Tuesday, March 24, 2015

Ayrlahn Johnson Files Complaint Against Rice Co. Attorney Fossum For Malicious Prosecution Prior To Rigged Trials For 66-VB-14-4097 & 66-VB-14-3349? Ayrlahn Informed By Fossum's Corrupt Assistant Prosecutor That Trooper Patric Ignaszewski Was Going To Give Perjured Testimony?


Lion News: Rice Co. Attorney Fossum Scripting Trooper Ignaszewski's Testimony In 66-VB-14-3349?

Lion News: Rice Co. Student Prosecutor Travis Kowitz Obstructs Justice In Case No. 66-VB-14-3349?

Lion News: Rice Co. Student Prosecutor Kowitz Covers Up Trooper Misconduct In 66-VB-14-3349?

Lion News: Rice Co. Attorney Beaumaster Tries To Provoke Nemmers To Violence In Data Dodge?

Lion News: Rice Co. Attorney Green's & Ignaszewski's Misconduct In 66-VB-14-3349?

Lion News: State Patrol Capt Mark Holm & Rice Co. Attorney Fossum Rigging Case 66-VB-14-3349?

Lion News: Special Prosecutor Fischer & Rice Co. Attorney Fossum Rigging Case 66-VB-14-3349?

Lion News: Transcript For Rice Co. Attorney Fossum's Scripted Trooper Ignaszewski's Testimony?





March 22, 2015 Via e-mail and United States Mail
Dave Miller, Rice County Commissioner:
431 Tatepaha Boulevard
Faribault, MN 55021

Re: Due Process Violations/Misconduct/Illegally Withholding of Evidence/Obstruction of Justice and Malicious Prosecution in Case Numbers 66-VB-14-3349 and 66-VB-14-4097

Dave Miller, Board Chair:

I am writing to tell you about the misconduct and obstruction of justice in the above listed cases on the part of the Rice County Attorney’s Office, the Minnesota State Highway Patrol and your local judges.

On August 9, 2014 I was stopped by Minnesota State Highway Patrolman Patric Ignaszweski and cited for speeding. He gave me a verbal warning for window tint too dark and not having current proof of insurance in my car. I then exercised my rights under Minnesota Statute 169.91 and requested an immediate appearance before a Judge. Trooper Ignaszweski made the wild and outrageous claim that he was not familiar with this Minnesota Statute even though a very large part of his job is to enforce traffic laws. This was very surprising to me because even the City of Winona has a policy concerning Minnesota Statute 169.91; Policy Number 105-05 dated July 27, 2004 which states in pertinent part:

2.0 POLICY: It is the policy of this department, in accordance with an opinion from the City Attorney’s office, that all violators of Minnesota Statutes Annotated Section 169 or any other law or ordinance relating to the operation or registration of vehicles shall be handled in accordance with Minnesota State Statutes Annotated Section 169.91, relative to arrest and/or pre-trial release.
3.0 PROCEDURE: 3.1 Any violator of Minnesota State Statutes Section 169 or any other ordinance or law relating to the operation or registration of vehicles shall be taken into custody and immediately taken before a magistrate, in the cases enumerated in Subdivision 1 of Minnesota State Statute Section 169.91.”

Trooper Ignaszweski immediately became hostile, belligerent and intimidating. He threatened me by stating that if I showed up in Court he would make sure the Prosecutor would have additional charges waiting for me. Also, the enduro racing Trooper Ignaszweski was tailgating me. Maybe Trooper Ignaszweski confused the highway he was supposed to patrol for public safety for a race track? Maybe that is why the dash cam video has country music playing on it instead of evidence of my conversation with Trooper Ignaszweski?

