Updated: 08-29-13
Lawless State of Minnesota, Bemidji is lurking and skulking on 08-29-13, aren't they?
Updated: 08-18-13
Lion News: Evidence That Itasca County's Judges Are A Threat To Tim Salisbury's Safety & Security?
Lawless State of Minnesota, Grand Rapids is lurking and skulking on 08-15-13, aren't they?
Lawless State of Minnesota, Mankato is lurking and skulking on 08-08-13, aren't they?
Update: 07-19-13
At 3:30 p.m. I called Itasca County Court Administrator Sean Jones, didn't I?
Lion News: Itasca Court Admin. Jones Deceptively Vague In Abuse Of Salisbury By Court Officers?
And do you know what happened right after I called? Yup! Here is the lawless State Of Minnesota, St. Paul back again, aren't they?
The videos I reference in the conversation with Mr. Jones are here, aren't they?
Lion News: Exposing The Stafsholt & Riley Scandal - No 07-20-07 Warrant Home Invasion Part 5
Lion News: Exposing The Stafsholt & Riley Scandal - No 07-20-07 Warrant Home Invasion Part 6
Does the presence of lawless State of Minnesota, Bemidji indicate more lurking & skulking from an agent of 9th Judicial District Administrator Paul Maatz?
Special Update: 07-18-13
This wouldn't be 9th Judicial District Administrator Paul Maatz, would it?
http://www.mncourts.gov/district/9/?page=696
Ninth Judicial District Paul Maatz,
District Administrator
616 America Ave NW, Ste 250
Bemidji, MN 56601
(218) 755-4500
Fax: (218) 755-4502
http://minnesota-employees.findthedata.org/l/14897/Paul-W-Maatz
Paul W Maatz is a Minnesota 9th Pennington Judge Employee with a salary of $131,609, which is
$90,468 higher
than the average for all Minnesota State Employees as of 2012. Paul W
Maatz is employed as a Jud District Administrator B in the
Trial Courts agency. Paul W was hired on 5/6/91.
http://www.sos.state.mn.us/index.aspx?page=833
Judges: Each district has
three or more judges. Judges are elected by the voters of the district
to six-year terms; vacancies are filled by governor’s appointment.
Judges are nominated and elected without party designation. Candidates
file for a specific judgeship; seat numbers are shown in parentheses on
the following pages. Judges of each district elect a chief judge and
assistant chief judge to exercise general administrative authority over
the courts of the district.
Salary: $127,797 chief judges; $121,712 judges
NINTH DISTRICT
District Administrator: Paul W. Maatz
616 N.W. America Ave., Bemidji 56601, (218)755-4500
Hey, Sean Jones decided to set up an appointment with me, didn't he?
But which came first? My post on my
ArrestAJudgeKit account saying he wouldn't set up an appointment or him offering the appointment? It was my post, wasn't it?
Updated: 07-18-13
Looks like yesterday's lurkers and skulkers from lawless State Of Minnesota, St. Paul brought some of their fellow lurkers and skulkers, doesn't it?
Did you enjoy the videos lawless State Of Minnesota, St. Paul, hmmm?
Updated: 07-17-13
Lawless State Of Minnesota, St. Paul is lurking & skulking, aren't they?
Video of my conversation with Itasca Co. Court Administration staff who were not kind, courteous & helpful?
Lion News: Corrupt Itasca Officers Of Court Don't Want To Take Salisbury's Valid Complaint? Part 1
Lion News: Corrupt Itasca Officers Of Court Don't Want To Take Salisbury's Valid Complaint? Part 2
Email sent to Sean Jones, Itasca Co. Court Administrator -
Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:58 AM
sean.jones@courts.state.mn.us
Sean Jones, Itasca County Court Administrator:
I want to set up an appointment to
speak with you, in depth, about the unhelpful, rude, nasty,
obstructionist, insulting and passive-aggressive behavior of some of
your staff. I have a recording of the conversations that I have posted
on YouTube and linked to my blog for your convenience. Please be
prepared to tell me what actions (or inaction) you plan on taking and
how long theses actions will take to implement and be accomplish.
Thursday & Friday of this week would be the preferred days for this conversation.
Notice:
I will not accept an email as your final response. I will speak to you
on the phone in regard to this very important and urgent matter.
Terry Dean, Nemmers
Lion News: Corrupt Itasca Co. Officer's
Of Court Don't Want To Take Salisbury's Valid Complaint? Part 1
Lion News: Corrupt Itasca Co. Officer's
Of Court Don't Want To Take Salisbury's Valid Complaint? Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGsNCcpPXIs
http://www.mncourts.gov/default.aspx?siteID=50&page=404
What Court Staff Can and Cannot Do for You
Court staff is ready to help you in whatever way they can. Their role is to provide you with
information, not legal advice. They have been instructed not to answer questions if they do not know
the answer and may refer you to other resources to assist you in getting the information you need.
• They can give you information on a court case, unless it is not available by law.
• They can give you general information on court rules, procedures and practices.
Lawless State Of Minnesota, St. Paul is back for more lurking & skulking, aren't they?
... and another round of lurking & skulking, right?
But, this time with a partner in crime, huh?
Original Post: 07-12-13
Just Noticed, They have got me listed as conditional
release! I paid the fucking bond before I left the building to have
that lifted and gave my copy to George!
What kind of shit are they pulling, and where did that $2500 go (10% of the $25k Bond I paid for)?
John was all for filing a complaint, wasn't he? And why shouldn't he be, huh?
And this isn't the only complaint that is being worked on, is it?
Tim Salisbury will also be filing a complaint really soon, won't he? He didn't appreciate the crooked judges wasting his time nor endangering his health with their passive-aggressive (They think that they have rights and you don't, don't they?) behavior, did he?
And I have a phone conversation with a very rude, nasty, passive-aggressive (They think that they have rights and you don't, don't they?), and obstructive Itasca county court staff, don't I? So that will mean at least three (3) complaints, won't it?
These complaints will start to pull the sheep's clothing off of these wolves, won't it?
The last thing these Itasca Co. wolves want is to have complaints filed against them, isn't it?
And, if you read John's complaint, then you will notice John's references of how Judge Lois "The Fix Is In" Lang made her loony order the day after (May 23, 2013) he filed criminal complaint against (May 22, 2013) the "Good Ol' Boys" Curtiss & LeClair, won't you? And don't forget: Curtiss & LeClair
lawyered up, didn't they?
What we have here is an act of desperation on "The Fix Is In" Lang's part, isn't it?
"The Fix Is In" Lang knows that Curtiss & LeClair are lying through their teeth, doesn't she?
So "The Fix Is In" Lang decides to make some wild assertions in her loony paperwork, doesn't she?
"The Fix Is In" Lang is really spinning a big whopper when she says that the trained & professional liar's stories can be trusted, isn't she? "The Fix Is In" Lang should have been clued in to the fact that Curtiss & LeClair were lying when
"I don't recall" was the most common phrase uttered, shouldn't she?
"The Fix Is In" Lang just makes sure she doesn't talk about how Curtiss & LeClair broke into John Lom's home and business, doesn't she? Nor does "The Fix Is In" Lang want to talk about how the proper procedure for interview/interrogation wasn't followed, does she?
"The Fix Is In" Lang doesn't want to talk about how the trained observers couldn't see that the clip was missing from John automatic, does she? Nor does "The Fix Is In" Lang want to talk about how the distances claimed by the lying deputies would have put the deputies standing outside the door, does she?
Nor does "The Fix Is In" Lang want to talk about the missing dash cam video in both squads, does she? And last but not least - "The Fix Is In" Lang doesn't want to talk about the missing $6500.00, does she? How can you trust a so-called ruling that knowingly, willingly and intentionally ignores all those damning facts, huh? You can't, can you?
So now you know why that was included in John's complaint, don't you?
More to come. . .
John's Response To Board
