https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609.48
609.48 PERJURY.
Subdivision 1. Acts constituting.
Whoever makes a false material statement not believing it to be true in any of the following cases is guilty of perjury and may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 4:
(1) in or for an action, hearing or proceeding of any kind in which the statement is required or authorized by law to be made under oath or affirmation;
Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. Exodus 20:16 King James Version (KJV)
A little more context okay?
Officers conducting all criminal investigations will, whenever possible, record oral victim and witness statements in lieu of written statements. Statement evidence obtained during an initial investigation can be very powerful evidence in determining the course of an investigation; ultimately impacting charging decisions and convictions. Policy Duluth Police Department 325 Duluth PD Policy Manual http://www.duluthmn.gov/media/304979/release_20171106_t124845_duluth_pd_policy_manual.pdf
Preliminary statement of Sarah Brodkorb:
Eagan Police Department 3830 Pilot Knob Rd Eagan, MN 55122 651) 675- 5700 Case #: EA18004549 Incident #: EA18004549
On 8/13/18 at 23:12 I was dispatched to 4136 Countryview Dr. to a report of a possible harassment issue. I was met at the door by Sarah Brodkorb and her husband, Michael Brodkorb. Sarah and Micheal showed me a picture that had been taken at the outlet mall in Eagan on Saturday by an unknown person. The photo had been posted to a Twitter account with the name of Jane Johnson, @johnsonmedia2. Famous Footwear. The photo was of Sarah and her daughter at the register at Neither Sarah nor her daughter appear to know that the photo was taken. In checking her receipt, Sarah was able to tell me that she was at the register at Famous Footwear on 8/11/ 18 at 12: 58: 33. The photo is captioned " Sarah # mbrodkorb # missinginminnesota spending money received from David Rucki via stolen from # grazzinirucki caught trust and Minneasota. evavoid" Micheal and Sarah believe that whoever took this photo is in some way connected to Sandra Grazzini Rucki. ... Micheal covered this story as a journalist and is also writing a book about the incident. Micheal mentioned that he has been harassed by this group of people for some time. ... I spoke with Sarah regarding her day at the mall. She said that she never noticed anything unusual that day. She said they went from Famous Footwear to the food court and had lunch. From there they went to the Asic' s store, then Old Navy and then left the area. She didn' t notice anything else that appeared noteworthy at the time. Micheal and Sarah are concerned for their safety at this point. This case status should be considered open/active with Investigations to follow up. SUPPLEMENT SPIESS/ 133 DANIEL 33133 33133 33133 2018SPIESS, 08/17/ 08/15/18, 1028 hours:
Printed On 10/24/2018 Page 3, 4 of 7 Printed By VASQUEZ, LYNN (emphasis added)
The perjury comes from when Sarah maliciously changes her 8-13-18 testimony from no commotion to commotion, doesn't it? It does, doesn't it?
Sarah Brodkorb - Cross Examination - Page 25-28.
By Mr. Hanson (Note: Court reporter isn't competent enough to figure out that Dede isn't Hansen, right?)
Q. So, Sarah, this is from Officer Lejcher's report. He's the one that came to your home that evening.
MR. HANSEN: Could you refer to her as Ms. Brodkorb, please. (Note: So much for attorneys directing all objections to judge, right?)
THE RESPONDENT: What did I say?
MR. HANSEN: Sarah.
THE RESPONDENT: Oh, I'm sorry.
BY THE RESPONDENT:
Q. Ms. Brodkorb, on 8/13 at 11:15 he was dispatched to your residence. Was met at the door by Sarah and her husband, Michael Brodkorb. Showed me a picture that was taken at the outlet mall. The photo has been posted to a Twitter account with the name of Jane Johnson. The photo was of Sarah and her daughter at the register at Famous Footwear. Neither Sarah nor her daughter appeared to know the photo was taken. Then the statement that you made under oath during Diane Ristau's hearing, you said there was a commotion actually 22 times in the hearing. So I guess my question is which one is true out of those two statements?
A. I'm sorry, which statements are you specifically asking about?
Q. About you said you guys didn't even know anything had taken place that day, that the photo had been taken, and then during the hearing with Diane Ristau 22 times you talked about commotion, a production.
A. Both are true.
Q. Okay.
A. I was not aware the photo was being taken, but there was a commotion that day, as I testified to. Or there was something going on in the corner. I at this point in this photo was looking at my other daughter.
Q. Okay. So did you make that statement to Officer Lejcher that night?
A. Which statement?
Q. That there was a commotion and you knew things were going on.
A. Yes, I did.
Q. Okay. And that is not in the report.
A. That is true. We had that conversation I think when we were here -- I can't remember the date -- last time that we were here with Ms. Ristau. I absolutely had that conversation. I know where I was standing in the kitchen at my table and how I explained it to him.
Q. And did you record that conversation?
A. No.
Q. I say that because I know that Michael likes to record lots of conversation.
THE COURT: I'm not interested in your comments, Ms. Evavold.
THE RESPONDENT: All right.
THE COURT: Ask questions.
THE RESPONDENT: Okay.
September 29, 2018 SLAPP suit hearing for Sarah Beth Brodkorb, Michael Brodkorb, and O/B/O Minor Children (AB, BB, EB), Petitioners, and Deidre Elise Evavold, Respondent. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS File No. 19AV-CV-18-2157. Dakota County Minnesota.
Sarah Brodkorb - Cross Examination - Page 29-30.
BY THE RESPONDENT:
Q. That's why I would question, you know, if you knew for sure because you may have a recording of that. Then another thing that was talked about is that you're not a public figure. What my question would be is were you a public figure when you did the press release on your husband after the DUI and the crashing into the bridge?
A. No.
Q. Okay. So being a public figure, even a limited purpose --
THE COURT: You get to ask questions. That's what you get to ask.
THE RESPONDENT: Yeah.
BY THE RESPONDENT:
Q. So you're saying you're not a public figure. Public figures usually do press releases.
THE COURT: That is not a question.
BY THE RESPONDENT: Were you a public figure when you filed domestic abuse against your husband?
A. What --
Q. And it came out --
MR. HANSEN: Objection.
THE COURT: The objection is sustained. That has no relevance here.
THE RESPONDENT: It has relevance because it was out in the public and it didn't identify --
THE COURT: No, it doesn't have relevance. I decide what has relevance. The objection is sustained.
September 29, 2018 SLAPP suit hearing for Sarah Beth Brodkorb, Michael Brodkorb, and O/B/O Minor Children (AB, BB, EB), Petitioners, and Deidre Elise Evavold, Respondent. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS File No. 19AV-CV-18-2157. Dakota County Minnesota.
Note: Does Dede sound like an intelligent person who wisely used the two (2) week continuance for her SLAPP suit to prepare for her court appearance OR Does Dede sound like a drunken idiot who squandered the two (2) week continuance by yelling, screaming and throwing a childish fit? If you came to the reasonable conclusion that Dede only prepped the night before the hearing, then you came to the correct conclusion, didn't you? FYI: Dede is the drunken idiot who bragged that she could handle testifying under oath if she could just smoke a cigarette on the witness stand, isn't she? You can't fix stupid, can you?
Sarah Brodkorb - Cross Examination - Page 29-30.
BY THE RESPONDENT:
Q. Okay. Wasn't the public spotlight on you when you filed the false police report?
MR. HANSEN: Objection.
THE WITNESS: I don't know what she's talking about.
THE COURT: Do you have a date on that?
BY THE RESPONDENT:
Q. Yeah, the police report that was filed against Diane Ristau, Carrie Beaudette.
By making that you're putting out a public record, willing to --
THE WITNESS: I don't know what she is asking me.
THE COURT: I don't know what she is asking you.
BY THE RESPONDENT:
Q. That's a public figure. My question is you say that you don't want any of the spotlight on you, and yet there's numerous times where the spotlight has been put on you.
THE COURT: That is not a question.
BY THE RESPONDENT:
Q. So you're not going to answer where you --
THE COURT: Well, the question is ridiculous, Ms. Evavold. Somebody that files a police report is not a public figure. Otherwise everybody would be a public figure.
THE RESPONDENT: Okay, well, that's to be argued.
September 29, 2018 SLAPP suit hearing for Sarah Beth Brodkorb, Michael Brodkorb, and O/B/O Minor Children (AB, BB, EB), Petitioners, and Deidre Elise Evavold, Respondent. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS File No. 19AV-CV-18-2157. Dakota County Minnesota.
Note: Who was enabling Dede in this two (2) week self-destructive temper tantrum? Did you guess Angela Young aka Angela French? If you did, then you were right on the mark, weren't you?
Search/Verify a License Last Name: Young First: Angela Results: Results 1 matches found Young, Angela M LMFT 1547 Active Name Young, Angela M Type 1547 - Marriage and Family Therapist Status Active Issued Jan 19, 2007 Last Renewed Jan 1, 2018 Expiration Dec 31, 2018. Board of Marriage and Family Therapy https://mft.hlb.state.mn.us/#/services/onlineLicenseSearch
Angela has failed in her repeated attempts to gaslight me, hasn't she? She has, hasn't she? Angela sabotaged Dede high-profile criminal case no. 19HA-CR-15-4227 by enabling another one of Dede's self-destructive temper tantrums, didn't she? She did, didn't she? Angela arbitrarily and capriciously decided that Dede didn't need the preliminary audio statements of Douglas Dahlen, Gina Dahlen, Samantha Rucki nor Gianna Rucki, didn't she? She did, didn't she? Not only does Angela deny this well-documented fact but she is trying to rewrite history on this well-documented fact, isn't she? She is, isn't she?
2. They deny they ever said something, even though you have proof. You know they said they would do something; you know you heard it. But they out and out deny it. It makes you start questioning your reality—maybe they never said that thing. And the more they do this, the more you question your reality and start accepting theirs. 11 Warning Signs of Gaslighting Gaslighting is a manipulation tactic used to gain power. And it works too well. By Stephanie A. Sarkis Ph.D., Posted Jan 22, 2017 https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/here-there-and-everywhere/201701/11-warning-signs-gaslighting
Sarah Brodkorb - Cross Examination - Page 31-32.
BY THE RESPONDENT:
Q. How about when your husband was having an affair with Amy Koch?
MR. HANSEN: Objection.
THE COURT: Sustained.
BY THE RESPONDENT:
Q. In the commotion that was happening, you talked about the commotion happening in front of you, why aren't you looking at the camera?
A. I would not have known someone was specifically taking a picture of me. I thought they were just people who were shopping in an odd kind of manner, again, commotion. As I stated multiple times, I'm looking at my other daughter.
Q. Normally if there is a commotion in production, a person is going to look to that area; wouldn't you agree?
THE COURT: That is not a question.
BY THE RESPONDENT:
Q. Okay. Do you think people would look to where the sound is
coming from?
A. Depends.
Q. All right. The other question I have, I note that you stated that you have concerns about another picture being taken. You made a lot of statements in the transcript that you were extremely anxious, your anxiety has been high.
You're fearful to go out in public. That you've been working with doctors because of the anxiety. Did you bring any documents for that?
A. No.
Q. Okay. What's the name of your doctor?
MR. HANSEN: Objection; relevance.
THE COURT: Sustained. Why is that relevant to this?
THE RESPONDENT: Because it is saying it was causing that much anxiety for a photo to be taken.
THE WITNESS: I understand that's privileged under HIPAA laws.
THE COURT: Well, I don't see how it is relevant who her doctor is when we are talking about a picture.
September 29, 2018 SLAPP suit hearing for Sarah Beth Brodkorb, Michael Brodkorb, and O/B/O Minor Children (AB, BB, EB), Petitioners, and Deidre Elise Evavold, Respondent. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS File No. 19AV-CV-18-2157. Dakota County Minnesota.
Sarah Brodkorb - Cross Examination - Page 32-35.
THE RESPONDENT: Again, it is making statements putting it in a record that this is, like I said --
THE WITNESS: I absolutely stand on my statement, but I don't feel the need to provide my doctor's name.
THE COURT: You don't have to. The objection has been sustained. She doesn't have to answer the question.
THE RESPONDENT:
BY THE RESPONDENT:
Q. Okay. The other question -- oh, I don't have any other questions I guess with that. You talked about -- again, I'm trying to establish the relevance of being a public figure, because, again, we could say that about my husband. Yeah, we have pictures of my husband at my house being taken. So I guess I wouldn't -- how do you see a difference in that?
MR. HANSEN: So I guess Objection; it doesn't sound like a question.
BY THE RESPONDENT:
Q. It is a question. How do you see a difference in --
Yeah, they are right there on your husband's website. So he's taken photos at my home that we have.
A. I don't know what pictures of your husband. I don't know what you're talking about.
THE COURT: I'm not quite sure how you think she's responsible for that.
BY THE RESPONDENT:
Q. Well, I'm saying how would it be any different that you have privacy rights and my husband wouldn't have that as well? I'm just establishing is there two sets of rules here?
A. I don't think your husband is a minor. I have minor children that are in this photo.
Q. You think -- is it illegal to take photos of people in a public place, including children?
MR. HANSEN: Objection; calls for legal conclusion.
THE COURT: Sustained. She is not a lawyer. I don't know how she would know that.
BY THE RESPONDENT:
Q. Yeah, it's not. So I guess that's what my question is. How this became anything when there is not a harassment. I guess I wouldn't see this rising to the level of a harassment restraining order.
MR. HANSEN: Objection; she's got to ask a question. She is just talking.
BY THE RESPONDENT:
Q. How do you think it rises to the level?
MR. HANSEN: Objection; calls for speculation.
THE COURT: She can answer that question. Overruled.
THE WITNESS: Well, I already have two -- or me, my children and my husband already have two HRO's that have stayed in place after being in this courtroom. So obviously it's been determined by a court of law that harassment has occurred.
BY THE RESPONDENT:
Q. Okay. So do you have any proof that I have received that photo?
A. The court testimony of Carrie Beaudette and Diane Ristau.
Q. Did they say that I received that?
A. I believe Ms. Beaudette did, because she also spoke about how she spoke with you, and she was very angry about what had occurred with the photo after it had been sent to you.
Q. Right. And, again, it's never been verified that I received that.
A. Well, it hasn't been verified that you haven't --
THE COURT: That is not a question. Just ask your question.
BY THE RESPONDENT:
Q. Was it verified that it was sent to Angie?
A. Ms. Beaudette testified in court that she sent the photo to an Angela Young.
Q. Again, so that's been testified that it's been sent. But, again, do you have any information that they were actually received?
A. I don't recall her saying having -- I'm not sure. I don't recall if she had a conversation with Angela Young. Only that she had conversations with Ms. Evavold about the photos being sent and received.
Q. Okay. Again, I would disagree with that. I don't think that's ever been established.
MR. HANSEN: Objection; argument with the witness.
September 29, 2018 SLAPP suit hearing for Sarah Beth Brodkorb, Michael Brodkorb, and O/B/O Minor Children (AB, BB, EB), Petitioners, and Deidre Elise Evavold, Respondent. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS File No. 19AV-CV-18-2157. Dakota County Minnesota.
The various types of gaslighting have in common two defining features. The first is an attempt to impair or destroy an individual's confidence in his or her psychic abilities. After this first aim has been achieved, the second aim is to attain control over the feelings, thoughts, and behaviors of the victim. By making another person feel fearful, guilty, or ashamed, the manipulator is in a position to gain control over the other individual's affects, thoughts, and behaviors by substituting his own beliefs. This is the basic mechanism of gaslighting whether used in everyday life, in psychotherapy situations, or in the thought-reform and mind-control manipulations of cult leaders. Some advertising and many social interactions in which one person attempts to gain control over another are based on this principle.” Gaslighting, The Double Whammy, Interrogation and Other Covert Control in Psychotherapy & Analysis, Theo L. Dorpat (Maryland: 2004), Page 7.
Note: Gaslighter Young's favorite tactic is to set herself up as the decider of what will work and what won't work, isn't it? It is, isn't it? You can tell that incompetent clown Young is gaslighting, can't you? You can, can't you? Incompetent clown Young is gaslighting when she ridicules tactics that have worked previously, isn't she? She is, isn't she? Incompetent clown Young is gaslighting when she can only ridicule but magically & mysteriously can never ever come up an effect plan herself, right? That's right, isn't it?
Appeal to Ridicule reductio ad ridiculum (also known as: appeal to mockery, the horse laugh) Description: Presenting the argument in such a way that makes the argument look ridiculous, usually by misrepresenting the argument or the use of exaggeration. https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/42/Appeal-to-Ridicule
Sarah Brodkorb - Cross Examination - Page 35-35.
BY THE RESPONDENT:
Q. I have one more thing I wanted to say. So, again, to your knowledge has anybody been able to determine whose account that is and who actually posted that?
A. To my knowledge, no.
Q. No. So that would really be -- don't you think the final question is who posted that?
A. I think that would be a question you might be able to answer.
Q. That's not -- I'm not on the stand.
A. I don't have an answer for that.
THE RESPONDENT: I'm all -- all right. I have no further questions.
THE COURT: Mr. Hansen, do you have any questions?
MR. HANSEN: Nothing further, Your Honor, for this
THE COURT: You may step down, Ms. Brodkorb. Thank you.
September 29, 2018 SLAPP suit hearing for Sarah Beth Brodkorb, Michael Brodkorb, and O/B/O Minor Children (AB, BB, EB), Petitioners, and Deidre Elise Evavold, Respondent. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS File No. 19AV-CV-18-2157. Dakota County Minnesota.
Definition of commotion
1 : a condition of civil unrest or insurrection The commotion was finally brought to an end and peace was restored. ...
4a : an agitated disturbance : to-do the commotion caused by the president's visit b : noisy confusion : agitation The commotion backstage had brought the play to a stop. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/commotion
Definition of production
1a : something produced : product
b
(1) : a literary or artistic work
(2) : a work presented to the public (as on the stage or screen or over the air)
c : something exaggerated out of proportion to its importance
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/production
... LIE Principle. (L) When the defendant takes the witness stand and proclaims his innocence, he's Lying. You did your job in the charging stage. You believe in your case. You do not prosecute the innocent. Well, if the defendant says he is innocent, then he must be lying. You must believe this with all your heart and nerve and sinew. If you ever begin to think maybe the defendant is telling the truth, then you can be assured that the jury is having the same thoughts. (I) If he is lying, then his story will be Illogical. If the truth is that he is guilty. Then his lie about his innocence must be fatally flawed. (E) You can Exploit the illogic. If the jury can see the implausibility, then they will not believe the story. The LIE Procedure How do you exploit the implausibility” You follow the LIE Procedure: (L) Listen. You must, at all costs listen to the defendant's story. You cannot sit there fretting about what questions you are going to ask. You must listen, and listen intently. (I) If you listen intently enough, you can Identify the illogic. You sit there and you hear it, and all your being shouts to you, “That doesn't make sense!” (E) Now that you have identified the illogic, you must Expose it. You strip all extraneous data from the illogic and make it impossible for the jury to miss. George R. Dekle, Sr, Prosecution Principles: A Clinical Handbook (Thompson/West:2007), Page 270.
Eagan Police Detective Daniel Spiess to admit he destroyed criminal investigative data aka City property, right? That's right, isn't it?
Daniel Spiess - Cross on Page 17
THE COURT: The question is why you didn't record these conversations. You should be able to answer that.
THE WITNESS: Yes. So what I can tell you, some conversations I did record, and some I did not. I don't record every single conversation I have with someone. I don't record conversations -- I don't record every conversation I have with someone. I just don't. I would say that is standard. You don't record every single conversation you have with someone. In specific instances, yes, you do. But not in every single one. So I did record my conversations originally with Ms. Ristau and Ms. Beaudette. After speaking with them, I did not believe that they needed to be put in the case file folder, and they were deleted.
October 29, 2018 SLAPP suit hearing for Sarah Beth Brodkorb, Michael Brodkorb, and O/B/O Minor Children (AB, BB, EB), Petitioners, and Deidre Elise Evavold, Respondent. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS File No. 19AV-CV-18-2157. Dakota County Minnesota.
Did a drunken idiot, a gaslighting enabler or an intelligent person, write this?
Judicial Officer Michael Baxter 10-30-18
14955 Galaxie Ave. West
Apple Valley, MN 55124
Phone: (952) 891-7256
Re: Sanctions in Case No.19AV-CV-18-2157
I’m demanding Rule 11.03 (Mn Statute 549.211) monetary sanctions 1,2 be levied against Michael Brodkorb and Sarah Brodkorb for filing their frivolous and malicious Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) suit against me. I’m also demanding Rule 11.03 (Mn Statute 549.211) monetary sanctions be levied against the Brodkorb’s attorney Nathan Hansen for defending what he knew or should have known was a frivolous and malicious SLAPP suit. I have reason to suspect that the Brodkorb’s and Hansen’s malicious plan was to harass me, to defame me, to financially drain me and to derail my mission to obtain a new trial for my high-profile criminal case no. 19HA-CR-15-4227.
Both myself and my witness Carrie Lynn Baudette were forced to drive for approximately 1.5 hours one way for the 9 AM, October 29, 2018 hearing for the Brodkorb’s and Hansen’s frivolous and malicious SLAPP suit. The Brodkorb’s and Hansen needlessly increased the cost of litigation by refusing to answer both Carrie’s and my phone calls. I have place my recordings of the calls to and from Hansen on my Red Herring Alert YouTube channel:
Attorney Nathan Hansen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ud4DEWkEn4o Attorney Nathan Hansen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1P3sT90RrA Calls to Nathan Hansen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYS9uAVHTtc
Plus, the Brodkorb’s and Hansen needlessly increased the cost of litigation by refusing to provide myself and my witness with the exculpatory evidence aka audio recordings and video files Michael Brodkorb (The Grand Old Party Tracker) interviewing with Famous Footwear employee McKenzie Poehler, Famous Footwear Assistant Manager Kalena Miller, Famous Footwear Manager Rachel Karin, and Twin Cities Premium Outlet head of Security Dan Moots.
I have a reasonable suspicion that Michael Brodkorb audio (personal audio recorder) and video (surveillance and GoPro video) recorded his conversations with Poehler, Miller, Karin, Moots.
Michael Brodkorb � @mbrodkorb Below is video and audio of Mr. Shimota at my home last Thursday. As seen in the video, I accepted service of the lawsuit, but told him to never come to my home again. I walked him off my property, repeating my request that neither he, nor his wife, come to my home again. 0:40 12:21 PM - 18 Jun 2018 3 Retweets 6 Likes PKY Kimberly's Waking Nightmare Annette Meeks Trevor Squire slarry21 Lori Musolf Nathan M. Hansen 2 replies 3 retweets 6 likes https://twitter.com/mbrodkorb/statuses/1008791824457240576 Michael Brodkorb � @mbrodkorb A trip to the store with @sarah.brodkorb. She wasn't a big fan of me trying out my new @gopro headset. 4:20 PM - 27 Dec 2015 1 Retweet 3 Likes mark Kathie Roberts Michael McCarron Carl Ghoul 2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes https://twitter.com/mbrodkorb/status/681268469325770752 Page 1 of 9
It is a matter of the public record 3.4 that in high-profile case no. 19HA-CR-15-4227 so-called journalist 5 Michael Brodkorb surreptitiously audio recorded 6 his conversation with me. Not only did so-called journalist Brodkorb not ask me if I wanted my conversation to be on the record or not, but so-called journalist Brodkorb never informed 5 his readers that he had surreptitiously audio recorded our conversation. So-called journalist Brodkorb purposefully avoided informing his readers that he had edited out damning statements 7 that he had made about the Dakota County courts 8 and their treatment of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki.
It defies logic that so-called journalist Michael Brodkorb would magically and mysteriously deviate from his standard operating procedure in regard to audio/video recording his interviews of Poehler, Miller, Karin, Moots. It also defies logic that so-called journalist Michael Brodkorb would magically and mysteriously not have surveillance video or an audio recording of his late night false police report with Eagan Police Officer Anthony Lejcher. Just as it defies logic that so-called journalist Michael Brodkorb would not have audio recorded his false police report with Eagan Detective Daniel Spiess.
I am aware that Famous Footwear’s Karin and Miller have stated that they had no knowledge of the alleged “commotion” at Famous Footwear on 8-11-18. I am also aware that Karin and Miller have stated that they only learned of the alleged “commotion” from Michael Brodkorb when he arrived at the store with Moots on 8-14-18. I know this because another individual obtained audio recorded statements from Karin, Miller and Moots.
It would seem crystal clear that the Brodkorb’s and Hansen willfully refused to communicate with me or provide me with the Brodkorb’s exculpatory evidence because they knew that the exculpatory evidence would prove my assertion that the SLAPP suit was a SLAPP suit. Which is why the Brodkorb’s and Hansen want to drive up the costs of this frivolous and malicious litigation by forcing me to subpoena them.
Attorney Hansen knew or should have knew that his clients were engaging in perjury when Sarah Brodkorb magically and mysteriously changed her story of “no commotion” that was reported in the Eagan police report 9 to “commotion” when she was under oath on the witness stand 11 . Attorney Hansen knew or should have knew that his client Michael Brodkorb engaged in perjury 12,13 when he made the wild and outrageous claim that Diane Ristau had pursued Sarah Brodkorb when Michael Brodkorb had provide no objective evidence 14 (aka surveillance video) to substantiate his wild and outrageous assertion.
I did file a criminal complaint with the Eagan Police department against so-called journalist Michael Brodkorb in regard this SLAPP suit. However, magically and mysteriously Eagan Police Chief has willfully refused to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act by his willful refusal to provide me with the public portion of my initial criminal complaint. My criminal complaint was filed against so-called journalist Michael Brodkorb for filing a false police report, harassment, witness tampering and perjury.
As a matter of fact, I am not the only one to accuse so-called journalist Michael Brodkorb of engaging in perjury. Attorneys Dale Nolan and Christopher Harristhal also accused so-called journalist Michael Brodkorb of engaging in perjury. 14 So-called journalist Michael Brodkorb was accused of perjury in the the high-profile case Brodkorb v. Minnesota, State of et al, No.
Page 2 of 9
0:2012cv01958. The reason not a lot of people knew about so-called journalist Michael Brodkorb’s perjury in that instance was because those allegations were dropped as part of a settlement agreement. 15 Did I forget to mention, that it is a matter of the public record that so- called journalist Michael Brodkorb was interferring 16 with the police investigation in my high- profile case? Case #:EA18004549
It is also a matter of the public record that so-called journalist Michael Brodkorb was upset with Fox 9 reporter Trish Van Pilsum 17 for not working closer with local law enforcement 18 in the high-profile Sandra Grazzini-Rucki case. Which is probably why so-called journalist Michael Brodkorb purposely avoided reporting that fact that Dakota County Judge David Knutson filed a false police report 19 in regard to the @Johnsonmedia2 Twitter account. Which is probably also why so-called journalist Michael Brodkorb purposely avoided reporting the fact that one of his fellow hacks, Laura Adelmann, was intimidating jurors 20 during Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’ high-profile trial.
Michael Brodkorb, Sarah Brodkorb and their attorney Nathan Hansen have been using some of the malicious prosecution tactics against me as Dakota County Attorney James Backstrom used in rigged case no. 19HA-CR-15-4227 and Lakeville City Attorney Eilliot Knetsch used in rigged case no. 19AV-CR-17-16709. I demanding that Michael Brodkorb’s, Sarah Brodkorb’s and their attorney Nathan Hansen SLAPP suit to end today. And I am demanding that the Brodkorb’s and their attorney Nathan Hansen are sanctioned. ___________________________________________
Dede Evavold dedeevavold@hotmail.com
3015 30th Street Ct. South 320-293-6233
St. Cloud, MN 56301
Faxed to: 651-704-9604 Nathan Hansen, Attorney Faxed to: (612) 455-6960 Andrew Putz, MinnPost editor Faxed to: 952-846-2010 Tad Johnson, Managing Editor/Dakota County/Letters to the Editor
Faxed to: (952) 891-7285 Heidi J. Carstensen, Court Administrator Faxed to: (651) 437-3750 Brian Jones, District Administrator Faxed to: 212 564-5363 Mary Rasenberger, Executive Director of the Authors' Guild
Faxed to: 317-920-4789 Alison Bethel McKenzie, Executive Director Society of Professional Journalists
Footnotes: 1. Subd. 2. Effect of acknowledgment. By presenting to the court, whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating, a pleading, written motion, or other paper, an attorney or unrepresented party is certifying that to the best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances: (1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; 549.211 Sanctions in civil actions. 2. 11.02 Representations to Court By presenting to the court (whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating) a pleading, written motion, or other document, an attorney or self-represented litigant is certifying that to the best of the person's knowledge, information,
Page 3 of 9
and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances: (a) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; Minnesota court rules – Civil procedure
3. On 062216 at 1430 hours I received an email from David Rucki containing an audio recording. I spoke with David on the phone and he explained to me that the recording was a conversation that Michael Brodkorb recorded between himself (Brodkorb) and Dede Evavold. He said the conversation was had in September of 2015. Dede said that David Rucki is a “pawn in all of this,” and it’s a dirty system. She said she felt bad for the entire family, including David. Lakeville Police Department Supplement Report Case/Incident Number 13001278. Current Date: 062316. Date Processed 6/29/16. 13001278 N Polinski 062316.docx
4. The interview with Evavold, from September 2015, contradicts many of the statements made by Evavold since she was charged related to the disappearance of the two girls. ... Reached today by phone, Evavold declined to comment about our interview from September 2015. In interview, Dede Evavold expressed sympathy for David Rucki June 27, 2016. By Michael Brodkorb http://missinginminnesota.com/in-interview-dede-evavold-expressed- sympathy-for-david-rucki/
5. Case No. 18-009299-FD Order Case Documents Sandra Sue Grazzini-Rucki Vs. Michael Bernard Brodkorb 10/10/2018 Exhibit Doc # 16 1 Society Of Profssional Journalist 10/10/2018 Exhibit Doc # 17 2 The Authors Guild Inc
6. Seek Truth and Report It Ethical journalism should be accurate and fair. Journalists should be honest and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information. Journalists should: Avoid undercover or other surreptitious methods of gathering information unless traditional, open methods will not yield information vital to the public. Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics. https://www.spj.org/pdf/spj-code-of-ethics.pdf
7. Although failure to investigate will not alone support a finding of actual malice, see St. Amant, 390 U.S., at 731, 733, the purposeful avoidance of the truth is in a different category. ... This evidence of an intent to avoid the truth was not only sufficient to convince the plurality that there had been an extreme departure from professional publishing standards, but it was also sufficient to satisfy the more demanding New York Times standard applied by Chief Justice Warren, 39 Justice Brennan, and Justice White. Harte-Hanks Communs. v. Connaughton, 491 U.S. 657 (1989).
8. MR. BRODKORB: I will tell you this to you, and I’ve said this to people as – as – as someone, you know, there are – there are basically – I’ve – I’ve met two people – two types of people: people that – that think the family court system is horrible and that Sandra’s been –
MS. EVAVOLD: (Inaudible) family – well –
MR. BRODKORB: – victimized by it and has been abused by it. There are other people who say that the family court system is wrong but, you know, Sam’s – that Sam – Sandra’s done a lot of pushing too in the system, I subscribe to this – this is my position. I believe that – I knew David Knutson when he was a state senator, And I’ve read – and I printed off and read almost every order and document in this case. I think that this case is a – is – is an abomination. I think that the family court system failed. It failed kids.
MS. EVAVOLD: Well, it didn’t fail. It’s designed very well.
MR. BRODKORB: Well, it’s –
MS. EVAVOLD: We know that, I – I don’t say it’s broken. It’s very well designed. MR. BRODKORB: The system – whatever – however it’s --
MS. EVAVOLD: It’s designed to –
Page 4 of 9
MR. BRODKORB: However it’s – however it’s constructed, whether – whether you want to say it’s by design or by what, then that result, I think we can maybe agree upon, is that it ain’t working.
MS. EVAVOLD: (Inaudible) – restore all these people, it’s going to be a lot. And that means a team of good people that step forward and say, “We want to do the right thing, We’re going to restore these lives.”
MR. BRODKORB: Okay.
MS. EVAVOLD: And if that’s done (inaudible).
MR. BRODKORB: So what – so what does – yes, but I also – but I also don’t necessarily – I don’t believe that while the court system is – been very wrong in this process – and I think stems from – and I – I – I – you know, having know Knutson – I knew knutson before he was a judge. The last time I saw --
MS. EVAVOLD: So are you saying you knew him in a good way? MR. BRODKORB: No, no. Let me just – I’ll just be – I saw David Knutson – I – I knew David Knutson when he was a state senator. I never --
MS. EVAVOLD: (Inaudible)
MR. BRODKORB: I only – the last time I saw Knutson was, I think, in 2007 when Pawlenty was inaugurated for his second term. So that’s the last time I’ve ever seen him and I – that I remember. I have tried repeatedly to interview him, to speak with him about this case. The person that I probably tried to interview the most has been David Knutson and anyone affiliated with the court system. I’ve gone down to the court. I’ve called him. I have done everything I could to try to get him to speak on the record. I’ve contacted – I’ve spoken with his clerk, spoke – spoken with everyone that I could possibly think of to try to get him to speak. There is no – I said – and I believe this: There is – if – if someone reviews the – the – the matters involved in this case and doesn’t immediately come to the conclusion that there has been – there – there is problems in – in the family court system, they are purposely trying further not to be a problem with the court system because –
MS. EVAVOLD: Right.
MR. BRODKORB: – a blind person can see that. But I will say to you -- MS. EVAVOLD: Yep.
MR. BRODKORB: – I don’t believe – I don’t believe that two teenagers ran away from their home and haven’t been assisted by their mother. I do believe that Sandra’s been helping them. Evavold Audio Given by D. Rucki. Transcribed September 1, 2016 by Nancy J. Meyer, Registered Professional Reporter, Notary Public, Dakota County, Minnesota. ...
MR. BRODKORB: And the problem that – I think that Sandra and this whole situation could potentially do is have the reverse effect, which is when you have – when – there are multiple bad actors in this situation. And as I’ve said repeatedly to folks, the – the – I think the most thoughtful analysis of how we got here will be written after things started to line themselves up in a little bit. But I will say to you that – is that I – there is no question that I think the – the family court system is – is absolutely screwy, and I – I think that – that the only people that want to fight that assertion are the ones who have – have a stake in. I’ve spoken --
MS. EVAVOLD: Yeah.
MR. BRODKORB: – to people that are --
MS. EVAVOLD: Absolutely.
MR. BRODKORB: – close to David Knutson. And what they will say is, you know,
Page 5 of 9
Sandra’s a criminal, Michelle MacDonald is a crack pot, and that’s what they’re sticking to. And – and what’s lost on them is any thoughtful bit of reform and things like that. Evavold Audio Given by D. Rucki. Transcribed September 1, 2016 by Nancy J. Meyer, Registered Professional Reporter, Notary Public, Dakota County, Minnesota. ...
MR. BRODKORB: But do you – do you – do you – but – but I’m –I’m going to point out and say this is – is I’ll speak with Michelle. And when I’ve spoken with Michelle, she’ll – she’ll ask me, you know – you know, “Have you spoken with Knutson? Have you called the judge?” Well, of course I have. I mean, I – I mean, you – this -- this isn’t – this isn’t – you – this is – this is, like the north and – I mean, this is like the winds of ware, north and south. This – this could be could be a three-part – this could be a three-night miniseries on television and you probably wouldn’t cover it all. MS. EVAVOLD: Uh-huh. MR. BRODKORB: This is – this is – this is, you know – it would take, you know, seven Harry Potter books to tell the whole story of this.
MS. EVAVOLD: Right. Evavold Audio Given by D. Rucki. Transcribed September 1, 2016 by Nancy J. Meyer, Registered Professional Reporter, Notary Public, Dakota County, Minnesota. ... Page 8-12, 20-21, 26-27.
9. I spoke with Sarah regarding her day at the mall. She said that she never noticed anything unusual that day. She said they went from Famous Footwear to the food court and had lunch. From there they went to the Asic's store, then Old Navy and then left the area. She didn't notice anything else that appeared noteworthy at the time. Main Report Lejcher/103 Lejcher, Anthony Report Date: 08/14/2018.... Supplement Spiess/133 Spiess, Daniel 33133 33133 09/06/2018 9/5/18, 1644 Hours - On 9/5/18, I received a response from Twitter regarding a subpoena I had sent them regarding the Twitter account of Johnsonmedia2. I was advised by Twitter that the information I requested would not be granted under a subpoena, and I would need a search warrant instead. Based upon the facts I have learned while investigating this case, I do not believe a crime and, therefore, will not be drafting a search warrant to be sent. This case is closed, advise/assist, with no further follow-up necessary. ... Eagan Police Department 3830 Pilot Knob Rd Eagan, MN 55122 (651) 675-5700 Case #:EA18004549 https://redherringalert.files.wordpress.com/2018/09/18004549_redacted-0041.pdf
10. A. Yes. As we were checking out, I recalled a -- what I would say a commotion. I'm going to use my hands. To the right of me there is an area, very small area, where there was a display of socks and other things from a footwear store. And there was a commotion of people trying to get back there and kind of -- you know, you could tell something was going on. I didn't know exactly what was going on, but definitely remember there being a commotion specifically as I was checking out. It was in an odd location. Sarah Brodkorb – Direct Examinition by Nathan Hansen. Sarah Beth Brodkorb, Michael Brodkorb, and o/b/o Minor Children (AB, EB, BB), Petitioners, vs. Diane Kathleen Ristau, Respondent. File No. 19AV- CV-18-2159. Transcript of SLAPP suit hearing on September 26, 2018.
11. Respondent has followed, pursued or stalked the victim as follows: Respondent received and and distributed a photograph of victims with intent to harass. Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) Suit Sarah Brodkorb and Michael Brodkorb vs. Deirdre Elise Evavold Case No. 19AV-CV-18-2157.
12. Respondent has followed, pursued or stalked the victim as follows: Respondent received and and distributed a photograph of victims with intent to harass. Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) Suit Sarah Brodkorb and Michael Brodkorb vs. Carrie Lynn
Page 6 of 9
Baudette No. 19AV-CV-18-2165.
13. Q. You note on page 2 of your petition that respondent, meaning Ms. Ristau, pursued and photographed victims with intent to distribute the photograph. Do you have certain knowledge that Ms. Ristau actually pursued your wife?
14. A. Yes. She wasn't with -- she wasn't accompanying my wife and my children at Famous Footwear. Q. Did you witness her pursue your wife?
A. I did not.
Q. Did you know Ms. -- are you claiming to know Ms. Ristau intent, you know what she's thinking?
A. I can't speak to -- I can't --
MR. HANSEN: Object as to foundation. She's asking him to read somebody's mind. I think if there is --
THE COURT: She's -- overruled. She's asking about what appeared in the petition. I think she has a right to ask those questions.
A. Well, based on what's in the petition, it's obvious that Ms. Ristau pursued my wife for a period of time.
BY MS. MOORE: Q. But it's not obvious based on the facts. Did you witness Ms. Ristau pursue your wife?
A. No.
Q. And you are not presuming to tell the Court that you know what Ms. Ristau's intent was when she took the photo?
A. I can offer my opinion, but I can't state what her --
Q. Okay. All right.
A. I can't state what Ms. Ristau's intent was. Direct Examination of Michael Brodkorb by Ms. Rebecca Moore. Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) Suit Sarah Beth Brodkorb, Michael Brodkorb, and o/b/o Minor Children (AB, EB, BB), Petitioners, vs. Diane Kathleen Ristau, Respondent. File No. 19AV- CV-18-2159. Transcript of hearing on September 26, 2018.
14. In reality, as shown by the very limited and irrelevant information in his interrogatory answer5, Plaintiff has no further information to share. However, he wants the specter of the release of additional information, coupled with his demonstrated willingness to release it in violation of the Protective Order, to give him leverage in the case. Plaintiff’s gasconade and lack of contrition, even after the Court sealed the information Plaintiff filed publicly, shows this was no mistake, but a willful strategy. 5 Plaintiff was required to furnish a complete answer to Interrogatory No. 1, about the names of comparably situated personnel. He signed the answer under oath. If his answer truly did not “stretch the surface” of the names and facts known to him, Plaintiff’s answer is perjury. Page 16 of 23, Document Number: 74, Date Filed: Aug 15, 2013, Description: Memorandum in Support re 71 Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 37 filed by Minnesota Senate, the. (Attachments: # 1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Nolan, Dayle) (Entered: 08/15/2013) Brodkorb v. Minnesota, State of (0:12-cv-01958) District Court, D. Minnesota https://www.scribd.com/document/160538723/Senate-motion-for-dismissal
15. Senate rules cmtee takes up brodkorb settlement Pioneer Press Published on Jun 4,2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JfJ1nFtSxk
16. Lori Muslof: So on Sunday this past Sunday this blogger who has been blogging the story called me. And started asking me questions. I have no idea who this guy even is.
Page 7 of 9
Detective Dronen: Okay
Lori Muslof: Michael
Detective Dronen: Brodkorb?
Lori Muslof: Yes! And I refused to tell him anything. I just told him that I want nothing to do with this. I have not had anything to do with these people in a couple years. And I want absolutely nothing to do with it. And he was insistent. And I continued to tell him I want nothing to do with this. And I hung up. Okay? ...
Lori Muslof: Just so you know, I think this blogger is ... I don't know if you've talked to this blogger at all. Detective Dronen: I have from time to time.
Lori Muslof: Okay.
Detective Dronen: I talked to him on Monday. The interesting thing is that he told me on Monday that he wasn't going to call you.
Lori Muslof: Yes he
Detective Dronen: Apparently he already had. So.
Lori Muslof: He already had. He called me Sunday. 2:54 p.m. I even have it in my notes. Yes, he had called me on Sunday. He had tried calling me I think it was on Friday and I totally avoided his phone call. Detective Dronen: Yeah and and Lori Muslof: Called me on Sunday and I just told him I have nothing to say. Detective Dronen: Yeah Lori Muslof: I want nothing to do with any of this Detective Dronen: Well I understand the press wanting to write their stories and they want to keep interest in the case. I do have to say they have been helpful in some ways. Um one thing that is kind ah worrisome to me is on Friday I got a phone call from somebody I talked to in Hutchinson. Because he was down there. And (unknown) I gave them him their name. And its like “Nope that wasn't me. I don't know where he got his information from. But, I don't give out names.” Lori Muslof: Yep. Detective Dronen: So I don't know. Um that's why it worries me a little bit sometimes is I might jump ahead of me or try to jump to the side. So I appreciate you being cognizant of that. 8:30-9:05, 39:46-41:02/41:24 from 13001278 Loralie Musolf.mp3 Audio recorded conversation with Loralie Musolf by Lakeville Detective Jim Dronen.
17. If FOX 9 had cooperated with law enforcement in 2013, it's possible Samantha and Gianna would have been reunited with their family much sooner. Michael Brodkorb: Why I wrote about the Rucki case By Michael Brodkorb, Star Tribune Special Correspondent December 2, 2015 — 3:03pm
18. Ah, clearly what Tom did and I think Tom is is a very aggressive reporter. One of the few on local TV. But, yeah I think he did crossed the ethical and moral guidelines here. Taking the tape. Not knowing what the tape contained. And showing it on the air. And again making a copy and giving it to law enforcement. Which clouds our independence as journalists. Ruben Rosario from the Pioneer Press on NewsNight Minnesota | Media Panel – Discussion on TPT (Twin Cities Public Television) – KMSP-9 reporter Tom Lyden's aggressive reporting style. Original Broadcast: 05/22/2000
19. On May 17, 2018 I met with Judge Knutson to speak with him about this investigation. I provided him information about Twitter's public portal which allows a private citizen to request content be removed if they feel it is defamatory or threatening in nature. I suggested that if he
Page 8 of 9
made a request as a private citizen it may hold more weight with Twitter as requests from law enforcement have been unsuccessful. Supplement Case Number: 18900089 Title: Criminal Defamation Dakota Investigations. Dakota Investigations (MN0190000) Page 2 of 2 Report Generated by: -() Creation: Brian Eells 2018-06-01 07:17:28. Dakota County Sheriff’s Department.
20. THE COURT: And the jurors felt intimidated. Jury Trial Volume IV, State of Minnesota vs. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki. Court File No. 19HA-CR- 15-2669. July 21, 2016 at the Dakota County Judicial Center, Hastings, Minnesota. Page 75.
21. The incident involving Adelmann was innocuous and it was the only incident during the criminal trial involving a member of the media attempting to speak with jurors. ...In the weeks after Volpe first contacted me about the false allegations from Grazzini-Rucki, he either failed to review the publicly available court transcript, or he chose to ignore the facts because he published a false and misleading story. Oops: Another fake news story from Grazzini-Rucki supporter retracted by Michael Brodkorb, Missing in Minnesota June 19, 2017 Written by Michael Brodkorb Missing in Minnesota is authored by Michael Brodkorb and Allison Mann. Michael's reporting on this story began with the Star Tribune in 2015. Michael is currently a columnist with MinnPost. A lifelong resident of Minnesota, Michael is also an experienced communications, public affairs & research consultant. http://missinginminnesota.com/oops-another-fake-news-story-from-grazzini-rucki-retracted/ https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3868551/7-21-2016-Jury.pdf
Page 9 of 9
When you add that damning context then Diane Risau's damning "conspiracy to commit harassment" is magically & mysteriously watered way, way, way, way down to "a close call," isn't it? It is, isn't it?
https://twitter.com/mbrodkorb/status/1045016358155694091Michael Brodkorb @mbrodkorb The judge said today that Diane Ristau was involved a “conspiracy to commit harassment” when she took the picture of my wife and minor children while shopping and later distributed the picture to people connected to Sandra #GrazziniRucki and Dede #Evavold. 11:24 AM - 26 Sep 2018 9 Likes slarry21 mactavish 🌎 🏳️🌈 💙💜❤️ Scott Rich Amanda 🌐👩🏻🎤☮️📎♣️ M@rci3⭐⭐⭐ tmcs 🎄 WeihnachtsJan 🎄 Danny Schoen 2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
So, it is safe to say that if Angela Young wasn't sabotaging drunken idiot Dede's prep for the SLAPP hearing, then even drunken idiot Dede should have easily won, isn't it? It is, isn't it?
While the evidence here is a close call, there is a reasonable basis to find that Respondent , Ms. Deidre Evavold (“Ms. Evavold”) was involved in the chain of events that led to the repeated harassment of Ms. Sarah Brodkorb (“Ms. Brodkorb”) and her minor children. Novemeber 19, 2018 SLAPP Meomarandum for Sarah Beth Brodkorb, Michael Brodkorb, and O/B/O Minor Children (AB, BB, EB), Petitioners, and Deidre Elise Evavold, Respondent. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS File No. 19AV-CV-18-2157. Dakota County Minnesota.
Why would Angela Young be sabotaging Dede's cases? Hmm?
It makes sense when you know that Angela Young is one of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki's "true belivers," doesn't it? It does, doesn't it?
true believer noun
Definition of true believer
1 : a person who professes absolute belief in something
2 : a zealous supporter of a particular cause
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/true%20believer
Maybe you want to ask true believer Angela Young if she ever asked Sandra to provide any medical records to substantiate Sandra's wild, outrageous and unsubstantiated assertions that "David Rucki is so violent, and so abusive that he beat ex-wife Sandra Grazzini-Rucki while pregnant, and assaulted his unborn before the child even took his first breath"??
I have reason to suspect that true believer Angela Young will tell you that Sandra's tears were all the proof that she needed, haven't I? I have, haven't I? Does this give you a clue as to why true believer Angela Young would be sabotaging Dede's cases? Hmm?
More to come . . . .
Related Links:
Sarah Brodkorb's Perjured Testimony In Frivolous & Malicious SLAPP suit VS. Diane Ristau? Malicious Publicity Stunt To Promote Pulp Fiction Spun By Perjurer Hubby MinnPost Hack Michael Brodkorb?
Eagan Detective Daniel Spiess Admits To Destroying City Property (Preliminary Audio Statements) In Case #: EA18004549? Case #: EA18004549 Is MinnPost Hack Michael Brodkorb's False Police Report, Isn't It? Mention Of Spiess' Unauthorized - Arbitrary - Capricious Deletion Of Diane Ristau's & Carrie Beaudette's Criminal Investigative Data Magically & Mysteriously Missing From False Police Report? Perjurer Brodkorb Cries On Witness Stand Because Nemmers Posted Twitter Approved Picture Of Perjurer Wife Sarah Beth Brodkorb On Lion News? Spiess Admits Under Oath That No Crime Committed? Yet Spiess Magically & Mysteriously Still Misusing Public Resources For Perjurer Brodkorb's Book Publicity Stunt?
What?!? David Rucki & Tammy Love Conspired To Stalk Sandra Grazzini-Rucki & Her Minnesota Boyfriend Michael Rhedin? Scott Co. Sheriff Dept ICR# 201400003835 Says Rucki's Sister Tammy Love's IP Address 97.92.88.61 Linked To Purchase Of GPS Used In Stalking?
Public Records Requests For Osceola County Sheriff's Office Prisoner Sandra Grazzini-Rucki For Incident 15I094561? Where Oh Where Is The Osceola County "Clerical Error" Data, Hmm? Clerical Error = Kidnap Minor - Kidnapping Charge, Right? Where Oh Where Are Those 10/18/15 Preliminary Audio Statements, Dispatch Logs & Dispatch Traffic Audios, Huh?
The Authors Guild Magically & Mysteriously Shifting Goal Posts In Bizarre Phone Conversation With General Counsel Cheryl L. Davis About Guild Member & MinnPost Hack Michael Brodkorb?
Update MinnPost Hack Michael Brodkorb's Buddies Corrupt Dakota County Judge Karen Asphaug's - Megan Elizabeth Loyas's & Corrupt Dakota County Judge David Knutson Filing False Police Reports Over @Johnsonmedia2 Twitter Posts? Sealed Warrant? Corrupt Knutson Told To Stop Misusing Public Resources & To File His Own Prviate Twitter Complaint? Bonus Round: Grazzini-Rucki Explains How She Was Sex Trafficking Minors? Where Oh Where Is Loyas Preliminary Audio Statement AKA Recorded Phone Call??
Pinellas Co. Sherff's Dept Reports A Criminal Stalking Complaint Against MinnPost Hack Michael Brodkorb? Pinellas Co. District Court Says 18-009299-FD 10/12/2018 DOMESTIC INJUNCTION - STALKING (10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer JUDGE, DEFAULT CONVERSION)? Bonus Round: Hack Brodkorb Threatens John "Jack" Auld?
Oooops! 19AV-CR-17-16709 Criminal SLAPP Dismissed? State Of Minnesota VS DEIRDRE ELISE EVAVOLD - Only To Be Heard By Judge Gearin Failed? Why? Exposed - Preliminary Audio Recordings Illegally Withheld By Lakeville City Attorney Elliot Knetsch & Lakevile PD Chief Jeff Long, Right?
MinnPost Hack Michael Brodkorb's Buddies Ed Straight, Corrupt Dakota County Judge Karen Asphaug's Megan Elizabeth Loyas & Corrupt Dakota County Judge David Knutson Filing False Police Reports Over @Jonsonmedia2 (Psst It's Actually @Johnsonmedia2, Isn't It?) Twitter Posts? MinnPost Hack Brodkorb (The Crying Perjurer, Right?) Filed False Police Reports Against Deirdre Elise Evavold, Diane Kathleen Ristau & Carrie Lynn Beaudette Over @Jonsonmedia2 Twitter Posts, Didn't He? Psst Don't Forget That MinnPost Hack Brodkorb Filed False Police Report Against Kimberley Bukstein AKA Kimberley Smith Raths, Okay? Hey Do You Remember That MinnPost Hack Brodkorb Said That Knutson's Court Was "An Abomination" & "Screwy"?
Audio Of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s PREA Complaint VS. Dakota County Deputy Timothy Gonder? Damning 10-28-15 Letter Shows That So-Called Law Enforcement Officers Dakota Co. Attorney James Backstrom & Kathryn Keena Were Illegally Withholding Public Jail Data From Sandra & Attorney Michelle MacDonald? Foreshadowing Of Illegal Withholding Of Criminal Investigative Data, Right? Sandra Received Only 1/12 The Evidence Dede Evavold Received, Right? Bonus Round: Audio Of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s 10-28-2015 Osceola Co. Jail Phone Call – Attorney Kept In Dark?
MinnPost Hack Michael Bernard Brodkorb Files False Police Report Against Deirdre Elise Evavold, Diane Kathleen Ristau & Carrie Lynn Beaudette? You Remember That MinnPost Hack Brodkorb Filed False Police Report Against Kimberly Bukstein AKA Kimberley Smith Raths, Don't You?
Trial Transcript Indicated That Readily Availalble Electronic Evidence Was Illegally Withheld In RIgged State Of Minnesota VS. Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Court File No. 19HA-CR- 15-2669 & Rigged State Of Minnesota VS Deirdre Elise Evavold Court File No. 19HA-CR-15- 4227? Richard J. Hakanson Testimony Provides Laundry List Of Electronic Data Illegally Withheld, Doesn't It?
Jurors Felt Intimidated By Sun This Week Hack Laura Adelmann According To July 21, 2016 Transcript For Rigged Trial For Sandra Grazzini-Rucki. Court File No. 19HA-CR-15-2669? MinnPost Hack Michael Brobkorb Maliciously Edits Out "And The Jurors Felt Intimidated" From Official Transcript To Cover Up Adelmann Juror Intimidation? Bonus Round: Sandra Loves To Put Her So-Called Friends On The Meat Hook, Doesn't She?
MinnPost Hack Michael Brodkorb Files False Police Report Against Kimberley Bukstein/Raths? Bukstein's/Raths' Crime Is Positing On Twitter? Former Star Tribune/Current MinnPost Hack Creating Drama Drama Drama Evidence? Sounds Like Hack Tony "The Psycho" Webster, Doesn't It?
Trial By Ambush Already Appears In Day One Of Transcript For Rigged Trial 19HA-CR-15-2669 For Sandra Grazzini-Rucki? Corrupt Judge Ashpaug Ignores Dede Evavold Reporting Missing Evidence To District Court Admininstrator? Where Oh Where Are Those Preliminary Audio Statements, Huh?
Lion News: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s 04-02-18 Pinellas Co Jail Video Visit – Pinellas Says Kidnapping?
Lion News: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s 03-31-18 Pinellas Co Jail Video Visit – Secretly Talks With Son?
Lion News: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s 03-29-18 Pinellas Co Jail Video Visit – ABC 20/20 Connect?
Lion News: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s PREA Complaint VS. Dakota County Deputy Timothy Gonder?
Lion News: St Cloud Police Illegally Withholding Incriminating Rucki Data For 19HA-CR-15-4227?
Lion News: Unedited ABC 20/20 Elizabeth Vargas 2nd Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Ramsey Jail Interview?
Lion News: St. Cloud Times Conspires With Sheriff Sanner In Obstruction Of Justice – Dede Evavold?
Lion News: Lakeville Police Chief Long & Deputy Kornmann Harass & Hang Up On Poor Dede?
Lion News: Evidence Chief Judge Conkel Aids & Abets In Trial By Ambush Of Dede Evavold?
Lion News: Poor Dede Evavold Exposes Corrupt Ramsey Co. Sheriff Bostrum's Prisoner Abuse?
Lion News: Ramsey Co. Sheriff Bostrum Harasses Prisoners Dede Evavold & Sandra Grazzini-Rucki?
Lion News: Poor Dede Evavold Reports Corrupt Dakota Co. Attorney Backstrom To Rude FBI?
Lion News: KSTP-TV's Altmann Justice-Hating Jerk On Trial-By-Ambush For Poor Dede Evavold?
Lion News: Poor Dede Reports Corrupt Dakota Co. Attorney Backstrom's Trial-By-Ambush To FBI?
Lion News: Lakeville Detective Dronen Caught Planting Evidence In Missing Rucki Girl's Case?
Lion News: Star Tribune Hack Michael Brodkorb Caught Interfering With Missing Rucki Girl's Probe?
Lion News: Exclusive Video Of Samantha Rucki Testifying Her Testimony Is Not Of Her Free Will?
Lion News: Exclusive Video Of Samantha Rucki Calling Dakota County Judge Knutson A “Dick”?
Lion News: Poor Dede Throws Monkey Wrench Into High-Profile Sandra Grazzini-Rucki Case?
Lion News: Audio Proves Corrupt Lakeville Police Illegally Withholding Evidence From Poor Dede?