On September 26, 2014 I had a conversation with what I thought was Rice County Assistant Attorney Travis Kowitz. I later found out that he was a Student Attorney hired part time by the Rice County Attorney’s Office on May 29, 2014 and was approved by the Rice County Board of Commissioners on June 10, 2014. During our conversation we discovered that Trooper Ignaszweski had added two charges, window tint too dark and no proof of insurance to his copy of the Citation without informing me. Needless to say I was shocked that a Minnesota Highway Patrolman would falsify a public document in such a way. I pointed out to Mr. Kowitz that I could have paid the ticket and not responded to the unknown to me additional charges one of which is a misdemeanor (no proof of insurance). An arrest warrant could have easily been issued and I could have been arrested at any point in the future because of these unknown to me additional charges. I subsequently learned that Mr. Kowitz was not really an Attorney at all but rather a Student Attorney who was attending Law School at St. Thomas School of Law. Since there were no real Attorney’s around yet from the Rice County Attorney’s Office interacting with or supervising Mr. Kowitz the Rice County Attorney’s Office is in and has been in violation of Rule 3.04 of the Student Practice Rules as promulgated by the Minnesota Board of Law Examiners which states:
        1. Rule 3.04 Supervisory Attorney

The attorney who supervises a student under Rule 3 shall:

(1) be a member of the bar of this court;

(2) assume personal professional responsibility for and supervision of the student's conduct;

(3) be present with the student during all interactions with the client; and

(4) report to the law school supervisor for the academic program or course as required by
the law school supervisor.”

The Rice County Attorney’s office is also in violation of Rule 1.04, subdivision (6) which states:

Rule 1.04 Supervisory Attorney

The attorney who supervises a student shall:

6) appear with the student at all other proceedings unless the attorney deems his or her personal appearance unnecessary to assure proper supervision. This authorization shall be made in writing and shall be available to the judge or other official conducting the proceedings upon request.”

The Rice County Attorney’s Office has ignored and covered up this misconduct on the part of Minnesota State Highway Patrol Trooper Patric Ignaszweski. They even have notes from Trooper Ignaszweski in their files that they have yet to produce for me where he claims that I was belligerent and that I crumpled up the Citation and threw it on the floor of the car and that he mailed the new Citation to me with the added charges. The Rice County Attorney’s office has utterly failed to investigate this misconduct and insists on continuing their malicious prosecution. When I pointed out to Assistant County Attorney Chad Green that my copy of the Citation was not crumpled he was forced to agree with me. Assistant County Attorney Chad Green then stated that Trooper Ignaszweski would get on the witness stand and tell the truth I then insisted that based on what I heard was in their notes from Trooper Ignaszweski he would be committing perjury and if the Rice County allowed this they would be suborning perjury. Unfortunately, the Malicious Prosecution continues….

In addition the Rice County Attorney’s Office has and continues to:

  • Illegally withhold evidence.
  • Tried to illegally charge me for free electronic public data.
  • Failed to email me a court filing on December 30, 3014 and when requested from new County Attorney John Fossum, a cover letter to me was typed up and backdated and a Certificate of Service was mailed to me that was not filed with the Court on December 30, was also backdated ,and because it was a sworn affidavit that the Court document was mailed to me on December 30, 2014 constitutes perjury within the Rice County Attorney’s Office.
  • Failing to email me the Discovery and plopping it (what limited information they in fact are giving me) in my lap the day of the hearing. (We do live in the age of technology, don't we?)
  • Failing to email me other filings in my cases, specifically not emailing me notice that they have appointed a Special Prosecutor. (The Rice County Attorney's could have easily emailed the searchable pdf format court documents from their MCAPS4 prosecuting software, which they've had since 4/1/2010, couldn't they?)


To illustrate the nature of the illegally withheld evidence in case number 66-VB-14-4097 the video of the traffic stop from the Minnesota Highway Patrol has complete audio to go along with the video. In case number 66-VB-14-3349 the video is truncated/edited and has no audio so there is no documentation regarding the misconduct of Trooper Ignaszweski. There can only be two options in this case; either the video was tampered with or Trooper Ignaszweski deliberately did not turn on the audio.

Instead of the Rice County Attorney’s Office going after Trooper Ignaszweski for falsifying documents and reports and committing perjury (which is a felony) they insist on continuing their malicious prosecution of me.

The new County Attorney Mr. John Fossum, instead of being an improvement over former County Attorney Paul Beaumaster, appears to be much worse. He has personally appeared for the County as the Prosecutor prosecuting me. The latest ploy on the part of the Rice County Attorney’s Office is to get the two charges of no proof of insurance certified as a petty misdemeanor to deny me my right to a Jury Trial so they can continue maliciously prosecuting me, covering up the misconduct of the Minnesota Highway Patrol, covering up the due process violations, covering up their illegally withholding of my evidence, and continuing to obstruct justice so the good citizens of Rice County will be none the wiser.

Things are so bad at the Rice County Attorney’s Office regarding my cases that they have appointed a Special Prosecutor, Mr. Kurt S. Fischer, to prosecute me for the Rice County Attorney’s Office. Fischer has his own problems with unprofessional conduct by notarizing signatures on court documents not signed in his presence and one of the signatures was later discovered to be forged.

Finally, the only way I was able to get some of my evidence in my case was to file a complaint against some of your corrupt judges. I say corrupt because any honest judge would have dismissed both cases and reported each and every one of your corrupt prosecutors to the proper authorities for possible prosecution and disbarment. You can't trust any arrest prosecution or conviction in lawless Rice County, can you?

Which is why I'm sure you that you'll try to help your corrupt prosecutors cover this up, aren't I?

Sincerely,

_________________________________________
Ayrlahn Johnson
13517 Clinton Place
Burnsville, Minnesota 55337
612-991-0568

Emailed and mailed via USPS Certificate of Mailing:
Jake Gillen, Commissioner, 24062 Cabot Avenue, Faribault, MN 55021, (507) 334-5746 (Home),
Email: jgillen@co.rice.mn.us
Galen Malecha, Commissioner, 1607 Pheasantwood Trail, Northfield, MN 55057, (507) 645-6041 (Home), Email: gmalecha@co.rice.mn.us
Dave Miller, Commissioner, 431 Tatepaha Boulevard, Faribault, MN 55021, (507) 334-4763 (Home),
Email: dmiller@co.rice.mn.us
Steve Bauer, Commissioner, 6386 Farwell Path, Faribault, MN 55021, (507) 334-9700 (Home),
Email: sbauer@co.rice.mn.us
Jeff Docken, Commissioner, 6320 Chester Avenue, Northfield, MN 55057, (952) 652-2876 (Home),
Email: jdocken@co.rice.mn.us
Jaci Smith, managing editor, Faribault Daily News, 514 Central Avenue, Faribault, MN 55021, 507-333-3134. jsmith@faribault.com
Matt Carlander, State Bank of Faribault, 428 Central Avenue, Faribault, MN 55021, (507) 332-7401.
mattc@tsbf.com
Nathan R. Gove, Executive Director, MN POST Board, 1600 University Avenue, Suite 200, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55104, 651-201-7788, nathan.gove@state.mn.us



LETTER OF COMPLAINT TO THE CHIEF JUDGE OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT


Via e-mail and United States Mail


January 13, 2015
Chief Judge, Third Judicial District Emailed to: mattc@tsbf.com
In Care of: District Administrator John.Fossum@co.rice.mn.us
Third Judicial District Office jcavaleri@gmail.com
1696 Greenview Drive South West
Rochester, Minnesota 55902



Dear Chief Judge:

I am writing to complain about illegal, immoral and unethical behavior on the part of the Minnesota State Highway Patrol, the Rice County Attorney’s Office and certain Judges sitting in Rice County.

On August 9, 2014 I was stopped by Minnesota State Highway Patrolman Patric Ignaszewski just south of Lonsdale, MN on County Road 4 in Erin Township. I came over a hill going northbound and observed three cars traveling southbound the third of which appeared to be a police car. I kept driving and observed the police car in my rear view mirror pull over on to the shoulder and perform a dangerous Dukes of Hazard u-turn. The police car then came upon me going at a high rate of speed and then tailgated me for a very uncomfortable 5 to 6 seconds as can be seen in the truncated video of the incident before turning on his lights. As soon as his lights came on I immediately pulled over onto the shoulder. I was frightened and scared and thought he was going to run me off the road. Officer Ignaszewski’s biography on the Minnesota State Patrol website states “In his spare time, he races enduro cars. Ignaszewski is excited to use his driving skills to make Minnesota’s roads safer for all.” Far from making Minnesota roads safer for all, Officer Ignaszewski is a danger on the roads and is a threat to public safety.

After stopping me he approached my car and asked for my driver’s license and insurance information. I gave him the requested information. He then came back to my car and gave me ticket for speeding. He gave me a verbal warning for window tint too dark and not having current proof of insurance in my car. I then exercised my rights under Minnesota Statute 169.91 and requested an immediate appearance before a Judge. He said there was a Court date on the Citation and I could go before a Judge at that time. I then asked him if he was familiar with this statute and he stated no. This was very surprising to me because even the City of Winona has a policy concerning Minnesota Statute 169.91; Policy Number 105-05 dated July 27, 2004 which states in pertinent part:

2.0 POLICY:

It is the policy of this department, in accordance with an opinion from the City Attorney’s office, that all violators of Minnesota Statutes Annotated Section 169 or any other law or ordinance relating to the operation or registration of vehicles shall be handled in accordance with Minnesota State Statutes Annotated Section 169.91,relative to arrest and/or pre-trial release.

3.0 PROCEDURE:

3.1 Any violator of Minnesota State Statutes Section 169 or any other ordinance or law relating to the operation or registration of vehicles shall be taken into custody and immediately taken before a magistrate, in the cases enumerated in Subdivision 1 of Minnesota State Statute Section 169.91.”

I then reiterated that under the statute I was requesting an immediate appearance before a Judge. Officer Ignaszewski immediately became hostile, belligerent and intimidating and stated “that’s not gonna happen.” He then asked me for the Citation back and I said no because he had already given it to me and I had set it on the passenger’s seat. He then further intimidated me and threatened me by stating that if I showed up in Court he would make sure the Prosecutor would have additional charges against me. I was not sure what kind of Conspiracy this Officer had going on with the Rice County Attorney’s Office. As I was pulling back out onto the road after the stop I noticed there was a passenger in the passenger’s seat of Officer Ignaszewski squad car. The name of this witness has still not been disclosed to me as of this date.

Prior to my initial Court appearance on October 1, 2014 I wrote a letter dated September 25, 2014 to the name of the person in the Rice County Attorney’s office who I was told would be in charge of this prosecution, Travis Kowitz. In the letter I detailed the rude, intimidating and threatening behavior of Officer Ignaszewski and asked for specific Discovery material. On September 26, 2014 I had a 32 minute conversation with Mr. Kowitz (this conversation was recorded) about my letter and the behavior of Officer Ignaszewski of the Minnesota Highway Patrol. During this conversation we had a misunderstanding of the exact charges that had been filed against me. We both discovered that on the Citation #889000218565 that was given to me on August 9, 2014 there was the single charge of speeding listed on the Citation. On the copy of Citation #889000218565 that Mr. Kowitz had there were three charges listed, speeding, window tint too dark, and no proof of insurance. This caused much consternation on both sides until we figured out this major discrepancy. Needless to say I was shocked that a Minnesota Highway Patrolman would falsify a public document in such a way. While still on the phone with Mr. Kowitz I scanned and e-mailed him a copy of my Citation. He seemed genuinely concerned to get to the bottom of this misbehavior by Officer Ignaszewski and expressed appreciation for the proof and evidence I provided. He also expressed concern about Officer Ignaszewski rude and threatening behavior and the denial of my rights. I pointed out to Mr. Kowitz that I could have paid the ticket and not responded to the unknown to me additional charges one of which is a misdemeanor (no proof of insurance). An arrest warrant could have easily been issued and I could have been arrested at any point in the future because of these unknown to me additional charges. He seemed sympathetic to this very strong possibility of bad things happening to me because of the misbehavior of Officer Ignaszewski.

At my initial Court session on October 1, 2014 Judge Christine Long stated that I had every right to Discovery before making a plea. A pre-trial hearing was then scheduled for November 18, 2014. On October 1, 2014 I then had another long discussion with Mr. Kowtiz. It was then that he explained that he was not really an Attorney but rather a Student Attorney and was attending Law School at St. Thomas Law School in St. Paul, MN. His attitude also changed as he seemed a lot less concerned about the behavior of Officer Ignaszewski and a lot more concerned about negotiating a plea as if I had done something wrong and not Officer Ignaszewski. There were no other Attorney’s around interacting or supervising Mr. Kowitz. The Rice County Attorney’s office is in and has been in violation of Rule 3.04 of the Student Practice Rules as promulgated by the Minnesota Board of Law Examiners which states:

Rule 3.04 Supervisory Attorney

The attorney who supervises a student under Rule 3 shall:
(1) be a member of the bar of this court;
(2) assume personal professional responsibility for and supervision of the student's conduct;
(3) be present with the student during all interactions with the client; and
(4) report to the law school supervisor for the academic program or course as required by the law school supervisor.”
The Rice County Attorney’s office is also in violation of Rule 1.04, subdivision (6) which states:

Rule 1.04 Supervisory Attorney

The attorney who supervises a student shall:
6) appear with the student at all other proceedings unless the attorney deems his or her personal appearance unnecessary to assure proper supervision. This authorization shall be made in writing and shall be available to the judge or other official conducting the proceedings upon request.
I received some limited Discovery signed by Chad Green, Assistant Rice County Attorney dated October 15 but not mailed to me until October 21, 2014. Rather than put all of the electronic data on to the CD or e-mail it to me the Rice County Attorney’s Office printed out the discovery material and mailed me paper copies which I in turn had to scan to turn them back into electronic copies.
My next Pre-Trial Hearing was held on November 18, 2014 in front of Judge John Cajacob. I pointed out Officer’s Ignaszewski misbehavior and showed him a copy of my Citation. Judge Cajacob then asked the Prosecutor (a lady Prosecutor who was pretending that she was not prepared) what they had to say about my revelation. She stated that she had not spoken with the Officer but did offer what he would say from the notes in the file. She stated that Officer Ignaszewski would state that I was belligerent, uncooperative, and that I crumpled up the Citation and threw it on the floor and that the Officer mailed a copy of the altered Citation to me. I told Judge Cajacobs that these were all lies. I then stated that the prosecution was maliciously and illegally withholding evidence and that the evidence appeared to have been truncated and tampered with and that Officer Ignaszewski was not following the rules laid down by the Minnesota Highway patrol for audio taping and videotaping incidents. The dash cam video that I was presented with had been conveniently and edited to remove the incriminating and embarassing “Dukes of Hazard” turn by Officer Ignaszewski. The dash cam video should have started immediately prior to Officer Ignaszewski's radar being allegedly triggered by my vehicle. Judge Cajacobs then accused me of calling out the prosecution and Highway patrol without any evidence. Judge Cajacobs could plainly see from my copy of the Citation that is was not crumpled up in any way shape or form. I then told Judge Cajacobs, based on the prosecutor’s notes of Officer Ignaszewski that the prosecution would be suborning perjury when moving forward with this case. Judge Cajacobs then accused me of not knowing what suborning perjury even means. Judge Cajacobs then told me to get a Lawyer about 5 or 6 times during the course of the 20 minute hearing acting as if I was somehow incompetent. At one point, Judge Cajacobs asked what I was holding in my hand. I stated it was the Minnesota Highway Patrol’s General Order effective March 25, 2009 regarding Audio/Video Recording Equipment which states in pertinent part:
“II. PROCEDURE
B. General Use
  1. The primary purpose for using audio and video recorders is to obtain evidence. Therefore, all traffic stops, pursuits, emergency vehicle operations, and other incidents of value to law enforcement or training should be recorded.
    a. Audio and video recordings are subject to General Order 10-025 (Data Practices) and the Minnesota Data Practices Act (Minn. Statutes Chapter 13).

  1. Retention
    1. Whether an audio or video recording documents an arrest or significant incident, the recording constitutes evidence and the legal rules of evidence apply. As in other cases, the arresting or Investigating Member must document and maintain the proper chain of custody for the recording evidence.”
III. RESPONSIBILITIES
  1. Members
    1. Record all traffic stops, pursuits, emergency vehicle operations, and other incidents of value to law enforcement or training.
3. Routinely inspect the department-issued audio and video equipment and report any defect in condition or appearance to a supervisor.
a. Check the video camera at least weekly to ensure that the time and date are accurate and that the body microphone is working effectively.”

The only audio or video that I have received in Discovery so far is a truncated video with no audio on it and no audio of the stop. I offered to read to Judge Cajacobs the pertinent provisions of Chapter 13 regarding Minnesota Data Practices Act requests but Judge Cajacobs was not interested in the law nor the facts. Judge Cajacobs then told the prosecutor to have the Officer Ignaszewski at the next pre-trial hearing scheduled for December 9, 2014.
Judge Cajacobs did not seem to care that the Prosecution was backing the misbehavior of Officer Ignaszewski and did not seem to care that Officer Ignaszewski had falsified a public document Officer Ignaszewski and did not seem to care that the Rice County Attorney’s office was maliciously prosecuting and illegally withholding evidence and did not seem to care that Officer Ignaszewski had committed perjury and was going to commit further perjury and did not seem to care that the Rice County Attorney’s Office was suborning perjury.
I then filed a written request for a copy of the court transcript with the Clerk of Court’s Office. I did not hear another word until after Thanksgiving. I had to go out of town for a week and the Court Reporter called me but did not leave a message so she sent me a letter that I did not receive until after Thanksgiving. I then called the Court Reporter and left her a message and never heard back from her.
The next Court hearing was another pre-trial hearing held on December 9, 2014 in front of Judge Christine Long. There was confusion at this Court hearing because now the prosecutor was Assistant Rice County Attorney Chad Green who was pretending to be unfamiliar with what happened and the pre-trial hearing held on November 18, 2014 and also Judge Long who was also unfamiliar with what happened at the pre-trial hearing on November 18. Judge Long stated since there wasn’t a transcript (I had tried to obtain one) we don’t know exactly what Judge Cajacobs ordered. The prosecution alleged that since I had filed no motions they did not have to have Officer Ignaszewski present in the courtroom even though there were clear issues of contention as outlined above. I mentioned to Judge Long that this was my third time dealing with this matter and the Prosecution’s illegally withholding my evidence was wasting my valuable time and downright criminal. Prosecutor Green told the Judge that there was a cost to obtain my discovery. Judge Long then advised but did not Order me (she is now representing me by giving me legal advice) to pay costs to obtain discovery. She also told Prosecutor Green to get me the discovery that I had asked for that did not have a cost. The Court and the Prosecution are conspiring to defraud me out of hard earned money for free electronic data. It is a matter of the public record that Rice County eCharges. In fact, former county attorney Beaumaster was hired by Dakota county for his expertise in eFiling.

Prokopowicz added that Dakota County is a pilot project for e-charging, e-filing and e-court, and they hope to use Beaumaster significantly for that project. Beaumaster to continue prosecuting in Dakota County Posted: Friday, January 2, 2015 1:00 pm | Updated: 11:28 pm, Fri Jan 2, 2015. By BRAD PHENOW bphenow@faribault.com.

Note: I tried to report this misconduct to Tony Murphy, Rice County Administrator. However, it would appear that Murphy is reading off the same prepared script. The wild, outrageous and unsubstantiated script that states that I should pay for free electronic data.

We then reviewed my discovery request and talked about the items I had not received and the items that Prosecutor Green would work on getting me. The Court then stated in their minute order that:

“Defendant must make written motion for any discovery not received by 12/30/2014; Court will not hear further motions re: Discovery if not filed by 12/30/2014.”

The problem with this order is that the Defendant has made no motions to date regarding discovery so how can the Court state it will not hear further motions when none have been made. It doesn’t make any sense. It is not my job to do the prosecutor's job. Nor can the judge force me to do the prosecutor's job.

“We have held that when the State suppresses or fails to disclose material exculpatory evidence, the good or bad faith of the prosecution is irrelevant: a due process violation occurs whenever such evidence is withheld.” Illinois v. Fisher.² 2. 540 U.S. 544, 547, 124 S.Ct. 1200, 1202 (2004). George R. Dekle, Sr, Prosecution Principles: A Clinical Handbook (Thompson/West: 2007), Page 145.

The judge is wasting my valuable time, insulting my intelligence and wasting valuable public resources aiding and abetting the prosecution in this due process violation! I am not fooled by this blatantly obvious due process violation!

Surely in vain the net is spread in the sight of any bird. Proverbs 1:17

I then met with Prosecutor Green after the Court hearing to discuss Discovery and Officer Ignaszewski perjury issues (this discussion was recorded). We reviewed the discovery I was seeking and Mr. Green stated he would respond to me via e-mail by Thursday, December 11, 2014. As of this date I have yet to hear from Mr. Green. Mr. Green admitted that my copy of the Citation was not crumpled and I advised Mr. Green to check the notes in his file to prove that Officer Ignaszewski was committing perjury. Mr. Green stated that Officer Ignaszewski would get on the witness stand and tell the truth and that I would have a chance to cross examine Officer Ignaszewski. Despite my best efforts to get at the truth Mr. Green is moving full steam ahead to suborn perjury in this case.

As of this date I have heard nothing from the Rice County Attorney’s Office since Tuesday, December 9, 2014. They continue to illegally withhold evidence, continue to maliciously prosecute me, continue their attempt to defraud me for free electronic data, continue to support the misbehavior of Officer Ignaszewski, continue to support the falsifying of public documents by Officer Ignaszewski, continue to support Officer Ignaszewski’s perjury, continue to move forward on the path of suborning perjury and at this point the Court either does not care or is conspiring with the Prosecution.

My next pre-trial court hearing is schedule for January 20, 2014 at 10:30 am. I want justice - not imitation!


Sincerely,



Ayrlahn Johnson
13517 Clinton Place
Burnsville, Minnesota 55337
612-991-0568

Matt Carlander
State Bank of Faribault
428 Central Avenue
Faribault, MN 55021
(507) 332-7401
mattc@tsbf.com

Minnesota State Bar Association
District Five President
Jorma Cavaleri
Cavaleri & De Marco LLP
17645 Juniper Path
Suite 210
Lakeville, MN 55044
P. 952.388-1833

John Fossum, Rice County Attorney
218 Third Street NW
Faribault, MN 55021




February 9, 2015 Via e-mail and United States Mail

Jeffrey D. Thompson Emailed to: mattc@tsbf.com
Third Judicial District Office John.Fossum@co.rice.mn.us
1696 Greenview Drive South West jcavaleri@gmail.com
Rochester, Minnesota 55902 rkvischer@stthomas.edu

Re: Due Process Violations/Misconduct in Case Number 66-VB-14-3349 and 66-VB-14-4097

Chief Judge Thompson:

I am in receipt of your funny letter dated January 24, 2014. I got a good chuckle reading your funny letter – talking about everything except the missing dash cam video from not one but two cases. And when did I ask you for legal advice? I asked you to do your job and investigate due process violations in two separate case, didn't ? Why are you willfully refusing to do you job? Why are you willfully refusing to report these due process violations to the proper authorities?

The video I received from the first case number 66-VB-14-3349 is missing all audio. The video is tampered with to cover up Trooper misconduct. My copy of the State Patrol General orders indicates that both audio and video are required for the traffic stop. Of course, you knew that, didn't you? Is that why you are refusing doing your job and investigate the due process violation in that case? I have received zero evidence in case number 66-VB-14-4097 since I first requested this information on October 1, 2014. Is that not an additional due process violation? Aren’t you supposed to be investigating this second due process violation as well? Instead, you send me this ridiculous letter that talks about everything except my clear, precise, and unquestionable evidence of these due process violations.

Your funny letter is a huge waste my valuable time, an insult to my intelligence, and a hudge waste valuable government resources trying to pretend these due process violations don’t exist. How is that judicial economy? Sounds more like a preplanned script for cover-up, doesn't it? It does, doesn't it?
Plus, I have information that the Rice County Attorney’s Office and the Minnesota State Patrol both participate in e-filing. That evidence is listed below.

BCA Agency Deployment Report – Rice Co. Attorney – Mn State Patrol
ORI: MNMHP0200 County: Olmsted
Agency Type: Law Enforcement Name:
 Minnesota State Patrol (Rochester)
Module: Incident Referral
Last Adapter Used:
 eCharging Date Deployed: 6/12/2012
ORI: MN066013A County: Rice
Agency Type: Prosecuting Authority Name:
 Rice County Attorney
Module: Complaint
Last Adapter Used: 
MCAPS4  Date Deployed: 4/1/2010
Effective September 16, 2013, all e-filed documents, whether in mandatory or voluntary case types, must be submitted in “searchable” PDF format. Visit the eFile Support Center for more details and
Page 1 of 2

John Fossum, Rice County Attorney should have no problem emailing me all my free electronic data, should he? Yet, John Fossum, Rice County Attorney is still following his due process violating script. Therefore, Fossum is still willfully refusing to send me my free electronic information. And you are aiding and abetting in this illegal withholding of my free electronic data, aren't you? Why? It's because you and John Fossum are part of the same corrupt court, isn't it? How can you trust any citation, arrest, prosecution or conviction in Rice county? You can't, can you? You're sadly mistaken if you think that I will remain silent while you “railroad” me, aren't you?

Sincerely,

_________________________________________
Ayrlahn Johnson
13517 Clinton Place
Burnsville, Minnesota 55337
612-991-0568

CC: Mailed First class U.S.P.S. certificate of mailing
Matt Carlander
State Bank of Faribault
428 Central Avenue
Faribault, MN 55021
(507) 332-7401

Minnesota State Bar Association
District Five President
Jorma Cavaleri
Cavaleri & De Marco LLP
17645 Juniper Path
Suite 210
Lakeville, MN 55044
P. 952.388-1833

John Fossum, Rice County Attorney
218 Third Street NW
Faribault, MN 55021

Robert Vischer, Dean and Professor of Law
University of St. Thomas · School of Law
1000 LaSalle Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55403
(651) 962-4838
Page 2 of 2



358.116 COURT DOCUMENTS. Unless specifically required by court rule, a pleading, motion, affidavit, or other document filed with a court of the Minnesota judicial branch is not required to be notarized. Signing a document filed with the court constitutes "verification upon oath or affirmation" as defined in section 358.41, clause (3), without administration of an oath under section 358.07, provided that the signature, as defined by court rules, is affixed immediately below a declaration using substantially the following language: "I declare under penalty of perjury that everything I have stated in this document is true and correct." In addition to the signature, the date of signing and the county and state where the document was signed shall be noted on the document. A person who signs knowing that the document is false in any material respect is guilty of perjury under section 609.48, even if the date, county, and state of signing are omitted from the document.

History: 2014 c 204 s 3
https://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/statutes/?id=358.116



Minnesota State Patrol General Orders Effective: April 5, 2013

Subject: ARREST, CUSTODY HOLDS/RELEASE, AND WARRANT PROCEDURES

Reference: General Orders 10-003, 10-027, 20-015, 20-021, 70-007

Number: 13-20-028

Special Instructions: Rescinds GOs 94-20-022; 90-20-024; 92-20-028;

Distribution: A,B,C,E

4. Aside from gross misdemeanor or felony level crimes involving personal injury or death, Minn. Stat.sec. 169.91 allows members to take into custody persons cited for a traffic or registration violation if the person demands an immediate court appearance or there is probable cause to believe the person

will leave the state and the violation is not covered by the Non-Resident Violators (NRV) Compact, which is an agreement between member states to release residents of other member states charged with moving violations which alone do not carry suspension or revocation.



Minnesota State Patrol General Orders Effective: August 17, 2009
Subject: MINNESOTA STATE PATROL POLICIES:
GENERAL ORDERS, CHIEF’S MEMOS, DISTRICT/SECTION MEMOS
Reference: All General Orders, CALEA Chapter 12
Special Instructions: Rescinds General Orders 07-10-001
Number: 09-10-001
Distribution: G
Revision Summary
I. POLICY
The policy of the Minnesota State Patrol is to provide guidance and direction to its employees on matters relating to the conduct of employees and the delivery of services to the public. These policies will be communicated through General Orders, Chief’s Memos, and District/Section Memos.
• Employees are responsible for knowing and understanding the Minnesota State Patrol Policies applicable to their assignment.
• Managers and supervisors are responsible for enforcing Minnesota State Patrol Policies.
• Failure to comply with these policies may result in disciplinary action.


More to come . . . .

Related Links:

Rice Co. Attorney Paul Beaumaster Caught Rigging Court Cases 66-VB-14-4097 & 66-VB-14-3349? Complaint Filed In State of Minnesota vs Ayrlahn Hegge Johnson? Rice Co. Attorney Beaumaster Recruited St. Thomas Law Student Travis Kowitz To Aid & Abet In Due Process Violations? Ayrlahn Has Trump Cards Since He Recorded Numerous Conversations With Corrupt Rice Co. Officials, Hasn't He? Updated: Co. Attorney John Fossums' Ploy To Avoid Jury Trial Fails?