Friday, December 17, 2021

Who Wants A Copy Of The Public Portion Of Larvita McFarquhar's ICR 21-17510 For Her Criminal Complaint Against City Of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross And Director Of Public Safety Jim Marshall? Let's Submit A Chapter 13 Data Quest, Shall We? It's Still Rigged Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State Of Minnesota Vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar, Isn't It?

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: President@smsu.edu,
Kumara.jayasuriya@smsu.edu,
Ross.Wastvedt@smsu.edu,
Provost@smsu.edu,
jeffrey.w.bell@smsu.edu,
raphael.onyeaghala@smsu.edu,
bill.mulso@smsu.edu,
gorear@marshallindependent.com,
Rick Maes rickmaes@co.lyon.mn.us,
"Eric D. Wallen" ericwallen@co.lyon.mn.us,
lorenstomberg@co.lyon.mn.us,
mlamb@marshallindependent.com,
dgau@marshallindependent.com
date: Dec 17, 2021, 6:52 AM
subject: Chapter 13 Data Request For Public Portion Of ICR 21-17510 AKA Criminal Complaint Against City Of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross And Director Of Public Safety Jim Marshall - Missing Data
mailed-by: gmail.com

Greg Orear, Publisher/General Manager, Marshall Independent 507 537-1551 ext. 107 & Mike Lamb, News Editor 507 537-1551 ext. 126 & Deb Gau, Reporter:

Hey, did you see the video of Larvita McFarquhar filing a criminal complaint against City of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross and Director of Public Safety Jim Marshall? The link is below, isn't it? Did you ever get a copy of Larvita McFarquhar's ICR 21-17510? Do you think that Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson and Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross will get a special prosecutor assigned to Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State of Minnesota vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar? Did you ever ask judicial officer Patrick Rohland how he could have misspelled both the middle and last name of Larvita McFarquhar in Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State of Minnesota vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar? Did you ever ask Larvita McFarquhar if she plans on suing Lyon County, the City of Marshall and Southwest Minnesota State University for her missing Chapter 13.04 Subject Data? Maybe you could be a witness for Larvita McFarquhar, huh?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

https://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp SPJ Code of Ethics Seek Truth and Report It Ethical journalism should be accurate and fair. Journalists should be honest and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information. Journalists should: – Diligently seek subjects of news coverage to allow them to respond to criticism or allegations of wrongdoing. – Recognize a special obligation to serve as watchdogs over public affairs and government. Seek to ensure that the public’s business is conducted in the open, and that public records are open to all. – Provide access to source material when it is relevant and appropriate. – Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable. Give voice to the voiceless.

Before ICR 21-17510:
Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State of Minnesota vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar
12/13/2021 Pre-trial (4:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Rohland, Patrick)
12/30/2021 Jury Trial (8:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Rohland, Patrick)
After ICR 21-17510:
Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State of Minnesota vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar
04/18/2022 Pre-trial (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Rohland, Patrick) 12/13/2021 Reset by Court to 04/18/2022
05/04/2022 Jury Trial (8:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Rohland, Patrick)12/30/2021 Reset by Court to 05/04/2022
Video of Complaint
Filing My Criminal Complaint https://rumble.com/vqfr5p-filing-my-criminal-complaint.html
Filing My Formal Criminal Complaint https://rumble.com/vqdy8r-filing-my-formal-criminal-complaint.html
Lyon County Police Investigator Voicemail https://rumble.com/vqkc38-lyon-county-police-investigator-voicemail.html
McFarquhar Tosses A Monkey Wrench Into Rigged Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State Of Minnesota Vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar By Filing A Criminal Complaint Against City Of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross And Director Of Public Safety Jim Marshall? It's ICR 21-17510, Isn't It? 12-13-21 Pre-trial Gets Booted Way Way Way Back To 04-18-22?
http://lionnews00.blogspot.com/2021/12/mcfarquhar-tosses-monkey-wrench-into.html

Eric Wallen, Lyon County Sheriff (507) 537-7666, Loren Stomberg, Lyon County Administrator (507) 537-6980 and Rick Maes, Lyon County Attorney (507) 537-6755:

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:
1. Public portion of the Larvita McFarquhar's ICR 21-17510 aka criminal complaint against City of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross and Director of Public Safety Jim Marshall. And if for some strange reason the case is no longer active then I want the entire incident report for ICR 21-17510.
2. Computer-aided dispatch reports Larvita McFarquhar's ICR 21-17510 DOB: 01/19/1975.
3. Gross salary, history of sustained complaints and work-related continuing education from date of first hire until today's date for Lyon County Sheriff's deputy Tony Rollings
4. Chapter 13 Data Requests submitted by Marshall Independent newspaper for Larvita McFarquhar's ICR 21-17510 or any unsolicited email(s) sent to Marshall Independent newspaper in regard to Larvita McFarquhar's ICR 21-17510.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. Your deputy was video recording Larvita McFarquhar's victim's statement, wasn't he? And Deputy Rollins made a notation of that video recording of Larvita McFarquhar's victim's statement in Rollings' report, won't it?
P.S.S What is the status on all that readily available, free, electronic public data that you still owe me, huh?
P.S.S.S. Do you or don't you plan on correcting each and every instance of your misspelling Larvita McFarquhar's middle and last name in your records? Do you feel even the slightest amount of shame that your negligence has carried right through into Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State of Minnesota vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar?

Kumara Jayasuriya, SMSU President (507) 537-6272:

What is the status on the 02/03/2021 and 02/04/2021 Public Safety incident reports for Larvita McFarquhar that you still owe me? Have you figured out how Southwest Minnesota State University could have a surveillance system but magically and mysteriously not have proof that you actually purchased the surveillance system?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

An Automatic Reply From SMSU's Bill Mulso?

from: Mulso, Bill Bill.Mulso@smsu.edu to: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com date: Dec 17, 2021, 6:53 AM subject: Automatic reply: Chapter 13 Data Request For Public Portion Of ICR 21-17510 AKA Criminal Complaint Against City Of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross And Director Of Public Safety Jim Marshall ... mailed-by: nam04-bn8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com signed-by: SMSU.EDU security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more : Important according to Google magic.

I will be out of the office until Monday, December 20th. I will respond to emails upon my return. Thank you. 

More to come ...

Related links:

McFarquhar Tosses A Monkey Wrench Into Rigged Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State Of Minnesota Vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar By Filing A Criminal Complaint Against City Of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross And Director Of Public Safety Jim Marshall? It's ICR 21-17510, Isn't It? 12-13-21 Pre-trial Gets Booted Way Way Way Back To 04-18-22?

Demand For Sanctions & Dismissal In Rigged Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State Of Minnesota Vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar? Nemmers' Intervention Puts An End To Ridiculous "Sovereign Citizen" Paperwork AKA "Patriot Paperwork"? Nemmers' Intervention Also Turns The Tables On The Corrupt City Of Marshall and Corrupt Southwest Minnesota State University (SMSU), Doesn't It?

Friday, December 10, 2021

McFarquhar Tosses A Monkey Wrench Into Rigged Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State Of Minnesota Vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar By Filing A Criminal Complaint Against City Of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross And Director Of Public Safety Jim Marshall? It's ICR 21-17510, Isn't It? 12-13-21 Pre-trial Gets Booted Way Way Way Back To 04-18-22?

Before ICR 21-17510: 

Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State of Minnesota vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar
12/13/2021 Pre-trial (4:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Rohland, Patrick)
12/30/2021 Jury Trial (8:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Rohland, Patrick)

After ICR 21-17510:
Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State of Minnesota vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar
04/18/2022 Pre-trial (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Rohland, Patrick) 12/13/2021 Reset by Court to 04/18/2022
05/04/2022 Jury Trial (8:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Rohland, Patrick)12/30/2021 Reset by Court to 05/04/2022

Video of Complaint

Filing My Criminal Complaint https://rumble.com/vqfr5p-filing-my-criminal-complaint.html

Filing My Formal Criminal Complaint https://rumble.com/vqdy8r-filing-my-formal-criminal-complaint.html

Lyon County Police Investigator Voicemail https://rumble.com/vqkc38-lyon-county-police-investigator-voicemail.html

 

 



42-CR-21-98 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 12/6/2021 11:56 PM
Larvita McFarquhar’s Number ICR# 21-17510



42-CR-21-98 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 12/6/2021 10:52 PM

Eric Wallen, Lyon Co. Sheriff    12-06-21
611 West Main Street
Marshall, MN 56258
(507) 537-7666                      Hand-delivered on 12-06-21
EricWallen@co.lyon.mn.us

This is my formal criminal complaint against City of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross and Director of Public Safety Jim Marshall for illegally withholding my Chapter 13.04 Subject Data 1 aka evidence aka discovery from me in Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State of Minnesota vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar pursuant to Mn Statute 609.43 Misconduct Of Public Officer Or Employee 2 . On 03-01-21 a Demand or Request for Discovery was submitted to City of Marshall City Attorney Dennis
Simpson and Assistant City of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross. As of today’s date I am missing the following data:

Pursuant to state statute Simpson, Gross and Marshall had ten (10) days 3,4 to provide me with my Chapter 13.04 Subject Data aka evidence aka discovery. It is my understanding that it is Simpson’s, Gross’ and Marshall’s known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the office to provide me with my my Chapter 13.04 Subject Data aka evidence aka discovery. As of today’s date Simpson, Gross and Marshall have willfully refused to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices act by illegally with the following readily available, free, electronic, subject data:

1. SMSU 02/04/2021 911 call and corresponding verbatim transcript 5 .
2. SMSU surveillance video 6 of Larvita McFarquhar on 02/03/2021 and 02/04/2021.
3. SMSU 02/03/2021 and 02/04/2021 Public Safety incident reports 7 aka Initial Complaint
Reports (ICRs) regarding Larvita McFarquhar.
4. Larvita McFarquhar’s 02/04/2021 phone calls to City of Marshall Police dept. and Lyon Co. Sheriff’s Office of officer/deputy assist/escort 8 at SMSU.
5. Computer-aid dispatch reports and corresponding audio of 02/04/2021 incident involving Larvita McFarquhar.
6. Recorded witness statements 9,10 , names and contact information of students and faculty in classrooms or hallways who were witnesses to the 02/03/2021 and 02/04/2021 incidents
involving Larvita McFarquhar.
7. Electronic communications Bill Mulso, SMSU vice president for government relations, communications and marketing and Mike Munford, SMSU Public Safety Director engaged in with Marshall Independent Reporter Deb Gau 11 .
I have reason to suspect this Subject data/Discovery is in the possession of City of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross and Director of Public Safety Jim Marshall is because gathering evidence is part of their job description 12 for a Marshall police officer. According to The Marshall Police Department Brady policy 13 and Standard of Standards Of Conduct For Peace Officers 14,15,16 indicate that the type of evidence to be preserved is exculpatory evidence or evidence that tends to prove my innocence. The Marshall Policy Department Brady policies dictates that they are required to
provide me with my missing evidence. I have reason to suspect Simpson, Gross and Marshall are illegally withholding my evidence 17 from me is because the evidence will show my actions

Page 1 of 6

42-CR-21-98 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 12/6/2021 10:52 PM

at Southwest Minnesota State University (SMSU) were a result of being provoked 18 by SMSU personnel.

I have reason to suspect the motive for the criminal misconduct is to fivefold. First, I believe Simpson‘s, Gross’ and Marshall’s motive is to either force me to plead guilty without ever receiving all my evidence or force me to go to trial without ever receiving all my evidence. The second reason is to indoctrinate me into the idea that prosecutors and law enforcement can break the law in order the enforce the law. The third reason is to indoctrinate me into the idea that I should keep my mouth shut when I see local corruption. The sixth motive is an attempt
by Simpson, Gross and Marshall to provoke 19 me in order to incite me to violence. Finally, I believe the last part of the motive is to cover up the fact that SMSU President Kumara Jayasuriya forced my 16 year old daughter S.C.M out of SMSU without a court order after S.C.M obtained a doctor’s note pursuant to section 8. Exempt individuals of the Emergency Executive Order 20-81.
____________________________________________
Larvita McFarquhar
106 E. Railroad St.
Lynd, Minnesota 56157

Note: See attached February 22, 2021 Demand for Discovery signed by Larvita McFarquhar

Footnotes:
1. 13.04 Rights Of Subjects Of Data. Subd. 3. Access to data by individual. Upon request to a responsible authority or designee, an individual shall be informed whether the individual is the subject of stored data on individuals, and whether it is classified as public, private or confidential. ... The responsible authority or designee shall comply immediately, if possible, with any request made pursuant to this subdivision, or within ten days of the date of the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays, if immediate compliance is not possible. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.04 

2. 609.43 Misconduct Of Public Officer Or Employee. A public officer or employee who does any of the following, for which no other sentence is specifically provided by law, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both: (1) intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law; or https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609.43
3. However, notwithstanding the attorney conduct concerns, the County’s obligation under the Data Practices Act to comply immediately or in ten business day with a data subject’s request is clear. (The Commissioner has also previously opined that the existence of litigation between a data requester and an entity does not relieve the entity of its data practices responsibilities. See Advisory Opinions 96-038 and 97-005.) As the Commissioner noted in Advisory Opinion 03-030:. Advisory Opinion 18-005, May 21, 2018; Carver County,
May 22, 2018 | Data subjects, Response to data requests, Requests for data
https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/opinions/library/?id=36-340460
4. Independent School District 709, Duluth Public Schools, did not respond appropriately to a

Page 2 of 6

42-CR-21-98 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 12/6/2021 10:52 PM

March 2, 2018, data request from a data subject pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.04, because it did not provide any data to the requester in 10 business days. Advisory Opinion 18-010 https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/opinions/library/#/detail/appId/1/id/347419
5. Subd. 4. Audio recording of 911 call. The audio recording of a call placed to a 911 system for the purpose of requesting service from a law enforcement, fire, or medical agency is private data on individuals with respect to the individual making the call, except that a written transcript of the audio recording is public, unless it reveals the identity of an individual otherwise protected under subdivision 17. A transcript shall be prepared upon request. The person requesting the transcript shall pay the actual cost of transcribing the call,
in addition to any other applicable costs provided under section 13.03, subdivision 3. The audio recording may be disseminated to law enforcement agencies for investigative purposes. The audio recording may be used for public safety and emergency medical services training purposes. 13.82 Comprehensive Law Enforcement Data. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.82
6. Non-violent disruptive demonstrations A. In the event that a demonstration blocks access to University facilities or interferes with the operation of the University: ii. The Director will consider having a photographer or video camera
available for verification/documentation purposes and notify Marshall PD of the situation. Southwest Minnesota State University Training Bulletns 600-12 Civil Disturbance or Demonstrations.
7. II. Training Format b. Initial Training: d. Phase III: Advanced iv. ICR Writing / Simplex Alarm protocol. IV. Use of the Master Keys b. In the event that you discover misuse of the master keys, you should: iii. Fill out an ICR. 400-01 Employee Guidelines. Employee Guidelines and Performance Expectations. Southwest Minnesota State University Public Safety Policy Manual.
8. https://www.facebook.com/larvita.mcfarquhar/videos/4155977071096399/ Larvita Mcfarquhar 351 Comments 102 Shares 7.4K Views · about 10 months ago Larvita Mcfarquhar February 3
9. 304.5.2 Special Deployment Considerations. The CED shall not be used to psychologically torment, elicit statements or to punish any individual. Policy 304. Conducted Energy Device Marshall Police Department Policy Manual
10. 305.6.2 Witness Identification And Interviews. Because potential witnesses to an officer-involved shooting or death may become unavailable or the integrity of their statements compromised with the passage of time, a supervisor should take reasonable steps to promptly coordinate with criminal investigators to utilize available law enforcement personnel for the following: 1. When feasible, a recorded statement should be obtained from those persons who claim not to have witnessed the incident but who were present at the time it occurred. Policy 304 Officer-Involved Shootings and Deaths. Marshall Police Department Policy Manual
11. Bill Mulso, vice president for government relations, communications and marketing at SMSU, confirmed there was an incident Wednesday morning when McFarquhar entered a classroom on campus. Mulso said McFarquhar disrupted a class in progress, and after a second classroom disruption later that morning, she was issued a trespassing notice. Lynd restaurant owner served with trespassing notice McFarquhar escorted from SMSU building after not wearing mask Local News Feb 4, 2021 Deb Gau Reporter 

Page 3 of 6

42-CR-21-98 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 12/6/2021 10:52 PM

https://www.marshallindependent.com/news/local-news/2021/02/lynd-restaurant-owner-served-with-trespassing-notice/
12. City of Marshall Job Description Position Title: Police Officer Date: December 2010 Division: Public Safety FLSA Status Non-exempt; Part-time Accountable to: Sergeant Union Status LELS Hay Points 317. ... Summary of Position To protect and promote public safety throughout the City through enforcement of all federal, state and local laws; the preservation of public peace; the protection of life and property; the prevention of crime; and the detection and apprehension of violators of the law. Assist in the judicial process by reporting the facts of the investigation to the prosecuting attorneys, and by testifying in court. ... Essential Duties
and Responsibilities ... 3. Gather information relating to the investigation of crime and non-criminal incidents. Prepare detailed written/typed reports for the use of prosecutors, Courts, Probation, Human Service, Detective’s Division, the State of MN, and other agencies. 4. Review Offense Reports, I.C.R.’s memos, e-mails, and other pertinent information to keep abreast of recent activity and complaints to assist in the prevention of future criminal activity. ... 7. Testify in court as to the facts and results of investigations.
13. 605.2 Policy The Marshall Police Department will conduct fair and impartial criminal investigations and will provide the prosecution with both incriminating and exculpatory evidence as well as information that may adversely affect the credibility of a witness. In addition to reporting all evidence of guilt, the Marshall Police Department will assist the prosecution by complying with its oblgation to disclose information that is both favorable and material to the defense. The Department will identify and disclose to the prosecution potentially exculpatory information as provided in this policy. Page 396. Policy
605 Brady Material Disclosure Marshall Police Department Policy Manual.
14. 320.1.1 Standards Of Conduct For Peace Officers. The Marshall Police Department adopts the Professional Conduct of Peace Officers model policy established and published by the Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training Board (POST) (Minn. Stat. § 626.8457). This model policy applies to all peace officers of this department. See attachment: MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf The provisions of this policy are in addition to collective bargaining agreements or any other applicable law (see generally Minn. R. 6700.1500). The Department shall report to POST any data regarding the investigation and disposition of cases involving alleged misconduct of officers (Minn. Stat. § 626.8457, Subd. 3). Policy 320 Standards of Conduct
Marshall Police Department Policy Manual
15. A. Principle One Peace officers shall conduct themselves, whether on or off duty, in accordance with the Constitution of the United States, the Minnesota Constitution, and all applicable laws, ordinances and rules enacted or established pursuant to legal authority. 1. Rationale: Peace officers conduct their duties pursuant to a grant of limited authority from the community. Therefore, officers must understand the laws defining the scope of their enforcement powers. Peace officers may only act in accordance with the powers granted to them. 2. Rules a) Peace officers shall not knowingly exceed their authority in the enforcement of the law. b) Peace officers shall not knowingly disobey the law or rules of
criminal procedure in such areas as interrogation, arrest, detention, searches, seizures, use of informants, and preservation of evidence, except where permitted in the performance of duty under proper authority. Page 490. Professional Conduct Of Peace Officers Model Policy MN STAT 626.8457 Attachment MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf Marshall Minnesota Police Department Policy Manual Policy Manual.
16. B. Principle Two Peace officers shall refrain from any conduct in an official capacity that

Page 4 of 6

42-CR-21-98 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 12/6/2021 10:52 PM

detracts from the public’s faith in the integrity of the criminal justice system. 1. Rationale: Community cooperation with the police is a product of its trust that officers will act honestly and with impartiality. The peace officer, as the public’s initial contact with the criminal justice system, must act in a manner that instills such trust. 2. Rules a) Peace officers shall carry out their duties with integrity, fairness and impartiality. ... c) Peace officers shall truthfully, completely, and impartially report, testify and present evidence, including exculpatory evidence, in all matters of an official nature. d) Peace officers shall take no action knowing it will violate the constitutional rights of any person. Page 490, 491. Professional Conduct Of Peace Officers Model Policy MN STAT 626.8457 Attachment MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf Marshall Minnesota Police Department Policy Manual Policy Manual.
17. Spoliation Any erasure, interlineation, or other alteration made to Commercial Paper, such as a check or promissory note, by an individual who is not acting pursuant to the consent of the parties who have an interest in such instrument. A spoliator of evidence in a legal action is an individual who neglects to produce evidence that is in her possession or control. In such a situation, any inferences that might be drawn against the party are permitted, and the withholding of the evidence is attributed to the person's presumed knowledge that it would have served to operate against her. West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Spoliation+of+evidence
18. Since you, as a prosecutor, are a minister of justice and not an attorney for miscreant officers, you must develop a strategy for dealing with these occasional incidents of misbehavior. The ways that an officer can fall short of the highest standards of excellence are numberless, but excessive zeal in the performance of their duties is one way. A common subtype of the overzealous officer is the serial resisting arrest victim. Some officers can retire after and never make a case against anyone for resisting arrest. Other officers cannot get through a shift without making a case. Serial resisting arrest victims fall into three main types: those who lack interpersonal skills necessary to obtain suspect compliance, those who verbally bait suspects, and those who are so thin-skinned that they overreact to suspect noncompliance. Seldom should so encounter an officer who purposely set out falsely convict as suspect of resisting arrest. Sometimes an officer will have unintentionally mishandled a situation, and you are burdened with a case where the defendant is technically guilty of the crime, but the victim precipitation issues make a make a conviction unlikely. Quick-witted officers who always have a quip on the tip of their tongue frequently let fly with those quips at the most inopportune times, resulting in black eyes, bruises and a questionable case against a defendant who, again is technically guilty, but was goaded into acting out. Finally, there are officers who are so quick to take offense that they will arrest at the drop of a hat for the most inconsequential misbehavior. A certain degree of noncompliance comes with the officer's territory, and the officer should have sufficient judgment to decline to arrest at all in de minimis situations. These types of cases are relatively easy to spot, and when one of them comes across your desk, you must handle it appropriately. Rubber stamping the officer's decision can sometimes be appropriate, but more often you must make the unpleasant decisions to dismiss the charges, to file reduced charges, or to accept reduced pleas. George R. Dekle, Sr, Prosecution Principles: A Clinical Handbook
(Thompson/West:2007), Page 20-21.
19. E. Principle Five Peace officers shall treat all members of the public courteously and with respect. 1. Rationale: Peace officers are the most visible form of local government.

Page 5 of 6

42-CR-21-98 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 12/6/2021 10:52 PM

Therefore, peace officers must make a positive impression when interacting with the public and each other. 2. Rules a) Peace officers shall exercise reasonable courtesy in their dealings with the public, other officers, superiors and subordinates. b) No peace officer shall ridicule, mock, deride, taunt, belittle, willfully embarrass, humiliate, or shame any person to do anything reasonably calculated to incite a person to violence. Page 492-493. Professional Conduct Of Peace Officers Model Policy MN STAT 626.8457 Attachment MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf Marshall Minnesota
Police Department Policy Manual Policy Manual.

Page 6 of 6

More to come...

Related Links:

Demand For Sanctions & Dismissal In Rigged Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State Of Minnesota Vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar? Nemmers' Intervention Puts An End To Ridiculous "Sovereign Citizen" Paperwork AKA "Patriot Paperwork"? Nemmers' Intervention Also Turns The Tables On The Corrupt City Of Marshall and Corrupt Southwest Minnesota State University (SMSU), Doesn't It?

Monday, November 22, 2021

DNR Data Practices Compliance Official Barbara Damchik-Dykes 651.259.5345 Reported To MN Department Of Natural Resources Policy And Planning Section Manager Anthony Alongi After Damchik-Dykes Harasses Nemmers Over Request For Entire DNR Policy & Procedure Manual & After Damchik-Dykes Illegally Releases Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data For High-Profile Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State Of Minnesota Vs Michael A Sysa; Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State Of Minnesota Vs David Alekseevich Sysa And Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State Of Minnesota Vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich To Media Outlets And To Nemmers?


from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: kristi.coughlon@state.mn.us
date: Nov 14, 2021, 1:02 PM
subject: Citations For Michael Sysa 22 Oak Grove Minnesota David Sysa 23 Oak Grove Yevgeniy Simonovich 29 Elk River
mailed-by: gmail.com

Kristi Coughlon Phone: 218-308-2647:

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:

1. Citations for Michael Sysa 22 Oak Grove Minnesota, David Sysa 23 Oak Grove and Yevgeniy Simonovich 29 Elk River.
2. Press releases that were sent "Courtesy of the Minnesota DNR" to the Bemidji Pioneer and/or Forum News Service for Citations for Michael Sysa 22 Oak Grove Minnesota, David Sysa 23 Oak Grove and Yevgeniy Simonovich 29 Elk River.
Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/newsroom/media-contacts.html DNR news media contacts Media Inquiries Northwest Region – Bemidji Kristi Coughlon Phone: 218-308-2647 Email: kristi.coughlon@state.mn.us (link sends email)

\BAUDETTE, Minn. — Three anglers have been charged for keeping too many walleyes and saugers on Lake of the Woods after conservation officers found them with 48 fish over their limit Sunday. Charged with possessing over their limit of walleyes and saugers were Michael Sysa, 22, Oak Grove, Minnesota; David Sysa, 23, Oak Grove; and Yevgeniy Simonovich, 29, Elk River, Minnesota.

https://www.twincities.com/2021/11/12/mn-anglers-had-48-over-limit-in-lake-of-the-woods-fish-bust/ MN anglers had 48 over limit in Lake of the Woods fish bust Seventy-two walleyes and saugers confiscated Nov. 7, 2021, were donated to the Warroad Senior Living Center in Warroad, Minnesota. (Courtesy of the Minnesota DNR) By Brad Dokken | bdokken@gfherald.com | Forum News Service PUBLISHED: November 12, 2021 at 12:39 p.m. | UPDATED: November 14, 2021 at 9:03 a.m.

https://www.bemidjipioneer.com/northland-outdoors/7278486-DNR-officers-seize-72-fish-in-Lake-of-the-Woods-walleye-and-sauger-bust DNR officers seize 72 fish in Lake of the Woods walleye and sauger bust – In addition to the 26 fish in the livewell, there were six walleyes and 10 saugers in the cooler with fish caught that day, and 17 walleyes and 13 saugers in the second cooler with fish the group had kept the previous day – 72 fish total. Written By: Brad Dokken | 2:30 pm, Nov. 11, 2021 The 72 walleyes and saugers were confiscated Sunday, Nov. 7, 2021, and donated to the Warroad Senior Living Center in Warroad, Minnesota, for residents' consumption. Contributed / Minnesota DNR Three anglers have been charged for keeping too many walleyes and saugers on Lake of the Woods after conservation officers found them with 48 fish over their limit Sunday, Nov. 7. Charged with possessing over their limit of walleyes and saugers were Michael Sysa, 22, Oak Grove, Minnesota; David Sysa, 23, Oak Grove; and Yevgeniy Simonovich, 29, Elk River, Minnesota.


from: MN_Data Request (DNR) datarequest.dnr@state.mn.us
to: "lionnews00@gmail.com" lionnews00@gmail.com
date: Nov 15, 2021, 11:41 AM
subject: data practices request
mailed-by: state.mn.us
signed-by: state.mn.us
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important according to Google magic.

Dear Mr. Nemmers,
 
Attached is the incident report you requested from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The name of a juvenile has been redacted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 84.0873.
 
Please note that there is no press release associated with this data. This completes your data practices request in full.
 
Kind Regards,
 
Barbara
 
Barbara Damchik-Dykes
Data Practices Compliance Official | OSD
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
500 Lafayette Road
Saint Paul, MN 55155
Phone: 651.259.5345
Fax: 651.296.0902
mndnr.gov

Attachment: 21026876-R_Redacted.pdf

 


from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: "MN_Data Request (DNR)" datarequest.dnr@state.mn.us
date: Nov 18, 2021, 6:55 AM
subject: Re: data practices request
mailed-by: gmail.com

Barbara Damchik-Dykes, Data Practices Compliance Official 651.259.5345:

Thanks for the incident reports. Where are the citations that I requested? 

"Citations for Michael Sysa 22 Oak Grove Minnesota, David Sysa 23 Oak Grove and Yevgeniy Simonovich 29 Elk River."


Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:
1. Current Minnesota Department of Natural Resources policy and procedure manual.
2. Redacted warning issued to the juvenile in ICR# 21026876.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

CO Huener and I discussed with the group that [Redacted] as a juvenile, would not be charged for possessing an over limit of walleye/sauger. We told Michael, David, and Yevgenity that they would each be charged for possessing over limit of walleye/sauger, and that the restitution for the 48 fish over the legal limit would be divided amongst the three of them- 16 fish each. The three agreed to this. Michael, David and Yevgenity were each charged/cited for possessing over limit of walleye/sauger, as well as restitution for 16 walleye per person. All walleye/sauger (72 total) were seized, as well as both coolers. A seizure receipt was issued. A warning was documented for [Redacted] for possessing over limit of walleye/sauger. End of Report. C. Sura 648. Department of Natural Resources Incident Report ICR# 21026876. Reported: 11-08-2021 0958. Officer Assigned: Sura, Cory Badge No. 648 Primary: Yes. Officer Assigned: Huener, Ben Badge No: 538 Primary: No.


from: MN_Data Request (DNR) datarequest.dnr@state.mn.us
to: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
date: Nov 19, 2021, 10:08 AM
subject: RE: data practices request
mailed-by: state.mn.us
signed-by: state.mn.us
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important mainly because you often read messages with this label.

Good morning. We will work on getting the data you have requested, including citations and warning.
 
You have requested a current copy of the DNR policy and procedure manual. Are you looking for a particular policy or procedure? We don’t have a singular policy or procedure manual.
 
Barbara
 
Barbara Damchik-Dykes
Data Practices Compliance Official | OSD
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
500 Lafayette Road
Saint Paul, MN 55155
Phone: 651.259.5345
Fax: 651.296.0902
mndnr.gov


from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: "MN_Data Request (DNR)" datarequest.dnr@state.mn.us
date: Nov 19, 2021, 10:28 AM
subject: Re: data practices request
mailed-by: gmail.com

Barbara Damchik-Dykes, Data Practices Compliance Official 651.259.5345:

I asked for the complete policy and procedure manual so I can compare it to the complete policy and procedure manual that I currently have in my possession.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 20-283-5713

VII. STORAGE OF PHOTOGRAPHS AND RECORDINGS A. Media containing recordings and photos shall be marked for identification, guarded against degradation and overwriting, and stored in a secure location. B. Officers taking digital images for evidentiary purposes shall download the images onto the officer’s computer and shall immediately copy the images to a write once CD-ROM. This CD-ROM shall be known and labeled as the “archive copy”. 1. Officers shall not release archive copies (or original video or audio tape recordings) from their custody. Officers shall honor legitimate requests for access to evidentiary media by making and providing a copy of the media to the prosecuting attorney or the division’s data practices responsible authorities. 2. The existence of evidentiary photos or recordings shall be disclosed in any citation notes or reports prepared about the incident. O-11-06, PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE STANDARDS Page 4 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE


from: MN_Data Request (DNR) datarequest.dnr@state.mn.us
to: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
date: Nov 22, 2021, 9:49 AM
subject: RE: data practices request
mailed-by: state.mn.us
signed-by: state.mn.us
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important mainly because you often read messages with this label.

Dear Mr. Nemmers,
 
Attached are the citations you requested. Some data has been redacted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 13.82. Data for the verbal warning involving a minor has been redacted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 84.0873.
 
Again, can you be more specific regarding the policy and procedure that you are requesting? Are you seeking policy related to DNR Enforcement citations? If you are more specific, it would be helpful for me to provide the policy that you are seeking.
 
Thank you,
 
Barbara

Attachments: Citation-Number-89062021009812_Redacted.pdf, Citation-Number-89062021009813_Redacted.pdf, Citation-Number-Notes-89062021009814_Redacted.pdf, Citation-Number-Notes-89062021009815-Verbal_Redacted.pdf


from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: "MN_Data Request (DNR)" datarequest.dnr@state.mn.us
date: Nov 22, 2021, 10:32 AM
subject: Re: data practices request
mailed-by: gmail.com

Barbara Damchik-Dykes, Data Practices Compliance Official 651.259.5345:

Please provide me with the name and contact information of the individual in your chain of command who has direct supervisory powers over you. I want to discuss with them why you can't fall back onto your expensive and time-consuming work-related continuing education to provide me with the entire/complete current Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Directives aka policy and procedure manual.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

VIII. PRINCIPLE FIVE Conservation Officers shall treat all members of the public courteously and with respect.3. No Conservation Officer shall ridicule, mock, deride, taunt, belittle, willfully embarrass, humiliate, or shame a person, or do anything reasonably calculated to incite a person to violence. A-4-99, CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER Page 5. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE DIRECTIVE NUMBER: A-4-99 SUBJECT: CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 1999 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Rescinds Directive 61-96 REFERENCE: Minnesota Statute Sec 626.8457, 43A.38, 43A.39; Directive A-3-98; C.L.E.A. 26.1; State Electronic Mail and Internet Policy; POST Model Conduct Policy DISTRIBUTION: All Division Employees NUMBER OF PAGES: 31


from: MN_Data Request (DNR) datarequest.dnr@state.mn.us
to: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
cc: "Alongi, Anthony (DNR)" anthony.alongi@state.mn.us
date: Nov 22, 2021, 10:42 AM
subject: RE: data practices request
mailed-by: state.mn.us
signed-by: state.mn.us
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important mainly because you often read messages with this label.


Dear Mr. Nemmers,
 
I am forwarding this email chain to my supervisor, Anthony Alongi, who is copied on this email. Please feel free to contact him directly about your concerns with my customer service.
 
Kind Regards,
 
Barbara

from: Alongi, Anthony (DNR) anthony.alongi@state.mn.us
to: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
date: Nov 22, 2021, 11:01 AM
subject: RE: data practices request
mailed-by: state.mn.us
signed-by: state.mn.us
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important mainly because you often read messages with this label

Mr. Nemmers,
 
I’ve reviewed the communication chain below. When you have a moment, please reply with any additional information or concerns you may have regarding the services you’ve received, so that I can review as complete a picture of what is happening as possible. Thank you,
 
Anthony Alongi
Section Manager, Policy and Planning
MN Department of Natural Resources


from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: "Alongi, Anthony (DNR)" anthony.alongi@state.mn.us
date: Nov 22, 2021, 11:20 AM
subject: Re: data practices request
mailed-by: gmail.com

Anthony Alongi, Section Manager, Policy and Planning MN Department of Natural Resources:

I actually have a couple of concerns. First of all, why am I being repeatedly harassed over my request for your entire/complete current Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Directives aka policy and procedure manual? Second, why is your Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesBarbara Damchik-Dykes Data Practices Compliance Official Barbara Damchik-Dykes illegally releasing confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal investigative data to media outlets for Citation No. 89062021009812 Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State of Minnesota vs Michael A Sysa; Citation No. 89062021009813 Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State of Minnesota vs David Alekseevich Sysa and Citation No. 89062021009814 Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State of Minnesota vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich? Finally, will I be able to get a copy of your Notice to individuals 13.055 Subd. 2. Notice to individuals that are sent to Michael A Sysa, David Alekseevich Sysa and Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich?

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:
1. Names and contact information for DNR personnel who investigate DNR Data Breaches.
2. DNR policy and procedure for Internal Affairs/Administrative investigations.
3. Direct phone number for Anthony Alongi, Section Manager, Policy and Planning MN Department of Natural Resources.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

Mr. Karpan: I do have one request. Um, I've not asked for this before, I'm not sure how to handle it, but the Department of Natural Resources as they've done in the past has seen fit to do a press release, and officer Osborne has answered questions for the newspaper. My client – all the facts of the case are in the Echo Press, on the radio and in sporting magazines. Not only are there quotes in there that aren't - - I mean I know the State has a right to release incident data I think it's called.
Under Chapter 13.82, investigative data is not to be released. Well, there are pictures allegedly of my client's fish all over the Echo Press. Everybody in town is talking about it. I don't know if I'll have to make a change of venue motion eventually. I'll have to see how this plays out in a few months.
But under 13.82, there's no way the DNR is supposed to be releasing pictures of evidence to the newspaper. It prejudices my client. It prejudices all of us. It makes it impossible to get a fair trail. So I'm asking the Court to order the Department of Natural Resources to not discuss this case any further until it's done.
The Court: Mr. Hochsprung?
Mr. Hochsprung: Your Honor, I did not authorize the Department of Natural Resources to disclose anything to the paper. Um, I can talk with Mr. Osborne or whoever about that, but I don't have any information about that. State of Minnesota vs. Ronald Wayne Johnson Rule 5/ Rule 8 Hearing. Court File No. 21-CR- 13-51. February 11, 2013.

VII. STORAGE OF PHOTOGRAPHS AND RECORDINGS A. Media containing recordings and photos shall be marked for identification, guarded against degradation and overwriting, and stored in a secure location. B. Officers taking digital images for evidentiary purposes shall download the images onto the officer’s computer and shall immediately copy the images to a write once CD-ROM. This CD-ROM shall be known and labeled as the “archive copy”. 1. Officers shall not release archive copies (or original video or audio tape recordings) from their custody. Officers shall honor legitimate requests for access to evidentiary media by making and providing a copy of the media to the prosecuting attorney or the division’s data practices responsible authorities. 2. The existence of evidentiary photos or recordings shall be disclosed in any citation notes or reports prepared about the incident. O-11-06, PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE STANDARDS Page 4 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE DIRECTIVE NUMBER: O-11-06 SUBJECT: PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE STANDARDS EFFECTIVE DATE: May 5, 2006 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Rescinds Directives 45-88, O-11-02 REFERENCE: Minnesota Statute Secs. 97A.221- .231; 626.04 13.82, Subd 20; Directives O-4, O-5 (pending) DISTRIBUTION: All Conservation Officers NUMBER OF PAGES: 8.

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.82 13.82 COMPREHENSIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT DATA. Subd. 7. Criminal investigative data. Except for the data defined in subdivisions 2, 3, and 6, investigative data collected or created by a law enforcement agency in order to prepare a case against a person, whether known or unknown, for the commission of a crime or other offense for which the agency has primary investigative responsibility are confidential or protected nonpublic while the investigation is active. Inactive investigative data are public unless the release of the data would jeopardize another ongoing investigation or would reveal the identity of individuals protected under subdivision 17. Images and recordings, including photographs, video, and audio records, which are part of inactive investigative files and which are clearly offensive to common sensibilities are classified as private or nonpublic data, provided that the existence of the images and recordings shall be disclosed to any person requesting access to the inactive investigative file. An investigation becomes inactive upon the occurrence of any of the following events:

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.43 13.43 PERSONNEL DATA. Subdivision 1.Definition. As used in this section, "personnel data" means government data on individuals maintained because the individual is or was an employee of or an applicant for employment by, performs services on a voluntary basis for, or acts as an independent contractor with a government entity. § Subd. 2.Public data. (a) Except for employees described in subdivision 5 and subject to the limitations described in subdivision 5a, the following personnel data on current and former employees, volunteers, and independent contractors of a government entity is public: (1) name; employee identification number, which must not be the employee's Social Security number; actual gross salary; salary range; terms and conditions of employment relationship; contract fees; actual gross pension; the value and nature of employer paid fringe benefits; and the basis for and the amount of any added remuneration, including expense reimbursement, in addition to salary; (2) job title and bargaining unit; job description; education and training background; and previous work experience; (3) date of first and last employment; (4) the existence and status of any complaints or charges against the employee, regardless of whether the complaint or charge resulted in a disciplinary action; (5) the final disposition of any disciplinary action together with the specific reasons for the action and data documenting the basis of the action, excluding data that would identify confidential sources who are employees of the public body; (6) the complete terms of any agreement settling any dispute arising out of an employment relationship, including a buyout agreement as defined in section 123B.143, subdivision 2, paragraph (a); except that the agreement must include specific reasons for the agreement if it involves the payment of more than $10,000 of public money; (7) work location; a work telephone number; badge number; work-related continuing education; and honors and awards received; and (8) payroll time sheets or other comparable data that are only used to account for employee's work time for payroll purposes, except to the extent that release of time sheet data would reveal the employee's reasons for the use of sick or other medical leave or other not public data.

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.055 13.055 DISCLOSURE OF BREACH IN SECURITY; NOTIFICATION AND INVESTIGATION REPORT REQUIRED. Subd. 2. Notice to individuals; investigation report. (a) A government entity that collects, creates, receives, maintains, or disseminates private or confidential data on individuals must disclose any breach of the security of the data following discovery or notification of the breach. Written notification must be made to any individual who is the subject of the data and whose private or confidential data was, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired by an unauthorized person and must inform the individual that a report will be prepared under paragraph (b), how the individual may obtain access to the report, and that the individual may request delivery of the report by mail or e-mail. The disclosure must be made in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, consistent with (1) the legitimate needs of a law enforcement agency as provided in subdivision 3; or (2) any measures necessary to determine the scope of the breach and restore the reasonable security of the data. (b) Notwithstanding section 13.15 or 13.37, upon completion of an investigation into any breach in the security of data and final disposition of any disciplinary action for purposes of section 13.43, including exhaustion of all rights of appeal under any applicable collective bargaining agreement, the responsible authority shall prepare a report on the facts and results of the investigation. If the breach involves unauthorized access to or acquisition of data by an employee, contractor, or agent of the government entity, the report must at a minimum include: (1) a description of the type of data that were accessed or acquired; (2) the number of individuals whose data was improperly accessed or acquired; (3) if there has been final disposition of disciplinary action for purposes of section 13.43, the name of each employee determined to be responsible for the unauthorized access or acquisition, unless the employee was performing duties under chapter 5B; and (4) the final disposition of any disciplinary action taken against each employee in response.



from: Alongi, Anthony (DNR) anthony.alongi@state.mn.us
to: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
date: Nov 22, 2021, 12:08 PM
subject: RE: data practices request
mailed-by: state.mn.us
signed-by: state.mn.us
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important mainly because you often read messages with this label.

Good morning,
 
Since your inquiry appears to relate to recent, current, and/or potential litigation, our team will engage the appropriate internal personnel and get back to you on a reasonable timeline. Meanwhile, with the understanding that I will not discuss such litigation over the phone, my direct phone number is 651.259.5556. I am available to discuss employee performance. That said, I believe I have the information I need regarding your assessment of the staff in question.
 
As noted, the other parts of your inquiry will get appropriate treatment, and either I or someone else from this agency will be in touch in the coming days to provide you with as much information as we can legally and practically provide. Thank you,
 
Anthony Alongi
Section Manager, Policy and Planning
MN Department of Natural Resources










More to come ...

Related links:

Update: Formal Criminal Complaint Against Your Corrupt City Of Mountain Lake City Administrator/Clerk Michael Schulte, Your Corrupt Chief Of Police Douglas Bristol, & Your Corrupt City Attorney Maryellen Shrhoff? Corrupt DNR Again Caught Illegally Releasing Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data In High-Profile Cases: Chanhthone Phongsim 17-VB-18-491 & Isouvahn Xayachack 17-VB-18-492? Public Portion Of Initial Criminal Complaint Arrives? Case SO19020069?

Formal Criminal Complaint Against Your Corrupt City Of Mountain Lake City Administrator/Clerk Michael Schulte, Your Corrupt Chief Of Police Douglas Bristol, & Your Corrupt City Attorney Maryellen Shrhoff? Corrupt DNR Again Caught Illegally Releasing Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data In High-Profile Cases: Chanhthone Phongsim 17-VB-18-491 & Isouvahn Xayachack 17-VB-18-492?

Witness Intimidation & Harassment By Judicial Officer Rachel C. Sullivan? Judicial Officer Sullivan & St Louis County Personnel Conspire To Provoke Witness Rick Kottom In Hopes Of Inciting Kottom To Violence?

Kottom Tosses Another Monkey Wrench Into Rigged 69DU-CR-17-900? Kottom's 07-01-18 Complaint To Chief Judicial Officer Sally L. Tarnowski?

Kottom Criminal Complaint Tosses Huge Monkey Wrench Into 69DU-CR-17-900 Trial? St. Louis Co. Attorney Mark S. Rubin, St. Louis Co. Attorney Criminal Division Head Gary W. Bjorklund, St. Louis Co. Assistant County Attorney Christopher Pinkert, Dept Of Natural Resources (DNR) Colonel Rodmen Smith, DNR Administrative Manager Captain Alex Gutierrez & MN DNR Data Practices Compliance Official Sheila Deyo All Named In Kottom Complaint? DNR & Corrupt Prosecutors Have Well-Documented History Of Trying Cases In Court Of Public Opinion, Don't They? Confidential/Nonpublic Criminal Investigative Data Illegally Released To Lap-Dog Media, Right?

Update On DNR's Illegal Search & Seizure At Indiana Fisherman's Upper Cormorant Lake Cabin? David Deckard, Oklahoma, Chair Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Notified Of Corrupt MN DNR's History Of Obstructing Justice? Does the Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Encourage Or Discourage Due Process Violations? Inquiring Minds Want To Know, Don't They? Anthony Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1798) Clifford Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1800) & Ryan Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1802) Exposing CO Joseph Stattelman's Breaking & Entering Of Cabin?

Corrupt DNR Conspires With Hacks At KARE 11 TV To Rig Case No. 69DU-CR-17-901 State Of Mn VS Douglas Anthony Marana & Case No. 69DU-CR-17-900 State Of MN VS Roderick Robert Kottom? DNR Illegally Releases Confidential Data Yet Again, Right? Do You Remember Former DNR Col Rodmen Illegally Releasing 03-CR-15-1798, 03-CR-15-1800, 03-CR-15-1801, 03-CR-15-1802, 03-CR-15-1803 & 03-CR-15-1804 Confidential Data To WCCO-TV Hack Bill Hudson?

DNR's Major Greg Salo Not Fazed By CO Osborne's Coercive Invasion Of Johnson's Home? Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson Still Maliciously Prosecuted By Former Pope Co. Assistant Attorney/Douglas Co. Attorney Chad "The Felon" Larson? Larson And DNR Have A Well-Documented History Of Home Invasion, Don't They?

Update On DNR's Illegal Search & Seizure At Indiana Fisherman's Upper Cormorant Lake Cabin? David Deckard, Oklahoma, Chair Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Notified Of Corrupt MN DNR's History Of Obstructing Justice? Does the Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Encourage Or Discourage Due Process Violations? Inquiring Minds Want To Know, Don't They? Anthony Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1798) Clifford Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1800) & Ryan Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1802) Exposing CO Joseph Stattelman's Breaking & Entering Of Cabin?

DNR Caught Sending Confidential Criminal Investigative Data To Brainerd Dispatch (Forum Communication Company)? Indiana Fisherman Victims Of Illegal Search & Seizure? Missing Audio? Nemmers' Call To Detroit Lakes Newspaper Editor Nathan Bowe (Forum Communication Company) Forces 08/31/2015 Arraignment To Be Reset By Court To 09/28/2015? (Nemmers Threw A Monkey Wrench Into 03-CR-15-1798, 03-CR-15-1800, 03-CR-15-1801, 03-CR-15-1802, 03-CR-15-1803, 03-CR-15-1804, Didn't He? Thank You, Jesus!) Sounds Like Ronald Johnson's Rigged Case No. 21-CR-13-51, Doesn't It?

Echo Press Editor (Forum Communications Company, Right?) Al Edenloff Conspired With Corrupt DNR Officer Shane Osborne To Rig Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson? Court Documents Reveal Corrupt Editor Edenloff Knowingly Willingly & Intentionally Published Confidential Chapter 13.82 Criminal Investigative Data? Former Corrupt Douglas Co. Attorney & Current Corrupt Defense Attorney Chris Karpan Filing A Loony Appeal That Doesn't Address Illegal Search By His Buddy DNR Officer Osborne? No Surprise, Right?

DNR Invades Ronald Wayne Johnson's Home Without Probable Cause? Johnson Is A Victim Of DNR Home Invasion, Isn't He? Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson Maliciously Prosecuted By Chad "The Felon" Larson? "The Felon" Larson Has A Well-Documented History Of Covering Up Illegal Home Invasions, Doesn't He? Sounds Like Pope Co Home Invasion Of Nemmers' Home, Doesn't It? DNR's CO Shane Osborne Tampered With Audio To Cover Up Home Invasion?

Friday, November 19, 2021

Whose Ready For Another Monkey Wrench To Be Tossed Into The Rigged Case 08-CR-21-272 State Of Minnesota Vs Candi Jolene Lemarr? MN Board of Veterinary Medicine Executive Director Julia H. Wilson, DVM Continues To Treat Nemmers Like A Retarded Child?

from: MED, VET (HLB) <vet.med@state.mn.us>
to: Lion News <lionnews00@gmail.com>
date: Nov 18, 2021, 4:14 PM
subject: RE: Chapter 13 Data Request For Data On Complaint Process At The MN Board of Veterinary Medicine
mailed-by: state.mn.us
signed-by: state.mn.us
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important mainly because you often read messages with this label.

Dear Mr. Nemmers,
 
Thank you for clarifying your data request. I am working on compiling the requested data for you.
 
Your patience is appreciated.
 
Sincerely,
 
Julia H. Wilson, DVM
Diplomate, American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Executive Director, Minnesota Board of Veterinary Medicine
New address beginning September 1, 2021:
335 Randolph Ave Suite 215
St. Paul, MN 55102
Phone: 651 201-2844
Fax: 651 201-2842
Website: http://www.vetmed.state.mn.us
E-mail: julia.wilson@state.mn.us

Our mission is to promote, preserve, and protect the health, safety and welfare of the public and animals through the effective control and regulation of the practice of veterinary medicine.
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

____________________________________________________________________

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: "MED, VET (HLB)" vet.med@state.mn.us,
michelle.vaughn@state.mn.us,
steven.shadwick@state.mn.us,
mahlon.bauman@state.mn.us,
christopher.powers@state.mn.us,
mary.j.olson@state.mn.us,
jody.grote@state.mn.us,
julie.dahlke@state.mn.us,
shadyoakvetclinic@gmail.com
date: Nov 19, 2021, 9:56 AM
subject: Re: Chapter 13 Data Request For Data On Complaint Process At The MN Board of Veterinary Medicine
mailed-by: gmail.com

Michelle Vaughn, DVM President, MN Board of Veterinary Medicine (651) 201-2844/(952) 938-1926:

When exactly is your Minnesota Board of Veterinary Medicine Executive Director Julia H. Wilson, DVM going to stop treating me like a retarded child? Why wasn't your MN Board of Veterinary Medicine Personnel policy and procedure manual attached to the last email sent by Wilson? Is efficient time management a foreign concept to Wilson? Is the MN Board of Veterinary Medicine Personnel policy and procedure manual "accessible for convenient use" or not? Are the names and contact information for investigators for the MN Board of Veterinary Medicine complaint process "accessible for convenient use" or not? Does Wilson know the answer to these questions? Does Wilson even know if your investigators have established policies and procedures?

When is Wislon going to stop insulting my intelligence and stop wasting my valuable time? Is Wilson competent enough to have an intelligent conversation about animal abuse or not? Is Wilson competent enough to discern the difference between subjective palpation of a horse and objective blood analysis of a horse? So when is my readily available, free, electronic public data hitting my email inbox? Five (5) minutes from never?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. Did Wilson only respond because she was lurking and skulking on my blog, Lion News?
P.S.S. You aren't upset that I sent my communications with your state agency to the New Ulm Journal, are you?

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.03 13.03 ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT DATA. § Subdivision 1.Public data. All government data collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated by a government entity shall be public unless classified by statute, or temporary classification pursuant to section 13.06, or federal law, as nonpublic or protected nonpublic, or with respect to data on individuals, as private or confidential. The responsible authority in every government entity shall keep records containing government data in such an arrangement and condition as to make them easily accessible for convenient use. Photographic, photostatic, microphotographic, or microfilmed records shall be considered as accessible for convenient use regardless of the size of such records.

http://www.vspn.org/Library/Misc/VSPN_M02371.htm
Veterinary Medical Terminology
Courtesy of Nanette Walker Smith, RVT, CVT and Elizabeth Warren, RVT
All veterinary hospitals should have a good veterinary medical dictionary accessible at all times. We recommend Saunders Comprehensive Veterinary Dictionary, second ed. by Blood and Saunders. Basic word structure: Most medical terms can be deciphered by breaking them down to their roots: Prefix – word beginning, may completely change the meaning of the word Combining vowel – links root words to root words or suffixes (usually “o”) Root word – foundation of the word, may change to a combining form to link words Suffix – word ending, refers back to the root The most common word structures seen in veterinary practice are listed in the charts below:
Suffix Meaning Example Literal Translation Actual Definition
-able, -ible, -ble The power to be Palpable The power to feel Able to feel something
-esthesia Denoting sensation Anesthesia Without sensation Without sensation
Terminology frequently used to designate body parts of organs:
Body part/organ Medical terminology
Muscle Myo
Combining Forms:
Root Meaning Example Definition of Example
nomalo- Denoting irregularity Anomaly An irregular finding
Somato- Denoting the body Somatic Pertaining to the body
Sphygma- Denoting a pulse Sphygmomanometer Instrument for measuring arterial blood pressure
Veno- Denoting a vein Venipuncture Surgical puncture a vein

Dr. Nancy Peterson, DVM, of the New Ulm Regional Veterinary Center testified she was contacted by the Brown County law enforcement to do a site visit for humane reasons at Lemarr’s farm on Nov. 23, 2020. “She had 19 horses, 12-14 goats, 20-30 chickens, two dogs and cats,” Peterson testified. “In the first pen I saw no hay, bunk or feeding spot, and smaller, underweight horses that looked pretty rough. They had dull coats, were scrawny, and hadn’t been groomed lately.” Peterson testified she touched the back of one of the horses, “J.J.” and described him as underweight, taking into account that he arrived at Lemarr’s farm underweight. In addition, Peterson testified a water tank had no tank heater that would allow water to stay thawed in the winter. “I saw no bedding or feed in stalls. The floor was packed with dirt and manure,” Peterson testified. “The horses needed more bedding. They didn’t have the coat or body condition score for winter.” Peterson testified “veterinarians should be involved in rehabilitating horses in case something goes wrong, because they know what they’ve been doing.” Chief deputy, veterinarian take trial stand in Lemarr trial Defense witness testifies she saw no neglect Nov 19, 2021 Fritz Busch Staff Writer fbusch@nujournal.com https://www.nujournal.com/news/local-news/2021/11/19/chief-deputy-veterinarian-take-trial-stand-in-lemarr-trial/

Decades of social science and jury research “has shown that most people are affective, not cognitive, thinkers.”48 “Most people are emotional, symbol oriented, selective perceivers of information who base their decisions largely on previously held attitudes about people and events.”49 The typical person is also a deductive reasoner—using only a few premises to arrive at a decision and then accepting, rejecting, or distorting “other information to fit their already determined conclusions.”50 In contrast, a scientific expert witness is a cognitive thinker—basing decisions on evaluation, synthesis, and analysis. Given a jury panel with a typical cross section of the population who will most like be affective thinkers, veterinary pathologists who are typically cognitive thinkers need to understand how to bridge that chasm between affective thinkers and cognitive thinkers. A way to bridge that chasm is for veterinary pathologists to think of themselves as teachers.51 Consider ways to take complicated testimony and make it simple and interesting for the students (the jurors).52 A good exercise is for the expert witness to think back on his or her best teachers and what qualities made them good teachers.53 Consider the ways in which those teachers made learning fun and understandable, and translate them into the testimony.54 Veterinary pathologists should also employ different ways to get across the testimony, including visual aids.55 Expert witnesses should delve into the natural enthusiasm and passion they have for their subjects. This is veterinary pathologists’ chance to discuss and share an area that they love and have spent years mastering. That enthusiasm will be noticed and appreciated by jurors, and it makes the expert likeable (likeability reaches the core of an affective thinker). Demystifying the Courtroom: Everything the Veterinary Pathologist Needs to Know About Testifying in an Animal Cruelty Case Reese Frederickson, First Published May 16, 2016 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0300985816647439

3. Only horses exhibiting altered metabolism and having inadequate feed stores on the premises should be seized. Removing healthy horses from their home is not necessary and may often result in adverse consequences due to stress created by a new environment and untrained handlers. 4. If at all possible, the alleged neglected horses should remain at the owner’s farm. Removing any horse from its familiar environment, drastically changing its diet, and exposing it to a new set of handlers will usually result in stress and a further loss of body condition. In the vast majority of cases, if the intent is truly the best care of the horse, that care can best be administered in familiar surroundings. If the legal authorities require, care can be conducted under their official guidance. “Innocent until proven guilty” is the most abused legal standard in America today. Due to biased press coverage, most “trials” are conducted before the accused ever has a chance to answer the charges. Once a horse owner has been accused of neglect, they are stained for life. If they are later proven to be innocent, the public has already painted them with a negative picture. This should not happen. It is imperative that the state authorities demonstrate adequate cause for seizure. Unsupported claims of neglect against a horse owner should be followed by a vigorous public campaign by the state authorities criticizing the parties who have filed a frivolous claim and, if possible, such parties should be prosecuted by the state. Author’s Information:(MIS)USE OF THE BCS IN ALLEGED NEGLECT by Don Henneke, Ph.D., is currently the Director of Equine Science at Tarleton State University, Stephenville, Texas. Dr. Henneke was the principal investigator in developing the Body Condition Scoring System for Horses at Texas A&M University in 1979.

08-CR-21-272 STATE OF MINNESOTA Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 11/1/2021 4:48 PM IN DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF BROWN FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Court File No. 08-CR-21-272 State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, vs. STATE’S AMENDED WITNESS LIST Candi Jolene Lemarr, Defendant. TO: Defendant above-named, and her attorney, James J. Kuettner, 427 South Broad Street, P.O. Box 12, Mankato, MN 56002. The State may call the following witnesses at trial: 1. Deputy Randee Murphy Brown County Sheriff's Office 15 South Washington Street New Ulm, MN 56073 No Known Criminal History 2. Deputy Derek Shaw Brown County Sheriff's Office 15 South Washington Street New Ulm, MN 56073 No Known Criminal History 3. Investigator Jeremy Reed Brown County Sheriff's Office 15 South Washington Street New Ulm, MN 56073 No Known Criminal History 4. Stacey Lee Gaede 16158 Lincoln Road Fayette, IA 52142 No Known Criminal History08-CR-21-272 5. Tami Bailey 215 Chalmer Drive North Ft. Meyers, FL 33917 No Known Criminal History 6. Dr. Amanda Elston South Winn Veterinary Clinic 315 Fisher Avenue Ossian, Iowa 52161 No Known Criminal History 7. Dr. Zach Loppnow Iowa State University Hospital 1809 S. Riverside Drive Ames, Iowa 50011 No Known Criminal History 8. Dr. Margo Cangemi Anoka Equine Vet Services 16445 70 th St. NE Elk River, MN 55330 No Known Criminal History 9. Elizabeth Ann Olander 4231 Stark Rd NE Cambridge, MN 55008 No Known Criminal History 10. Ryan Michael Hauth 26731 315th Avenue Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 Please See Attached 11. Drew Ann Fitzpatrick Please See Attached Minnesota Hooved Animal Rescue Foundation P.O. Box 47 Zimmerman, MN 55398 12. Steven Edmund Sellner 405 North 6 th St. Henderson, MN 56044 Please See Attached 13. Kym Garvey Save the Brays 12788 115 th Street Milaca, MN 56353 No Known Criminal History 2 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 11/1/2021 4:48 PM08-CR-21-272 14. Dr. Nancy Peterson New Ulm Regional Veterinary Center 401 20 th Street South New Ulm, MN 56073 No Known Criminal History 15. Elizabeth Jane Meyer 16158 Lincoln Road Fayette, Iowa 52142 No Known Criminal History 16. Devlin Ray Corler 406 Mechanic St. Fayette, Iowa 52142 No Known Criminal History 17. Madeline Harford 1108 Grant Ave, Apt 3 Waterloo, IA 50702 No Known Criminal History 18. Christine Maire 506 2 nd Avenue SW Independence, Iowa 50644 No Known Criminal History 19. Stephanie Poor 16134 Jade Rd. Fayette, Iowa 52142 No Known Criminal History 20. Anyone else listed on Defendant’s Witness List. 21. Anyone else listed in Discovery materials. 22. John Feinberg Facebook, Inc 1601 S. California Ave Palo Alto, CA 94304 23. Joseph Dela Cruz GoFundMe c/o Legal Department 855 Jefferson Avenue P.O. Box 1329 Redwood City, CA 94063 3 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 11/1/2021 4:48 PM08-CR-21-272 24. Cora Hamann Kuettner Legal PLLC 427 S. Broad St. Mankato, MN 56001 25. Janelle Louwagie 26. Jesse Kettner 27. Jennifer Eaton 28. Kayla Mathiowetz 29. Madie Wildfeuer 30. Eryn Friesen 31. Rachel Friesen 32. Rachelle Rients 33. Barb Herrig 34. Nicole Maras 35. Josh Garcia 36. Clara Lemarr 26731 315th Ave. Sleepy Eye, MN 56086 37. Michelle Koenig New Ulm Regional Veterinary Center 401 20 th Street South New Ulm, MN 56073 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 11/1/2021 4:48 PM Expert Witness List: (Minn. R. Evid. 702) Dr. Nancy Peterson Ms. Peterson is a Licensed Veterinarian for New Ulm Regional Veterinary Clinic. Pursuant to Minn. R. Evid. 702, Ms. Peterson qualifies as an expert to testify regarding animal science, welfare and overall practice of veterinary care. Ms. Peterson qualifies as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, and education in the area of veterinary medicine. A copy of Ms. Peterson’s Curriculum Vitae is provided via the exhibit list and her criminal history attached hereto. 408-CR-21-272 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 11/1/2021 4:48 PM Dr. Zach Loppnow Mr. Loppnow is a Licensed Veterinarian for Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medical Center. Pursuant to Minn. R. Evid. 702, Mr. Loppnow qualifies as an expert to testify regarding animal science, welfare and overall practice of veterinary care. Mr. Loppnow qualifies as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, and education in the area of veterinary medicine. A copy of Mr. Loppnow’s resume is provided via the exhibit list and his criminal history attached hereto. Dr. Margo Cangemi Ms. Cangemi is a Licensed Veterinarian for Anoka Equine. Pursuant to Minn. R. Evid. 702, Ms. Cangemi qualifies as an expert to testify regarding animal science, welfare and overall practice of veterinary care. Ms. Camgemi qualifies as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, and education in the area of veterinary medicine. A copy of Ms. Cangemi’s resume is provided via the exhibit list and her criminal history attached hereto. Dr. Amanda Elston Ms. Elson is a Licensed Veterinarian for South Winn Veterinary Clinic. Pursuant to Minn. R. Evid. 702, Ms. Elston qualifies as an expert to testify regarding animal science, welfare and overall practice of veterinary care. Ms. Elston qualifies as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, and education in the area of veterinary medicine. A copy of Ms. Elston’s resume is provided via the exhibit list and her criminal history attached hereto. CHARLES W. HANSON BROWN COUNTY ATTORNEY Dated: November 1, 2021 By: /s/ Jill M. Jensen Jill M. Jensen #0398408 Deputy County Attorney 1 South State Street P.O. Box 248 New Ulm, MN 56073 Phone: (507) 233-6688 Fax: (507) 233-6692 5

Attachment: Chapter 13 Data Request For Candi Lemarr Related Data Why Is The Convicted Thief Brown County Attorney Chuck Hanson Still Harassing111821_1000am.pdf

More to come ...

Related links: 

How About We Tell The New Ulm Journal About The Hostile Response Nemmers Received From The The MN Board of Veterinary Medicine? The Data From The Rigged Cases (13-CR-19-1031 State Of Minnesota Vs Carmen Marie Burth & 08-CR-21-272 State Of Minnesota Vs Candi Jolene Lemarr) Made Executive Director Julia H. Wilson, DVM Hostile, Right? Where Oh Where Is That Brown County Data, Huh?

How About We Toss A Monkey Wrench Into The High-Profile Animal Cruelty Cases Of Candi Lemarr And Carmen Marie Burth? It's Rigged Case Nos. 13-CR-19-1031 State Of Minnesota Vs Carmen Marie Burth & 08-CR-21-272 State Of Minnesota Vs Candi Jolene Lemarr, Isn't It? Let's Request Some Data From The MN Board of Veterinary Medicine, Shall We? Do You Want To See The Ridiculous Response From Executive Director Julia H. Wilson, DVM?

Who Wants To Toss A Monkey Wrench Into The High-Profile Candi Lemarr Animal Cruelty Case? It's Rigged Case No. 08-CR-21-272 State Of Minnesota Vs Candi Jolene Lemarr, Isn't It? Chapter 13 Data Request For Candi Lemarr Related Data – Why Is The Convicted Thief Brown County Attorney Chuck Hanson Harassing Nemmers?

Nemmers Asks The Brown Co. Commissioners: "Have You Or Haven't You Watched The Damning Video Of Your Corrupt Brown Co. Attorney Charles “The Thief” Hanson Falsely Accusing Nemmers Of Harassment?" Why Oh Why Is “The Thief” Hanson Retaliating Against Nemmers? Did You Know That Nemmers Was Looking Into How “The Thief” Hanson Was Hired As A Law Enforcement Officer AKA Assistant Watonwan Co. Attorney When “The Thief” Hanson Had Prior Theft Convictions? And Nemmers Tossed A Huge Monkey Wrench Into The High-Profile Case No. 08-CV-20-978 Candi Lemarr Vs Brown County, Didn't He? Sounds Like A Motive To Threaten & To Harass Nemmers, Doesn't It? 

Who Wants To Toss A Monkey Wrench Into Case No. 13-CR-19-1031 State Of Minnesota Vs Carmen Marie Burth? North Branch Chief Of Police Daniel Meyer, Assistant Chisago County Attorney Kathryn Jean Kelly And Chisago County Attorney Janet Reiter Are Trying Burth's Case In The Court Of Public Opinion, Aren't They? Animal Humane Society's Pistol Packing Humane Agent Keith Streff And Anoka Equine Veterinary Services Dr. Zach Loppnow Are Aiding & Abetting In The Conspiracy, Aren't They? You Want To See How Nonprofits Conspire With LEO To Steal Your Horses?

Transcripts For Case No 46-CV-19-1224 Goldmount Veterinary Center PA Vs Watonwan Co Animal Humane Society Not On The Register Of Actions But Hidden In Affidavit In Support Of The AHS’s Motion For A New Trial Or In The Alternative Remittitur? You Want To Read The Transcripts For The Testimony Of Pistol Packing AHS Humane Agent Keith Streff, Don't You? Did Anyone Ask Streff On The Witness Stand Why He Wasn't Trying To Impersonate A Peace Officer During The Trial? FYI: Did You Know That Streff Was Forced To Wear "Street Clothes" As A Result Of Nemmers' Complaint?

Let's Ask Joseph A. Gangi, Attorney for Michael Johnson, If Johnson Plans On Reporting Pistol Packing AHS Agent Keith Streff To LEO For Impersonating A Peace Officer, Shall We? Armed Minnesota Animal Humane Society Humane Agent Keith Streff Wearing A Pistol In Case No 83-CR-18-513 State Of Minnesota Vs Michael Charles Johnson? A Monkey Wrench For Case No. 46-CV-19-1224 Goldmount Vs Watonwan Co And AHS?

Let's Ask Martin County Sheriff Markquart If Armed Minnesota Animal Humane Society Humane Agent Keith Streff Will Be Allowed To Impersonate A Peace Officer In His Jurisdiction, Shall We? Hey How About We Ask Watonwan County Sheriff Bergeman Why The Pistol Packing Streff Was Allowed To Impersonate A Peace Officer In His Jurisdiction? Will Streff Get Permission To Influence the Jury With His Pistol In The June 28, 2021 Through July 2, 2021 Trial for Court File 46-CV-19-1224 Goldmount Veterinary Center, P.A. Vs Watonwan County, Animal Humane Society?

Armed Minnesota Animal Humane Society Humane Agent Keith Streff Wearing A Firearm In Case No. 83-CR-18-513 State Of Minnesota Vs Michael Charles Johnson? Will AHS Agent Streff Show Up Armed At June 28‐June 30th, 2021 & July 1– July 2, 2021 Jury Trial for Court File 46-CV-19-1224 Goldmount Veterinary Center, P.A. Vs Watonwan County, Animal Humane Society? Has Streff Ever Been Accused Of Impersonating An Officer? Let's Ask AHS Attorney Freitag, Okay? Should We Tell The St. James Plaindealer & The Martin County Star Editors About Watonwan Co. Attorney Lindee's Illegal Withholding Of Public Data? Lindee Knows That The Chapter 13 Data Will Toss A Monkey Wrench Into 46-CV-19-1224, Doesn't He