How many of you were stupid enough to believe that you were going to benefit from the eCourtMN Initiative ... aka the corrupt Minnesota paperless court project? Hmmm?
Trial-by-ambush can be very effective if you are are the party with all the aces up your sleeve, but many worthy persons believe justice suffers in the process. George R. Dekle, Sr, Prosecution Principles: A Clinical Handbook (Thompson/West: 2007). page 144.
If you've been following this blog for a while, (Or read Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment. John 7:24 King James Version (KJV), right?) then you would know that you can't trust any arrest, prosecution nor conviction in lawless Minnesota, right? That's right, isn't it?
More technology won’t address what Rysavy described as a people issue in the number of court employees. In other words, the move isn’t likely to drastically speed up business at courthouses. “A trial is still going to take two weeks if it was going to take two weeks before,” Rysavy said. Courts brace for paperless system Published 11:57am Monday, January 30, 2012 By Jason Schoonover, Austin Daily Herald
And, if you can't trust any arrest, prosecution nor conviction in lawless Minnesota, then you should know that the corrupt paperless court is not created to benefit you, shouldn't you? You should, shouldn't you?
A growing number of people are representing themselves in court instead of hiring attorneys, and Rysavy said such individuals could keep feeding paper into the system if they’re not computer literate. ... The courts must ensure people who aren’t computer literate still have the ability to represent themselves, even if they don’t have a computer background. “That’s more daunting than it sounds like,” he said. Paperless courts are coming Published 9:47am Monday, January 30, 2012 By Jason Schoonover, Austin Daily Herald
In fact, if you bothered to to keep up with the public record, then you would find out, in their own words, that the rigged paperless court is not designed to benefit you, wouldn't you? You would, wouldn't you?
“I think it’s going to be a great boon to court administration and the people who are working in the justice system because of access and court administration eliminating a lot of unnecessary paper work,” Rysavy said. “For judges, you’ve got a finite situation: You’re dealing with people.” The paperless approach will not necessarily improve the speed of cases, according to Rysavy. Electronic court documents come to Mower sooner than expected Published 10:49am Friday, January 10, 2014 By Jason Schoonover, Austin Daily Herald.
The whole concept of the corrupt paperless court is to make the injustice system more efficient and less work for the petty dictators/haters of justice who run the rigged courts, isn't it? It is, isn't it?
eCourtMN Initiative. The eCourtMN Initiative by the Minnesota Judicial Branch will require that the Rice County Attorney’s Office eFile and eServe court documents. This initiative is to move state courts from paper files to an electronic information environment, and will require searchable pdf versions of our court documents be served and filed with the court.
Performance Indicator: Rice County Attorney’s Office will complete the implementation of eCourtMN.
Budget Impact: The goal would be for most of the cost to be funded through the savings of reorganization and funding a shared Criminal Justice Informational Technology System Specialist position with the County Attorney’s Office, Community Corrections and the Sheriff’s Office.
Responsible Person: County Attorney G. Paul Beaumaster, Rice County Sheriff Troy Dunn and Rice County Community Corrections Director Christine Curtis. Completed By: Ongoing and dependent upon funding, position creation and program deployment. PRELIMINARY BUDGET REPORT For the year ending December 31, 2015 Rice County Minnesota Uploaded Sep 9, 2014. http://www.co.rice.mn.us/sites/default/files/pdfs/administration/documents/Preliminary%20Budget%202015.pdf
Again, I have shown over and over again that the corrupt courts of Minnesota spend all sorts of valuable time and valuable public resources trying to prevent defendants from receiving justice, haven't I? I have, haven't I?
Commissioner Nelson offered the following resolution; RESOLUTION No.15 –154 Approving eCourtMN Agreement WHEREAS, the County of Freeborn desires to improve efficiencies through participating in a more efficient court process with the Minnesota Judicial Branch; and, WHEREAS, as the Minnesota Judicial Branch moves towards a more efficient court process, the eCourtMN initiative is committed to ensuring that non-court governmental agencies have appropriate access to court records and documents; and, WHEREAS, the Freeborn County desires to subscribed to Minnesota Court Data Services Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Freeborn County Board of Commissioners approves and authorizes Thomas Jensen, Director of Freeborn County Court Services to sign the Master Subscriber Agreement for Minnesota Court Data Services for Governmental Agencies http://www.co.freeborn.mn.us/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Minutes/06162015-359
The petty, stupid, and gutless haters of justice blindly believe the lie that the corrupt Minnesota courts are there for their for benefit, don't they? They do, don't they?
http://www.cityofkenyon.com/9-8-15%20COUNCIL%20PACKET.pdf
(eCourtMN contract for lawless City of Kenyon found here, right?)
That's because the petty, stupid, and gutless haters of justice wouldn't know real justice if it stared them right in the eye, isn't it? It is, isn't it?
“It's not a legal system. It's a legal prosecution system out of which sometime justice falls.” 6:22/1:55:43 William Mitchell Law Professor Peter Erlinder http://bambuser.com/v/5153444 "How Police Kill With Impunity" by Communities United Against Police Brutality, at 4200 Cedar.
Real justice = Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment. John 7:24 King James Version (KJV), doesn't it? It does, doesn't it?
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/338/49/case.html U.S. Supreme Court Watts v. Indiana, 338 U.S. 49 (1949) Watts v. Indiana No. 610 Argued April 25, 1949 Decided June 27, 1949 338 U.S. 49 Amid much that is irrelevant or trivial, one serious situation seems to me to stand out in these cases. The suspect neither had nor was advised of his right to get counsel. This presents a real dilemma in a free society. To subject one without counsel to questioning which may and is intended to convict him, is a real peril to individual freedom. To bring in a lawyer means a real peril to solution of the crime because, under our adversary system, he deems that his sole duty is to protect his client -- guilty or innocent -- and that, in such a capacity, he owes no duty whatever to help society solve its crime problem. Under this conception of criminal procedure, any lawyer worth his salt will tell the suspect in no uncertain terms to make no statement to police under any circumstances. If the State may arrest on suspicion and interrogate without counsel, there is no denying the fact that it largely negates the benefits of the constitutional guaranty of the right to assistance of counsel. Any lawyer who has ever been called into a case after his client has "told all" and turned any evidence he has over to the Government knows how helpless he is to protect his client against the facts thus disclosed.
Most Likely Suspect: Remember that when circumstantial evidence or especially physical evidence points toward a particular person, that person is usually the one who committed the offense. Inbau, Fred E., Reid, John E., Buckley Joseph P., Jayne, Brian C. Essentials of the Reid Technique: Criminal Interrogation and Confessions. Page 16.
The vast majority of cases involving criminal interrogation involve no overwhelming evidence of a suspect's guilt: That is precisely why the interrogation is being conducted – to obtain such evidence. Many guilty suspects, however, must be convinced that the truth is already known or will be established shortly before they decide to tell the truth. In this situation, the investigator must make the decision as to whether to introduce evidence during the interrogation. Inbau, Fred E., Reid, John E., Buckley Joseph P., Jayne, Brian C. Essentials of the Reid Technique: Criminal Interrogation and Confessions. Page 174.
Frequently, prior to an interrogation, the only evidence supporting a suspect's guilt is circumstantial or behavioral in nature. Under this condition, conducting a nonaccusatory interview of the suspect is indispensable with respect to identifying whether the suspect is, in fact, likely to be guilty. Furthermore, the information learned during the interview of a guilty suspect, when there is sparse incriminating evidence linking him to the crime, is necessary to conduct a proper interrogation. Inbau, Fred E., Reid, John E., Buckley Joseph P., Jayne, Brian C. Essentials of the Reid Technique: Criminal Interrogation and Confessions. Page 6.
As the foregoing case demonstrates, no one should be eliminated from suspicion because of professional status, social status, or any other comparable consideration when there exists strong circumstantial evidence of guilt. Inbau, Fred E., Reid, John E., Buckley Joseph P., Jayne, Brian C. Essentials of the Reid Technique: Criminal Interrogation and Confessions. Page 16-17
The petty, stupid, and gutless haters of justice think that one can get justice in Minnesota's corrupt papered/paperless courts, don't they? They do, don't they?
I think it [Adversarial System] works … ah … for the wealthy. It works for corporations and people who have enormous resources. It works generally for the government. Who can come into court because their litigation is support by our tax structure. Where it falls apart is for the middle class and for the poor. Former Chief Justice Wallace Jefferson Discusses the Shortcomings of the Adversarial System. The Texas Politics Project Presents: An interview with Wallace Jefferson, Former Chief Justice of the Suupreme Court of Texas. Moderated by James Henson, Director of the Texas Project at UT Austin. March 25, 2014. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skdrDaPgnV4
Again, I have shown over and over again that the corrupt, rigged court of Minnesota waste all sorts of valuable time and valuable public resources trying to prevent you from getting your evidence, haven't I? I have, haven't I?
http://www.ipad.state.mn.us/docs/accesspol.html
Part 2: Setting Parameters for Data Requests (Policies for Members of the Public and Data Subjects Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, does not require that individuals make data requests in writing; however, IPAD recommends that government entities make this their policy. If you decide to require written requests, you should include it in your Data Practices Policy (see Advisory Opinion 01-014). If you decide not to require written requests, you should still have some system of documenting data requests made verbally. Worksheet for Developing Data Practices Policies. MN Department of Administration, Information Policy Analysis Division · www.ipad.state.mn.us · November 2014 Page 6 http://www.ipad.state.mn.us/docs/accesspolworksheet.pdf
http://www.ipad.state.mn.us/opinions/2001/01014.html Opinion: Based on the facts and information provided, my opinion on the issue that X raised is as follows: Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.05, subdivision 12, when an individual requests access to public data, it is not appropriate for the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry (DLI) to ask a data requestor to identify him/herself and to justify the request. Signed: David F. Fisher Commissioner Dated: January 16, 2001 Minnesota Department of Administration Advisory Opinion 01-014
Minnesota Statutes, section 13.025, subdivision 4, also requires that government entities make their policies easily available to the public by distributing free copies, or by posting a copy on the government entity’s website. Worksheet for Developing Data Practices Policies MN Department of Administration, Information Policy Analysis Division · www.ipad.state.mn.us · November 2014 Page 8 http://www.ipad.state.mn.us/docs/accesspol.html http://www.ipad.state.mn.us/docs/policyworksheet.doc https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=13.025&format=pdf https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=13.025
http://www.ipad.state.mn.us/opinions/2001/01014.html Opinion: Based on the facts and information provided, my opinion on the issue that X raised is as follows: Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.05, subdivision 12, when an individual requests access to public data, it is not appropriate for the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry (DLI) to ask a data requestor to identify him/herself and to justify the request. Signed: David F. Fisher Commissioner Dated: January 16, 2001 Minnesota Department of Administration Advisory Opinion 01-014
How to Make a Data Request ... If you choose not to use the data request form, your request should include: that you, as a member of the public, are making a request for data under the Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13; whether you would like to look at the data, get copies of the data, or both; and a clear description of the data you would like to inspect or have copied. ... This government entity cannot require you, as a member of the public, to identify yourself or explain the reason for your data request. Worksheet for Developing Data Practices Policies. Data Practices Policy for Members of the Public. Policy required by Minnesota Statutes, section 13.025, subdivision 2. Page 8 http://www.ipad.state.mn.us/docs/accesspolpub.doc
Tip #2: you can't trust any arrest, prosecution nor conviction in lawless Minnesota, can you? You can't, can you?
http://www.ipad.state.mn.us/docs/copycost.html
Copy Costs Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, allows, but does not require, government entities to charge for copies of government data. If an entity's policy is to charge for copies, the allowable amount depends on whether the requester is a member of the public or a data subject.
Charging for copies of data Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, allows, but does not require, government entities to charge for copies of data. MN Department of Administration, Information Policy Analysis Division · www.ipad.state.mn.us · September 201 3 Page 1 Worksheet for Developing Data Practices Policies MN Department of Administration, Information Policy Analysis Division · www.ipad.state.mn.us · September 2013 Page 3 http://www.ipad.state.mn.us/docs/accesspolworksheet.pdf
If we have the data, and the data are public, we will respond to your request appropriately and promptly, within a reasonable amount of time by doing one of the following: arrange a date, time, and place to inspect data, for free, if your request is to look at the data, or provide you with copies of the data as soon as reasonably possible. You may choose to pick up your copies, or we will mail or fax them to you. If you want us to send you the copies, you will need to provide us with an address or fax number. We will provide electronic copies (such as email or CD-ROM) upon request if we keep the data in electronic format. Data Practices Policy for Members of the Public [Brackets are located in the sections in this document where an entity must fill in the blank. In some of these instances, IPAD has included a recommendation. If your entity adopts this policy it must notify the Commissioner of Administration per Minnesota Statutes, section 13.073, subdivision 6. Please use the form at the end of this model.] Policy required by Minnesota Statutes, section 13.025, subdivision 2. Page 9 http://www.ipad.state.mn.us/docs/accesspolpub.doc
If we have the data, and the data are public or private data about you, we will respond to your request within 10 business days, by doing one of the following: arrange a date, time, and place to inspect data, for free, if your request is to look at the data, or provide you with copies of the data within 10 business days. You may choose to pick up your copies, or we will mail or fax them to you. We will provide electronic copies (such as email or CD-ROM) upon request if we keep the data in electronic format. Data Practices Policy for Data Subjects [Brackets are located in the sections in this document where an entity must fill in the blank. In some of these instances, IPAD has included a recommendation. If your entity adopts this policy it must notify the Commissioner of Administration per Minnesota Statutes, section 13.073, subdivision 6. Please use the form at the end of this model.] Policy required by Minnesota Statutes, section 13.025, subdivision 3. Page 11 http://www.ipad.state.mn.us/docs/accesspolds.doc
The Commissioner has the following comments. Mr. Herbst made his data request on July 3 and did not receive a response from the District until August 13, approximately six weeks later. A determination of whether such a response is appropriate, prompt, or reasonable depends on the facts and circumstances of each case. Here, given the nature of Mr. Herbst's request, six weeks is not appropriate, prompt, or reasonable. David F. Fisher Commissioner Dated: September 11, 2002 Minnesota Department of Administration Advisory Opinion 02-032 http://www.ipad.state.mn.us/opinions/2002/02032.html
http://www.mncourts.gov/district/4/?page=3953 Effective September 16, 2013, all e-filed documents, whether in mandatory or voluntary case types, must be submitted in “searchable” PDF format. Visit the eFile Support Center for more details and other important notices.
http://www.mncourts.gov/About-The-Courts/NewsAndAnnouncements/ItemDetail.aspx?id=1148 On July 1, 2016, use of the eFile and eServe system will become mandatory for attorneys, government agencies, and guardians ad litem in all district court cases statewide.
https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/bca-divisions/mnjis/Documents/eCharging%20benefits%20-%20March%202011.doc eCharging: Officer electronically signs complaint; Benefits: Keeps process electronic eCharging: Prosecutor electronically signs complaint; Benefits: Keeps process electronic eCharging: Judge signs complaint electronically; Benefits: Keeps process electronic Overview: Instantaneous data transmission, no redundant data entry, reduced error rate, high transparency of workflow, less paper, no vehicles/fuel Reduces review time; Benefits: Reduced time, reduced costs, more accurate data, and improved public safety. Minnesota Criminal Complaint Process - Comparison of Manual and eCharging Systems and Benefits CONTACT: Jill Oliveira 651-793-2726
http://www.dot.state.mn.us/information/datapractices/pdfs/request-guidelines.pdf MnDOT can provide copies of data via email, FTP site, or US Mail. MnDOT can also make arrangements for data to be picked up. Delivery of data may be made in installments as it becomes available. Whenever possible, MnDOT will provide data in electronic format. Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Chief Counsel, Data Practices Unit. This document explains the process used to obtain data from MnDOT. This document is required by Minnesota Statutes §13.03, subd. 2(b). GUIDE FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC REQUESTING INFORMATION. page 2
What MDE Does Not Include in Copy Charges As a courtesy to our community, MDE never charges for the time of the data practices compliance official or other data practices staff, even when these individuals are substantially involved in searching for, retrieving and making copies of data. In addition, MDE does not charge for the first two (2) hours of program staff time spent searching for, retrieving and making copies of data. MDE cannot and does not charge a fee for separating public data from private data, and this includes preparing summary data from private or confidential data. GUIDE FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC REQUESTING INFORMATION - This document explains the process for reviewing or obtaining copies of data held by the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE). It is required by Minnesota Statutes, section 13.03, Subdivision 2(b). Pages 5-6. http://www.education.state.mn.us/mdeprod/idcplg?IdcService=GET_FILE&dDocName=042023&RevisionSelectionMethod=latestReleased&Rendition=primary
When you are arrested today, the federal prosecutors automatically expect that they will be able to force you to plead guilty – whether you are or not. And their police agents, especially the DEA, take the same attitude. It is now quite common to see truly innocent defendants convicted and sentenced to longer terms because the Government rewards others, often the guiltiest parties, with shorter sentences in exchange for testifying against the innocent. Defense attorneys know this – they see it constantly – and it is slowly corrupting many of them. To understand how this works you need to understand that in the eyes of a federal agent, you are guilty. If he arrests you, or anyone else arrested you, you are guilty. And once they believe that you are guilty, they will tell as many lies as necessary to convict you. Now that federal agents, especially DEA agents, have almost all learned their trade in a judicial system hamstrung by the sentencing guideline; they no longer think in terms of genuine proofs when making their cases. They think in terms of how much pressure do they need to put on the defendant to force him to plead guilty. They think like this because they expect (with good reason!) that every defendant will plead guilty. They do not expect to have to testify; so they are not worried about being impeached on their lies. And in the occasional case that does go to trial, where they do have to give false testimony, the agents are usually up against an appointed attorney who could not afford to do the investigation and preparation necessary to effectively impeach them. Busted by the Feds: A Manual for Defendants Facing Federal Prosecution by Larry Fassler, 12th Ed., page 108
More to come ...
Related Links:
Don't Be Deceived! You Should Be Very Suspicious Of Any Criminal Case That Lacks Technology In The Age Of Technology, Shouldn't You? You Should, Shouldn't You? We Live In The Age Of eCourt, eFiling, eDiscovery, Squad Audio/Video, Squad Laptop Computers, Taser Video, Personal Audio Recorders, Body Cameras, Digital Cameras, Video Interrogation, State Of The Art Dispatch Traffic, Etc. Don't We? So One Of The Very First Questions You Should Ask Is: Is The Technology Missing From This Case, Right?
Don't Be Deceived! You Should Be Very Suspicious Of Any Criminal Case That Lacks Technology In The Age Of Technology - Part 2? Why Are These Criminal Officers Of The Corrupt & Rigged Courts Charging You For Paper Copies When Everything Is Electronic? To Drive Up The Costs And To Force You To Plead Guilty, Right? That's Right, Isn't It? Common Criminal Stearns Co. Attorney Janelle Kendall Is Doing That In State Of Mn VS Robert Earl Rhoades Case No. 73-CR-13-5992, Isn't She? Corrupt Kendall Doesn't Want To Prove You Guilty, Does She? Corrupt Kendall Would Rather Break Your Will And Break You Financially, Wouldn't She? BCA & eFiling?
Racist Comment & Illegally Withheld Evidence In State Of Mn VS Robert Earl Rhoades Case No. 73-CR-13-5992? St. Cloud City Attorney Matthew Staehling Aiding & Abetting Stearns Co. Attorney Janelle Kendall In Cover-Up? St. Cloud's First Black Chief Of Police Wm. Blair Anderson Doesn't Want To Take Complaint Or Evidence Of Racist Statement? Nemmers Really Blindsided Corrupt St. Cloud On This One, Didn't He?
