Maggie R. Wallner Attorney at Law
Direct Dial: (612) 337-9301
Email: mwallner@kennedy-graven.com
January 20, 2022
Tammie Nelder
[Redacted]
Lewiston, MN 55952
CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED AND REGULAR U.S. MAIL
Dear Ms. Nelder:
Our firm represents the Lewsiton-Altura School District. This letter is in response to the “Notice” that was delivered to School Board members on January 10, 2022.
The School Board and its members have acted in full compliance with state and federal law and within its statutory and constitutional authority, and your assertions otherwise are wholly without merit. The District’s Safe Learning Plan is aimed at protecting health and safety of students and staff; and the District will not be deterred from that effort.
With respect to your allegations and demands related to the Oath of Office, all Board members have been duly elected and are properly serving under oath, including the oral oath taken at the January 4, 2021 School Board meeting. The District will continue its efforts to locate all executed forms. Any representation by you that you, by self-appointment, are a member of the member of the School Board of Independent School District No. 857. is and act of fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation, for which there are potential civil and criminal penalties.
There is absolutely no basis for your $250,000 per board member monetary demand; it is frivolous and is hereby rejected. Any purported lien filed against Board members would be, as a matter of law, invalid, unless authorized by a court order or a specific statute. See, Minnesota Statutes, Section 514.99, subdivision 4. A fraudulent lien will be reported to law enforcement as a violation of Minnesota Statutes, Section 609.7475, which is a gross misdemeanor. Also, if it is necessary to bring an action in district court to remove liens against Board members, they will seek all available money damages, costs, attorney fees and punitive damages available under Minnesota Statutes, Section 514.99 against all individuals who filed the liens.
If you are represented by an attorney, please provide me his/her contact information, so any further correspondence or service of process can be directed to him/her.
Sincerely, KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED By: /s/ Maggie R. Wallner
If you want to read Haskell's and Nelder's paper terrorism then just click on the images, okay?
FYI: https://www.republicaneagle.com/news/man-charged-with-pepper-spraying-2-police-officers/article_f93ef6bd-7494-57b7-8cfa-6cec11442f56.html Man charged with pepper-spraying 2 police officers editor@rosemounttownpages.com Published on Apr 5, 2007 Two Rosemount police officers got faces full of pepper spray last month when they tried to arrest a man suspected of larceny and impersonating a police officer. Police from Sioux Falls, S.D. called Rosemount March 21 and asked local police to arrest Keith Douglas Haskell, 44. The South Dakota department planned to extradite Haskell to Sioux Falls so he could face charges there. Sioux Falls police warned Rosemount officers Haskell has a history of impersonating police officers and likely had police equipment. Investigators Henry Cho and Emau Morgan went to Haskell's home on Atrium Avenue at 2 p.m. March 21. According to a complaint filed in the Dakota County Attorney's office Haskell tried to keep the officers from getting into his home, then sprayed them with pepper spray when they tried to push through the door as Haskell tried to close it. Cho was hit directly in both eyes and was incapacitated but Morgan, who was sprayed directly in only one eye, was able to arrest Haskell. Haskell reportedly told Morgan later he wouldn't have used the pepper spray if he'd known the two were police officers, but according to the complaint Haskell sprayed Cho and Morgan after they identified themselves.
FYI: Guest – Keith Haskell: We’re in a society where we want someone else to do everything for us. You know, I just put on my Facebook page if we had 6,000 at a rally or 3,000 people at a rally, why don’t we have election judges? Why are we not becoming election judges or poll watchers? Or going to caucus? Or becoming a delegate?
Sons Of Liberty – Tim Brown: Yeah.
Guest – Keith Haskell: That’s a huge concern. If I have 5,000 patriot brothers and sisters standing at the state capitol.You know, 200 of us with guns or whatever. Why are we not doing the things that we need to do to take this country
back? One community one state at a time. And those are things that we have to do. If we don’t do it. This is all I hear “Waa, waa, waa, waa, waa.” And these are my patriots brothers and sisters. It’s time to take action. It doesn’t all have
to be by force. But, I’m agreeing with you Tim I think that time. It’s not here right now. It’ll be here in 90 days.
Sons Of Liberty – Tim Brown: Yup. ... 53:37-54:30/1:00:06 https://www.bitchute.com/video/fdiwT5swUqzy/ Taking It To The Tyrants Of Minnesota - Guest - Keith Haskell Watch % buffered 12:19 20:08 124 6 4 First published at 15:12 UTC
on December 28th, 2021. #sonsofliberty #vaccinehoax #medicaltyranny channel image SonsOfLiberty1776AD Sons
FYI: Keith Haskell, an investigator with the National Action Task Force (NATF), https://national-taskforce.org/about-us who has been working to assist Hanson throughout the process, told The Minnesota Sun that he wants to see the judge removed and the city attorney who handled the case disbarred, due to the alleged misconduct outlined in the writ of habeas corpus. NATF is a national group made up of investigators that “work in concert with local and federal authorities when and where it is appropriate.”EXCLUSIVE: Lisa Hanson Files Writ of Habeas Corpus with United States District Court of Minnesota December 15, 2021 Hayley Feland hayley@volente.biz
https://theminnesotasun.com/2021/12/15/exclusive-lisa-hanson-files-writ-of-habeas-corpus-with-united-states-district-court-of-minnesota/
FYI: An individual identified as Richard Martin attempted to appear by teleconference and represent Defendant. Mr. Martin would not provide the Court with a verification of his Minnesota attorney registration number to confirm he is authorized to practice law in the state of Minnesota. The Court attempted to ask Mr. Martin if he was a licensed attorney in the state of Minnesota. Mr. Martin refused to answer the Court’s questions. Instead, Mr. Martin asked the Court if it wanted to go down that path. Because Mr. Martin refused to answer the question, the Court delegated Mr. Martin an observer for the hearing. As an observer, Mr. Martin’s microphone was muted and he was not permitted to speak during the proceeding. Order For Contempt BY THE COURT: Dated: 10 January 2021 Ross L. Leuning Judge of District Court State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General, Keith Ellison, Plaintiff, vs. MLH Enterprises L.L.C. d/b/a The Interchange Wine & Coffee Bistro, Defendant. File No. 24-CV-20-1788
FYI: THE COURT: All right. Well, it seems like it is diminished. We'll press
on. And so I have called the case. Ms. Hanson, I did not ask: Are you
represented by counsel?
MS. HANSON: I am represented by assistance of counsel.
THE ZOOM HOST: If I could, I could try to move Ms. Hanson into a breakout room to fix her audio.
THE COURT: All right. We're going to go off the record.
(Whereupon, at 3:55 p.m., a recess was taken, after which, at 4:02 p.m., the following proceedings were had:)
THE COURT: We'll go back on the record. And, Ms. Hanson, when we were interrupted with the
communication issues, I asked if you were represented by counsel. Are you represented by counsel?
MS. HANSON: I am represented by assistance of counsel.
MS. HANSON: I am represented by Richard Martin, my lawyer.
THE COURT: All right. Mr. Martin, are you there? And for our host –
THE ZOOM HOST: I have asked him to unmute.
THE COURT: Okay.
MR.
MARTIN: Okay. I've lost -- tell me -- I got you on audio, but I don't
have you on visual currently. This is Rick Martin of the Constitutional
Law Group. And I am acting only as assistance of counsel.
THE COURT: So, Mr. Martin, by that, what do you mean?
MR.
MARTIN: Under the Sixth Amendment, her rights are protected. She
chooses her assistance of counsel, and I am currently acting of as
assistance of counsel. That is my only capacity.
THE COURT: Mr. Martin, are you a licensed attorney in the State of Minnesota?
MR. MARTIN: Let me ask you this question before we go any further: Do you want to pursue that?
THE COURT: Yes, I do. Are you a licensed –
MR. MARTIN: You really do?
THE COURT: -- attorney in the State of Minnesota?
MR. MARTIN: I'm going to ask you the question --
THE COURT: All right. Our host can mute him.
MR. MARTIN: Listen. I've got to ask for clarity: So that we are clear –
THE ZOOM HOST: That was your wish, Your Honor, to mute him; correct? It was hard to hear.
THE COURT: That is correct, yes.
THE ZOOM HOST: Okay.
THE
COURT: So, Ms. Hanson, Mr. Martin is not a licensed attorney in the
State of Minnesota; he is not authorized to practice law in this court;
he has not filed any motion to appear pro hoc vice. No attorney in the
state has made that motion and represented that they will assist him in
this
proceeding. And, because of that, I can't allow him to be your
attorney. I can certainly allow him to continue to observe the
proceedings as any member of the public does. Do you understand?
MS. HANSON: No, I don't understand.
THE
COURT: Well, the State of Minnesota does not allow anyone to practice
law unless they are a licensed attorney within the state. He is not, so
he cannot practice in this court. It is that simple.
(Whereupon, an unidentified third party spoke to the defendant off the record.)
THE COURT: Are you ready to proceed?
MS. HANSON: I'm sorry. No, sir. I am not ready to proceed. Can I have a moment to look at my notes?
THE COURT: You certainly may.
MS. HANSON: Thank you.
THE
COURT: Ms. Hanson, the question before you is: Are you ready to
proceed? It is time to answer the question. You've had enough time to
look at your notes. And, for our host, let's unmute Ms. Hanson.
THE ZOOM HOST: I have made the request, sir.
THE COURT: Okay.
MS. HANSON: Can you hear me now?
THE COURT: We can, yes.
MS.
HANSON: I'm not ready to proceed, sir. Can you provide me with a copy
of your license and your bond to practice law in the State of Minnesota?
That would be a question for both the judge and the
prosecutor.
THE
COURT: Ma'am, we are not going to do that; we don't have to do that. We
are going to proceed. Is there anything else you'd like to address?
MS.
HANSON: I'm asking if you can provide me with a copy of your license
and your bond to practice law in the State of Minnesota.
THE COURT:
And I answered that, "No," ma'am. We're not going to do that; we're
going to proceed with this case. (Whereupon, an unidentified third party
spoke to the defendant off the record.)
MS. HANSON: I'm sorry?
THE
COURT: All right. With that, then, we will proceed. Ms. Hanson will be
representing herself and her business, and the moving party is the State
of Minnesota. … Page 9-13 State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General,
Keith Ellison, Plaintiff, vs. MLH Enterprises L.L.C. d/b/a The
Interchange Wine & Coffee Bistro, Defendant. Motion Hearing Court
File No. 24-Cv-20-1788 The above-entitled matter came on for hearing via
Zoom before the Honorable Ross L. Leuning, Judge of District Court, at
the Freeborn County Government Center, Courtroom No. 2, City of Albert
Lea, County Of Freeborn, State Of Minnesota, at 3:45 P.M. on January 8,
2021. 24-Cv-20-1788 Filed In District Court State Of Minnesota 1/26/2021
4:09 Pm State Of Minnesota In District Court County of Freeborn Third
Judicial District Civil Division
FYI: Keith Haskell: Alternative demand for redress. Hey I like choice. I like alternatives. Don’t you? I like choice. That’s what an alternative is. I have an alternative for you. And it’s not wear the mask or go home. Cease and desist with enforcement of wearing a face mask as a condition upon which to enter this public place. And provide notice to the claimant of this decision. In other words you got to tell me you’re going to quit doing it. Now folks that is just one alternative demand for redress of grievances. Let’s talk about some more that have been used in the state of Minnesota successfully. Does anybody know there are nine school board . I’m sorry nine superintendents of schools that have already resigned in the state of Minnesota this year?
Videographer: They’re not telling us that.
Keith Haskell: Oh yeah.
Videographer: Yeah. 36:37-37:22/1:10:41 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUehmPUsoVU TAKE BACK THE SCHOOL BOARDS! Keith Haskell. 44 views Feb 24, 2022 4 Dislike Share Save Wes Lund
FYI: Keith Haskell: I don’t need you pushing me out front and making me a sacrificial lamb. I don’t need you taking a Brian Brotner and Elena or or even a Wes Lund and saying “Hey look at all this information I have for you. You should go scream at them.” No. That is not what we need. Listen I’m dumb enough. I’m going to volunteer to be in the front. I don’t need your help.
