Thursday, November 18, 2021

How About We Tell The New Ulm Journal About The Hostile Response Nemmers Received From The The MN Board of Veterinary Medicine? The Data From The Rigged Cases (13-CR-19-1031 State Of Minnesota Vs Carmen Marie Burth & 08-CR-21-272 State Of Minnesota Vs Candi Jolene Lemarr) Made Executive Director Julia H. Wilson, DVM Hostile, Right? Where Oh Where Is That Brown County Data, Huh?

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: fbusch@nujournal.com,
Kevin Sweeney ksweeney@nujournal.com,
gorear@nujournal.com,
sam.hansen@co.brown.mn.us,
Jason Seidl Jason.Seidl@co.brown.mn.us,
district2@co.brown.mn.us
date: Nov 18, 2021, 10:00 AM
subject: Chapter 13 Data Request For Candi Lemarr Related Data – Why Is The Convicted Thief Brown County Attorney Chuck Hanson Still Harassing Nemmers?
mailed-by: gmail.com

Greg Orear, Publisher New Ulm Journal, Kevin Sweeney, Editor, Fritz Busch, Staff Writer 507-359-2911:

Hey did you want an update on my Chapter 13 Data Request and the harassment that I have been receiving from the convicted thief Brown County Attorney Chuck Hanson? Did you know that Brown County won't even acknowledge my latest Chapter 13 Data Request? Do you want to hear how I contacted the MN Board of Veterinary Medicine? Did you know that the Minnesota Board of Veterinary Medicine Executive Director Julia H. Wilson, DVM. became hostile with me when I sent information about the Veterinarians involved in both the high-profile animal cruelty cases of Candi Lemarr (08-CR-21-272) and Carmen Marie Burth (13-CR-19-1031)?

Do you remember when that thief Hanson wanted to use the confidential body camera video for 08-CR-21-272 to dispel widespread rumor or unrest in Case No. 08-CV-20-978 Candi Lemarr vs Brown County? Do you think that the thief Hanson didn't want to release the now public information to the general public so state investigators couldn't see if the vet on Lemarr's farm was "acting in good faith and in the normal course of business"? Do you think that is why the body camera video was illegally withheld from me, also? Hmm? Inquiring minds want to know, don't they?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. See attached, okay?

https://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp Society Of Professional Journalists SPJ Code of Ethics Seek Truth and Report It Ethical journalism should be accurate and fair. Journalists should be honest and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information. Journalists should: – Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable. Give voice to the voiceless. – Recognize a special obligation to serve as watchdogs over public affairs and government. Seek to ensure that the public’s business is conducted in the open, and that public records are open to all.

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/343.215 343.215 VETERINARIAN IMMUNITY. A licensed veterinarian acting in good faith and in the normal course of business is immune from civil and criminal liability in any action arising in connection with the report of a suspected incident of animal cruelty. History: 2020 c 89 art 4 s 33

Q Investigator Reed, if someone is posting online regarding what happened on November 23rd, 2020, were there eight deputies out at Sapphire Farms on November 23rd, 2020?
MR. KUETTNER: Objection to the -- sorry, Your Honor. Objection to the relevance. The first half of this question, whether or not somebody posting online, whatever they're posting has nothing to do with what happened on November 23.
THE COURT: I agree. I don't know what has been posted online. Obviously, we were focused here on what did happen and not on rumors or speculation or guesses online, so I will sustain the objection to the first part of the question. Page 146-147. Evidentiary Hearing - Volume III Day 3 of 3 Pages 111-172 Evidentiary Hearing File No. CV-20-978 Candi Lemarr vs. Brown County. Q = Assistant Brown County Attorney Andrea Liester, A = Investigator Jeremy Reed

Subd. 15. Public benefit data. Any law enforcement agency may make any data classified as confidential or protected nonpublic pursuant to subdivision 7 or as private or nonpublic under section 13.825 or 626.19 accessible to any person, agency, or the public if the agency determines that the access will aid the law enforcement process, promote public safety, or dispel widespread rumor or unrest. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.82 13.82 Comprehensive Law Enforcement Data.

Sam Hansen, Brown County Administrator 507-233-6600 & Jason Seidl, Sheriff 507-233-6713 & Anton Berg, Board Chair 507-359-7844:

Why oh why haven't you acknowledged receipt of my 11-15-21 Chapter 13 Data Request entitled "Chapter 13 Data Request For Candi Lemarr Related Data – Why Is The Convicted Thief Brown County Attorney Chuck Hanson Harassing Nemmers?"

Correction:
Incorrect: "1. Gross salary, history of sustained complaints and work-related continuing education from data of first hire until today's date for Brown County Sheriff’s Office Investigator Jeremy Reed, Derek Shaw, Derek Shaw and Steve Depew."
Correct: "1. Gross salary, history of sustained complaints and work-related continuing education from data of first hire until today's date for Brown County Sheriff’s Office Investigator Jeremy Reed, Randee Murphy, Derek Shaw and Steve Depew."

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. When is my readily available, free, electronic, public data hitting my email inbox, huh? Five (5) minutes from never?

Government entities should respond in one of three ways 1. Provide access to the data (and copies when requested) 2. Inform you the data are classified as not public (must give statute section) 3. Inform you the data do not exist • Not responding is not a proper response. Minnesota Department of Administration - Information Policy Analysis Division - Can I ask for that? Government Data Practices Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 page 12.

A response five weeks later is neither prompt nor reasonable. Although the Department did not provide information about its data practices policies and procedures, in instances like this one, those procedures ought to provide for a response within a matter of days, not weeks. Advisory Opinion 95-042. October 31, 1995; Minnesota Department of Children, Families and Learning. October 31, 1995 | Inspection, Response to data requests, Statutory construction (Ch. 645)
https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/opinions/library/?id=36-267796

3. Only horses exhibiting altered metabolism and having inadequate feed stores on the premises should be seized. Removing healthy horses from their home is not necessary and may often result in adverse consequences due to stress created by a new environment and untrained handlers. 4. If at all possible, the alleged neglected horses should remain at the owner’s farm. Removing any horse from its familiar environment, drastically changing its diet, and exposing it to a new set of handlers will usually result in stress and a further loss of body condition. In the vast majority of cases, if the intent is truly the best care of the horse, that care can best be administered in familiar surroundings. If the legal authorities require, care can be conducted under their official guidance. “Innocent until proven guilty” is the most abused legal standard in America today. Due to biased press coverage, most “trials” are conducted before the accused ever has a chance to answer the charges. Once a horse owner has been accused of neglect, they are stained for life. If they are later proven to be innocent, the public has already painted them with a negative picture. This should not happen. It is imperative that the state authorities demonstrate adequate cause for seizure. Unsupported claims of neglect against a horse owner should be followed by a vigorous public campaign by the state authorities criticizing the parties who have filed a frivolous claim and, if possible, such parties should be prosecuted by the state. Author’s Information:(MIS)USE OF THE BCS IN ALLEGED NEGLECT by Don Henneke, Ph.D., is currently the Director of Equine Science at Tarleton State University, Stephenville, Texas. Dr. Henneke was the principal investigator in developing the Body Condition Scoring System for Horses at Texas A&M University in 1979.

3 Attachments: Chapter 13 Data Request For Data On Complaint Process At The MN Board of Veterinary Medicine111721_904am.pdf; Chapter 13 Data Request For Data On Complaint Process At The MN Board of Veterinary Medicine111721_944am.pdf; Chapter 13 Data Request For Data On Complaint Process At The MN Board of Veterinary Medicine111721_1014am.pdf

More to come ...

Related links:

How About We Toss A Monkey Wrench Into The High-Profile Animal Cruelty Cases Of Candi Lemarr And Carmen Marie Burth? It's Rigged Case Nos. 13-CR-19-1031 State Of Minnesota Vs Carmen Marie Burth & 08-CR-21-272 State Of Minnesota Vs Candi Jolene Lemarr, Isn't It? Let's Request Some Data From The MN Board of Veterinary Medicine, Shall We? Do You Want To See The Ridiculous Response From Executive Director Julia H. Wilson, DVM?

Who Wants To Toss A Monkey Wrench Into The High-Profile Candi Lemarr Animal Cruelty Case? It's Rigged Case No. 08-CR-21-272 State Of Minnesota Vs Candi Jolene Lemarr, Isn't It? Chapter 13 Data Request For Candi Lemarr Related Data – Why Is The Convicted Thief Brown County Attorney Chuck Hanson Harassing Nemmers?

Nemmers Asks The Brown Co. Commissioners: "Have You Or Haven't You Watched The Damning Video Of Your Corrupt Brown Co. Attorney Charles “The Thief” Hanson Falsely Accusing Nemmers Of Harassment?" Why Oh Why Is “The Thief” Hanson Retaliating Against Nemmers? Did You Know That Nemmers Was Looking Into How “The Thief” Hanson Was Hired As A Law Enforcement Officer AKA Assistant Watonwan Co. Attorney When “The Thief” Hanson Had Prior Theft Convictions? And Nemmers Tossed A Huge Monkey Wrench Into The High-Profile Case No. 08-CV-20-978 Candi Lemarr Vs Brown County, Didn't He? Sounds Like A Motive To Threaten & To Harass Nemmers, Doesn't It? 

Who Wants To Toss A Monkey Wrench Into Case No. 13-CR-19-1031 State Of Minnesota Vs Carmen Marie Burth? North Branch Chief Of Police Daniel Meyer, Assistant Chisago County Attorney Kathryn Jean Kelly And Chisago County Attorney Janet Reiter Are Trying Burth's Case In The Court Of Public Opinion, Aren't They? Animal Humane Society's Pistol Packing Humane Agent Keith Streff And Anoka Equine Veterinary Services Dr. Zach Loppnow Are Aiding & Abetting In The Conspiracy, Aren't They? You Want To See How Nonprofits Conspire With LEO To Steal Your Horses?

Transcripts For Case No 46-CV-19-1224 Goldmount Veterinary Center PA Vs Watonwan Co Animal Humane Society Not On The Register Of Actions But Hidden In Affidavit In Support Of The AHS’s Motion For A New Trial Or In The Alternative Remittitur? You Want To Read The Transcripts For The Testimony Of Pistol Packing AHS Humane Agent Keith Streff, Don't You? Did Anyone Ask Streff On The Witness Stand Why He Wasn't Trying To Impersonate A Peace Officer During The Trial? FYI: Did You Know That Streff Was Forced To Wear "Street Clothes" As A Result Of Nemmers' Complaint?

Let's Ask Joseph A. Gangi, Attorney for Michael Johnson, If Johnson Plans On Reporting Pistol Packing AHS Agent Keith Streff To LEO For Impersonating A Peace Officer, Shall We? Armed Minnesota Animal Humane Society Humane Agent Keith Streff Wearing A Pistol In Case No 83-CR-18-513 State Of Minnesota Vs Michael Charles Johnson? A Monkey Wrench For Case No. 46-CV-19-1224 Goldmount Vs Watonwan Co And AHS?

Let's Ask Martin County Sheriff Markquart If Armed Minnesota Animal Humane Society Humane Agent Keith Streff Will Be Allowed To Impersonate A Peace Officer In His Jurisdiction, Shall We? Hey How About We Ask Watonwan County Sheriff Bergeman Why The Pistol Packing Streff Was Allowed To Impersonate A Peace Officer In His Jurisdiction? Will Streff Get Permission To Influence the Jury With His Pistol In The June 28, 2021 Through July 2, 2021 Trial for Court File 46-CV-19-1224 Goldmount Veterinary Center, P.A. Vs Watonwan County, Animal Humane Society?

Armed Minnesota Animal Humane Society Humane Agent Keith Streff Wearing A Firearm In Case No. 83-CR-18-513 State Of Minnesota Vs Michael Charles Johnson? Will AHS Agent Streff Show Up Armed At June 28‐June 30th, 2021 & July 1– July 2, 2021 Jury Trial for Court File 46-CV-19-1224 Goldmount Veterinary Center, P.A. Vs Watonwan County, Animal Humane Society? Has Streff Ever Been Accused Of Impersonating An Officer? Let's Ask AHS Attorney Freitag, Okay? Should We Tell The St. James Plaindealer & The Martin County Star Editors About Watonwan Co. Attorney Lindee's Illegal Withholding Of Public Data? Lindee Knows That The Chapter 13 Data Will Toss A Monkey Wrench Into 46-CV-19-1224, Doesn't He