Lion News: February 2022

Friday, February 18, 2022

DNR Commissioner Sarah Strommen Sics Operations Services Division Acting Director Greg Kruse After Nemmers? Kruse Attempts To Harass & Intimidate Nemmers Into Silence About Illegally Released Data With Retarded Script? It's Still The Cover-up For The Illegal Release Of Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data For State Of MN VS Michael Sysa 39-VB-21-468, David Sysa 39-VB-21-469 And Yevgeniy Simonovich 39-VB-21-470, Isn't It?

from: Kruse, Greg A (DNR) greg.kruse@state.mn.us
to: "lionnews00@gmail.com" lionnews00@gmail.com
date: Feb 17, 2022, 1:41 PM
subject: Data practices requests
mailed-by: state.mn.us
signed-by: state.mn.us
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important according to Google magic.

Dear Mr. Nemmers,

I am responding to your email of January 4, 2022, to Commissioner Strommen and others regarding the data practices requests you submitted to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) on November 14, and November 18, 2021.

In your email you indicate that the DNR has not responded to data requests you made in November. However, the DNR did respond to your requests in a timely manner, as indicated in the following paragraphs. You also state in your January 4, 2022, email that DNR released not public data to you in response to your requests. As described below, that assertion is not correct.

In your November 14, 2021 request, you asked for copies of citations of the three individuals named in a November 12, 2021 Pioneer Press article as well as a press release sent to the Bemidji Pioneer regarding a news article that appeared in that paper. Additionally, on November 18, 2021, you requested a redacted copy of the warning given the minor referenced in the article, as well as “the DNR policy and procedure manual”.

On November 15, 2021, DNR staff notified you that there was no press release related to the Bemidji Pioneer news article and therefore no data to provide regarding that request. On this date, DNR staff also emailed you copies of incident reports that were redacted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 13.82, subdivision 6. On November 22, 2021, DNR staff emailed you a copy of the three citations that you requested as well as a copy of the verbal warning issued to the minor. The citations were redacted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 13.82, subdivision 2 and the data on the verbal warning issued to a minor was redacted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 84.0873.

The redacted incident reports, citations and verbal warning are not criminal investigative data as defined in statute. Minnesota Statutes section 13.82, subdivision 2, classifies “data created or collected by law enforcement agencies which document any actions taken by them to cite, arrest, incarcerate or otherwise substantially deprive an adult individual of liberty” as public data. Minnesota Statutes section 13.82, subdivision 6 classifies “data collected or created by law enforcement agencies which document the agency’s response to a request for service” as public data. DNR redacted information that is not classified as public under subdivisions 2 and 6 of section 13.82, but the remainder of this data is public. Arrest data under subdivision 2 and response data under subdivision 6 of section 13.82 is excluded from the definition of “criminal investigative data” in subdivision 7 of section 13.82. Further, a warning is not “criminal investigative data” because it is not data collected in order to “prepare a case against a person . . . for the commission of a crime.” Minnesota Statutes 13.82, subdivision 7.

On November 19, 2021, in response to your inquiry about a “DNR policy and procedure manual,” staff noted the breadth of options and sought clarification of your request, which you did not provide in your subsequent communications. In an effort to be as responsive as possible, on November 29, 2021, staff provided you with the two DNR operational orders most closely associated with the nature of your request (data practices). Staff subsequently provided you with the entirety of DNR’s operational orders over the course of multiple emails sent to you on December 1, 2021.

As indicated above, DNR staff have promptly provided the data you requested in accordance with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act; staff also promptly responded to your requests for data that did not exist (i.e., a press release) by indicating that such data did not exist.

You can always request other data from this agency at https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dataaccess/index.html. Thank you for your correspondence.

Sincerely,

Greg Kruse
Acting Director
Operations Services Division

Minnesota Department of Natural Resource
500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155
651-259-5718
greg.kruse@state.mn.us

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: "Kruse, Greg A (DNR)" greg.kruse@state.mn.us,
Barb.Naramore@state.mn.us,
Sarah.Strommen@state.mn.us,
"Alongi, Anthony (DNR)" anthony.alongi@state.mn.us,
"MN_Data Request (DNR)" datarequest.dnr@state.mn.us
date: Feb 17, 2022, 2:46 PM
subject: Re: Data practices requests
mailed-by: gmail.com

Sarah Strommen, DNR Commissioner & Barb Naramore, Deputy DNR Commissioner 651-259-5033:

Is your Acting Director Greg Kruse drunk as a skunk? Or is Kruse high as a kite on prescription or illicit drugs? Maybe Kruse had a traumatic brain injury or a stroke? Or is Kruse just continuing with the same harassment script that I have been receiving from your other corrupt DNR personnel?

1, Have or haven't I received the current Minnesota Department Of Natural Resources Division Of Enforcement Directives? Answer: No. Why not?
2. Do or don't I want the entire current Minnesota Department Of Natural Resources Division Of Enforcement Directives emailed to me? Answer: Yes. Why haven't that data been emailed to me?
2. DId or didn't the DNR receive authorization from Lake of the Woods County Attorney James Carl Austad 218-634-1190? Where is my data that indicates that you received proper authorization from Lake of the Woods County Attorney James Carl Austad of confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal investigative data for Michael A Sysa (Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State Of Minnesota vs Michael A Sysa) David Alekseevich Sysa (Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State Of Minnesota vs David Alekseevich Sysa) and Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich (Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State Of Minnesota vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich) to members of the media?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

CO Huener and I discussed with the group that [Redacted] as a juvenile, would not be charged for possessing an over limit of walleye/sauger. We told Michael, David, and Yevgenity that they would each be charged for possessing over limit of walleye/sauger, and that the restitution for the 48 fish over the legal limit would be divided amongst the three of them- 16 fish each. The three agreed to this. Michael, David and Yevgenity were each charged/cited for possessing over limit of walleye/sauger, as well as restitution for 16 walleye per person. All walleye/sauger (72 total) were seized, as well as both coolers. A seizure receipt was issued. A warning was documented for [Redacted] for possessing over limit of walleye/sauger. End of Report. C. Sura 648. Department of Natural Resources Incident Report ICR# 21026876. Reported: 11-08-2021 0958. Officer Assigned: Sura, Cory Badge No. 648 Primary: Yes. Officer Assigned: Huener, Ben Badge No: 538 Primary: No.

Mr. Karpan: I do have one request. Um, I've not asked for this before, I'm not sure how to handle it, but the Department of Natural Resources as they've done in the past has seen fit to do a press release, and officer Osborne has answered questions for the newspaper. My client – all the facts of the case are in the Echo Press, on the radio and in sporting magazines. Not only are there quotes in there that aren't - - I mean I know the State has a right to release incident data I think it's called.
Under Chapter 13.82, investigative data is not to be released. Well, there are pictures allegedly of my client's fish all over the Echo Press. Everybody in town is talking about it. I don't know if I'll have to make a change of venue motion eventually. I'll have to see how this plays out in a few months.
But under 13.82, there's no way the DNR is supposed to be releasing pictures of evidence to the newspaper. It prejudices my client. It prejudices all of us. It makes it impossible to get a fair trail. So I'm asking the Court to order the Department of Natural Resources to not discuss this case any further until it's done.
The Court: Mr. Hochsprung?
Mr. Hochsprung: Your Honor, I did not authorize the Department of Natural Resources to disclose anything to the paper. Um, I can talk with Mr. Osborne or whoever about that, but I don't have any information about that. State of Minnesota vs. Ronald Wayne Johnson Rule 5/ Rule 8 Hearing. Court File No. 21-CR- 13-51. February 11, 2013.

VII. STORAGE OF PHOTOGRAPHS AND RECORDINGS A. Media containing recordings and photos shall be marked for identification, guarded against degradation and overwriting, and stored in a secure location. B. Officers taking digital images for evidentiary purposes shall download the images onto the officer’s computer and shall immediately copy the images to a write once CD-ROM. This CD-ROM shall be known and labeled as the “archive copy”. 1. Officers shall not release archive copies (or original video or audio tape recordings) from their custody. Officers shall honor legitimate requests for access to evidentiary media by making and providing a copy of the media to the prosecuting attorney or the division’s data practices responsible authorities. 2. The existence of evidentiary photos or recordings shall be disclosed in any citation notes or reports prepared about the incident. O-11-06, PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE STANDARDS Page 4

VIII. PRINCIPLE FIVE Conservation Officers shall treat all members of the public courteously and with respect. A. Rationale Conservation Officers are one of the most visible forms of state government. Therefore, Conservation Officers must make a positive impression when interacting with the public and each other. B. Rules 3. No Conservation Officer shall ridicule, mock, deride, taunt, belittle, willfully embarrass, humiliate, or shame a person, or do anything reasonably calculated to incite a person to violence. A-4-99, CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER Page 6. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE DIRECTIVE NUMBER: A-4-99 SUBJECT: CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 1999 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Rescinds Directive 61-96 REFERENCE: Minnesota Statute Sec 626.8457, 43A.38, 43A.39; Directive A-3-98; C.L.E.A. 26.1; State Electronic Mail and Internet Policy; POST Model Conduct Policy DISTRIBUTION: All Division Employees NUMBER OF PAGES: 31

More to come ...

Wednesday, February 16, 2022

What Is The Status Of My Chapter 13 Data Request For Data That Stacy Schoon Alleged Was Illegally Withheld From Her In Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State Of Minnesota Vs Stacy Joy Schoon? Nemmers' Chapter 13 Data Request Triggers Motion For Missing Booking Photo & Fingerprints?

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: dbucholz@co.ottertail.mn.us,
WayneJohnsonOTC@outlook.com,
leerogness@yahoo.com,
kmortens@co.ottertail.mn.us,
bmurphy@co.otter-tail.mn.us,
bfitzgib@co.ottertail.mn.us,
Michelle Eldien meldien@co.ottertail.mn.us
date: Feb 16, 2022, 10:51 AM
subject: What Is The Status Of My Chapter 13 Data Request For Data That Stacy Schoon Alleged Was Illegally Withheld From Her In Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State Of Minnesota Vs Stacy Joy Schoon?
mailed-by: gmail.com

Dan Bucholz District 1 Commissioner 218-849-2143/218-346-3575, Wayne D. Johnson District 2 Commissioner (Vice Chair) 218-863-7500, Kurt Mortenson District 3 Commissioner 218-205-2415, Betty Murphy District 4 Commissioner (Chair) 218-640-1706, Leland (Lee) Rogness District 5 Commissioner 218-770-7066:

Why oh why Otter Tail County Sheriff Barry Fitzgibbons 218-998-8534 and Otter Tail County Attorney Michelle Eldien 218-998-8400 both willfully refused to respond to my Chapter 13 Data Request for 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal investigative data that Stacy Schoon alleged that was illegally withheld from her? Are both Fitzgibbons and Eldien mad at me because I pointed out the obvious fact that they had not obtained fingerprints nor mugshots from Stacy? Are both Fitzgibbons and Eldien mad at me because the fingerprints and the mugshots might convince Stacy to withdraw her guilty plea or appeal her criminal conviction? Do you think that might be a motive for both Fitzgibbons and Eldien to willfully refuse to respond to me?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.03 13.03 ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT DATA. § Subdivision 1. Public data. All government data collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated by a government entity shall be public unless classified by statute, or temporary classification pursuant to section 13.06, or federal law, as nonpublic or protected nonpublic, or with respect to data on individuals, as private or confidential. The responsible authority in every government entity shall keep records containing government data in such an arrangement and condition as to make them easily accessible for convenient use. Photographic, photostatic, microphotographic, or microfilmed records shall be considered as accessible for convenient use regardless of the size of such records.
56-CR-20-926 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 2/14/2022 8:41 AM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF OTTER SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT State of Minnesota, MOTION FOR FINGERPRINTING Plaintiff, vs. Court File No. 56-CR-20-926 Atty. File No. 20F-119V Stacy Joy Schoon, Defendant. TO: Stacy Joy Schoon: Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 299C.10, subd. 1(a), the State requests that pursuant to a request by the Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Department that the Court order that the above-named Defendant, be fingerprinted for her arrest of April 13, 2019 for Financial Card Fraud Use – No Consent. The State would request an in-person hearing date so that Defendant may appear for fingerprinting. Date: February 14, 2022 /s/Matthew C. Spielman Matthew C. Spielman: 0398760 Assistant County Attorney 121 W. Junius Fergus Falls, MN 56537 (218) 998-8400 mspielma@co.ottertail.mn.us 1

Barry Fitzgibbons, Sheriff 218-998-8534 & Michelle Eldien, County Attorney, 218-998-8400:

What is the status on my Chapter 13 Data Request for the hoarder Stacy Schoon?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. How many people with mental problems do you take advantage of in a single week?

Government entities should respond in one of three ways 1. Provide access to the data (and copies when requested) 2. Inform you the data are classified as not public (must give statute section) 3. Inform you the data do not exist • Not responding is not a proper response. Minnesota Department of Administration - Information Policy Analysis Division - Can I ask for that? Government Data Practices Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 page 12.

A response five weeks later is neither prompt nor reasonable. Although the Department did not provide information about its data practices policies and procedures, in instances like this one, those procedures ought to provide for a response within a matter of days, not weeks. Advisory Opinion 95-042. October 31, 1995; Minnesota Department of Children, Families and Learning. October 31, 1995 | Inspection, Response to data requests, Statutory construction (Ch. 645)
https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/opinions/library/?id=36-267796

It should be noted that Stacy Wilde and Jeff Wilde do not currently reside in the same residence, but they share a joint checking accont. Page 2. Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office Follow Up Investigation Report 19035893 Offense Category: Financial Transaction Card Fraud-609.821 subd 2 (1) Complainant: Stacy Ellen Wilde Deputy: Detective Jon Karger #325. Report of Karger.DOCX Throughout the investigation, I made contact with Security State Bank Customer Service Specialist Carla Ahrends. Ahrends explained to me that after receiving the report of fraudulent activity, she was only able to file charge backs on no more than 35 transactions in the last 90 days. As there were more than 35 transactions within the last 90 days, she was only able to attempt charge backs for an approximate amount of $3371. Page 2. Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office Follow Up Investigation Report 19035893 Offense Category: Financial Transaction Card Fraud-609.821 subd 2 (1) Complainant: Stacy Ellen Wilde Deputy: Detective Jon Karger #325. Report of Karger.DOCX A few days after initially speaking with Carla Ahrends, I visited with her again. Page 3. Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office Follow Up Investigation Report 19035893 Offense Category: Financial Transaction Card Fraud-609.821 subd 2 (1) Complainant: Stacy Ellen Wilde Deputy: Detective Jon Karger #325. Report of Karger.DOCX

I have spoken with Jeff Wilde. Jeff Wilde stated that he has known Stacy Schoon for the last six or seven years and has known her through friends. Jeff stated that Stacy Schoon used to bartend in Underwood. Jeff stated a couple years ago he used to hang around her. In a later conversation, Jeff told me that he never did date Stacy Schoon although Stacy Schoon would tell people that she was dating Jeff. Jeff Wilde suspected that Stacy got his credit card information when they were in Mazatlán in March 2019. She would have been in his hotel room, and he kept his debit card in the hotel room. Page 3. Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office Follow Up Investigation Report 19035893 Offense Category: Financial Transaction Card Fraud-609.821 subd 2 (1) Complainant: Stacy Ellen Wilde Deputy: Detective Jon Karger #325. Report of Karger.DOCX Jeff Wilde stated that Stacy Schoon had no permission to use his credit card information. Jeff reiterated this upon me re-contacting him after I had interviewed Stacy Schoon. Page 3. Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office Follow Up Investigation Report 19035893 Offense Category: Financial Transaction Card Fraud-609.821 subd 2 (1) Complainant: Stacy Ellen Wilde Deputy: Detective Jon Karger #325. Report of Karger.DOCX

On 12/17/19 at approximately 1315 hours, the search warrant was executed at Stacy Schoon’s residence. I was assisted by Detective Eric Lien, Det. Sgt. Robert Huckeby and Deputy Colby Palmersheim. Deputy Keith Rogal was involved for a short time also. Page 3. Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office Follow Up Investigation Report 19035893 Offense Category: Financial Transaction Card Fraud-609.821 subd 2 (1) Complainant: Stacy Ellen Wilde Deputy: Detective Jon Karger #325. Report of Karger.DOCX

Prior to the search, I visited with Stacy Schoon alone at her residence. Page 3. Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office Follow Up Investigation Report 19035893 Offense Category: Financial Transaction Card Fraud-609.821 subd 2 (1) Complainant: Stacy Ellen Wilde Deputy: Detective Jon Karger #325. Report of Karger.DOCX EVIDENCE / RECORDINGS: Recorded interview with Stacy Schoon Recovered items as noted and entered into evidence Financial records from Security State Bank Cellebrite report (copies provided to records) Page 5 Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office Follow Up Investigation Report 19035893 Offense Category: Financial Transaction Card Fraud-609.821 subd 2 (1) Complainant: Stacy Ellen Wilde Deputy: Detective Jon Karger #325. Report of Karger.DOCX
On Monday, October 28, 2019, at 1456 hours, I Officer Estep, was dispatched to the Fergus Falls Police Department at the address of 122 West Junius Avenue to meet with a party who had came to report a theft. When I arrived at the police department minutes later, I met with Stacy Wilde. Stacy had informed me that she has had money taken from her checking account via online purchases on Amazon. While speaking with Stacy I learned the following: Stacy and her husband share a checking account. They noticed that charges had been showing up in their account since July of 2019. Page 1. Fergus Falls Police Department Incident Report Incident Number: 19035893 Offense Category: Theft Location Of Offense: 128 East Washington Avenue Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Date/Time Reported: 10/28/2019 Officer(S) Assigned: Officer Matthew Estep #105 Additional Officers: Detective Andy Renner #128 SUBJECT: Stacy Ellen Wilde DOB: 06/10/1971 24796 County Highway 88 Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Phone: 218-205-112. Report of Estep.DOCX

When speaking to Stacy on November 1, 2019, she informed me that they now believe it is closer to $7,000.00 and that the bank was reimbursing them for approximately 30 of the transactions, with an approximate value of $3,300.00. Stacy believes there is approximately 60 fraudulent transactions total. Page 2. Fergus Falls Police Department Incident Report Incident Number: 19035893 Offense Category: Theft Location Of Offense: 128 East Washington Avenue Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Date/Time Reported: 10/28/2019 Officer(S) Assigned: Officer Matthew Estep #105 Additional Officers: Detective Andy Renner #128 SUBJECT: Stacy Ellen Wilde DOB: 06/10/1971 24796 County Highway 88 Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Phone: 218-205-112. Report of Estep.DOCX

On Wednesday, November 6, 2019, I spoke with Stacey Wilde who had more information for me pertaining to this case. Stacey informed me that an Amazon employee disclosed to her husband that the last package from the fraudulent account was sent to the address of 27875 County Road 124. The package was addressed to “Stacey Schoon.” Stacy did inform me that Stacey Schoon went to Mexico in March with a group of people, including her husband. Stacy stated that she believes Schoon stole her husband’s card information while in Mexico. Page 2. Fergus Falls Police Department Incident Report Incident Number: 19035893 Offense Category: Theft Location Of Offense: 128 East Washington Avenue Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Date/Time Reported: 10/28/2019 Officer(S) Assigned: Officer Matthew Estep #105 Additional Officers: Detective Andy Renner #128 SUBJECT: Stacy Ellen Wilde DOB: 06/10/1971 24796 County Highway 88 Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Phone: 218-205-112. Report of Estep.DOCX

Details: On 12/17/2019, I, Sergeant Robert Huckeby #308, assisted Detective Jon Karger #325 in executing a search warrant at the residence of Stacy Schoon. Part of my participation in the execution of the warrant was collecting the magnetic cell phone holder in the Ford F150 pickup and taking photographs that item as well as the F150 pickup. Stolen Property/Estimate Of Damages To Property Section Description Serial Number Make/Model/Brand Value Evidence / Recordings: Digital Photographs Magnetic cellphone holder was given to #325 Status: Forward with Detective Karger’s reports Detective Sergeant Robert Huckeby #308 Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office RH: asl 12/20/19@1100hours ADM1 Job#66356. Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office Follow Up Investigation Report 19035893 Offense Category: Theft Incident Number: Complainant: Deputy: Detective Sergeant Robert Huckeby #308 Report of Huckeby.DOCX

More to come ...

Wednesday, February 9, 2022

Who Wants To Submit A Chapter 13 Data Request For The 13.82 Subdiv. 7 Criminal Investigative Data That Stacy Schoon Alleged That Otter Tail County Attorney Michelle Eldien Was Illegally Withholding From Her? Restitution Affidavit Amount Starts At $10,835.72? After Schoon Filed Complaint Against Public Defender Porter Amount Drops To $5,837.07? Final Amount Is $2,466.07? Did The So-Called Victims Perjure Themselves Over $8,369.65 Or More?

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com to: dbucholz@co.ottertail.mn.us, WayneJohnsonOTC@outlook.com, leerogness@yahoo.com, kmortens@co.ottertail.mn.us, bmurphy@co.otter-tail.mn.us, Michelle Eldien meldien@co.ottertail.mn.us, bfitzgib@co.ottertail.mn.us date: Feb 9, 2022, 10:40 AM subject: Chapter 13 Data Request For Data That Stacy Schoon Alleged Was Illegally Withheld From Her In Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State Of Minnesota Vs Stacy Joy Schoon mailed-by: gmail.com

Hey do you remember that complaint that Stacy Schoon signed against her backstabbing public defender Matthew Porter? You know the one where Schoon was allegeding that Porter was conspiring with Otter Tail County Attorney Michelle Eldien to illegally withhold her evidence from her Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State Of Minnesota Vs Stacy Joy Schoon? Did you know that I am going to request the data that Schoon was alleging that Eldien was illegally withholding from her? Do you know what I am thinking? I'm thinking that Eldien and Otter Tail County Sheriff Barry Fitzgibbons with all sorts of wild and crazy excuses why they can't email/file share that readily available, free, electronic public data to me, aren't I?

Do you remember me telling you about Jessica Hartger and Jeremy Boles filing their complaints against their public defenders in the court's Register of Actions in their respective cases in the First Judicial District? You remember that Both Hartger and Boles were allegeding similar misconduct by their public defenders as Schoon was allegeding against her public defender? Did you know that both Hartger and Boles were able to get new public defenders? Maybe that explains why your corrupt judicial officer Johnathan R. Judd willfully refused to allow Schoon to file her complaint against Porter into her Register of Actions?

Do you find it troubling that magically and mysteriously absolutely no mention of Schoon's admitted Hoarding disorder was ever mentioned during her plea hearing(s)? Maybe that explains why oh why Schoon was never required to undergo a psych evaluation? Because during the pysch eval Schoon might let it slip about her valid complaint against Porter? That would be pretty embarrassing for Eldien that Stacy was forced to take a plea deal because her evidence was being illegally withheld from her, correct? Plus, Schoon probably would have balked at the plea deal if a psych evaluation was part of the deal, right? Maybe that explains why oh why no mention of Schoon getting fingerprints or a mughsot was mentioned during Schoon's plea hearings?

Did you know that the amount on the Restitution affidavit for Schoon's case was originally $10,835.72? Oh, and then after Schoon filed her complaint it magically and mysteriously went down to $5,837.07? Can you guess the amount of restitution at the time of Schoon's Plea Hearings? If you guessed $2,466.07, then you are correct, aren't you? Doesn't that sound like the so-called victims made false claims of at least $8,369.65 in their Restitution affidavit? Wouldn't that be perjury on the part of the so-called victims? So you can see why both Otter Tail County Attorney Michelle Eldien and Otter Tail County Sheriff Barry Fitzgibbons would have a motive to illegally withhold this data from me, can't you? I'll keep you updated, okay?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

Minnesota Judicial Branch Logo Minnesota Judicial Branch Minnesota Court Records Online (MCRO) https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch Case Details Case Number: 72-CR-20-85 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs JEREMY JAMES BOLES 08/10/2021 Correspondence 15 pages 07-09-21 Jeremy Boles signed complaint to First Judicial District Chief Judicial Officer Kathryn Messerich Case Details Case Number: 19HA-CR-19-2768 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Jessica Danielle Hartger 06/22/2021 Correspondence 8 pages 06-01-21 Jessica Hartger’s signed complaint to First Judicial District Chief Judicial Officer Kathryn Messerich

My attorney has told me and I understand that a judge generally will not accept a plea of guilty from someone who claims to be innocent. However, I understand that the judge may accept my Alford guilty plea despite my claim of innocence, so long as I agree the state’s evidence is sufficient for a jury to find me guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, if I have a trial. With this principle in mind, I acknowledge that: ... d. I may be required to successfully complete treatment for my conduct underlying the offense to which I am pleading. If I am required to successfully complete such treatment and I refuse to admit my guilt in treatment, I may be discharged from treatment. Failure to complete such treatment may result in my incarceration, civil commitment for treatment, or both. Alford Addendum to Petition to Enter Plea of Guilty Pursuant to Rule 15 https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/Appellate/Supreme%20Court/Rules%20of%20Crim%20Proc%20Forms%20Appendix/15-appendixG.pdf

6. I have / I have never been a patient in a mental hospital. 7. I have / have not talked with or been treated by a psychiatrist or other person for a nervous or mental condition. Petition To Enter Plea of Guilty In Felony Case Pursuant To Rule 15 https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/Appellate/Supreme%20Court/Rules%20of%20Crim%20Proc%20Forms%20Appendix/15-appendixA.pdf

I then explained to Stacy that I had a search warrant to search the contents of her residence. Stacy stated that she is a hoarder and her house is full of items. She stated that there was no room to stand near the front door of the residence and that is why she met with me outside. I did explain that we still would need to search her residence. At that time, I requested assistance from other officers in the search. While inside the residence, I provided Stacy Schoon a copy of the search warrant. It appeared she reviewed the search warrant for several minutes and stated that the items listed in the search warrant were or had been at her residence. Upon being inside the residence, it was extremely difficult to walk from one side of the room to another due to the amount of hoarding that had taken place inside the residence. Involved officers rummaging through extreme amount of debris, requested that Stacy Schoon retrieve the items listed in the search warrant. There were a number of items that were disposed of, mostly used or had been consumed that we were not able to retrieve. As mentioned earlier, a number of these items were consumables or grocery items. Stacy Schoon stated that the prepaid Visa gift cards listed in the search warrant were used for vehicle gas and groceries and there’s no balance remaining. OTTER TAIL COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE FOLLOW UP INVESTIGATION REPORT INCIDENT NUMBER: 19035893 OFFENSE CATEGORY: Financial Transaction Card Fraud-609.821 subd 2 (1) COMPLAINANT: Stacy Ellen Wilde DEPUTY: Detective Jon Karger #325

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/hoarding-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20356056 Hoarding disorder Overview Signs and symptoms may include: Excessively acquiring items that are not needed or for which there's no space Persistent difficulty throwing out or parting with your things, regardless of actual value Feeling a need to save these items, and being upset by the thought of discarding them Building up of clutter to the point where rooms become unusable Having a tendency toward indecisiveness, perfectionism, avoidance, procrastination, and problems with planning and organizing. Risk factors include: Personality. Many people who have hoarding disorder have a temperament that includes indecisiveness. Family history. There is a strong association between having a family member who has hoarding disorder and having the disorder yourself. Stressful life events. Some people develop hoarding disorder after experiencing a stressful life event that they had difficulty coping with, such as the death of a loved one, divorce, eviction or losing possessions in a fire.

Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation Policy Statement It is the policy of the Board of Public Defense that discrimination, harassment, and retaliation in the workplace be prohibited. Discrimination or harassment based on sex, race, color, creed, religion, national origin, age, veteran status, marital status, sexual orientation, disability, or status with regard to public assistance will not be tolerated. It is the responsibility of Board of Public Defense employees to strive to create an environment free of harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. All Board employees are expected to treat other employees and the public with dignity, and respect and to comply with this policy. ... 4. Retaliation Retaliation includes, but is not limited to, intentionally engaging in any form of intimidation, reprisal or harassment against an individual because he or she made a complaint under this policy or assisted or participated in any manner in an investigation, or process under this policy, regardless of whether a claim of discrimination or harassment is substantiated; or associated with a person or group of persons who are disabled or are of a different race, color, creed, religion, sexual orientation or national origin. Retaliation may occur whether or not there is a power or authority differential between the individuals involved. State of Minnesota Board of Public Defense General Office Policies –Revised May 2019

D. The defense does not have to request the information, the prosecutor has the obligation to turn it over. United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). E. “Under Brady, the suppression by the State, whether intentional or not, of material evidence favorable to the defendant violates the constitutional guarantee of due process." Walen v. State, 777 N.W.2d 213, 216 (Minn. 2010). Brady/Giglio Policy Office Of The Otter Tail County Attorney Date Issued/Revised: July 20, 2020

Barry Fitzgibbons, Sheriff 218-998-8534 & Michelle Eldien, County Attorney, 218-998-8400:

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:

1. Audio/video recorded statements and associated transcripts of Stacy Wilde, Jeff Wilde and Carla Ahrends for Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State of Minnesota vs Stacy Joy Schoon DOB: 10/04/1979

2. Data indicating that Stacy Joy Schoon and or her public defender Matthew Porter received the audio/video recorded statements and associated transcripts of Stacy Wilde, Jeff Wilde and Carla Ahrends for Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State of Minnesota vs Stacy Joy Schoon DOB: 10/04/1979.

3. Pleadings - 09/09/2020 Discovery Disclosure Index # 12 and 03/04/2021 Discovery Disclosure Index # 20 for Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State of Minnesota vs Stacy Joy Schoon DOB: 10/04/1979.

4. Pleadings - 8/24/2021 Discovery Disclosure Index # 10, 09/23/2021 Discovery Disclosure Index # 11, 09/29/2021 Discovery Disclosure Index # 12, 10/08/2021 Discovery Disclosure Index # 14 for Case No. 56-CR-21-1817 State of Minnesota vs Heather Leah Morris DOB: 11/09/1982.

5 . Pleadings - 02/08/2022 Petition to Enter Guilty Plea Index # 43 (Judicial Officer: Judd, Johnathan R ) for Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State of Minnesota vs Stacy Joy Schoon DOB: 10/04/1979.

6. Data indicating that Stacy Schoon was ordered to turned herself in to the Otter Tail County Sheriff's Office or other law enforcement agency for mugshot and fingerprints for Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State of Minnesota vs Stacy Joy Schoon DOB: 10/04/1979

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

Tunnel vision may have already led investigators at this point to prematurely but confidently conclude that the innocent suspect is guilty. Confirmation bias then leads investigators to seek out information and evidence that affirms this belief and to reject or discount information and evidence that does not. Richard A. Leo, Police Interrogation and American Justice, (Cambridge: 2008), Page 264.

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.03 13.03 Access To Government Data. Subd. 12. Pleadings. Pleadings, as defined by court rule, served by or on a government entity, are public data to the same extent that the data would be public if filed with the court.

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal investigative data. Except for the data defined in subdivisions 2, 3, and 6, investigative data collected or created by a law enforcement agency in order to prepare a case against a person, whether known or unknown, for the commission of a crime or other offense for which the agency has primary investigative responsibility are confidential or protected nonpublic while the investigation is active. Inactive investigative data are public unless the release of the data would jeopardize another ongoing investigation or would reveal the identity of individuals protected under subdivision 17. Images and recordings, including photographs, video, and audio records, which are part of inactive investigative files and which are clearly offensive to common sensibilities are classified as private or nonpublic data, provided that the existence of the images and recordings shall be disclosed to any person requesting access to the inactive investigative file. An investigation becomes inactive upon the occurrence of any of the following events: ... Subd. 15. Public benefit data. Any law enforcement agency may make any data classified as confidential or protected nonpublic pursuant to subdivision 7 or as private or nonpublic under section 13.825 or 626.19 accessible to any person, agency, or the public if the agency determines that the access will aid the law enforcement process, promote public safety, or dispel widespread rumor or unrest.

