The Assault At The 2010 (Sunday July 25, 2010) Glenwood Waterama!
Updated: 06-13-13
On June 13, 2013 the infamous Koch Industries was lurking & skulking on Lion News for Belvin Doebbert, the former lawless Pope County Attorney, weren't they?
Updated: 04-24-13
Guess Who The Female Is! Guess Who Is Aiding And Abetting The Assault!
Here's A Hint:
Click On Image For Larger View:
Lion News: Glenwood Police Chief Caught Covering Up For Judge Jon Stafsholt's Wife!
Link To Video Of Assault
Waterama Assault (Link New)
Waterama Assault (Link New Backup)
Waterama Assault (Link 1)
Waterama Assault (Link 1 Backup Link)
Assault.
Click On Image For Larger View:
Lion News: Glenwood Police Chief Caught Covering Up For Judge Jon Stafsholt's Wife!
Link To Video Of Assault
Waterama Assault (Link New Backup)
Waterama Assault (Link 1)
Waterama Assault (Link 1 Backup Link)
Definitions
Assault.
Any unjustifiable act causing a well-founded apprehension of immediate peril from a force already partially or fully put in motion.
Black's Law Dictionary 3rd Edition, page 149.
Assault.
An unlawful offer or attempt with force or violence to do a corporal hurt to another.
Black's Law Dictionary 3rd Edition, page 149.
Battery.
The slightest touching of another, of his clothes or anything, if done in a rude, insolent, or angry manner.
Black's Law Dictionary 3rd Edition, page 149.
What was on the flyer to make the female engage in the criminal act of assault?
Click On Image For Larger View:
Click On Image For Larger View:
The Weapon (The Motive)
What was on the flyer to make the female engage in the criminal act of assault?
Click On Image For Larger View:
Still Pictures Of Assault
Click On Image For Larger View:
Click On Image For Larger View:
Click On Image For Larger View:
Click On Image For Larger View:
Click On Image For Larger View:
Click On Image For Larger View:
Click On Image For Larger View:
The Fun Has Just Begun!
Stafsholt Present At Waterama: (The Opportunity)
Video Of Stafsholt - Stafsholt 1 Stafsholt 2Click On Image For Larger View:
Click On Image For Larger View:
Click On Image For Larger View:
Previous complaint against Stafsholt (The Motive) - Missing from files of Board on Judicial Standards*
Complaint Page 1
Complaint Page 2
Complaint Page 3
Complaint Page 4
Complaint Page 5
Complaint Page 6
Complaint Page 7
Complaint Page 8
* David S. Paull, Executive Secretary states that only two complaints on record - both from 2006. (Link to admission) This complaint was filed on 12-23-08.
http://www.bjs.state.mn.us/canon2.html
Table of Canons
Preamble
CANON
1. A Judge Shall Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary.
2. A Judge Shall Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All of the Judge's Activities.
3. A Judge Shall Perform the Duties of the Office Impartially and Diligently.
4. A Judge Shall Conduct All Extra-Judicial Activities so as to Minimize the Risk of Conflict With Judicial Obligations.
5. A Judge or Judicial Candidate Shall Refrain From Political Activity Inappropriate to Judicial Office. Application of the Code of Judicial Conduct.
http://thesaurus.com/browse/impropriety
Main Entry: impropriety
Part of Speech: noun
Definition: bad taste, mistake
Synonyms: barbarism, blunder, faux pas, gaffe, gaucherie, goof, immodesty, impudence, incongruity, incorrectness, indecency, indecorum, inelegance, rudeness, slip*, solecism, unseemliness, unsuitability, vulgarism, vulgarity
Antonyms: correctness, propriety, suitability, tastefulness
http://www.yourdictionary.com/impropriety
Impropriety
im·pro·pri·ety (im′prō prī′ə tē)
noun pl. improprieties -·ties
- the quality of being improper
- improper action or behavior
- an improper or unacceptable use of a word or phrase (Ex.: “borrow” for “lend”)
At first blush, this popular image is puzzling. After all, a judge is a combination of the two most reviled figures in American life – a lawyer and a politician. But somehow by donning the black robes confers instant credibility and esteem on even the most notorious politician operator or corner-cutting attorney. Most people seem to assume, without giving the matter much thought, that anyone accorded so much respect (“Your Honor”) and power must be worthy of the position.
Max Boot, Out of Order, (New York: 1998), P. xvi.
Larry Rice - Attorney
Click On Image For Larger View:
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=609.224
2010 Minnesota Statutes
Resources
Recent History
- 2006 Subd. 2 Amended 2006 c 260 art 1 s 16
- 2001 Subd. 2 Amended 1Sp2001 c 8 art 10 s 8
- 2000 Subd. 2 Amended 2000 c 437 s 6
- 1996 Subd. 2 Amended 1996 c 408 art 3 s 21
- 1995 Subd. 2 Amended 1995 c 259 art 3 s 13
- 1995 Subd. 2 Amended 1995 c 229 art 2 s 1
- 1995 Subd. 3 Amended 1995 c 259 art 3 s 14
- 2006 Subd. 4 Amended 2006 c 260 art 1 s 17
- 2001 Subd. 4 Amended 1Sp2001 c 8 art 10 s 9
- 2000 Subd. 4 Amended 2000 c 437 s 7
- 1996 Subd. 4 Amended 1996 c 408 art 3 s 22
609.224 ASSAULT IN THE FIFTH DEGREE.
Subdivision 1.Misdemeanor.
Whoever does any of the following commits an assault and is guilty of a misdemeanor:
(1) commits an act with intent to cause fear in another of immediate bodily harm or death; or(2) intentionally inflicts or attempts to inflict bodily harm upon another.
Subd. 2.Gross misdemeanor.
(a) Whoever violates the provisions of subdivision 1 against the same victim within ten years of a previous qualified domestic violence-related offense conviction or adjudication of delinquency is guilty of a gross misdemeanor and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both.
(b) Whoever violates the provisions of subdivision 1 within three years of a previous qualified domestic violence-related offense conviction or adjudication of delinquency is guilty of a gross misdemeanor and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both.(c) A caregiver, as defined in section 609.232, who is an individual and who violates the provisions of subdivision 1 against a vulnerable adult, as defined in section 609.232, is guilty of a gross misdemeanor and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both.
Subd. 3.Firearms.
(a) When a person is convicted of a violation of this section or section 609.221, 609.222, or 609.223, the court shall determine and make written findings on the record as to whether:
(1) the defendant owns or possesses a firearm; and(2) the firearm was used in any way during the commission of the assault.
(b) Except as otherwise provided in section 609.2242, subdivision 3, paragraph (c), a person is not entitled to possess a pistol if the person has been convicted after August 1, 1992, of assault in the fifth degree if the offense was committed within three years of a previous conviction under sections 609.221 to 609.224, unless three years have elapsed from the date of conviction and, during that time, the person has not been convicted of any other violation of section 609.224. Property rights may not be abated but access may be restricted by the courts. A person who possesses a pistol in violation of this paragraph is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
Subd. 4.Felony.
(a) Whoever violates the provisions of subdivision 1 against the same victim within ten years of the first of any combination of two or more previous qualified domestic violence-related offense convictions or adjudications of delinquency is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.
(b) Whoever violates the provisions of subdivision 1 within three years of the first of any combination of two or more previous qualified domestic violence-related offense convictions or adjudications of delinquency is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.History:
1979 c 258 s 7; 1983 c 169 s 2; 1985 c 159 s 1; 1987 c 329 s 7; 1992 c 537 s 1,2; 1992 c 571 art 6 s 13; 1993 c 326 art 2 s 11,12; 1Sp1993 c 5 s 2,3; 1994 c 636 art 3 s 10; 1995 c 229 art 2 s 1; 1995 c 259 art 3 s 13,14; 1996 c 408 art 3 s 21,22; 2000 c 437 s 6,7; 1Sp2001 c 8 art 10 s 8,9; 2006 c 260 art 1 s 16,17
Background
Click On Image For Larger View:
Click On Image For Larger View:
Click On Image For Larger View:
Timeline
July 25, 2010 [Waterama: Sunday]: Assault.
October 10, 2010: Email sent to City Attorney's office – confirmation email sent by obenlandroth.com.
http://www.obenlandroth.com/contact.htm states: We will respond to you within 72 hours during regular business hours. All email correspondence is completely confidential. As of November 3, 2010 no follow up email or any communication has been received from the City Attorney's office.
October 10, 2010: Email sent to County Attorney's office – No response. As of November 3, 2010 no follow up communication has been received from the County Attorney's office.
Belvin Doebbert Email 1
October 12, 2010: Contacted DFL Local Unit Leader, Senate District 13, Dean Paulson (320) 634-4255 dpgoldenacres@wisper-wireless.com.via phone. Video interview. As of November 3, 2010 no follow up communication has been received from Dean Paulson.
Dean Paulson Interview
Dean Paulson Interview
October 15, 2010: Interview with the Pope County Tribune. As of November 3, 2010 no follow up communication has been received from the Pope County Tribune.
Pope County Tribune Interview
October 17, 2010: Interview with Glenwood Mayoral Candidate. Vicky Wolf-Sawdon, Deputy Assessor - Pope County Assessor's Office (634-4970). As of November 3, 2010 no follow up communication has been received from Vicky Wolf-Sawdon.
October 17, 2010: Interview with Glenwood Mayoral Candidate with Glenwood city commissioner Bill Ogdahl (634-5372). Ogdahl stated that he would contact Neil Nelson [Assistant City Attorney for Glenwood - 2010 Candidate for Pope County Attorney] in regard to video. As of November 3, 2010 no follow up communication has been received from Bill Ogdahl.
October 30, 2010: Interview with Scott Formo of the Glenwood Chamber of Commerce. Formo stated that they would contact law enforcement: "I certainly can contact law enforcfement to make sure they are aware of the situation..." (Found at approximately 9:59 in video) [Or are these just weasel words?] As of November 3, 2010 no follow up communication has been received from Scott Formo nor Glenwood law enforcement.
Scott Formo Interview
As of November 3, 2010 no communication has been received from DFL Senate Candidate for the 13 District, Larry Rice or his wife Cindy.
As of November 3, 2010 no communication has been received from DFL Pope County Organization
leader Helen Stafsholt, (320) 634-3740, stafsholt@charter.net.
November 4, 2010
Complaint Filed With Minnesota Board On Judicial Standards Via Phone
Complaint Part 1
Complaint Part 2
Complaint Part 3
6. The board is always trying to rush you off the phone. No one would tolerate such treatment in a retail store. Yet, these people who are on the public's payroll seem to think their time is more valuable than yours.
7. Constant interruptions in your train of thought. Again if you had your complaint organized in your mind before the phone call, then the constant interruptions and poor attitude of the board would throw the average person off their train of thought.
Lion News: Mn Board On Judicial Standards Tactics to Derail Complaints P2
Lion News: Mn Board On Judicial Standards Tactics to Derail Complaints P3
November 8, 2010 Contacted David S. Paull, Executive Secretary of MN Board on Judicial Standards. Informed Paull that November 4, 2010 complaint was videotaped. Paull hung up phone. See link below
Lion News: Mn Board On Judicial Standards Tactics to Derail Complaints P4
Interview Part 1November 4, 2010
Complaint Filed With Minnesota Board On Judicial Standards Via Phone
Complaint Part 1
Complaint Part 2
Complaint Part 3
1. You will learn that you can file a complaint by phone. You will also learn that the state will go out of its way to try to prevent you from filing a complaint by phone.
2. You will learn how the board goes out of its way to place roadblocks in your path to filing a complaint. Two of people's biggest excuses for not doing something are: [1.] Time, [2.] Money. So you will see David S. Paull, Executive Secretary wasting both your time and your money by dragging a potentially 5-10 minute phone conversation out to 30+ minutes.
3. You will see how the board "plays dumb" when it comes to finding information on the computer when they don't want to hear certain information [Information about a crooked judge]. However, you will see how proficient they are at using their own computer when it serves their own purpose [Information about you].
4. The board DOES NOT have a toll-free number like the Attorney General's office. So by not having a toll-free number it adds an extra expense to the individual who wants to file a complaint. It also adds another excuse for people not to call in a complaint.. .
5. Which takes less time: a phone call or writing a letter? Obviously a phone call. What does the board try to do? It wants you to write a complaint. The strategy is to put you off so you either give up in frustration or decide that it is too much work to write out a complaint.6. The board is always trying to rush you off the phone. No one would tolerate such treatment in a retail store. Yet, these people who are on the public's payroll seem to think their time is more valuable than yours.
7. Constant interruptions in your train of thought. Again if you had your complaint organized in your mind before the phone call, then the constant interruptions and poor attitude of the board would throw the average person off their train of thought.
Check out the Policeabuse.com tests at Hidden Camera Tests and see how many of the tactics used by cops to prevent people from filing complaints are used by the Minnesota Board on Judicial Standards.
Lion News: Mn Board On Judicial Standards Tactics to Derail Complaints P2
Lion News: Mn Board On Judicial Standards Tactics to Derail Complaints P3
November 8, 2010 Contacted David S. Paull, Executive Secretary of MN Board on Judicial Standards. Informed Paull that November 4, 2010 complaint was videotaped. Paull hung up phone. See link below
Lion News: Mn Board On Judicial Standards Tactics to Derail Complaints P4
November 9, 2010 Contacted Governor Tim Pawlenty's Office to file a complaint against David S. Paull, Executive Secretary of MN Board on Judicial Standards for trying to prevent me from making a phone complaint against Judge Jon Stafsholt. See link below.
Lion News: Mn Board On Judicial Standards Tactics to Derail Complaints P5
November 9, 2010 Phoned the newly elected Glenwood city council member, Kyle Thompson:
November 9, 2010 Phoned the newly elected Glenwood city council member, Kyle Thompson:
Interview Part 2
November 10, 2010 still no response from any indivdual contacted previously.
Click On Image For Larger View:
Contacting Authorities
Can you file a complaint with a Prosecuting Attorney instead of a cop? Yes!
B. THE AMERICAN PROSECUTOR'S TRIPARTITE ROLE
1. Law Enforcement Officer
As a minister of justice and not just an advocate the prosecutor retains the law enforcement function of the schout. In the charging stage the prosecutor performs the judicial function of the inquisitorial system's investigating magistrate, and in the post charging stage he performs the advocacy role of the inquisitorial prosecutor, seeking not just a favorable verdict but a fair one. As a law enforcement officer, the American prosecutor is just as concerned with the detection of crime and the arrest of criminals as the cop on the beat. In America, both court decision14 and statute15 recognize the prosecutor's role as a law enforcement officer. In their roles as law enforcement officers, prosecutors can become involved in almost all aspects of the investigation of a case, and it is sometimes very easy for them to become too much the law enforcement officer and too little the minister of justice. Because the apprehension and arrest of suspected criminals can become a highly competitive endeavor, a prosecutor engaged in this highly competitive undertaking can easily lose the objectivity necessary to perform his other two functions.
- Krischer v. D'Amato, 674 So.2d 909 (Fla.App.4th DCA 1996); District Attorney for Norfolk Dit. v. Flately, 419 Mass. 507, 509 n.3, 646 N.E.2d 127, 128 (1995); People v. Jackson, 192 Mich.App. 10, 15, 480 N.W.2d 283, 286 (1991); State v. Vitiello, 377 N.J.Super. 452, 457, 873 A.2d 591, 594 (2005).
- West's Fla. Stat.Ann. § 790.001(8)(f); New Jersey Stat. Ann, § 2A:158-5.
George R. Dekle, Sr, Prosecution Principles: A Clinical Handbook (Thompson/West:2007), Page 5.
A prosecutor ordinarily relies on police and other investigative agencies for investigation f alleged criminal acts, but the prosecutor has an affirmative responsibility to investigate suspected illegal activity when it is not adequately dealt with by other agencies,--Standard 3-31.(a) American Bar Association Criminal Justice Section Standards for the Prosecution Function.¹ 1. American Bar Association Standards for Criminal Justice: Prosecution and Defense Function, 3rd Ed., American Bar Association Criminal Justice Section, Washington DC, 1993. Copyright © 1993 by the America Bar Association. Reprinted with Permission.
George R. Dekle, Sr, Prosecution Principles: A Clinical Handbook (Thompson/West:2007), Page 14.
Well received or not you have a right and a duty to investigate. Although the prosecutor traditionally depends upon law enforcement officers to perform the investigative tasks necessary to prosecution of criminal cases, the American Bar Association Standards for Prosecution Function impose a duty to investigate when the police are either unable or unwilling to perform. The National Prosecution District Attorneys Association National Prosecution Standards appear to go further, simply imposing an affirmative duty to investigate.”
George R. Dekle, Sr, Prosecution Principles: A Clinical Handbook (Thompson/West:2007), Page 17-18.
Screenshots of Lion News Gmail account. Emails sent to both the City Attorney of Glenwood and the Pope County Attorney on October 10, 2010.
Click On Image For Larger View:
Click On Image For Larger View:
Screenshots of City Attorney's website - contact information.
Click On Image For Larger View:
Click On Image For Larger View:
Reasons Why The Police Were Not Contacted
1. Glenwood Police Refuse To Investigate Crimes* - Click Link For Video 1
2. Glenwood Police Allow Schwieters Chevrolet To Endanger The Public's Safety - Click Link For Video 2
3. Glenwood Police Hated By Public - Click Link For Video 3
*Note:
Date of Video 1: April 19, 2010
On April 28, 2010 Glenwood Police Chief announced his resignation and reitrement - Coincidence? Not hardly!
"Glenwood Police Chief David Thompson announced his resignation and retirement from the Glenwood Police Department at last Wednesdays city commission meeting."
Thompson to retire June 30. Pope County Tribune. Monday, May 3, 2010. Page 1A.
4. Cops are professional liars - Flyer 1a Flyer 1b
5. The average IQ of a cop is 104 (Average intelligence = 102) - Flyer 2a Flyer 2b
6. Cops erroneously claim to be "human lie detectors" - Flyer 3a Flyer 3b Flyer 3c Flyer 3d Flyer 3e
Why You Can't Trust The County Attorney
7. County Attorney Refuses To Investigate Local Corruption - Click Link For Video 7
Pope County Attorney Belvin Doebbert gets served with Lion News issue #4 on 06-09-10: See Document
9. Belvin Doebbert threatens Terry Dean, Nemmers on camera:
Sounds like abuse of power, huh? Coercion?
Why You Can't Trust The County Commissioners
9. County Commissioner Covers Up Contractor Incomptence - Click Link For Video 9
Evidence Against So-Called Judge Jon Stafsholt by John Besser - Videos Found At Youtube: nbesser08 http://www.youtube.com/user/nbesser08
John Besser Accuses Judge Jon Stafsholt
John Besser 04-20-10 Evidence Against Judge Jon Stafsholt P1
John Besser 04-20-10 Evidence Against Judge Jon Stafsholt P2
John Besser: 05-25-10 Pope County MN 8th Jud. Dist. Judge: Jon Stafsholt
John Besser: Teresa Fredrickson Court Admin Covers Up For Judge Jon Stafsholt
John Besser Gets Embarrassing Confession From Swift County Co
John Besser: Co. Attorney Finke Covers Up For Stafsholt P1
John Besser: Co. Attorney Finke Covers Up For Stafsholt P2
John Besser: Co. Attorney Finke Covers Up For Stafsholt P3
John Besser: Co. Attorney Finke Covers Up For Stafsholt P4
John Besser : Sheriff Holtz Covers Up For Stafsholt P1
John Besser: Sheriff Holtz Covers Up For Stafsholt P2
John Besser : Sheriff Holtz Covers Up For Stafsholt P3
John Besser : Sheriff Holtz Covers Up For Stafsholt P4
Check out John's website here: Besserpaperwork
HOW TO GET OUT OF JURY DUTY
1. Expose Local Corruption Or
2. Write A Letter Like This:
.....................................................................................................
Videos Found At ArrestAJudgeKit On Youtube:
..............................................................................................
Click On Image For Larger View:
Click On Image For Larger View:
Click On Image For Larger View:
