstrom & Sheriff Bellows Abet Judge Knutson's Illegal Search?
And Dakota County Judge David Knutson feels that he is above the law, doesn't he? He does, doesn't he?
Lion News: Malicious Harassment Claims By Hastings Mayor Paul Hicks End When Notified That?
Instead of making his officers of the corrupt court fill out a probable cause statement for a warrant to search an attorney's camera ol' Judge Knutson just gave his thugs with badges and guns a "verbal court order" to search the camera, didn't he? He did, didn't he?
And according to the corrupt deputy's testimony it wasn't the first time that a "verbal court order" was used at the corrupt Dakota county court, was it? It wasn't, was it?
Lion News: Cover-Up Of Judge Knutson's Illegal Search Of Camera By Hastings Mayor Paul Hicks?
And I have no doubt that self-righteous Dakota county judge Knutson loves to lecture people who are in front of his corrupt court that they need to respect and follow the law, haven't I? I have, haven't it?
Lion News: Complaint Filed Against Hastings Mayor Hicks With Boss- Chief Clerk Mathiowetz?
So this data would be a prize piece for my corruption collection, wouldn't it? It would, wouldn't it?
And corrupt City of Hastings Mayor Paul Hicks knew that the data would be extremely damaging to the reputation of his corrupt city and corrupt county if this data ever ended up in my hands, right? That's right, isn't it?
That's why I started receiving passive-aggressive behavior immediately from the corrupt City of Hastings, isn't it? It is, isn't it?
And Mayor Paul Hick's part was try to provoke me into making some sort of comment that he could twist into a malicious harassment complaint against me, wasn't he? He was, wasn't he?
That way I would be too busy defending a malicious harassment charge to complain about the fact that all sorts of electronic data was missing from the data that I received, right?
That's right, isn't it? It is, isn't it?
This trumped up case is all about an attorney taking pictures in court without permission, isn't it? It is, isn't it?
So where are the "illegal" pictures that the attorney took that are supposed to be part of my data request, huh? They aren't here, are they? They aren't, are they?
Neither is the surveillance video, is it? It isn't, is it?
Finally, the order from the judge banning pictures/video in the court and the transcript of a hearing are missing also, aren't they?
They are, aren't they?
Too bad for the corrupt City of Hasting that I already had a copy of the transcript, isn't it? The transcript tells the whole story, doesn't it? And the transcript lists all of the missing data, doesn't it? It does, doesn't it? It is really hard for the corrupt officials to pretend that the data doesn't exist or make wild claims that they have given you all the data when you have the official record, right? That's right, isn't it? It is, isn't it?
More to come . . .
Related Links:
In The Minor Battle Of Wills (City Of Eagan VS. Terry Dean, Nemmers) We Can Declare An Early Victory, Can't We? The Victor Is Nemmers, Isn't It? (Thank You, Lord!) Fear Of Nemmers' Public Humilation Of City Of Hastings Mayor Paul Forced Eagan To Concede?
