to: Michael.kelley@courts.state.mn.us,
jisaackson@marshallindependent.com,
kevershillstrom@dglobe.com,
kgoodrich@mankatofreepress.com,
jjens@co.murray.mn.us,
lgunnink@co.murray.mn.us,
gmagnus@co.murray.mn.us,
gkluis@co.murray.mn.us,
dthiner@co.murray.mn.us,
Katie Beers wheelherald@gmail.com
date: May 18, 2018, 12:21 PM
subject: Data Breach For Rock, Nobles Community Corrections Agents Banegas/Cordova and Agent Barraza - Similar Special Treatment For Hennepin County Sheriff Rich Stanek’s sonnyboy Ryan James Stanek?
mailed-by: gmail.com
Michelle A. Dietrich, Chief Judicial Officer (507) 537-6734 & Michael J. Kelley 5th Judicial District Administrator (507) 344-4940:
I have reason to suspect that your officers of the court, Murray Co. Attorney//former Nobles Co. Assistant County Attorney/BRDTF Attorney Travis Smith and City of Worthington's Sgt/BRDTF Commander Nate Grimmius, conspired to illegally release confidential Chapter 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal investigative data for Case No. 53-CR-18-325 State of Minnesota vs Nobles/Rock Co. Community Corrections Cynthia Margarita Benegas/Cordova & Case No. 53-CR-18-291/53-CR-18-326 State of Minnesota vs Rebecca Barraza to me in an email on Friday, April 27, 2018 at 11:34 AM. See attached. It's safe to say that the data does not qualify as 13.82 Subd. 15. Public benefit data. The ironic part is that a variety of government agencies are illegally withholding public readily available, free, electronic, pubic data related to the above mentions cases from me. I've even received "Go to hell!" snail-mail letters with fraudulent bills in the mail. See attached.
Means motive opportunity: I've have reason to suspect that Smith authorized the data breach to allowed the defendants Benegas/Cordova and Barraza to scream "mistrial" after I posted the information on Internet. Why would Smith do that? For the same reason Smith is illegally withholding his Murray County Attorney's office general and prosecution policy and procedure manual from me: blatant conflict of interest. Plus, I figured out a long time ago that Benegas/Cordova and Barraza were receiving similar special treatment in their cases as Hennepin County Sheriff Rich Stanek’s sonnyboy Ryan James Stanek did in his case ... the same special "catch and release" program. Which is why your officer's of the court Blue Earth County Attorney Pat McDermott and Blue Earth County Sheriff Brad Peterson are also illegally withholding, readily available, free, electronic, public data from me, also. See attached.
Terry Dean, Nemmers (320) 283-5713
Case No. 07-CR-17-2058 State of Minnesota vs Hennepin County Sheriff Rich Stanek’s sonnyboy Ryan James Stanek
05/31/2017 E-filed Comp-Summons Index # 1
07/06/2017 First Appearance (8:15 AM) (Judicial Officer Walker, Robert D.)
06/22/2017 Reset by Court to 07/06/2017 Result: Held
03/12/2018 Plea Hearing (3:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Johnson, Kurt D.) Result: Held
10/18/2017 Omnibus Hearing (10:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Johnson, Kurt D.) Result: Held
01/16/2018 Omnibus Hearing (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Johnson, Kurt D.) Result: Held
03/12/2018 Omnibus Hearing (3:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Johnson, Kurt D.)
Why do you post on something you have no idea of what is going on? Cynthia Cordova email. Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:09 PM
When can I get a copy of the investigative report? Investigation ongoing If the law enforcement agency is still investigating the crime, members of the public will not be able to get a copy of the report. They can, however, get what’s often referred to as the public portion of the report containing basic information about the case that is classified as public. https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/ojp/forms-documents/Documents/Getting%20copy%20of%20report.pdf
Law Enforcement Officers. The presumption is that we will handle all cases involving law enforcement officers who allegedly commit crimes in Hennepin County over which the Office has jurisdiction except where the law enforcement officer(s) has a substantial connection with this Office. Substantial connection may include such factors as: 1. Regularly presents cases for review and charging to this Office. 2. Regularly appears as a prosecution witness in Office omnibus hearings or trials. HC County Attorney Manual Guidelines for Cases Involving a Conflict of Interest Revised Date: 04/2014 GENERAL INFORMATION
Two Rock Nobles Community Corrections agents were recently arrested within an approximately four-day period of the other. Rebecca Barraza, 25, and Cynthia Banegas, 37, were arrested March 18 and 21, respectively, and transported to the Cottonwood County Jail. ... Per orders from the Nobles County Sheriff’s Office, Sell said, Barraza was being held for felony aiding an offender, fourth-degree driving while impaired and test refusal. She was released March 19 under directions from the Nobles County Sheriff’s Office. According to Nobles County Sheriff Kent Wilkening, the request for Barraza’s release was made due to the fact that no charges or a 48-hour detainer were filed. ... Banegas was being held for felony aiding an offender. Sell said Banegas did not appear in Cottonwood County District Court while being held, and that she was released March 22 by the order of the Nobles County Attorney’s Office. Two Rock Nobles corrections agents arrested By Alyssa Sobotka, The Globe and Forum Communications Company on Mar 24, 2018 at 7:30 a.m.
Stanek is charged with soliciting a child to engage in sexual conduct, soliciting a child through electronic communication to engage in sexual conduct, engaging in electronic communication relating or describing sexual conduct with a child, and possessing child pornography. He was charged by summons and is to appear in court June 22. Hennepin County sheriff's son charged with soliciting girl, 13, for sex, possessing child porn Rich Stanek says phone son used is registered to his volunteer committee. By Pat Pheifer Star Tribune June 1, 2017 — 10:56am
Attachment: Complaint_Evidence.pdf
from: Kelley, Michael Michael.Kelley@courts.state.mn.us
to: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
date: May 18, 2018, 2:45 PM
subject: RE: Data Breach For Rock, Nobles Community Corrections Agents Banegas/Cordova and Agent Barraza - Similar Special Treatment For Hennepin County Sheriff Rich Stanek’s sonnyboy Ryan James Stanek?
mailed-by: courts.state.mn.us
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important according to Google magic.
Mr. Nemmers,
I am in receipt of your email and attached information and have forwarded it to Chief Judge Dietrich. I will review the information and determine what action is needed from my office
Respectfully,
Michael J. Kelley
District Administrator
Fifth Judicial District
From: Lion News [mailto:lionnews00@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 12:21 PM
To: Kelley, Michael Michael.Kelley@courts.state.mn.us; jisaackson@marshallindependent.com; kevershillstrom@dglobe.com; kgoodrich@mankatofreepress.com; jjens@co.murray.mn.us; lgunnink@co.murray.mn.us; gmagnus@co.murray.mn.us; gkluis@co.murray.mn.us; dthiner@co.murray.mn.us; Katie Beers wheelherald@gmail.com
Subject: Data Breach For Rock, Nobles Community Corrections Agents Banegas/Cordova and Agent Barraza - Similar Special Treatment For Hennepin County Sheriff Rich Stanek’s sonnyboy Ryan James Stanek?
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.82
13.82 COMPREHENSIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT DATA. § Subdivision 1.Application. This section shall apply to agencies which carry on a law enforcement function, including but not limited to municipal police departments, county sheriff departments, fire departments, the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, the Minnesota State Patrol, the Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training, the Department of Commerce, and county human service agency client and provider fraud investigation, prevention, and control units operated or supervised by the Department of Human Services. ... Subd. 7.Criminal investigative data. Except for the data defined in subdivisions 2, 3, and 6, investigative data collected or created by a law enforcement agency in order to prepare a case against a person, whether known or unknown, for the commission of a crime or other offense for which the agency has primary investigative responsibility are confidential or protected nonpublic while the investigation is active. Inactive investigative data are public unless the release of the data would jeopardize another ongoing investigation or would reveal the identity of individuals protected under subdivision 17. Images and recordings, including photographs, video, and audio records, which are part of inactive investigative files and which are clearly offensive to common sensibilities are classified as private or nonpublic data, provided that the existence of the images and recordings shall be disclosed to any person requesting access to the inactive investigative file. An investigation becomes inactive upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (a) a decision by the agency or appropriate prosecutorial authority not to pursue the case; (b) expiration of the time to bring a charge or file a complaint under the applicable statute of limitations, or 30 years after the commission of the offense, whichever comes earliest; or (c) exhaustion of or expiration of all rights of appeal by a person convicted on the basis of the investigative data. Any investigative data presented as evidence in court shall be public. Data determined to be inactive under clause (a) may become active if the agency or appropriate prosecutorial authority decides to renew the investigation.
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.03
13.03 ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT DATA. § Subd. 3.Request for access to data. (a) Upon request to a responsible authority or designee, (e) The responsible authority of a government entity that maintains public government data in a computer storage medium shall provide to any person making a request under this section a copy of any public data contained in that medium, in electronic form, if the government entity can reasonably make the copy or have a copy made. This does not require a government entity to provide the data in an electronic format or program that is different from the format or program in which the data are maintained by the government entity. The entity may require the requesting person to pay the actual cost of providing the copy.
