How would you like to get maliciously prosecuted by a corrupt prosecutor and then receive a harassing letter from him?
You wouldn't, would you?
“However, the influence exerted by the covert methods of interpersonal control is harmful to human well-being and normal development. One of the major ways such methods work is through the evocation of human misery in the myriad of shame, guilt, and anxiety.” Gaslighting, The Double Whammy, Interrogation and Other Covert Control in Psychotherapy & Analysis, Theo L. Dorpat (Maryland: 2004), Page 29.
It would be no different than a rapist sending letter to their rape victim, wouldn't it? It would, wouldn't it?
But, when you remember that McLeod county is a lawless county, then it makes perfect sense why a so-called law enforcement officer would continue to use public funds to mentally torture (Mentally rape?) his victims, doesn't it? It does, doesn't it?
As a law enforcement
officer, the American prosecutor is just as concerned with the
detection of crime and the arrest of criminals as the cop on the
beat. In America, both court decision14 and statute15 recognize the
prosecutor's role as a law enforcement officer. In their roles as law
enforcement officers, prosecutors can become involved in almost all
aspects of the investigation of a case, and it is sometimes very easy
for them to become too much the law enforcement officer and too
little the minister of justice. Because the apprehension and arrest
of suspected criminals can become a highly competitive endeavor, a
prosecutor engaged in this highly competitive undertaking can easily
lose the objectivity necessary to perform his other two functions.
14. Krischer v. D'Amato, 674 So.2d 909 (Fla.App.4th DCA 1996);
District Attorney for Norfolk Dit. v. Flately, 419 Mass. 507, 509
n.3, 646 N.E.2d 127, 128 (1995); People v. Jackson, 192 Mich.App. 10,
15, 480 N.W.2d 283, 286 (1991); State v. Vitiello, 377 N.J.Super.
452, 457, 873 A.2d 591, 594 (2005). 15. West's Fla. Stat.Ann. §
790.001(8)(f); New Jersey Stat. Ann, § 2A:158-5.
No peace officer shall ridicule, mock, deride, taunt, belittle, willfully embarrass, humiliate, or shame any person to do anything reasonably calculated to incite a person to violence. Page 1 of 5 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT OF PEACE OFFICERS MODEL POLICY Minnesota Statute 626.8457
https://dps.mn.gov/entity/post/model-policies-learning-objectives/Documents/Professional-Conduct-of-Peace-Officers-Model-Policy.pdf
In a lawless county the victims of local corruption must have their will broken so the corrupt local official can maintain power, correct? That's correct, isn't it? It is, isn't it?
B. In an effort to prevent the perception of biased law enforcement peace officers shall: 6. explain and/or apologize if it is determine d the reasonable suspicion was unfo unded (e.g. after an investigatory stop).
https://dps.mn.gov/entity/post/model-policies-learning-objectives/Documents/Impartial-Policing-Model-Policy.pdf
And that is why the corrupt City of Winsted and the corrupt County of McLeod are still illegally withholding free electronic data that proves that the corrupt s-called law enforcement officer engaged in a May 13, 2014 home invasion at Heather Swantek's and Jessie Schafer's home in lawless Winsted, isn't it? It is, isn't it?
They did, didn't they?
From: "Gove, Nathan (DPS)"
Nathan.Gove@state.mn.us
Date: Mar 4, 2015 1:54 PM
Subject: RE: Formal complaint filed
against McLeod County Sheriff Scott Rehmann and Winsted Police Chief
Justin Heldt
To: "Heather A. Swantek"
hswantek@gmail.com
Cc:
Dear Ms. Swantek,
I have received your complaint via this
e-mail. I will need to review your allegations before making a
determination on the next step in the investigation process.
Sincerely
Nathan R. Gove
Executive Director
Minnesota Board of Peace Officer
Standards and Training
Direct # 651-201-7788
Fax # 651-643-3072
Nathan.Gove@state.mn.us
Swantek and Schafer also filed a complaint with the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board, didn't they? They did, didn't they?
The valid complaints were filed against Co. Attorney Junge - Winsted City Attorney Eggert - McLeod Co. Sheriff Rehmann - Winsted Police Chief Heldt, weren't they? They were, weren't they?
However, neither Swantek nor Schafer have a single ounce of confidence that either board will do their advertised job, do they? They don't, do they?
From: "Heather A. Swantek" <hswantek@gmail.com>
Date: Mar 7, 2015 12:21 AM
Subject: Chapter 13 data request for Heather Swantek Jail records
To: <scott.rehmann@co.mcleod.mn.us
Cc:Sheriff Rehmann:
On February 25, 2015 I sent you this email. Where is my free, electronic jail data? Email it to me immediately.
Heather Swantek
hswantek@gmail.com
-- Originally sent by hswantek@gmail.com on Feb 25, 2015 12:38 PM ---Sheriff Scott Rehmann, McLeod County Attorney Michael Junge
Mr. Scott Rehmann and Mr. Mike Junge,
I would like a copy sent to my email address in pdf format of my entire jail record for the times I spent in your facility as well as the time that I was transferred to and held at Renville as a border from McLeod county jail. I am also sending this request to the McLeod county attorneys office requesting the same thing. I expect to receive this in electronic pdf format via my email listed below in a timely fashion. I will not tolerate any form of harassment in my attempt to receive this information from you or anyone in your office. Thank you for your time and look forward to a fast reply. Heather A Swantek hswantek@gmail.com
Mr. Scott Rehmann and Mr. Mike Junge,
I would like a copy sent to my email address in pdf format of my entire jail record for the times I spent in your facility as well as the time that I was transferred to and held at Renville as a border from McLeod county jail. I am also sending this request to the McLeod county attorneys office requesting the same thing. I expect to receive this in electronic pdf format via my email listed below in a timely fashion. I will not tolerate any form of harassment in my attempt to receive this information from you or anyone in your office. Thank you for your time and look forward to a fast reply. Heather A Swantek hswantek@gmail.com
Heather Anderson Swantek hswantek@gmail.com
Neither Swantek nor Schafer believe that either board will be the cavalry coming to the rescue, do they? They don't do they?
From: "Joseph P. Beckman" <JBeckman@hjlawfirm.com>
Date: Mar 5, 2015 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: complaint against mcleod county attorney Mike Junge, Winsted city attorney Fran Eggert
To: "Heather A. Swantek" <hswantek@gmail.com>
Cc:
Good afternoon, Ms. Swantek:
This acknowledges your email and attachments from yesterday,
which appears to be a complaint against a Minnesota lawyer. While you
have correctly identified me as a member of the Lawyers Professional
Responsibility Board (the “Board”), the process for complaints against
Minnesota lawyers is for you to submit the same to the Office of Lawyers
Professional Responsibility (the “Office”).
The
Office is charged with receiving and the initial review of complaints
against Minnesota attorneys is the exclusive responsibility of the
Office. The Board is responsible for oversight and administration of
the Minnesota lawyer discipline system, including the Office. No Board
Member is directly involved at this stage of the complaint process.
The Office maintains a website
to inform the public. On the home page of that site is a large button
labeled “File a Complaint” with links giving you the option of submitting your complaint electronically or of printing a complaint form that you fill in and mail to the Office. In either case, the supporting documents should be mailed to the Office at:
Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility
1500 Landmark Towers
345 St. Peter Street
St. Paul, MN 55102
651-296-3952
1-800-657-3601
1500 Landmark Towers
345 St. Peter Street
St. Paul, MN 55102
651-296-3952
1-800-657-3601
As
a courtesy, I have forwarded your complaint to the Office. My
transmittal is not an official complaint, however, so I strongly suggest
that you submit at least an online complaint so that it gets logged
into the system.
Thank you for your inquiry.
Sincerely,
Joe Beckman
Board Member (2014-17)
Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board
Remember: the key in exposing a corrupt local government is not to trust it, right? That's right, isn't it?
A wise man scaleth the city of the mighty, and casteth down the strength of the confidence thereof. Proverbs 21:22 King James Version (KJV)
More to come . . .
Related links:
Case No. 43-CR-14-715 - Dismissed - State Of Minnesota VS Heather Swantek? Chief Judge Terrence E. Conkel Leaves Case Open Even Though He Closed It? Conkel's Attempt To Criminally Defame Swantek? Winsted Police Chief Justin Heldt & McLeod Co. Sheriff Scott Rehmann Still Illegally Withholding Free Electronic Public Data Which Proves Home Invasion By Corrupt Cops? Public Money Used To Cover Up Crime? You Can't Trust Any Arrest, Prosecution Or Conviction In Lawless McLeod Co., Can You?
Jesse Schafer & Heather Swantek File A Complaint Against McLeod Co. Attorney Michael Junge & Sheriff Scott Rehmann? Junge & Rehmann Conspiring With Winsted City Attorney Fran Eggert & Police Chief Justin Heldt To Cover Up May 13, 2014 Home Invasion? Winsted's Herald Journal Aiding & Abetting In Local Corruption? Herald's Editor Ivan Raconteur Willfully Refuses To Interview Schafer & Swantek? City Of Winsted Willfully Refuses To Acknowledge Receipt Of Complaint? Malicious Case No. 43-CR-14-715 To Be Dismissed?
Jesse Schafer & Heather Swantek File A Personnel Complaint Against Winsted City Attorney Fran Eggert & Police Chief Justin Heldt? Eggert & Heldt Conspiring With McLeod Co. Attorney Michael Junge & Sheriff Scott Rehmann To Cover Up May 13, 2014 Home Invasion?
Lawless McLeod County; thugs with badges commit home invasion, illegally withhold evidence
