Thursday, January 6, 2022

How About We Submit A Chapter 13 Data Request For The Steele Co. And The Freeborn Co. Contracts AKA Retainer Agreements With Koch & Garvis, LLC For Hanson V Thiele AKA Hanson V Freitag Et Al? Did Assistant Attorney General Ed Stackmeyer Engage In A Sanctionable Activity? Are Sheriff's Thiele & Freitag Worried They Might be Sued For Deisel Therapy? Let's Ask, Shall We?

 

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: tom.jensen@co.freeborn.mn.us,
pat.martinson@co.freeborn.mn.us,
andrew@uptownlawyer.com,
Scott.Golberg@co.steele.mn.us,
catherine.piepho@co.steele.mn.us
date: Jan 6, 2022, 11:42 AM
subject: Chapter 13 Data Request For Steele Co. And Freeborn Co. Contracts AKA Retainer Agreements With Koch & Garvis, LLC For Hanson V Thiele AKA Hanson V Freitag Et Al
mailed-by: gmail.com

Andrew Stanton Garvis, attorney for Steele Co. Sheriff Lon Thiele & Freeborn Co. Sheriff Kurt Freitag 612-827-8101:

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:

1. Koch & Garvis, LLC signed contract/retainer agreement with Steele County for legal services for Hanson v. Thiele aka Hanson v. Freitag et al.
2. Koch & Garvis, LLC signed contract/retainer agreement with Freeborn County for legal services for Hanson v. Thiele aka Hanson v. Freitag et al.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. Would it or wouldn't it be a sanctionable offense for Assistant Attorney General Ed Stackmeyer to waste the court's valuable time by filing frivolous filings in Hanson v. Thiele aka Hanson v. Freitag et al? Was it or wasn't it Stackmeyer's duty to notify the Steele & Freeborn County Attorneys instead of the City of Albert Lea City Attorney?
P.S.S. Are you or clients worried that Hanson v. Thiele aka Hanson v. Freitag et al would be amended or a separate action might be initiated to address the diesel therapy treatment that Melissa Hanson was allegedly subjected to by your clients? Hmm? Inquiring minds want to know, don't they?
P.S.S.S. Will it or won't it affect the credibility of your clients when they both have a well-documented history of willfully refusing to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act? Hmm? Inquiring minds really want to know, don't they?

https://www.yourdictionary.com/diesel-therapy Diesel-therapy noun A form of punishment in which prisoners are shackled and transported long distances for days or weeks.

https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/data/types/contracting/ Can requests for public data be made to the private contractor? Yes, if the public data are not available from the government entity or if it is specified in the contract that the private contractor will reply to data requests (Minnesota Statutes, section 13.05, subdivision 11(b)). The private party must fulfill data requests consistent with the time limits and copy cost requirements of the Data Practices Act (Advisory Opinion 10-024). The government entity continues to be responsible in making decisions about data classification. Unless the contract specifies otherwise, the government entity retains ultimate responsibility for responding even if the data are maintained by the private contractor (Advisory Opinions 09-022 and 09-003).
https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/data/types/contracting/

CASE 0:21-cv-02651-NEB-LIB Doc. 2 Filed 12/15/21 Page 1 of 1 The Office of Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison helping people afford their lives and live with dignity and respect • www.ag.state.mn.us December 15, 2021 U.S. Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois United States District Court 515 West 1st Street Room 412 Duluth, MN 55802-1397 Re: United States District Court District of Minnesota Hanson v. Thiele Court File No. 21-CV-02651 (NEB/LIB) (Attorney Substitution) Dear Magistrate Judge Brisbois: Please find, as an attachment to this letter, a letter, dated December 15, 2021, to the Albert Lea City Attorney's Office, asking that office to file a Notice of Appearance in this case on behalf of Respondent. Sincerely, s/Ed Stockmeyer ED STOCKMEYER Assistant Attorney General (651) 757-1247 (Voice) ( 651) 297-4348 (Fax) ed.stockmeyer@ag.state.mn.us Attachment cc: Kelly Martinez, Albert Lea City Attorney (w/attachment) Melissa L. Hanson 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1400, St. Paul, MN 55101-2131 Office: (651) 296-3353 • Toll Free: (800) 657-3787 • Minnesota Relay: (800) 627-3529 An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity • Printed on 30% Post-Consumer Material Paper