PDF A file format that provides an electronic image of text that looks like a printed document, which can be viewed, printed, and electronically transmitted. Reference Number An internal reference number the eFiler gives a filing. Scanned PDF A file created by scanning a paper original and saving it in the “.pdf” file format. Glossary - eFile and eServe - (eFS) Terms and Definitions - skills, tools, and knowledge on our way to a paperless court - ECourtMN Minnesota Judicial Branch http://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/scao_library/documents/eFile%20Support/Glossary-eFS-Terms-and-Definitions-Public.pdf
What’s new with Rule 14? Rule 14 of the General Rules of Practice governs eFiling and eService. Previously, this Rule allowed documents to be eFiled in several different formats. As of September 13, 2013, however, documents are required to “be submitted in searchable PDF format only.”
What is “searchable PDF format?” Searchable PDF format allows users to search easily for words or phrases within a document. You achieve this by saving documents you’ve created in Microsoft Word, Excel, etc. as PDFs (see QRG: Creating a Searchable PDF Document).
What if my documents aren’t searchable? If you submit a non-searchable document (which is an incorrect format under Rule 14), a judge may not be able to review it effi- ciently (if at all). Aside from a directive to resubmit your docu- ment in the correct format, you may also be subject to sanctions including, without limitation, costs for staff to convert the docu- ment on your behalf.
Fast Facts: eFiling a Searchable PDF Document Under Rule 14 - skills, tools, and knowledge on our way to a paperless court - ECourtMN Minnesota Judicial Branch
http://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/scao_library/documents/eFile%20Support/Fast-Facts-eFiling-a-Searchable-PDF-Document-Under-Rule-14.pdf
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.09
13.09 PENALTIES. (a) Any person who willfully violates the provisions of this chapter or any rules adopted under this chapter or whose conduct constitutes the knowing unauthorized acquisition of not public data, as defined in section 13.055, subdivision 1, is guilty of a misdemeanor. (b) Willful violation of this chapter, including any action subject to a criminal penalty under paragraph (a), by any public employee constitutes just cause for suspension without pay or dismissal of the public employee.
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609.43
609.43 MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE. A public officer or employee who does any of the following, for which no other sentence is specifically provided by law, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both: (2) in the capacity of such officer or employee, does an act knowing it is in excess of lawful authority or knowing it is forbidden by law to be done in that capacity; or (3) under pretense or color of official authority intentionally and unlawfully injures another in the other's person, property, or rights; or
eCharging: Prosecutor electronically signs complaint; Benefits: Keeps process electronic; Overview: Instantaneous data transmission, no redundant data entry, reduced error rate, high transparency of workflow, less paper, no vehicles/fuel Benefits: Reduced time, reduced costs, more accurate data, and improved public safety. Minnesota Criminal Complaint Process Comparison of Manual and eCharging Systems and Benefits. CONTACT: Jill Oliveira 651-793-2726. eCharging benefits - March 2011.doc https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/bca-divisions/mnjis/Documents/eCharging%20benefits%20-%20March%202011.doc
to: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
cc: "Travis J. Smith" TSmith@co.murray.mn.us
date: Apr 27, 2018, 11:35 AM
subject: FW: Scanned image from Sharp Copier
mailed-by: co.nobles.mn.us
security: nobles.mn.us did not encrypt this message Learn more
: Important according to Google magic.
You have requested “any and all subd. 7 criminal investigative data for Rock Nobles Community Corrections Supervised Probation Agent Rebecca Barraza Court File No. 53-CR-18-291 & 53-CR-18-326 - Cynthia Margarita Benegas/Cordova 53-CR-18-325.” Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 13.82, subd. 7, “investigative data collected or created by a law enforcement agency in order to prepare a case against a person, whether known or unknown, for the commission of a crime or other offense for which the agency has primary investigative responsibility are confidential or protected nonpublic while the investigation is active.” The only exceptions to this are those types of data defined in Minn. Stat. § 13.82, subds. 2 (arrest data), 3 (request for service data), and 6 (response or incident data), which are public at all times. The criminal charges have not been resolved and therefore the investigation is active as defined by Minn. Stat. § 13.82, subd. 7.
Accordingly only that data classified in Minn. Stat. § 13.82, subds. 2, 3, and 6, can be provided. The documents containing those types of data are attached. The portions of the documents provided that have been redacted contain investigative data that is confidential or protected nonpublic under Minn. Stat. § 13.82, subd. 7 since there is an active criminal investigation.
Please contact me to obtain the squad car video’s as they are too large to send via email.
Thanks!
cid:image001.png@01D3DD80.CEBCABE0
From: noreply@co.nobles.mn.us [mailto:noreply@co.nobles.mn.us]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2018 11:30 AM
To: Nathan Grimmius
Subject: Scanned image from Sharp Copier
Attachment: Scanned Document_20180427_112942.pdf
https://www.hennepinattorney.org/news/news/2018/October/EdenPrairie-cases-dismissed
Police officer lied on search warrant, cases being dismissed - Friday, October 12, 2018.
An Eden Prairie police detective lied on a drug case search warrant and as a result, more than 30 cases will be dismissed by the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office.
David Brown, chief deputy county Attorney, told a news conference Friday morning that the cases had been charged but not completed as of Sept. 22, 2017. That is the date Eden Prairie Police Detective Travis Serafin filed with the court a search warrant that had been falsified.
“The fair trial of a defendant depends on complete truthfulness by everyone involved,” Brown said. “That did not happen here.”
As a result, 32 cases have been dismissed or in the process of being dismissed because Serafin was a critical witness. In additions, there are another 11 cases where Serafin was a peripheral witness and the defense lawyers have been contacted. ...
However, the judge who heard Detective Serafin testify was concerned about its truthfulness. He sent a copy of the transcript and of the two search warrants to the Eden Prairie Police chief on March 29.
The department immediately began an investigation and a later examination of the detective’s computer showed that a week after the search warrant for only the house was signed by a judge and after paralegal asked for the car search warrant, Detective Serafin created a new front page and apparently attached it to a copy of the original, signed search warrant. Clearly, the original search warrant did not allow the search of the car and anything taken from the car was illegally obtained, Brown said. The Eden Prairie Police Department then moved through its disciplinary process.
Police officer lied on search warrant, cases being dismissed HennepinAttorney - Published on Oct 12, 2018. An Eden Prairie police detective lied on a drug case search warrant and as a result, more than 30 cases will be dismissed by the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAasGtnZqQs&feature=youtu.be
Corrupt fifth judicial district Chief Judicial Officer Michelle A. Dietrich doesn't want to admit that it is her adviertised job to report criminal misconduct to the proper authorities, does she? She doesn't, does she?
More to come . . .
Related Links:
Will Chapter 13 Data Request Toss Monkey Wrench Into Super-Duper Secret Plea Deal For Rock Nobles Community Corrections Supervised Probation Agent Rebecca Barraza Court File No. 53-CR-18-291 & 53-CR-18-326 - Cynthia Margarita Benegas/Cordova 53-CR-18-325? Bingo! Magically & Mysteriously All Cases All Continued To 05/21/2018?
Super-Duper Secret Plea Deal For Rock Nobles Community Corrections Supervised Probation Agent Rebecca Barraza Court File No. 53-CR-18-291 & 53-CR-18-326 - Cynthia Margarita Benegas/Cordova 53-CR-18-325?
March 25, 2018 Chapter 13 Data Request Gets Rock, Nobles Community Corrections Agents Cynthia Margarita Banegas And Agent Rebecca Barraza Fired? Super-Duper Special Treatment For Barraza In Case No. 53-CR-18-291? Friday News Dump Charges & Special Prosecutor Who Is Former Assistant Nobles County Attorney? Looks Like Another Team Effort For Criminal Personnel Of The Correct MN Dept Of Corrections, Doesn't it? IP Address 136.234.63.1 State Of Mn Ciity Worthington Lurking & Skulking On 03/26 & 03/27? IP Address 136.234.63.20 State Of Mn Ciity Luverne Lurking & Skulking On 03/26?
Chapter 13 Data Request - Rock, Nobles Community Corrections Agent Cynthia Margarita Banegas And Agent Rebecca Barraza - More DOC Special Treatment? Variation Off The Theme For Rigged Cases For Convicted Sex Offender Chippewa, Lac qui Parle, Yellow Medicine Sentence to Service Crew Leader Michael Martin (87-CR-17-264 & 12-CR-17-367)
After Hints That Nemmers Will File Criminal Complaint Yellow Medicine Co. Attorney Keith R. Helgeson Sends "Go To Hell" Snail Mail? Snail Mail Contains Paper Copy Of Petition To Enter Guilty Plea For Rigged Case No. 87-CR-17-264 & Rigged Case No.12-CR-17-367 For Minnesota Department Of Corrections Sentencing To Service Crew Leader Michael John Martin? Nemmers Requested 13.03 Subd 3(e) Electronic Data, Didn't He?
Have Conflicts Of Interests Been Recorded On The Court Record In Open Court For Rigged Case No. 87-CR-17-264 & Rigged Case No.12-CR-17-367 For Minnesota Department Of Corrections Sentencing To Service Crew Leader Michael John Martin?
Will Nemmers' 09-25-17 Email Toss Another Monkey Wrench Into Rigged Chippewa Co., Lac Qui Parle Co., Yellow Medicine Co. Dept Of Correction Sentence To Serve Crew Leader Michael John Martin's Rigged Case No. 87-CR-17-264 & Case No. 12-CR-17-367? Inquiring Minds Want To Know, Don't They? Gilbertson's Go To Hell Response?
Candidates For Eighth Judicial District Corrupt Judge Donald Spilseth Job Are The Common Criminals: Helgeson, Jordan & Wentzell? 08-25-17 Automated Reply?
Go To Hell Response From Corrupt David M. Gilbertson Chippewa County Attorney? Gilbertson Is Mad That Nemmers Tossed A Monkey Wrench Into Rigged Chippewa Co & Yellow Medicine Co Prosecutions For Minnesota Department Of Corrections Sentencing To Service Crew Leader (For Yellow Medicine Co. Lac Qui Parle Co & Chippewa Co, Right?) Michael John Martin - Rigged Case No. 87-CR-17-264 & 12-CR-17-367, Right? Gilbertson Confesses To No Special Assistant Prosecutor? No Special Prosecutor Is An Admission Of Willful & Blatant Conflict Of Interest, Right?
Corrupt Dept Of Corrections Coughs Up Chapter 13 Data For DOC Chippewa, Lac Qui Parle, & Yellow Medicine Co. STS Crew Leader Michael Martin? Contracts Don't Say Martin Is To Allowed To Rape Or Allowed Special Treatment In Rigged Case No. 87-CR-17-264 & 12-CR-17-367, Do They? Must Be The "Goes Without Saying" Part, Huh?
Update On Rigged Rigged Yellow Medicine Co Prosecution For Minnesota Department Of Corrections Sentencing To Service Crew Leader (For Yellow Medicine Co., Right?) Michael John Martin - Case No. 87-CR-17-264? Hey Did You Know That Martin Is Getting Special Treatment In Chippewa County, Also? It's Rigged Case No. 12-CR-17-367 State Of Minnesota VS MICHAEL JOHN MARTIN, Isn't it? Will Martin Get A Super-Duper Plea Deal Before All His Victims Are Found? Are There Any In Lac qui Parle County? Why Did Lac Qui Parle Former Deputy/Commissioner Maatz & Chippewa County Attorney David Gilbertson Both Hang Up On Nemmers, Huh? Go To Hell Snail Mail Responses From Corrupt Yellow Medicine Co. & Corrupt City Of Granite Falls?
Rigged Yellow Medicine Co Prosecution For Minnesota Department Of Corrections Sentencing To Service Crew Leader (For Yellow Medicine Co., Right?) Michael John Martin - Case No. 87-CR-17-264? Hey Let's Ask For That Illegally Withheld Andrew Dikken & Kelly Jean Anderson Data, Okay?
Corrupt MN DNR & Corrupt Lac Qui Parle Co. Attorney Richard G. Stulz Caught Rigging Case No. 37-CR-15-22 State Of Minnesota VS Joshua Dwight Liebl's? Corrupt DNR & Corrupt Stulz Illegally Releasing Confidential Criminal Investigative Data To Corrupt Media? No Surprise, Right? Sounds Like Rigged Cases: 03-CR-15-1798 State Of Minnesota VS Anthony Emmons; 03-CR-15-1800 State Of Minnesota VS Clifford Emmons; 03-CR-15-1802 State Of Minnesota VS Ryan Emmons & 21-CR-13-51 State Of Minnesota VS Ronald Wayne Johnson, Doesn't it? It Does, Doesn't it? Corrupt Stulz Sends Nemmers Harassing Email But No Readily Available, Free, Electronic, Searchable PDF Format, Public Data? Stulz Is Retaliating Against Nemmers, Isn't He? He Is, Isn't He? You'll Want To See Nemmers Slowly But Surely Discredit The Corrupt DNR And Corrupt Lac Qui Parle County, Won't You? You Will, Won't You? Why Is Supposed Interim Sheriff Kevin Monson, Badge 338 Harassing Nemmers?
