Tuesday, April 23, 2019
Celebrity Attorney Kim Picazio Huffs & Puffs But Fails To Blow Conspiracy Theorist Sarah Westall's Audio Recordings Of Kim Picazio's & Jeremiah Regan's Affair Off Of Westall's Social Media Accounts? Picazio Magically & Mysteriously Intentionally Forgets To Provide East Grand Forks Detective Lieutenant Rod Hajicek Evidence That Conspiracy Theorist Timothy Charles Holmseth Was Prosecuted & Convicted Of Making Death Threats To Celebrity Attorney Kim Picazio?
Lion News: Celebrity Attorney Kim Picazio’s Affair With Regan Exposed By Investigation Into Westall?
Lion News: Celebrity Attorney Kim Picazio Falsely Reporting Death Threats By Timothy Holmseth?
Lion New: Inver Grove Heights PD Withholds Recorded Line Data For Celebrity Attorney Kim Picazio?
Celebrity Attorney Kim Picazio huffs and puffs . . .
---------- Original Message ----------
From: Kim Picazio kim@picaziolaw.com
To: sarahw@galexconsulting.com
Date: April 6, 2018 at 11:18 AM
Subject: Website Posting of Illegal Audios
Ms. Westall:
On February 25, 2018, you posted content on your website entitled, Timothy Holmseth Update – Serious Findings Disclosed, at the following URL: http://sarahwestall.com/timothy-holmseth-update-serious-findings-disclosed/.
The blog posting contains two (2) audios of illegally recorded, private telephone calls wherein I am a participant to the conversation. I had no knowledge the posted telephone calls were being recorded, and no one obtained my authority and/or consent. One of the audios clearly reveals the parties’ intent to secretly record me without my knowledge, and therefore, you have know that I did not consent to the recording of that telephone call.
Florida is a two (2) party state, meaning it is a crime to record a telephone call without both parties’ consent. All parties to those calls were in Florida at the time of the illegal recordings. The act of using or disclosing an illegally recorded telephone conversation in Florida is a felony in the third degree, an extraditable offense. Please refer to Florida Statute 934.03 Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited, which states in relevant part:
(1) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter, any person who:
(a) Intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept any wire, oral, or electronic communication;
(b) Intentionally uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when:
1. Such device is affixed to, or otherwise transmits a signal through, a wire, cable, or other like connection used in wire communication; or
2. Such device transmits communications by radio or interferes with the transmission of such communication;
(c) Intentionally discloses, or endeavors to disclose, to any other person the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this subsection;
(d) Intentionally uses, or endeavors to use, the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this subsection; or
(e) Intentionally discloses, or endeavors to disclose, to any other person the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication intercepted by means authorized by subparagraph (2)(a)2., paragraph (2)(b), paragraph
Further, pursuant to Minnesota law, your act of posting these audios online also constitutes a felony. Minnesota Statute 626A.02, INTERCEPTION AND DISCLOSURE OF WIRE, ELECTRONIC, OR ORAL COMMUNICATIONS PROHIBITED, clearly states that you, as a third party, may not use or disclose recordings you know, or should know, were illegally obtained. Even under Minnesota’s “one party consent” laws, which are nearly identical to Federal Wiretapping laws, a person who is not a party to a recorded conversation must have the consent of at least one party to the recorded call, prior to disclosure of the same. The “one party consent” aspect of Minnesota law, as well as federal law, only comes into play when you are one of the participants to the conversation, and you have consented to the recording. You were not a party to any of the recorded telephone conversations posted on your website, and therefore, you need to demonstrate that you have the consent by at least one participant to the call to post the audio online. I have not consented to your posting of these illegally obtained audios, nor has any of the other participants of these call(s). Consequently, posting of audio recordings of me on a private telephone call constitutes criminal violations of Florida, Minnesota, and Federal laws.
By the very content of the audio(s) themselves, you know, or have reason to know, that the recordings were obtained without my consent and/or knowledge, in Florida. In fact one of the recordings actually contains audio of those recording the call, speaking to each other as they attempt to call me back for illegal recording purposes. It is clear on the audio itself, that the recording is being made without my knowledge, and for tortious and/or illegal purposes. Your posting of these audios, especially for commercial gain, constitutes very serious crimes for which I intend to prosecute. I demand that you remove this illegal and intrusive content from your website immediately. If you fail to do so, I intend to use every avenue available under the law to have the content removed, and to seek law enforcement intervention in Florida, Minnesota, and with the Federal Bureau of Investigation to have you prosecuted for this criminal conduct. Civil remedies will also be sought against you.
I must say, for an individual who promotes themselves as giving guidance on businesses and ethics, I would think that the online publishing of a person’s most personal, intimate, and private telephone conversations, which were clearly serendipitously recorded without their consent, for the purpose of humiliating or disgracing them, is something you’d be morally and professionally averse to. Society as a whole is averse to the online publication of a person’s private life and facts, Ms. Westall. There are other ways to make a point, or to inform the world of whatever point you are trying to make, rather than to post illegal recordings of them while they thought they were having a private call about very personal, intimate and familial subjects. This posting of illegally recorded audios of someone’s most intimate moments, their lives, their family, their finances, their traumas, is far beyond every single journalistic or professional boundary that exists. It is unethical, it is immoral, it is tortious, and it happens to be a felony. The First Amendment has its limitations, and illegal wiretapping and the publication of private facts online to humiliate or disgrace an individual, is one of them.
You do not have my consent to post these audios of my private calls, nor can you demonstrate that you have the consent of any participant heard speaking in these call. Please remove the recordings of my private telephone calls from your website immediately or I file criminal complaints against you with law enforcement in all relevant jurisdictions.
KIM L. PICAZIO
Attorney at Law Law Office of Kim L. Picazio, P.A. One Financial Plaza, Suite 2024 100 S.E. Third Avenue Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 Telephone: (954) 467-5558 Fax: (954) 467-0477 Email: kim@picaziolaw.com Email for Service of court documents: Lawoffice@picaziolaw.com
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.
Celebrity Attorney Kim Picazio fails to blow the damning affair audios off of the Internet, doesn't she?
SUPPLEMENT Case Number: 18001128 Title: Disclose Electronic Communications Inver Grove Heights 8150 Barbara Ave Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 Telephone: 651-450-2525 Case Disposition: Exception Cleared
INCIDENT INFORMATION Charges/Citation: Address: 9716 Benjamin Trail Inver Grove Hts, MN 55077; US Location Description: Incident Type: Other Start Date: 2018-02-25 00:00 End Date: 2018-02-25 00:00 Reported Date: 2018-10-16 13:37 Parties Involved:
OFFICER INFORMATION Name Patrick Sloan Agency Inver Grove Heights Badge 3622 Role Primary
NARRATIVE This case was submitted to Dougherty and Molenda law firm for charging. Criminal charges were declined.
Inver Grove Heights (MN0190900) Page 1 of 1 Report Generated by: -() Creation: Patrick Sloan 2018-10-16 13:39:07 18001128 R4 Sloan 101618.pdf
http://www.egf.mn/Directory.aspx?did=6
Physical Address: 520 Demers Ave. East Grand Forks, MN 56721 Phone: (218) 773-1104 Fax: (218) 773-1108
Staff Name Title Email Phone
Hedlund, Michael Chief of Police Email mhedlund@eastgrandforks.net (218) 773-2283
Hajicek, Rod Detective Lieutenant Email rhajicek@eastgrandforks.net (218) 773-2294
Hart, Tony Detective Email thart@egf.mn (218) 773-2285
More to come . . .
Related Links:
UPDATE: AFTER A WEEK A VERY ANGRY LPPD BEGRUDGINGLY TOOK A FORMAL STATEMENT FROM NEMMERS, RIGHT? Celebrity Attorney And False Accuser Kim Picazio Turns On Her Buddies At Inver Grove Height Police Department (IGHPD)? Picazio Magically & Mysteriously Changes Story And Now Says That Conspiracy Theorist Timothy Charles Holmseth Never Made Death Threats To Her? Picazio Accuses Her Cop Buddies At IGHPD Of Falsifying Report? Is That Because Celebrity Attorney And False Accuser Kim Picazio Can't Produce Any Proof That Conspiracy Theorist Holmseth Was Ever Prosecuted Or Convicted Of Making Death Threats? IGHPD Is Still Illegally Withholding Preliminary Audio Statements Of Picazio And Conspiracy Theorist Sarah Westall From Nemmers, Aren't They?
Update: Did You Hear That I Was Forced To Report Celebrity Florida Attorney Kim Picazio To Law Enforcement On 04-11-19? Celebrity Florida Attorney Kim Picazio Reported To Florida Bar Association? Celebrity Florida Attorney Kim Picazio Reported For SLAPP Suit Against Conspiracy Theorist Timothy Charles Holmseth?
Why Is Celebrity Florida Attorney Kim Picazio Filing False Police Reports With The Inver Grove Heights Police Department Against Conspiracy Theorist Sarah Westall? It's To Cover Up Picazio's Affair With Jeremiah Regan, Isn't It? It Is, Isn't It? Picazio Has Been Conspiring With The Corrupt East Grand Forks Police To Harass & Maliciously Prosecute Westall's Conspiracy Theorist Buddy Timothy Charles Holmseth For Years, Hasn't She? Picazio Maliciously SLAPPed Holmseth, Didn't She? (Note: Dede Evavold Is A Consumer Of Holmseth's Conspiracy Theories, Isn't She?)