CASE 0:21-cv-02651-NEB-LIB Doc. 2-1 Filed 12/15/21 Page 1 of 1 The Office of Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison helping people afford their lives and live with dignity and respect • www.ag.state.mn.us December 15, 2021 Kelly Martinez Albert Lea City Attorney City Hall 221 East Clark Street Albert Lea, MN 56007 Re: Hanson v. Thiele Court File No. 21-CV-02651 (NEB/LIB) Dear Ms. Martinez: Enclosed please find a federal Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and accompanying documents in a case handled by the Albert Lea City Attorney. Because your office has an interest in these prosecutions, we are forwarding this matter to you. We generally do not handle these cases. Accordingly, we ask that you file a Notice of Appearance, letting the United States District Court know that you are the attorney of record for Respondent. By copy of this letter I am advising the Court that the Attorney General's Office does not represent the Respondent in this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or would like any sample habeas motions or briefs. Sincerely, s/Ed Stockmeyer ED STOCKMEYER Assistant Attorney General (651) 757-1247 (Voice) (651) 297-4348 (Fax) ed.stockmeyer@ag.state.mn. us Enclosures cc: Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois (w/o encl.) Melissa L. Hanson (w/o encl.) 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1400, St. Paul, MN 55101-2131 Office: (651) 296-3353 • Toll Free: (800) 657-3787 • Minnesota Relay: (800) 627-3529 An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity • Printed on 30% Post-Consumer Material Paper

Thomas Jensen, Freeborn County Administrator 507-377-5115 & Pat Martinson, Freeborn Auditor - Treasurer 507-377-5121:

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:
1. Appointment of Freeborn County Minnesota Government Data Practice Act Responsible Authority and Compliance Official.
2. Signed contract/retainer agreement with Koch & Garvis, LLC for legal services for Hanson v. Thiele aka Hanson v. Freitag et al.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. Does Freeborn County have any plans to illegally withhold Melissa Hanson's Chapter 13.04 Subject Data from her? Hanson's Chapter 13.04 Subject Data would substantiate allegation of diesel therapy aka torture being inflicted upon Hanson, correct?
P.S.S. Can you explain to me why oh why Freeborn Co. Sheriff Kurt Freitag is willfully refusing to respond to my most recent Chapter 13 Data Request? Can you also explain why Freeborn Co. Sheriff Kurt Freitag is illegally withholding data from me aka deputy data related to the 02-03-21 COVID-19 superspreader event hosted by City of Albert Lea City Attorney Kelly Martinez? (Agency ALPD Albert Lew PD Incident # 202100003681 Case# CALL FOR SERVICE Activity ALARM Alarm, Burlary Or Robber Priority 2 ASAP Common Place City Hall Blotter: city attorney office alarm 210 no bwc all 10-2 326 bwc 102 BWC 209bwc 211 BWC)

Government entities should respond in one of three ways 1. Provide access to the data (and copies when requested) 2. Inform you the data are classified as not public (must give statute section) 3. Inform you the data do not exist • Not responding is not a proper response. Minnesota Department of Administration - Information Policy Analysis Division - Can I ask for that? Government Data Practices Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 page 12.

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.03 13.03 ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT DATA. Subd. 3. Request for access to data. Subd. 12. Pleadings. Pleadings, as defined by court rule, served by or on a government entity, are public data to the same extent that the data would be public if filed with the court.

Hanson was initially booked into the Freeborn County Jail, but then was moved to the Steele County Jail the day after her sentencing. Monday morning, following obtaining her signature on a writ of habeas corpus, Hanson was moved back to Freeborn County Jail, which made the original writ of habeas corpus, filed for Steele County, invalid. A second was filed on Tuesday, involving both counties of Steele and Freeborn, rather than just Steele. The circumstances surrounding her transfer are unknown. The habeas corpus now lists both Sheriff Kurt Freitag, with Freeborn County, and Sheriff Lon Thiele, with Steele County. EXCLUSIVE: Lisa Hanson Files Writ of Habeas Corpus with United States District Court of Minnesota December 15, 2021 Hayley Feland
https://theminnesotasun.com/2021/12/15/exclusive-lisa-hanson-files-writ-of-habeas-corpus-with-united-states-district-court-of-minnesota/

318.1.1 STANDARDS OF CONDUCT FOR PEACE OFFICERS The Freeborn County Sheriff's Office adopts the Professional Conduct of Peace Officers model policy established and published by the Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training Board (POST) (Minn. Stat. § 626.8457). This model policy applies to all peace officers of this office. See attachment: MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf The provisions of this policy are in addition to collective bargaining agreements or any other applicable law (see generally Minn. R. 6700.1500). The Office shall report annually to POST any data regarding the investigation and disposition of cases involving alleged misconduct of deputies (Minn. Stat. § 626.8457, Subd. 3). Page 154. Policy 318 Standard of Conduct Freeborn County Sheriff's Office Freeborn Cnty SO Policy Manual

A. PRINCIPLE ONE Peace officers shall conduct themselves, whether on or off duty, in accordance with the Constitution of the United States, the Minnesota Constitution, and all applicable laws, ordinances and rules enacted or established pursuant to legal authority. 1. Rationale: Peace officers conduct their duties pursuant to a grant of limited authority from the community. Therefore, officers must understand the laws defining the scope of their enforcement powers. Peace officers may only act in accordance with the powers granted to them. 2. Rules a) Peace officers shall not knowingly exceed their authority in the enforcement of the law. b) Peace officers shall not knowingly disobey the law or rules of criminal procedure in such areas as interrogation, arrest, detention, searches, seizures, use of informants, and preservation of evidence, except where permitted in the performance of duty under proper authority. c) Peace officers shall not knowingly restrict the freedom of individuals, whether by arrest or detention, in violation of the Constitutions and laws of the United States and the State of Minnesota. d) Peace officers, whether on or off duty, shall not knowingly commit any criminal offense under any laws of the United States or any state or local jurisdiction. Page 685. Attachment MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf Freeborn Cnty SO Policy Manual Freeborn Cnty SO Policy Manual

Scott Golberg, Steele Co. Administrator 507.444.7431 & Catherine Piepho, Treasurer 507-444-7420:

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:
1. Appointment of Steele County Minnesota Government Data Practice Act Responsible Authority and Compliance Official.
2. Signed contract/retainer agreement with Koch & Garvis, LLC for legal services for Hanson v. Thiele aka Hanson v. Freitag et al

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. Does Steele County have any plans to illegally withhold Melissa Hanson's Chapter 13.04 Subject Data from her? Hanson's Chapter 13.04 Subject Data would substantiate allegation of diesel therapy aka torture being inflicted upon Hanson, correct?
P.S.S. Can you explain to me why oh why your Steele Co. Sheriff Lon Thiele would illegally withhold the jail rosters from me that correspond to Melissa Hanson's stay at the Steele Co. jail?

A response five weeks later is neither prompt nor reasonable. Although the Department did not provide information about its data practices policies and procedures, in instances like this one, those procedures ought to provide for a response within a matter of days, not weeks. Advisory Opinion 95-042. October 31, 1995; Minnesota Department of Children, Families and Learning. October 31, 1995 | Inspection, Response to data requests, Statutory construction (Ch. 645)
https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/opinions/library/?id=36-267796

321.1.1 STANDARDS OF CONDUCT FOR PEACE OFFICERS The Steele County Sheriff's Office adopts the Professional Conduct of Peace Officers model policy established and published by the Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training Board (POST) (Minn. Stat. § 626.8457). This model policy applies to all peace officers of this office. See attachment: MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf The provisions of this policy are in addition to collective bargaining agreements or any other applicable law (see generally Minn. R. 6700.1500). The Office shall report annually to POST any data regarding the investigation and disposition of cases involving alleged misconduct of deputies (Minn. Stat. § 626.8457, Subd. 3). Page 155. Policy 321 Steele County Sheriff's Office Steele County SO Policy Manual

A. PRINCIPLE ONE Peace officers shall conduct themselves, whether on or off duty, in accordance with the Constitution of the United States, the Minnesota Constitution, and all applicable laws, ordinances and rules enacted or established pursuant to legal authority. 1. Rationale: Peace officers conduct their duties pursuant to a grant of limited authority from the community. Therefore, officers must understand the laws defining the scope of their enforcement powers. Peace officers may only act in accordance with the powers granted to them. 2. Rules a) Peace officers shall not knowingly exceed their authority in the enforcement of the law. b) Peace officers shall not knowingly disobey the law or rules of criminal procedure in such areas as interrogation, arrest, detention, searches, seizures, use of informants, and preservation of evidence, except where permitted in the performance of duty under proper authority. c) Peace officers shall not knowingly restrict the freedom of individuals, whether by arrest or detention, in violation of the Constitutions and laws of the United States and the State of Minnesota. d) Peace officers, whether on or off duty, shall not knowingly commit any criminal offense under any laws of the United States or any state or local jurisdiction. Page 569. Attachment MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf Steele County SO Policy Manual Steele County SO Policy Manual

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/42939573/Hanson_v_Thiele
Hanson v. Thiele
Minnesota District Court
Judge: Nancy E Brasel
Referred: Leo I Brisbois
Case #: 0:21-cv-02651
Nature of Suit 530 Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus - General
Cause 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Case Filed: Dec 13, 2021
Docket
Docket last updated: 7 hours ago
Wednesday, January 05, 2022
4 notice Notice of Appearance Wed 01/05 11:15 AM
NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew S Garvis on behalf of All Defendants. (Garvis, Andrew)
Wednesday, December 15, 2021
2 misc Letter to Magistrate Judge Wed 12/15 9:33 AM
LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Lon Thiele Attorney Substitution .(Stockmeyer, Edwin)
 Att: 1 Cover Letter Attorney Substitution
Tuesday, December 14, 2021
3 cmp Amended Petition (in a Civil Case) Wed 12/15 12:08 PM
AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Lon Thiele and Sheriff Kurt Freitag filed by Melissa Lynn Hanson. No summons requested. (MKB)
 Att: 1 Attachment,
 Att: 2 Exhibit(s) A,
 Att: 3 Exhibit(s) B,
 Att: 4 Exhibit(s) C,
 Att: 5 Exhibit(s) D,
 Att: 6 Exhibit(s) E,
 Att: 7 Exhibit(s) F
Monday, December 13, 2021
1 cmp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Mon 12/13 12:48 PM
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing fee $5, receipt number 34641016375) filed by Melissa Lynn Hanson. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd/4th Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (NAH)
 Att: 1 Exhibit(s) A,
 Att: 2 Exhibit(s) B,
 Att: 3 Exhibit(s) C,
 Att: 4 Exhibit(s) D,
 Att: 5 Exhibit(s) E,
 Att: 6 Exhibit(s) F,
 Att: 7 Civil Cover Sheet

Attachments: Automatic reply Chapter 13 Data For Melissa Hanson Related Data Freitag Subjecting Prisoner Lisa Hanson To Diesel Therapy122921_1008am.pdf, Chapter 13 Data For Melissa Hanson Related Data Freitag Subjecting Prisoner Lisa Hanson To Diesel Therapy122921_1007am.pdf, Why Is Nemmers Still Being Harassed By Steele County Over Readily Available Free Electronic Data For Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus123021_729am.pdf

More to come ...

Related links:

Why Oh Why Aren't Freeborn Co. Sheriff Kurt Freitag & Body Cameraless ALPD Detective/School Resource Officer/Freeborn County Commissioner Ted Herman Responding To My 08-23-21 Chapter 13 Data Request? Who Wants To Expose The Illegal Withholding Of Body Camera Video For The 02-03-21 COVID-19 Superspreader Event At Albert Lea City Attorney Kelly Martinez's Office? Hey Did I Forget To Mention That I Spoke To Martinez’s Maskless Legal Assistant Lisa “Typhoid Mary” Williamson? Does IP Address 136.234.33.250 Belong Freitag? Is Or Isn’t Albert Lea City Attorney Kelly Martinez Allowed To Commit Perjury In Freeborn County?

Who Wants The Chapter 13 Data For The 02-03-21 COVID-19 Superspreader Event At Albert Lea City Attorney Kelly Martinez's Office Which Involved Lisa Hanson? It Features A Body Cameraless ALPD Detective/School Resource Officer/Freeborn County Commissioner Ted Herman, Doesn't It? Oh And A Maskless ALPD Lt. Jeff Strom, Right? Can You Name All The Unmasked City Of Albert Lea Personnel? Who Filed The False Police Report Via The Panic Alarm? Was It Masked Albert Lea City Attorney Kelly Martinez Or Her Maskless Legal Assistant Lisa Willamson?

Why Oh Why Is City Of Albert Lea City Attorney Kelly Martinez Making Perjured Statements In High-Profile Case No. 24-CR-21-137 State of Minnesota vs Melissa Lynn Hanson? Let's See If Local Law Enforcement Is Launching A Criminal Investigation Into Martinez's Crimes, Shall We? If Hanson Is Going To Be Prosecuted For Alleged COVID Crimes, Then Shouldn't Martinez Be Prosecuted For Committing Criminal Acts During the Prosecution Of Hanson? FYI: You'll Get Extremely Sick And Tired Of Hearing Hanson Rant And Rave About Jurisdiction In Her Cases 24-CR-21-137 and 24-CR-21-188, Won't You? Let's Make An Open Records Request To Clear Lake Chief Of Police Peter Roth & Cerro Gordo County Sheriff Kevin Pals, Okay? UPDATE: Freeborm Attorney Walker Responds With Obvious Lies? FYI: Sheriff Freitag Tried And Failed A Simliar Play Dumb Harassment Scheme, Didn't He?

Tuesday, January 4, 2022

Who Wants To Ask DNR Commissioner Sarah Strommen Why DNR Personnel Harassing Are Nemmers For Exposing Illegal Release Of Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data For State Of MN VS Michael Sysa 39-VB-21-468, David Sysa 39-VB-21-469 And Yevgeniy Simonovich 39-VB-21-470? Why Don't We Ask Lake of the Woods County Attorney Jim Austad If He AUthorized The Data Breach?

 

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: Barb.Naramore@state.mn.us,
Sarah.Strommen@state.mn.us,
jim_a@co.lotw.mn.us,
"Alongi, Anthony (DNR)" anthony.alongi@state.mn.us,
"MN_Data Request (DNR)" datarequest.dnr@state.mn.us
date: Jan 4, 2022, 10:37 AM
subject: Why Are DNR Personnel Harassing Nemmers For Exposing Illegal Release Of Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data For State Of MN VS Michael Sysa 39-VB-21-468, David Sysa 39-VB-21-469 And Yevgeniy Simonovich 39-VB-21-470?
mailed-by: gmail.com

Sarah Strommen, DNR Commissioner & Barb Naramore, Deputy DNR Commissioner 651-259-5033:

Can you explain to me why oh why I am being harassed by your miscreant DNR Data Practices Compliance Official Barbara Damchik-Dykes 651.259.5345 and Policy and Planning MN Department of Natural Resources Section Manager Anthony Alongi 651.259.5556? Why are they retaliating against me for exposing a DNR data breach? When am I going to receive the current policy and procedure manual (You call them Directives, don't you?) that I requested way, way, way, way, way back in November? When is that data showing up in my email inbox? And when am I going to receive the DNR's data that indicates that you notified Michael A Sysa (Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State Of Minnesota vs Michael A Sysa) David Alekseevich Sysa (Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State Of Minnesota vs David Alekseevich Sysa) and Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich (Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State Of Minnesota vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich) of the DNR's illegal release of their confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. criminal investigative data to members of the media? Five (5) minutes from never?

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:

1. Data indicating that either Jim Austad, Lake of the Woods County Attorney or his office personnel authorized the MN DNR to illegally release Michael A Sysa's (Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State Of Minnesota vs Michael A Sysa) David Alekseevich Sysa's (Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State Of Minnesota vs David Alekseevich Sysa) and Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich's (Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State Of Minnesota vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich) confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. criminal investigative data to members of the media.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

Mr. Karpan: I do have one request. Um, I've not asked for this before, I'm not sure how to handle it, but the Department of Natural Resources as they've done in the past has seen fit to do a press release, and officer Osborne has answered questions for the newspaper. My client – all the facts of the case are in the Echo Press, on the radio and in sporting magazines. Not only are there quotes in there that aren't - - I mean I know the State has a right to release incident data I think it's called. Under Chapter 13.82, investigative data is not to be released. Well, there are pictures allegedly of my client's fish all over the Echo Press. Everybody in town is talking about it. I don't know if I'll have to make a change of venue motion eventually. I'll have to see how this plays out in a few months.
But under 13.82, there's no way the DNR is supposed to be releasing pictures of evidence to the newspaper. It prejudices my client. It prejudices all of us. It makes it impossible to get a fair trail. So I'm asking the Court to order the Department of Natural Resources to not discuss this case any further until it's done.
The Court: Mr. Hochsprung?
Mr. Hochsprung: Your Honor, I did not authorize the Department of Natural Resources to disclose anything to the paper. Um, I can talk with Mr. Osborne or whoever about that, but I don't have any information about that. State of Minnesota vs. Ronald Wayne Johnson Rule 5/ Rule 8 Hearing. Court File No. 21-CR- 13-51. February 11, 2013.