On Monday, October 28, 2019, at 1456 hours, I Officer Estep, was dispatched to the Fergus Falls Police Department at the address of 122 West Junius Avenue to meet with a party who had came to report a theft. When I arrived at the police department minutes later, I met with Stacy Wilde. Stacy had informed me that she has had money taken from her checking account via online purchases on Amazon. While speaking with Stacy I learned the following: Stacy and her husband share a checking account. They noticed that charges had been showing up in their account since July of 2019. Page 1. Fergus Falls Police Department Incident Report Incident Number: 19035893 Offense Category: Theft Location Of Offense: 128 East Washington Avenue Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Date/Time Reported: 10/28/2019 Officer(S) Assigned: Officer Matthew Estep #105 Additional Officers: Detective Andy Renner #128 SUBJECT: Stacy Ellen Wilde DOB: 06/10/1971 24796 County Highway 88 Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Phone: 218-205-112. Report of Estep.DOCX

More to come ...

Monday, February 7, 2022

Is Stacy Schoon Being Coerced Into Pleading Guilty? Will Judicial Officer Judd Ask Schoon Specific Questions About Schoon's Complaint Against Public Defender Porter Prior To Take Her Guilty? Who Wants To Watch The Zoom Hearing Today For Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State Of Minnesota Vs Stacy Joy Schoon??

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: kenh@fergusfallsjournal.com,
zach.stich@fergusfallsjournal.com,
mary.pat.maher@state.mn.us,
debra.mueske@courts.state.mn.us,
OttertailCourt OttertailCourt@courts.state.mn.us,
Kathryn.Ouren@courts.state.mn.us,
sjschoon sjschoon@gmail.com
date: Feb 7, 2022, 12:36 PM
subject: Is Stacy Schoon Being Coerced Into Pleading Guilty? Will Judicial Officer Judd Ask Schoon Specific Questions About Schoon's Complaint Against Public Defender Porter Prior To Take Her Guilty?
mailed-by: gmail.com

Ken Harty, Publisher 218-739-7019 & Zach Stich, Editor - Daily Journal 218-739-7030:

Are you attending the Zoom Sentencing hearing for Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State of Minnesota vs Stacy Joy Schoon? The Zoom instruction are below, aren't they? Do you remember that complaint that I sent you that was signed by Stacy Schoon against her backstabbing public defender Matthew Porter? Did you ever contact Stacy and ask her if she was coerced into dropping her complaint? Did you ever contact Seventh Judicial District Court Administrator Debra Mueske to see if and when she ever responded to Schoon's valid complaint? You remember don't you that Porters' bosses were coming up with crazy excuses not to investigate Schoon's complaint? Porter's bosses were claiming that they weren't sure if the signature on Schoon's complaint was valid while at the same time not contacting Schoon to verify the signature on the complaint, right? Did you ask Mueske if she used the same crazy excuse to avoid investigating Schoon's valid complaint? Did you know that Mueske never returned my emails nor my phone calls? Sounds like a cover-up, doesn't it? Oh, did you know that Schoon admitted to being a hoarder? Do you think that Porter is using Schoon's condition to manipulate and coerce her into pleading guilty? You remember that judicial officer Johnathan R Judd aided and abetted Porter by not allowing Schoon to place her valid complaint into the court record, don't you? If Judd was actually doing his job and had a fair court, then he would make sure that he asked Schoon specific questions about the allegations that she raised in her complaint prior to her pleading guilty, right? Are you going to watch Schoon's hearing to see that Judd asks Schoon if she has been coerced into dropping her complaint against Porter or not? Hmm? Inquiring minds want to know, don't they?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

https://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp SPJ Code of Ethics Seek Truth and Report It Ethical journalism should be accurate and fair. Journalists should be honest and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information. Journalists should: Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable. Give voice to the voiceless.

Minnesota Judicial Branch Logo Minnesota Judicial Branch Minnesota Court Records Online (MCRO)
https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch
Case Details Case Number: 72-CR-20-85 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs JEREMY JAMES BOLES 08/10/2021 Correspondence 15 pages 07-09-21 Jeremy Boles signed complaint to First Judicial District Chief Judicial Officer Kathryn Messerich
Case Details Case Number: 19HA-CR-19-2768 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Jessica Danielle Hartger 06/22/2021 Correspondence 8 pages 06-01-21 Jessica Hartger’s signed complaint to First Judicial District Chief Judicial Officer Kathryn Messerich

Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 12/6/2021 State of Minnesota Otter Tail County District Court Seventh Judicial District Court File Number: 56-CR-20-926 Case Type: Crim/Traf Mandatory Notice of Remote Zoom Hearing FILE COPY State of Minnesota vs Stacy Joy Schoon You are notified this matter is set for a remote hearing. This hearing will not be in person at the courthouse. Hearing Information February 07, 2022 Plea Hearing 2:30 PM The hearing will be held via Zoom and appearance shall be by video and audio unless otherwise directed with Judicial Officer Johnathan R Judd, Otter Tail County District Court. If you fail to appear a warrant may be issued for your arrest. The Minnesota Judicial Branch uses strict security controls for all remote technology when conducting remote hearings. You must: • Notify the court if your address, email, or phone number changes. • Be fully prepared for the remote hearing. If you have exhibits you want the court to see, you must give them to the court before the hearing. Visit https://www.mncourts.gov/Remote-Hearings.aspx for more information and options for joining remote hearings, including how to submit exhibits. • Contact the court at 218-560-7045 if you do not have access to the internet, or are unable to connect by video and audio. • If you cannot afford to hire a lawyer and would like to apply for a court-appointed attorney before this appearance visit https://pdapplication.courts.state.mn.us or scan the QR code to start the application. To join by internet: 1. Type https://zoomgov.com/join in your browser’s address bar. 2. Enter the Meeting ID and Meeting Passcode (if asked): MNCIS-PAN-104 STATE Notice of Remote Zoom Hearing 4/21Meeting ID: 160 2905 5649 Passcode: 790939 3. Update your name by clicking on your profile picture. If you are representing a party, add your role to your name, for example, John Smith, Attorney for Defendant. 4. Click the Join Audio icon in the lower left-hand corner of your screen. 5. Click Share Video. To join by telephone (if you are unable to join by internet): Be sure you know how to mute your phone when you are not speaking and unmute it again to speak. 1. Call Toll-Free: 1-833-568-8864 2. Enter the Meeting ID and Meeting Passcode: Meeting ID: 160 2905 5649 Passcode: 790939 Para obtener más información y conocer las opciones para participar en audiencias remotas, incluido cómo enviar pruebas, visite www.mncourts.gov/Remote-Hearings. Booqo www.mncourts.gov/Remote-Hearings oo ka eego faahfaahin iyo siyaabaha aad uga qeybgeli karto dacwad-dhageysi ah fogaan-arag, iyo sida aad u soo gudbineyso wixii caddeymo ah. To receive an eReminder for future court dates via e-mail or text, visit www.mncourts.gov/Hearing-eReminders.aspx or scan the QR code to enroll. Dated: December 6, 2021 cc: Kathryn A. Ouren Otter Tail County Court Administrator 121 W. Junius Ave. Fergus Falls MN 56537 218-560-7045 Matthew Spielman Matthew Calvin Porter MNCIS-PAN-104 STATE Notice

Mary Pat Maher Executive Assistant Minnesota Board on Judicial Standards 651- 296-3999:

Is it or isn't it a judicial officer's job to take advantage of people with mental conditions in their court? Is that why Otter Tail County Judicial Officer Johnathan R Judd willfully refused to allow Stacy Schoon to file her complaint against her public defender Matthew Porter into the Register of Actions for Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State of Minnesota vs Stacy Joy Schoon? Judd is taking advantage of Schoon's tendencies of indecisiveness, perfectionism, avoidance, procrastination, isn't he? Judd knows or should know that Schoon proclaimed her innocence in her complaint, right? So Judd should be asking a lot of specific question of why Schoon suddenly wants to plead guilty, shouldn't he?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

https://www.mncourts.gov/About-The-Courts/Overview/JudicialDirectory/Bio.aspx?jid=1890 Judge Johnathan Judd Otter Tail County Courthouse Seventh Judicial District (218) 560-7045 Seventh Judicial District Judicial Officers Judge Johnathan Judd Appointed/Elected: Appointed on Mar. 1, 2021, by Governor Tim Walz. Current term expires Jan. 2023. Education: University of North Dakota School of Law Political science and history degrees, North Dakota State University Past Employment: Mayor City of Moorhead Part-time contract, Minnesota Board of Public Defense Prosecutor, Clay County Attorney’s office Private practice Assistant Public Defender, Minnesota Board of Public Defense Director of Multicultural Affairs, Concordia College Minnesota Department of Commerce Law clerk, Judge Gerald J. Seibel, Morris, MN Professional and Community Activities: Adjunct instructor, Criminal Justice Department, Minnesota State University Moorhead Various City of Moorhead commissions and committees

Kathryn Ouren, Court Administrator 218-560-7045 & Debra Mueske, District Administrator 320-656-3650:

Is or isn't judicial officer Johnathan R. Judd going to ask Stacy Schoon if she was coerced into dropping her complaint against her backstabbing public defender Matthew Porter? Why isn't Schoon's complaint against Porter in the Register of Actions for Schoon's case Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State of Minnesota vs Stacy Joy Schoon? Why are similar complaints found in the First Judicial District Registers of Actions for 72-CR-20-85 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs JEREMY JAMES BOLES and State of Minnesota vs Jessica Danielle Hartger but not for Stacy Schoon? Hmm? Inquiring minds want to know, don't they?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

More to come ...

Lion News

Friday, February 18, 2022

Wednesday, February 16, 2022

What Is The Status Of My Chapter 13 Data Request For Data That Stacy Schoon Alleged Was Illegally Withheld From Her In Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State Of Minnesota Vs Stacy Joy Schoon? Nemmers' Chapter 13 Data Request Triggers Motion For Missing Booking Photo & Fingerprints?

Wednesday, February 9, 2022

Monday, February 7, 2022

Is Stacy Schoon Being Coerced Into Pleading Guilty? Will Judicial Officer Judd Ask Schoon Specific Questions About Schoon's Complaint Against Public Defender Porter Prior To Take Her Guilty? Who Wants To Watch The Zoom Hearing Today For Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State Of Minnesota Vs Stacy Joy Schoon??

Followers

Blog Archive

Contact Information: