It looks like Andrew "Buttinski" Henderson's Kangaroo court trial is set for September 9, 2013, doesn't it? The City of Little Canada wanted a rush on the perversion of justice, didn't they? Why? The first kangaroo court judge was sandbagging too long on the decision to throw out the frivolous motion to dismiss of the ACLU, wasn't he?
Register of Actions
Case No. 62SU-CR-12-4910
State of Minnesota vs ANDREW JOSEPH HENDERSON| 05/20/2013 | Hearing
(8:45 AM)
(Judicial Officer Wilson, Edward)
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/20/2013 | Other Document (Judicial Officer: Wilson, Edward ) | ||
| 05/20/2013 | Notice and Order to Appear (Judicial Officer: Wilson, Edward ) | ||
| 05/22/2013 | Hearing
(1:30 PM)
(Judicial Officer Wilson, Edward)
| ||
| 05/22/2013 | Memorandum | ||
| 05/22/2013 | Affidavit of Service | ||
| 05/22/2013 | Taken Under Advisement (Judicial Officer: Wilson, Edward ) | ||
| 08/19/2013 | Order Denying Motion | ||
| 08/21/2013 | Notice and Order to Appear | ||
| 09/09/2013 | Jury Trial (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Alshouse, Diane R.) |
And it would appear that the first kangaroo court judge Edward Wilson is being replaced by kangaroo court judge Diane Alshouse, wouldn't it?
Kangaroo court. Term descriptive of a sham legal proceeding in which a person's rights are totally disregarded and in which the result is a forgone conclusion because of the bias of the court or other tribunal. Black's Law Dictionary, 5th Edition, Page 780.
I wonder if "Buttinski" Henderson's frivolous litigants called the ACLU have informed him that the facts don't matter in a kangaroo court, don't I?
It has been stated of witnesses in court that what they say is not as important as how they say it. Unfortunately, an anxious, rambling, absent-minded witness who is telling the truth is less likely to believed than a lying witness who comes across as confident, unyielding, and certain. The witness who comes across as must appreciate what lawyers have known for years: the courtroom is a stage where attorney's carefully direct a drama wherein witnesses unfold their story before the jury's eyes. The jury represents the audience of this production and the witnesses become players. In this carefully constructed arena, the witness needs to fit the jury's image of someone who is telling the truth. Fred E. Inbau, John E. Reid, Joseph P. Buckley, Brian C. Jayne, Criminal Interrogation and Confessions, 4th Ed., page 454.
I wouldn't count on it, would I?
Settle it therefore in your hearts, not to meditate before what ye shall answer: For I will give you a mouth and wisdom, which all your adversaries shall not be able to gainsay nor resist. Luke 21:14-15 King James Version (KJV)
My letter to the ACLU:
More to come ...
Related Posts:
State of Minnesota vs ANDREW JOSEPH HENDERSON - Case No. 62SU-CR-12-4910: Judge Steamrolls Over Frivolous ACLU Defense?
State of Minnesota vs ANDREW JOSEPH HENDERSON - Case No. 62SU-CR-12-4910
Internal Affairs Complaint VS Ramsey Co.'s Randall Gustafson - Contemptuous Attitude?
Will Ramsey County Deputies Charge Andrew "Buttinski" Henderson For Giving A Deputy "The Bird" ... AKA "The Finger"?