VIII. PRINCIPLE FIVE Conservation Officers shall treat all members of the public courteously and with respect. A. Rationale Conservation Officers are one of the most visible forms of state government. Therefore, Conservation Officers must make a positive impression when interacting with the public and each other. B. Rules 3. No Conservation Officer shall ridicule, mock, deride, taunt, belittle, willfully embarrass, humiliate, or shame a person, or do anything reasonably calculated to incite a person to violence. A-4-99, CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER Page 6. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE DIRECTIVE NUMBER: A-4-99 SUBJECT: CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 1999 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Rescinds Directive 61-96 REFERENCE: Minnesota Statute Sec 626.8457, 43A.38, 43A.39; Directive A-3-98; C.L.E.A. 26.1; State Electronic Mail and Internet Policy; POST Model Conduct Policy DISTRIBUTION: All Division Employees NUMBER OF PAGES: 31

Monday, November 22, 2021 DNR Data Practices Compliance Official Barbara Damchik-Dykes 651.259.5345 Reported To MN Department Of Natural Resources Policy And Planning Section Manager Anthony Alongi After Damchik-Dykes Harasses Nemmers Over Request For Entire DNR Policy & Procedure Manual & After Damchik-Dykes Illegally Releases Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data For High-Profile Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State Of Minnesota Vs Michael A Sysa; Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State Of Minnesota Vs David Alekseevich Sysa And Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State Of Minnesota Vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich To Media Outlets And To Nemmers? http://lionnews00.blogspot.com/2021/11/dnr-data-practices-compliance-official.html

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.055 13.055 DISCLOSURE OF BREACH IN SECURITY; NOTIFICATION AND INVESTIGATION REPORT REQUIRED. Subd. 2. Notice to individuals; investigation report. (a) A government entity that collects, creates, receives, maintains, or disseminates private or confidential data on individuals must disclose any breach of the security of the data following discovery or notification of the breach. Written notification must be made to any individual who is the subject of the data and whose private or confidential data was, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired by an unauthorized person and must inform the individual that a report will be prepared under paragraph (b), how the individual may obtain access to the report, and that the individual may request delivery of the report by mail or e-mail. The disclosure must be made in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, consistent with (1) the legitimate needs of a law enforcement agency as provided in subdivision 3; or (2) any measures necessary to determine the scope of the breach and restore the reasonable security of the data. (b) Notwithstanding section 13.15 or 13.37, upon completion of an investigation into any breach in the security of data and final disposition of any disciplinary action for purposes of section 13.43, including exhaustion of all rights of appeal under any applicable collective bargaining agreement, the responsible authority shall prepare a report on the facts and results of the investigation. If the breach involves unauthorized access to or acquisition of data by an employee, contractor, or agent of the government entity, the report must at a minimum include: (1) a description of the type of data that were accessed or acquired; (2) the number of individuals whose data was improperly accessed or acquired; (3) if there has been final disposition of disciplinary action for purposes of section 13.43, the name of each employee determined to be responsible for the unauthorized access or acquisition, unless the employee was performing duties under chapter 5B; and (4) the final disposition of any disciplinary action taken against each employee in response.

Jim Austad, Lake of the Woods County Attorney 218-634-1190:

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:

1. Your current Lake of the Woods County Attorney's office general policy and procedure manual and prosecutor's policy and procedure manual.
2. Data indicating that either you or your office personnel authorized the MN DNR to illegally release Michael A Sysa's (Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State Of Minnesota vs Michael A Sysa) David Alekseevich Sysa's (Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State Of Minnesota vs David Alekseevich Sysa) and Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich's (Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State Of Minnesota vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich) confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. criminal investigative data to members of the media.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. Do you remember that the evidence of your willful refusal to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act was used by me to toss a huge monkey wrench into your failed 2016 attempt to be appointed as a judicial officer?
P.S.S. Are you going to harass me with snail mail, again? Or are you going to harass me with electronic communications this time?

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/pr/subtype/cond/id/3.8/ Minnesota Court Rules PROFESSIONAL RULES Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.8 Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor The prosecutor in a criminal case shall: (f) exercise reasonable care to prevent employees or other persons assisting or associated with the prosecutor in a criminal case and over whom the prosecutor has direct control from making an extrajudicial statement that the prosecutor would be prohibited from making under Rule 3.6.

IV. PRINCIPLE ONE Conservation Officers shall conduct themselves, whether on or off duty, in accordance with the Constitution of the United States, the Minnesota Constitution, and all applicable laws, ordinances, and rules enacted or established pursuant to legal authority. A. Rationale Conservation Officers conduct their duties pursuant to a grant of limited authority. Therefore, officers must understand the laws defining the scope of their enforcement powers. Conservation Officers may only act in accordance with powers granted to them. B. Rules 1. Conservation Officers shall not knowingly exceed their authority in the enforcement of the law. 2. Conservation Officers shall not knowingly disobey the law or rules of criminal procedure in such areas as interrogation, arrest, detention, searches, seizures, use of informants, preservation of evidence, and use of force. A-4-99, CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER Page 2. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE DIRECTIVE NUMBER: A-4-99 SUBJECT: CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 1999 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Rescinds Directive 61-96 REFERENCE: Minnesota Statute Sec 626.8457, 43A.38, 43A.39; Directive A-3-98; C.L.E.A. 26.1; State Electronic Mail and Internet Policy; POST Model Conduct Policy DISTRIBUTION: All Division Employees NUMBER OF PAGES: 31

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.82 13.82 COMPREHENSIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT DATA. Subd. 7. Criminal investigative data. Except for the data defined in subdivisions 2, 3, and 6, investigative data collected or created by a law enforcement agency in order to prepare a case against a person, whether known or unknown, for the commission of a crime or other offense for which the agency has primary investigative responsibility are confidential or protected nonpublic while the investigation is active. Inactive investigative data are public unless the release of the data would jeopardize another ongoing investigation or would reveal the identity of individuals protected under subdivision 17. Images and recordings, including photographs, video, and audio records, which are part of inactive investigative files and which are clearly offensive to common sensibilities are classified as private or nonpublic data, provided that the existence of the images and recordings shall be disclosed to any person requesting access to the inactive investigative file. An investigation becomes inactive upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (a) a decision by the agency or appropriate prosecutorial authority not to pursue the case; (b) expiration of the time to bring a charge or file a complaint under the applicable statute of limitations, or 30 years after the commission of the offense, whichever comes earliest; or (c) exhaustion of or expiration of all rights of appeal by a person convicted on the basis of the investigative data. Any investigative data presented as evidence in court shall be public. Data determined to be inactive under clause (a) may become active if the agency or appropriate prosecutorial authority decides to renew the investigation.


from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: savanna_s@co.lotw.mn.us
date: Jan 4, 2022, 10:41 AM
subject: Fwd: Why Are DNR Personnel Harassing Nemmers For Exposing Illegal Release Of Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data For State Of MN VS Michael Sysa 39-VB-21-468, David Sysa 39-VB-21-469 And Yevgeniy Simonovich 39-VB-21-470?
mailed-by: gmail.com

More to come ...

Related Links:

DNR Data Practices Compliance Official Barbara Damchik-Dykes 651.259.5345 Reported To MN Department Of Natural Resources Policy And Planning Section Manager Anthony Alongi After Damchik-Dykes Harasses Nemmers Over Request For Entire DNR Policy & Procedure Manual & After Damchik-Dykes Illegally Releases Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data For High-Profile Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State Of Minnesota Vs Michael A Sysa; Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State Of Minnesota Vs David Alekseevich Sysa And Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State Of Minnesota Vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich To Media Outlets And To Nemmers?

Update: Formal Criminal Complaint Against Your Corrupt City Of Mountain Lake City Administrator/Clerk Michael Schulte, Your Corrupt Chief Of Police Douglas Bristol, & Your Corrupt City Attorney Maryellen Shrhoff? Corrupt DNR Again Caught Illegally Releasing Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data In High-Profile Cases: Chanhthone Phongsim 17-VB-18-491 & Isouvahn Xayachack 17-VB-18-492? Public Portion Of Initial Criminal Complaint Arrives? Case SO19020069?

Formal Criminal Complaint Against Your Corrupt City Of Mountain Lake City Administrator/Clerk Michael Schulte, Your Corrupt Chief Of Police Douglas Bristol, & Your Corrupt City Attorney Maryellen Shrhoff? Corrupt DNR Again Caught Illegally Releasing Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data In High-Profile Cases: Chanhthone Phongsim 17-VB-18-491 & Isouvahn Xayachack 17-VB-18-492?

Witness Intimidation & Harassment By Judicial Officer Rachel C. Sullivan? Judicial Officer Sullivan & St Louis County Personnel Conspire To Provoke Witness Rick Kottom In Hopes Of Inciting Kottom To Violence?

Kottom Tosses Another Monkey Wrench Into Rigged 69DU-CR-17-900? Kottom's 07-01-18 Complaint To Chief Judicial Officer Sally L. Tarnowski?

Kottom Criminal Complaint Tosses Huge Monkey Wrench Into 69DU-CR-17-900 Trial? St. Louis Co. Attorney Mark S. Rubin, St. Louis Co. Attorney Criminal Division Head Gary W. Bjorklund, St. Louis Co. Assistant County Attorney Christopher Pinkert, Dept Of Natural Resources (DNR) Colonel Rodmen Smith, DNR Administrative Manager Captain Alex Gutierrez & MN DNR Data Practices Compliance Official Sheila Deyo All Named In Kottom Complaint? DNR & Corrupt Prosecutors Have Well-Documented History Of Trying Cases In Court Of Public Opinion, Don't They? Confidential/Nonpublic Criminal Investigative Data Illegally Released To Lap-Dog Media, Right?

Update On DNR's Illegal Search & Seizure At Indiana Fisherman's Upper Cormorant Lake Cabin? David Deckard, Oklahoma, Chair Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Notified Of Corrupt MN DNR's History Of Obstructing Justice? Does the Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Encourage Or Discourage Due Process Violations? Inquiring Minds Want To Know, Don't They? Anthony Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1798) Clifford Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1800) & Ryan Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1802) Exposing CO Joseph Stattelman's Breaking & Entering Of Cabin?

Corrupt DNR Conspires With Hacks At KARE 11 TV To Rig Case No. 69DU-CR-17-901 State Of Mn VS Douglas Anthony Marana & Case No. 69DU-CR-17-900 State Of MN VS Roderick Robert Kottom? DNR Illegally Releases Confidential Data Yet Again, Right? Do You Remember Former DNR Col Rodmen Illegally Releasing 03-CR-15-1798, 03-CR-15-1800, 03-CR-15-1801, 03-CR-15-1802, 03-CR-15-1803 & 03-CR-15-1804 Confidential Data To WCCO-TV Hack Bill Hudson?

DNR's Major Greg Salo Not Fazed By CO Osborne's Coercive Invasion Of Johnson's Home? Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson Still Maliciously Prosecuted By Former Pope Co. Assistant Attorney/Douglas Co. Attorney Chad "The Felon" Larson? Larson And DNR Have A Well-Documented History Of Home Invasion, Don't They?

Update On DNR's Illegal Search & Seizure At Indiana Fisherman's Upper Cormorant Lake Cabin? David Deckard, Oklahoma, Chair Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Notified Of Corrupt MN DNR's History Of Obstructing Justice? Does the Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Encourage Or Discourage Due Process Violations? Inquiring Minds Want To Know, Don't They? Anthony Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1798) Clifford Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1800) & Ryan Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1802) Exposing CO Joseph Stattelman's Breaking & Entering Of Cabin?

DNR Caught Sending Confidential Criminal Investigative Data To Brainerd Dispatch (Forum Communication Company)? Indiana Fisherman Victims Of Illegal Search & Seizure? Missing Audio? Nemmers' Call To Detroit Lakes Newspaper Editor Nathan Bowe (Forum Communication Company) Forces 08/31/2015 Arraignment To Be Reset By Court To 09/28/2015? (Nemmers Threw A Monkey Wrench Into 03-CR-15-1798, 03-CR-15-1800, 03-CR-15-1801, 03-CR-15-1802, 03-CR-15-1803, 03-CR-15-1804, Didn't He? Thank You, Jesus!) Sounds Like Ronald Johnson's Rigged Case No. 21-CR-13-51, Doesn't It?

Echo Press Editor (Forum Communications Company, Right?) Al Edenloff Conspired With Corrupt DNR Officer Shane Osborne To Rig Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson? Court Documents Reveal Corrupt Editor Edenloff Knowingly Willingly & Intentionally Published Confidential Chapter 13.82 Criminal Investigative Data? Former Corrupt Douglas Co. Attorney & Current Corrupt Defense Attorney Chris Karpan Filing A Loony Appeal That Doesn't Address Illegal Search By His Buddy DNR Officer Osborne? No Surprise, Right?

DNR Invades Ronald Wayne Johnson's Home Without Probable Cause? Johnson Is A Victim Of DNR Home Invasion, Isn't He? Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson Maliciously Prosecuted By Chad "The Felon" Larson? "The Felon" Larson Has A Well-Documented History Of Covering Up Illegal Home Invasions, Doesn't He? Sounds Like Pope Co Home Invasion Of Nemmers' Home, Doesn't It? DNR's CO Shane Osborne Tampered With Audio To Cover Up Home Invasion?