Videographer: (Laughs)
Keith Haskell: I don’t need your help pushing me there. But, I’ll tell you what. I used to love a good old western. And I was talking with a gentleman today and this just came to me today. I don;t need you behind me. I don’t need me up here talking at the school board podium and have 45 of you or 50 or 60 of you behind me. Or 100 of 140. I need you on my flank. My right and my left. I need it to be like the old westerns with the cowboys looked up out of the valley up on the hill and all they saw was horses and feathers. All the way around. And when uh oh they brought an army and we’re surrounded. Now you don’t all have to have skills. And yes there’s strength in numbers. You don’t have to have the same skills I have. But you do all have skills, I know because you were made by God. And He didn’t leave you empty-handed. He gave you certain talents and skills that I don’t have. But one of them is joint the doggone army. Quit standing behind us. Quit making your neighbor do all the work. There’s people out her fighting at these school boards and city councils do not have children in public schools. Well yeah those are the rabblerousers. And they shouldn’t be there. They don’t have a reason to be there. Listen, we all have a reason to be there. 57:20-59:18/1:10:41 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUehmPUsoVU TAKE BACK THE SCHOOL BOARDS! Keith Haskell. 44 views Feb 24, 2022 4 Dislike Share Save Wes Lund
FYI: Notice of Wrongdoing and Demand for Redress
(Verified)
I, [your in proper capitalization], a [man/woman], hereinafter referenced as “Claimant”, HEREBY NOTICE [name of wrongdoer, in his/her full capacity as a man/woman [acting in agency of XXX] of wrongful conduct against the Claimant and MAKE DEMAND for redress of the wrongdoing in the alternative, make the Offer of Opportunity to dispute the facts, assert any law that would avoid the liability as charged, or dispute the value of the damages as noticed herein.
Wrongdoer is FURTHER NOTICED that he/she has [7, 14, 21] days from the date of receipt of service made by [certified mail or personal service] to either redress the wrongdoing as demanded herein or make dispute of any such fact, or allege claims in avoidance, under penalty of perjury by certified mail addressed to the Claimant at : [address].
In absent of said dispute or assertion of claim(s) in avoidance to the liability as charged and made in the manner and services so specified, it will be established that no dispute exists and that the Claimant is entitled to the redress of wrongdoing upon the actions(s) of trespass on the case according to the DEMAND made herein and will be deemed as tacit admission to the wrongdoing in fact and tacit agreement with the value established for redress of the wrongdoing – having no authority upon which to avoid the liability as charged – and will estop Wrongdoer from asserting any legal rights thereafter. Any dispute of fact shall be put before a trial by jury tribunal.
Upon reasonable belief, Wrongdoer is not licensed to practice medicine in [your state].
Wrongdoer made no claim to have medical knowledge.
Claimant gave notice to Wrongdoer that she did not consent to the wearing of a face mask.
Wrongdoer made assertions that he/she could interfere with the liberty and freedom of the medical choice of the Claimant in conspiracy with other unknown people as a matter of a policy of [policy maker].
Medical device. Any article or healthcare product intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or condition, or for the use in the care, treatment or prevention of disease, which does not achieve any of its primary intended purpose by chemical actions or by being metabolized.
Duty
Wrongdoer has a duty as a man/woman under common law to not commit a trespass against another man or woman.
First Cause of Action: Intentional Trespass on the case (trespass ab initio) against Wrongdoer for interference with the liberty and medical choice of the Claimant in his/her decision to not wear a face mask in the conduct of Claimant’s private matter in a premise open to the public.
Paragraphs 1 through 14 incorporated here by reference as fully stated.
DEMAND FOR REDRESS
WHEREFORE: Because of the truthfulness of the foregoing cause of action and the facts in support thereof, the Claimant makes DEMAND for MONEY DAMAGES against Wrongdoer as according to the following demand:
Considering that the trespass was intentional and a violation of constitutionally protected common law rights of personal liberty and medical choice and Wrongdoer’s willful and contemptuous disregard, Special or Punitive Damage in the amount of $250,000 as the punitive value Congress has established with respect to any two or more person who who conspire to injure any person in any State in the free exercise or enjoyment or any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States – They shall be fined as not to exceed $250,000 under 18 U.S.C. § 241 and 18 U.S.C § 3571(b).
ALTERNATIVE DEMAND FOR REDRESS
CEASE AND DESIST with the enforcement of wearing a face mask as a condition upon which to enter [public place] and provide notice to the Claimant of the cessation.
Verification
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of [your state] that the foregoing is true, correct, and made in good faith upon my knowledge and belief and will testify to the same in court if called to do so.
Executed on this _________ day of [month], 2022
by: ____________________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUehmPUsoVU TAKE BACK THE SCHOOL BOARDS! Keith Haskell. 44 views Feb 24, 2022 4 Dislike Share Save Wes Lund
More to come ...
Related Links:
