Thursday, January 6, 2022

How About We Submit A Chapter 13 Data Request For The Steele Co. And The Freeborn Co. Contracts AKA Retainer Agreements With Koch & Garvis, LLC For Hanson V Thiele AKA Hanson V Freitag Et Al? Did Assistant Attorney General Ed Stackmeyer Engage In A Sanctionable Activity? Are Sheriff's Thiele & Freitag Worried They Might be Sued For Deisel Therapy? Let's Ask, Shall We?

 

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: tom.jensen@co.freeborn.mn.us,
pat.martinson@co.freeborn.mn.us,
andrew@uptownlawyer.com,
Scott.Golberg@co.steele.mn.us,
catherine.piepho@co.steele.mn.us
date: Jan 6, 2022, 11:42 AM
subject: Chapter 13 Data Request For Steele Co. And Freeborn Co. Contracts AKA Retainer Agreements With Koch & Garvis, LLC For Hanson V Thiele AKA Hanson V Freitag Et Al
mailed-by: gmail.com

Andrew Stanton Garvis, attorney for Steele Co. Sheriff Lon Thiele & Freeborn Co. Sheriff Kurt Freitag 612-827-8101:

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:

1. Koch & Garvis, LLC signed contract/retainer agreement with Steele County for legal services for Hanson v. Thiele aka Hanson v. Freitag et al.
2. Koch & Garvis, LLC signed contract/retainer agreement with Freeborn County for legal services for Hanson v. Thiele aka Hanson v. Freitag et al.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. Would it or wouldn't it be a sanctionable offense for Assistant Attorney General Ed Stackmeyer to waste the court's valuable time by filing frivolous filings in Hanson v. Thiele aka Hanson v. Freitag et al? Was it or wasn't it Stackmeyer's duty to notify the Steele & Freeborn County Attorneys instead of the City of Albert Lea City Attorney?
P.S.S. Are you or clients worried that Hanson v. Thiele aka Hanson v. Freitag et al would be amended or a separate action might be initiated to address the diesel therapy treatment that Melissa Hanson was allegedly subjected to by your clients? Hmm? Inquiring minds want to know, don't they?
P.S.S.S. Will it or won't it affect the credibility of your clients when they both have a well-documented history of willfully refusing to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act? Hmm? Inquiring minds really want to know, don't they?

https://www.yourdictionary.com/diesel-therapy Diesel-therapy noun A form of punishment in which prisoners are shackled and transported long distances for days or weeks.

https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/data/types/contracting/ Can requests for public data be made to the private contractor? Yes, if the public data are not available from the government entity or if it is specified in the contract that the private contractor will reply to data requests (Minnesota Statutes, section 13.05, subdivision 11(b)). The private party must fulfill data requests consistent with the time limits and copy cost requirements of the Data Practices Act (Advisory Opinion 10-024). The government entity continues to be responsible in making decisions about data classification. Unless the contract specifies otherwise, the government entity retains ultimate responsibility for responding even if the data are maintained by the private contractor (Advisory Opinions 09-022 and 09-003).
https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/data/types/contracting/

CASE 0:21-cv-02651-NEB-LIB Doc. 2 Filed 12/15/21 Page 1 of 1 The Office of Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison helping people afford their lives and live with dignity and respect • www.ag.state.mn.us December 15, 2021 U.S. Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois United States District Court 515 West 1st Street Room 412 Duluth, MN 55802-1397 Re: United States District Court District of Minnesota Hanson v. Thiele Court File No. 21-CV-02651 (NEB/LIB) (Attorney Substitution) Dear Magistrate Judge Brisbois: Please find, as an attachment to this letter, a letter, dated December 15, 2021, to the Albert Lea City Attorney's Office, asking that office to file a Notice of Appearance in this case on behalf of Respondent. Sincerely, s/Ed Stockmeyer ED STOCKMEYER Assistant Attorney General (651) 757-1247 (Voice) ( 651) 297-4348 (Fax) ed.stockmeyer@ag.state.mn.us Attachment cc: Kelly Martinez, Albert Lea City Attorney (w/attachment) Melissa L. Hanson 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1400, St. Paul, MN 55101-2131 Office: (651) 296-3353 • Toll Free: (800) 657-3787 • Minnesota Relay: (800) 627-3529 An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity • Printed on 30% Post-Consumer Material Paper

CASE 0:21-cv-02651-NEB-LIB Doc. 2-1 Filed 12/15/21 Page 1 of 1 The Office of Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison helping people afford their lives and live with dignity and respect • www.ag.state.mn.us December 15, 2021 Kelly Martinez Albert Lea City Attorney City Hall 221 East Clark Street Albert Lea, MN 56007 Re: Hanson v. Thiele Court File No. 21-CV-02651 (NEB/LIB) Dear Ms. Martinez: Enclosed please find a federal Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and accompanying documents in a case handled by the Albert Lea City Attorney. Because your office has an interest in these prosecutions, we are forwarding this matter to you. We generally do not handle these cases. Accordingly, we ask that you file a Notice of Appearance, letting the United States District Court know that you are the attorney of record for Respondent. By copy of this letter I am advising the Court that the Attorney General's Office does not represent the Respondent in this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or would like any sample habeas motions or briefs. Sincerely, s/Ed Stockmeyer ED STOCKMEYER Assistant Attorney General (651) 757-1247 (Voice) (651) 297-4348 (Fax) ed.stockmeyer@ag.state.mn. us Enclosures cc: Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois (w/o encl.) Melissa L. Hanson (w/o encl.) 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1400, St. Paul, MN 55101-2131 Office: (651) 296-3353 • Toll Free: (800) 657-3787 • Minnesota Relay: (800) 627-3529 An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity • Printed on 30% Post-Consumer Material Paper

Thomas Jensen, Freeborn County Administrator 507-377-5115 & Pat Martinson, Freeborn Auditor - Treasurer 507-377-5121:

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:
1. Appointment of Freeborn County Minnesota Government Data Practice Act Responsible Authority and Compliance Official.
2. Signed contract/retainer agreement with Koch & Garvis, LLC for legal services for Hanson v. Thiele aka Hanson v. Freitag et al.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. Does Freeborn County have any plans to illegally withhold Melissa Hanson's Chapter 13.04 Subject Data from her? Hanson's Chapter 13.04 Subject Data would substantiate allegation of diesel therapy aka torture being inflicted upon Hanson, correct?
P.S.S. Can you explain to me why oh why Freeborn Co. Sheriff Kurt Freitag is willfully refusing to respond to my most recent Chapter 13 Data Request? Can you also explain why Freeborn Co. Sheriff Kurt Freitag is illegally withholding data from me aka deputy data related to the 02-03-21 COVID-19 superspreader event hosted by City of Albert Lea City Attorney Kelly Martinez? (Agency ALPD Albert Lew PD Incident # 202100003681 Case# CALL FOR SERVICE Activity ALARM Alarm, Burlary Or Robber Priority 2 ASAP Common Place City Hall Blotter: city attorney office alarm 210 no bwc all 10-2 326 bwc 102 BWC 209bwc 211 BWC)

Government entities should respond in one of three ways 1. Provide access to the data (and copies when requested) 2. Inform you the data are classified as not public (must give statute section) 3. Inform you the data do not exist • Not responding is not a proper response. Minnesota Department of Administration - Information Policy Analysis Division - Can I ask for that? Government Data Practices Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 page 12.

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.03 13.03 ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT DATA. Subd. 3. Request for access to data. Subd. 12. Pleadings. Pleadings, as defined by court rule, served by or on a government entity, are public data to the same extent that the data would be public if filed with the court.

Hanson was initially booked into the Freeborn County Jail, but then was moved to the Steele County Jail the day after her sentencing. Monday morning, following obtaining her signature on a writ of habeas corpus, Hanson was moved back to Freeborn County Jail, which made the original writ of habeas corpus, filed for Steele County, invalid. A second was filed on Tuesday, involving both counties of Steele and Freeborn, rather than just Steele. The circumstances surrounding her transfer are unknown. The habeas corpus now lists both Sheriff Kurt Freitag, with Freeborn County, and Sheriff Lon Thiele, with Steele County. EXCLUSIVE: Lisa Hanson Files Writ of Habeas Corpus with United States District Court of Minnesota December 15, 2021 Hayley Feland
https://theminnesotasun.com/2021/12/15/exclusive-lisa-hanson-files-writ-of-habeas-corpus-with-united-states-district-court-of-minnesota/

318.1.1 STANDARDS OF CONDUCT FOR PEACE OFFICERS The Freeborn County Sheriff's Office adopts the Professional Conduct of Peace Officers model policy established and published by the Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training Board (POST) (Minn. Stat. § 626.8457). This model policy applies to all peace officers of this office. See attachment: MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf The provisions of this policy are in addition to collective bargaining agreements or any other applicable law (see generally Minn. R. 6700.1500). The Office shall report annually to POST any data regarding the investigation and disposition of cases involving alleged misconduct of deputies (Minn. Stat. § 626.8457, Subd. 3). Page 154. Policy 318 Standard of Conduct Freeborn County Sheriff's Office Freeborn Cnty SO Policy Manual

A. PRINCIPLE ONE Peace officers shall conduct themselves, whether on or off duty, in accordance with the Constitution of the United States, the Minnesota Constitution, and all applicable laws, ordinances and rules enacted or established pursuant to legal authority. 1. Rationale: Peace officers conduct their duties pursuant to a grant of limited authority from the community. Therefore, officers must understand the laws defining the scope of their enforcement powers. Peace officers may only act in accordance with the powers granted to them. 2. Rules a) Peace officers shall not knowingly exceed their authority in the enforcement of the law. b) Peace officers shall not knowingly disobey the law or rules of criminal procedure in such areas as interrogation, arrest, detention, searches, seizures, use of informants, and preservation of evidence, except where permitted in the performance of duty under proper authority. c) Peace officers shall not knowingly restrict the freedom of individuals, whether by arrest or detention, in violation of the Constitutions and laws of the United States and the State of Minnesota. d) Peace officers, whether on or off duty, shall not knowingly commit any criminal offense under any laws of the United States or any state or local jurisdiction. Page 685. Attachment MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf Freeborn Cnty SO Policy Manual Freeborn Cnty SO Policy Manual

Scott Golberg, Steele Co. Administrator 507.444.7431 & Catherine Piepho, Treasurer 507-444-7420:

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:
1. Appointment of Steele County Minnesota Government Data Practice Act Responsible Authority and Compliance Official.
2. Signed contract/retainer agreement with Koch & Garvis, LLC for legal services for Hanson v. Thiele aka Hanson v. Freitag et al

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. Does Steele County have any plans to illegally withhold Melissa Hanson's Chapter 13.04 Subject Data from her? Hanson's Chapter 13.04 Subject Data would substantiate allegation of diesel therapy aka torture being inflicted upon Hanson, correct?
P.S.S. Can you explain to me why oh why your Steele Co. Sheriff Lon Thiele would illegally withhold the jail rosters from me that correspond to Melissa Hanson's stay at the Steele Co. jail?

A response five weeks later is neither prompt nor reasonable. Although the Department did not provide information about its data practices policies and procedures, in instances like this one, those procedures ought to provide for a response within a matter of days, not weeks. Advisory Opinion 95-042. October 31, 1995; Minnesota Department of Children, Families and Learning. October 31, 1995 | Inspection, Response to data requests, Statutory construction (Ch. 645)
https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/opinions/library/?id=36-267796

321.1.1 STANDARDS OF CONDUCT FOR PEACE OFFICERS The Steele County Sheriff's Office adopts the Professional Conduct of Peace Officers model policy established and published by the Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training Board (POST) (Minn. Stat. § 626.8457). This model policy applies to all peace officers of this office. See attachment: MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf The provisions of this policy are in addition to collective bargaining agreements or any other applicable law (see generally Minn. R. 6700.1500). The Office shall report annually to POST any data regarding the investigation and disposition of cases involving alleged misconduct of deputies (Minn. Stat. § 626.8457, Subd. 3). Page 155. Policy 321 Steele County Sheriff's Office Steele County SO Policy Manual

A. PRINCIPLE ONE Peace officers shall conduct themselves, whether on or off duty, in accordance with the Constitution of the United States, the Minnesota Constitution, and all applicable laws, ordinances and rules enacted or established pursuant to legal authority. 1. Rationale: Peace officers conduct their duties pursuant to a grant of limited authority from the community. Therefore, officers must understand the laws defining the scope of their enforcement powers. Peace officers may only act in accordance with the powers granted to them. 2. Rules a) Peace officers shall not knowingly exceed their authority in the enforcement of the law. b) Peace officers shall not knowingly disobey the law or rules of criminal procedure in such areas as interrogation, arrest, detention, searches, seizures, use of informants, and preservation of evidence, except where permitted in the performance of duty under proper authority. c) Peace officers shall not knowingly restrict the freedom of individuals, whether by arrest or detention, in violation of the Constitutions and laws of the United States and the State of Minnesota. d) Peace officers, whether on or off duty, shall not knowingly commit any criminal offense under any laws of the United States or any state or local jurisdiction. Page 569. Attachment MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf Steele County SO Policy Manual Steele County SO Policy Manual

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/42939573/Hanson_v_Thiele
Hanson v. Thiele
Minnesota District Court
Judge: Nancy E Brasel
Referred: Leo I Brisbois
Case #: 0:21-cv-02651
Nature of Suit 530 Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus - General
Cause 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Case Filed: Dec 13, 2021
Docket
Docket last updated: 7 hours ago
Wednesday, January 05, 2022
4 notice Notice of Appearance Wed 01/05 11:15 AM
NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew S Garvis on behalf of All Defendants. (Garvis, Andrew)
Wednesday, December 15, 2021
2 misc Letter to Magistrate Judge Wed 12/15 9:33 AM
LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Lon Thiele Attorney Substitution .(Stockmeyer, Edwin)
 Att: 1 Cover Letter Attorney Substitution
Tuesday, December 14, 2021
3 cmp Amended Petition (in a Civil Case) Wed 12/15 12:08 PM
AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Lon Thiele and Sheriff Kurt Freitag filed by Melissa Lynn Hanson. No summons requested. (MKB)
 Att: 1 Attachment,
 Att: 2 Exhibit(s) A,
 Att: 3 Exhibit(s) B,
 Att: 4 Exhibit(s) C,
 Att: 5 Exhibit(s) D,
 Att: 6 Exhibit(s) E,
 Att: 7 Exhibit(s) F
Monday, December 13, 2021
1 cmp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Mon 12/13 12:48 PM
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing fee $5, receipt number 34641016375) filed by Melissa Lynn Hanson. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd/4th Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (NAH)
 Att: 1 Exhibit(s) A,
 Att: 2 Exhibit(s) B,
 Att: 3 Exhibit(s) C,
 Att: 4 Exhibit(s) D,
 Att: 5 Exhibit(s) E,
 Att: 6 Exhibit(s) F,
 Att: 7 Civil Cover Sheet

Attachments: Automatic reply Chapter 13 Data For Melissa Hanson Related Data Freitag Subjecting Prisoner Lisa Hanson To Diesel Therapy122921_1008am.pdf, Chapter 13 Data For Melissa Hanson Related Data Freitag Subjecting Prisoner Lisa Hanson To Diesel Therapy122921_1007am.pdf, Why Is Nemmers Still Being Harassed By Steele County Over Readily Available Free Electronic Data For Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus123021_729am.pdf

More to come ...

Related links:

Why Oh Why Aren't Freeborn Co. Sheriff Kurt Freitag & Body Cameraless ALPD Detective/School Resource Officer/Freeborn County Commissioner Ted Herman Responding To My 08-23-21 Chapter 13 Data Request? Who Wants To Expose The Illegal Withholding Of Body Camera Video For The 02-03-21 COVID-19 Superspreader Event At Albert Lea City Attorney Kelly Martinez's Office? Hey Did I Forget To Mention That I Spoke To Martinez’s Maskless Legal Assistant Lisa “Typhoid Mary” Williamson? Does IP Address 136.234.33.250 Belong Freitag? Is Or Isn’t Albert Lea City Attorney Kelly Martinez Allowed To Commit Perjury In Freeborn County?

Who Wants The Chapter 13 Data For The 02-03-21 COVID-19 Superspreader Event At Albert Lea City Attorney Kelly Martinez's Office Which Involved Lisa Hanson? It Features A Body Cameraless ALPD Detective/School Resource Officer/Freeborn County Commissioner Ted Herman, Doesn't It? Oh And A Maskless ALPD Lt. Jeff Strom, Right? Can You Name All The Unmasked City Of Albert Lea Personnel? Who Filed The False Police Report Via The Panic Alarm? Was It Masked Albert Lea City Attorney Kelly Martinez Or Her Maskless Legal Assistant Lisa Willamson?

Why Oh Why Is City Of Albert Lea City Attorney Kelly Martinez Making Perjured Statements In High-Profile Case No. 24-CR-21-137 State of Minnesota vs Melissa Lynn Hanson? Let's See If Local Law Enforcement Is Launching A Criminal Investigation Into Martinez's Crimes, Shall We? If Hanson Is Going To Be Prosecuted For Alleged COVID Crimes, Then Shouldn't Martinez Be Prosecuted For Committing Criminal Acts During the Prosecution Of Hanson? FYI: You'll Get Extremely Sick And Tired Of Hearing Hanson Rant And Rave About Jurisdiction In Her Cases 24-CR-21-137 and 24-CR-21-188, Won't You? Let's Make An Open Records Request To Clear Lake Chief Of Police Peter Roth & Cerro Gordo County Sheriff Kevin Pals, Okay? UPDATE: Freeborm Attorney Walker Responds With Obvious Lies? FYI: Sheriff Freitag Tried And Failed A Simliar Play Dumb Harassment Scheme, Didn't He?

Tuesday, January 4, 2022

Who Wants To Ask DNR Commissioner Sarah Strommen Why DNR Personnel Harassing Are Nemmers For Exposing Illegal Release Of Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data For State Of MN VS Michael Sysa 39-VB-21-468, David Sysa 39-VB-21-469 And Yevgeniy Simonovich 39-VB-21-470? Why Don't We Ask Lake of the Woods County Attorney Jim Austad If He AUthorized The Data Breach?

 

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: Barb.Naramore@state.mn.us,
Sarah.Strommen@state.mn.us,
jim_a@co.lotw.mn.us,
"Alongi, Anthony (DNR)" anthony.alongi@state.mn.us,
"MN_Data Request (DNR)" datarequest.dnr@state.mn.us
date: Jan 4, 2022, 10:37 AM
subject: Why Are DNR Personnel Harassing Nemmers For Exposing Illegal Release Of Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data For State Of MN VS Michael Sysa 39-VB-21-468, David Sysa 39-VB-21-469 And Yevgeniy Simonovich 39-VB-21-470?
mailed-by: gmail.com

Sarah Strommen, DNR Commissioner & Barb Naramore, Deputy DNR Commissioner 651-259-5033:

Can you explain to me why oh why I am being harassed by your miscreant DNR Data Practices Compliance Official Barbara Damchik-Dykes 651.259.5345 and Policy and Planning MN Department of Natural Resources Section Manager Anthony Alongi 651.259.5556? Why are they retaliating against me for exposing a DNR data breach? When am I going to receive the current policy and procedure manual (You call them Directives, don't you?) that I requested way, way, way, way, way back in November? When is that data showing up in my email inbox? And when am I going to receive the DNR's data that indicates that you notified Michael A Sysa (Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State Of Minnesota vs Michael A Sysa) David Alekseevich Sysa (Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State Of Minnesota vs David Alekseevich Sysa) and Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich (Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State Of Minnesota vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich) of the DNR's illegal release of their confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. criminal investigative data to members of the media? Five (5) minutes from never?

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:

1. Data indicating that either Jim Austad, Lake of the Woods County Attorney or his office personnel authorized the MN DNR to illegally release Michael A Sysa's (Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State Of Minnesota vs Michael A Sysa) David Alekseevich Sysa's (Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State Of Minnesota vs David Alekseevich Sysa) and Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich's (Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State Of Minnesota vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich) confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. criminal investigative data to members of the media.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

Mr. Karpan: I do have one request. Um, I've not asked for this before, I'm not sure how to handle it, but the Department of Natural Resources as they've done in the past has seen fit to do a press release, and officer Osborne has answered questions for the newspaper. My client – all the facts of the case are in the Echo Press, on the radio and in sporting magazines. Not only are there quotes in there that aren't - - I mean I know the State has a right to release incident data I think it's called. Under Chapter 13.82, investigative data is not to be released. Well, there are pictures allegedly of my client's fish all over the Echo Press. Everybody in town is talking about it. I don't know if I'll have to make a change of venue motion eventually. I'll have to see how this plays out in a few months.
But under 13.82, there's no way the DNR is supposed to be releasing pictures of evidence to the newspaper. It prejudices my client. It prejudices all of us. It makes it impossible to get a fair trail. So I'm asking the Court to order the Department of Natural Resources to not discuss this case any further until it's done.
The Court: Mr. Hochsprung?
Mr. Hochsprung: Your Honor, I did not authorize the Department of Natural Resources to disclose anything to the paper. Um, I can talk with Mr. Osborne or whoever about that, but I don't have any information about that. State of Minnesota vs. Ronald Wayne Johnson Rule 5/ Rule 8 Hearing. Court File No. 21-CR- 13-51. February 11, 2013.

VIII. PRINCIPLE FIVE Conservation Officers shall treat all members of the public courteously and with respect. A. Rationale Conservation Officers are one of the most visible forms of state government. Therefore, Conservation Officers must make a positive impression when interacting with the public and each other. B. Rules 3. No Conservation Officer shall ridicule, mock, deride, taunt, belittle, willfully embarrass, humiliate, or shame a person, or do anything reasonably calculated to incite a person to violence. A-4-99, CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER Page 6. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE DIRECTIVE NUMBER: A-4-99 SUBJECT: CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 1999 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Rescinds Directive 61-96 REFERENCE: Minnesota Statute Sec 626.8457, 43A.38, 43A.39; Directive A-3-98; C.L.E.A. 26.1; State Electronic Mail and Internet Policy; POST Model Conduct Policy DISTRIBUTION: All Division Employees NUMBER OF PAGES: 31

Monday, November 22, 2021 DNR Data Practices Compliance Official Barbara Damchik-Dykes 651.259.5345 Reported To MN Department Of Natural Resources Policy And Planning Section Manager Anthony Alongi After Damchik-Dykes Harasses Nemmers Over Request For Entire DNR Policy & Procedure Manual & After Damchik-Dykes Illegally Releases Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data For High-Profile Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State Of Minnesota Vs Michael A Sysa; Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State Of Minnesota Vs David Alekseevich Sysa And Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State Of Minnesota Vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich To Media Outlets And To Nemmers? http://lionnews00.blogspot.com/2021/11/dnr-data-practices-compliance-official.html

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.055 13.055 DISCLOSURE OF BREACH IN SECURITY; NOTIFICATION AND INVESTIGATION REPORT REQUIRED. Subd. 2. Notice to individuals; investigation report. (a) A government entity that collects, creates, receives, maintains, or disseminates private or confidential data on individuals must disclose any breach of the security of the data following discovery or notification of the breach. Written notification must be made to any individual who is the subject of the data and whose private or confidential data was, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired by an unauthorized person and must inform the individual that a report will be prepared under paragraph (b), how the individual may obtain access to the report, and that the individual may request delivery of the report by mail or e-mail. The disclosure must be made in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, consistent with (1) the legitimate needs of a law enforcement agency as provided in subdivision 3; or (2) any measures necessary to determine the scope of the breach and restore the reasonable security of the data. (b) Notwithstanding section 13.15 or 13.37, upon completion of an investigation into any breach in the security of data and final disposition of any disciplinary action for purposes of section 13.43, including exhaustion of all rights of appeal under any applicable collective bargaining agreement, the responsible authority shall prepare a report on the facts and results of the investigation. If the breach involves unauthorized access to or acquisition of data by an employee, contractor, or agent of the government entity, the report must at a minimum include: (1) a description of the type of data that were accessed or acquired; (2) the number of individuals whose data was improperly accessed or acquired; (3) if there has been final disposition of disciplinary action for purposes of section 13.43, the name of each employee determined to be responsible for the unauthorized access or acquisition, unless the employee was performing duties under chapter 5B; and (4) the final disposition of any disciplinary action taken against each employee in response.

Jim Austad, Lake of the Woods County Attorney 218-634-1190:

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:

1. Your current Lake of the Woods County Attorney's office general policy and procedure manual and prosecutor's policy and procedure manual.
2. Data indicating that either you or your office personnel authorized the MN DNR to illegally release Michael A Sysa's (Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State Of Minnesota vs Michael A Sysa) David Alekseevich Sysa's (Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State Of Minnesota vs David Alekseevich Sysa) and Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich's (Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State Of Minnesota vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich) confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. criminal investigative data to members of the media.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. Do you remember that the evidence of your willful refusal to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act was used by me to toss a huge monkey wrench into your failed 2016 attempt to be appointed as a judicial officer?
P.S.S. Are you going to harass me with snail mail, again? Or are you going to harass me with electronic communications this time?

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/pr/subtype/cond/id/3.8/ Minnesota Court Rules PROFESSIONAL RULES Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.8 Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor The prosecutor in a criminal case shall: (f) exercise reasonable care to prevent employees or other persons assisting or associated with the prosecutor in a criminal case and over whom the prosecutor has direct control from making an extrajudicial statement that the prosecutor would be prohibited from making under Rule 3.6.

IV. PRINCIPLE ONE Conservation Officers shall conduct themselves, whether on or off duty, in accordance with the Constitution of the United States, the Minnesota Constitution, and all applicable laws, ordinances, and rules enacted or established pursuant to legal authority. A. Rationale Conservation Officers conduct their duties pursuant to a grant of limited authority. Therefore, officers must understand the laws defining the scope of their enforcement powers. Conservation Officers may only act in accordance with powers granted to them. B. Rules 1. Conservation Officers shall not knowingly exceed their authority in the enforcement of the law. 2. Conservation Officers shall not knowingly disobey the law or rules of criminal procedure in such areas as interrogation, arrest, detention, searches, seizures, use of informants, preservation of evidence, and use of force. A-4-99, CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER Page 2. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE DIRECTIVE NUMBER: A-4-99 SUBJECT: CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 1999 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Rescinds Directive 61-96 REFERENCE: Minnesota Statute Sec 626.8457, 43A.38, 43A.39; Directive A-3-98; C.L.E.A. 26.1; State Electronic Mail and Internet Policy; POST Model Conduct Policy DISTRIBUTION: All Division Employees NUMBER OF PAGES: 31

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.82 13.82 COMPREHENSIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT DATA. Subd. 7. Criminal investigative data. Except for the data defined in subdivisions 2, 3, and 6, investigative data collected or created by a law enforcement agency in order to prepare a case against a person, whether known or unknown, for the commission of a crime or other offense for which the agency has primary investigative responsibility are confidential or protected nonpublic while the investigation is active. Inactive investigative data are public unless the release of the data would jeopardize another ongoing investigation or would reveal the identity of individuals protected under subdivision 17. Images and recordings, including photographs, video, and audio records, which are part of inactive investigative files and which are clearly offensive to common sensibilities are classified as private or nonpublic data, provided that the existence of the images and recordings shall be disclosed to any person requesting access to the inactive investigative file. An investigation becomes inactive upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (a) a decision by the agency or appropriate prosecutorial authority not to pursue the case; (b) expiration of the time to bring a charge or file a complaint under the applicable statute of limitations, or 30 years after the commission of the offense, whichever comes earliest; or (c) exhaustion of or expiration of all rights of appeal by a person convicted on the basis of the investigative data. Any investigative data presented as evidence in court shall be public. Data determined to be inactive under clause (a) may become active if the agency or appropriate prosecutorial authority decides to renew the investigation.


from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: savanna_s@co.lotw.mn.us
date: Jan 4, 2022, 10:41 AM
subject: Fwd: Why Are DNR Personnel Harassing Nemmers For Exposing Illegal Release Of Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data For State Of MN VS Michael Sysa 39-VB-21-468, David Sysa 39-VB-21-469 And Yevgeniy Simonovich 39-VB-21-470?
mailed-by: gmail.com

More to come ...

Related Links:

DNR Data Practices Compliance Official Barbara Damchik-Dykes 651.259.5345 Reported To MN Department Of Natural Resources Policy And Planning Section Manager Anthony Alongi After Damchik-Dykes Harasses Nemmers Over Request For Entire DNR Policy & Procedure Manual & After Damchik-Dykes Illegally Releases Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data For High-Profile Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State Of Minnesota Vs Michael A Sysa; Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State Of Minnesota Vs David Alekseevich Sysa And Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State Of Minnesota Vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich To Media Outlets And To Nemmers?

Update: Formal Criminal Complaint Against Your Corrupt City Of Mountain Lake City Administrator/Clerk Michael Schulte, Your Corrupt Chief Of Police Douglas Bristol, & Your Corrupt City Attorney Maryellen Shrhoff? Corrupt DNR Again Caught Illegally Releasing Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data In High-Profile Cases: Chanhthone Phongsim 17-VB-18-491 & Isouvahn Xayachack 17-VB-18-492? Public Portion Of Initial Criminal Complaint Arrives? Case SO19020069?

Formal Criminal Complaint Against Your Corrupt City Of Mountain Lake City Administrator/Clerk Michael Schulte, Your Corrupt Chief Of Police Douglas Bristol, & Your Corrupt City Attorney Maryellen Shrhoff? Corrupt DNR Again Caught Illegally Releasing Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data In High-Profile Cases: Chanhthone Phongsim 17-VB-18-491 & Isouvahn Xayachack 17-VB-18-492?

Witness Intimidation & Harassment By Judicial Officer Rachel C. Sullivan? Judicial Officer Sullivan & St Louis County Personnel Conspire To Provoke Witness Rick Kottom In Hopes Of Inciting Kottom To Violence?

Kottom Tosses Another Monkey Wrench Into Rigged 69DU-CR-17-900? Kottom's 07-01-18 Complaint To Chief Judicial Officer Sally L. Tarnowski?

Kottom Criminal Complaint Tosses Huge Monkey Wrench Into 69DU-CR-17-900 Trial? St. Louis Co. Attorney Mark S. Rubin, St. Louis Co. Attorney Criminal Division Head Gary W. Bjorklund, St. Louis Co. Assistant County Attorney Christopher Pinkert, Dept Of Natural Resources (DNR) Colonel Rodmen Smith, DNR Administrative Manager Captain Alex Gutierrez & MN DNR Data Practices Compliance Official Sheila Deyo All Named In Kottom Complaint? DNR & Corrupt Prosecutors Have Well-Documented History Of Trying Cases In Court Of Public Opinion, Don't They? Confidential/Nonpublic Criminal Investigative Data Illegally Released To Lap-Dog Media, Right?

Update On DNR's Illegal Search & Seizure At Indiana Fisherman's Upper Cormorant Lake Cabin? David Deckard, Oklahoma, Chair Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Notified Of Corrupt MN DNR's History Of Obstructing Justice? Does the Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Encourage Or Discourage Due Process Violations? Inquiring Minds Want To Know, Don't They? Anthony Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1798) Clifford Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1800) & Ryan Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1802) Exposing CO Joseph Stattelman's Breaking & Entering Of Cabin?

Corrupt DNR Conspires With Hacks At KARE 11 TV To Rig Case No. 69DU-CR-17-901 State Of Mn VS Douglas Anthony Marana & Case No. 69DU-CR-17-900 State Of MN VS Roderick Robert Kottom? DNR Illegally Releases Confidential Data Yet Again, Right? Do You Remember Former DNR Col Rodmen Illegally Releasing 03-CR-15-1798, 03-CR-15-1800, 03-CR-15-1801, 03-CR-15-1802, 03-CR-15-1803 & 03-CR-15-1804 Confidential Data To WCCO-TV Hack Bill Hudson?

DNR's Major Greg Salo Not Fazed By CO Osborne's Coercive Invasion Of Johnson's Home? Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson Still Maliciously Prosecuted By Former Pope Co. Assistant Attorney/Douglas Co. Attorney Chad "The Felon" Larson? Larson And DNR Have A Well-Documented History Of Home Invasion, Don't They?

Update On DNR's Illegal Search & Seizure At Indiana Fisherman's Upper Cormorant Lake Cabin? David Deckard, Oklahoma, Chair Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Notified Of Corrupt MN DNR's History Of Obstructing Justice? Does the Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Encourage Or Discourage Due Process Violations? Inquiring Minds Want To Know, Don't They? Anthony Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1798) Clifford Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1800) & Ryan Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1802) Exposing CO Joseph Stattelman's Breaking & Entering Of Cabin?

DNR Caught Sending Confidential Criminal Investigative Data To Brainerd Dispatch (Forum Communication Company)? Indiana Fisherman Victims Of Illegal Search & Seizure? Missing Audio? Nemmers' Call To Detroit Lakes Newspaper Editor Nathan Bowe (Forum Communication Company) Forces 08/31/2015 Arraignment To Be Reset By Court To 09/28/2015? (Nemmers Threw A Monkey Wrench Into 03-CR-15-1798, 03-CR-15-1800, 03-CR-15-1801, 03-CR-15-1802, 03-CR-15-1803, 03-CR-15-1804, Didn't He? Thank You, Jesus!) Sounds Like Ronald Johnson's Rigged Case No. 21-CR-13-51, Doesn't It?

Echo Press Editor (Forum Communications Company, Right?) Al Edenloff Conspired With Corrupt DNR Officer Shane Osborne To Rig Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson? Court Documents Reveal Corrupt Editor Edenloff Knowingly Willingly & Intentionally Published Confidential Chapter 13.82 Criminal Investigative Data? Former Corrupt Douglas Co. Attorney & Current Corrupt Defense Attorney Chris Karpan Filing A Loony Appeal That Doesn't Address Illegal Search By His Buddy DNR Officer Osborne? No Surprise, Right?

DNR Invades Ronald Wayne Johnson's Home Without Probable Cause? Johnson Is A Victim Of DNR Home Invasion, Isn't He? Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson Maliciously Prosecuted By Chad "The Felon" Larson? "The Felon" Larson Has A Well-Documented History Of Covering Up Illegal Home Invasions, Doesn't He? Sounds Like Pope Co Home Invasion Of Nemmers' Home, Doesn't It? DNR's CO Shane Osborne Tampered With Audio To Cover Up Home Invasion?

Friday, December 17, 2021

Who Wants A Copy Of The Public Portion Of Larvita McFarquhar's ICR 21-17510 For Her Criminal Complaint Against City Of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross And Director Of Public Safety Jim Marshall? Let's Submit A Chapter 13 Data Quest, Shall We? It's Still Rigged Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State Of Minnesota Vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar, Isn't It?

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: President@smsu.edu,
Kumara.jayasuriya@smsu.edu,
Ross.Wastvedt@smsu.edu,
Provost@smsu.edu,
jeffrey.w.bell@smsu.edu,
raphael.onyeaghala@smsu.edu,
bill.mulso@smsu.edu,
gorear@marshallindependent.com,
Rick Maes rickmaes@co.lyon.mn.us,
"Eric D. Wallen" ericwallen@co.lyon.mn.us,
lorenstomberg@co.lyon.mn.us,
mlamb@marshallindependent.com,
dgau@marshallindependent.com
date: Dec 17, 2021, 6:52 AM
subject: Chapter 13 Data Request For Public Portion Of ICR 21-17510 AKA Criminal Complaint Against City Of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross And Director Of Public Safety Jim Marshall - Missing Data
mailed-by: gmail.com

Greg Orear, Publisher/General Manager, Marshall Independent 507 537-1551 ext. 107 & Mike Lamb, News Editor 507 537-1551 ext. 126 & Deb Gau, Reporter:

Hey, did you see the video of Larvita McFarquhar filing a criminal complaint against City of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross and Director of Public Safety Jim Marshall? The link is below, isn't it? Did you ever get a copy of Larvita McFarquhar's ICR 21-17510? Do you think that Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson and Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross will get a special prosecutor assigned to Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State of Minnesota vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar? Did you ever ask judicial officer Patrick Rohland how he could have misspelled both the middle and last name of Larvita McFarquhar in Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State of Minnesota vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar? Did you ever ask Larvita McFarquhar if she plans on suing Lyon County, the City of Marshall and Southwest Minnesota State University for her missing Chapter 13.04 Subject Data? Maybe you could be a witness for Larvita McFarquhar, huh?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

https://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp SPJ Code of Ethics Seek Truth and Report It Ethical journalism should be accurate and fair. Journalists should be honest and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information. Journalists should: – Diligently seek subjects of news coverage to allow them to respond to criticism or allegations of wrongdoing. – Recognize a special obligation to serve as watchdogs over public affairs and government. Seek to ensure that the public’s business is conducted in the open, and that public records are open to all. – Provide access to source material when it is relevant and appropriate. – Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable. Give voice to the voiceless.

Before ICR 21-17510:
Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State of Minnesota vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar
12/13/2021 Pre-trial (4:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Rohland, Patrick)
12/30/2021 Jury Trial (8:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Rohland, Patrick)
After ICR 21-17510:
Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State of Minnesota vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar
04/18/2022 Pre-trial (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Rohland, Patrick) 12/13/2021 Reset by Court to 04/18/2022
05/04/2022 Jury Trial (8:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Rohland, Patrick)12/30/2021 Reset by Court to 05/04/2022
Video of Complaint
Filing My Criminal Complaint https://rumble.com/vqfr5p-filing-my-criminal-complaint.html
Filing My Formal Criminal Complaint https://rumble.com/vqdy8r-filing-my-formal-criminal-complaint.html
Lyon County Police Investigator Voicemail https://rumble.com/vqkc38-lyon-county-police-investigator-voicemail.html
McFarquhar Tosses A Monkey Wrench Into Rigged Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State Of Minnesota Vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar By Filing A Criminal Complaint Against City Of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross And Director Of Public Safety Jim Marshall? It's ICR 21-17510, Isn't It? 12-13-21 Pre-trial Gets Booted Way Way Way Back To 04-18-22?
http://lionnews00.blogspot.com/2021/12/mcfarquhar-tosses-monkey-wrench-into.html

Eric Wallen, Lyon County Sheriff (507) 537-7666, Loren Stomberg, Lyon County Administrator (507) 537-6980 and Rick Maes, Lyon County Attorney (507) 537-6755:

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:
1. Public portion of the Larvita McFarquhar's ICR 21-17510 aka criminal complaint against City of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross and Director of Public Safety Jim Marshall. And if for some strange reason the case is no longer active then I want the entire incident report for ICR 21-17510.
2. Computer-aided dispatch reports Larvita McFarquhar's ICR 21-17510 DOB: 01/19/1975.
3. Gross salary, history of sustained complaints and work-related continuing education from date of first hire until today's date for Lyon County Sheriff's deputy Tony Rollings
4. Chapter 13 Data Requests submitted by Marshall Independent newspaper for Larvita McFarquhar's ICR 21-17510 or any unsolicited email(s) sent to Marshall Independent newspaper in regard to Larvita McFarquhar's ICR 21-17510.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. Your deputy was video recording Larvita McFarquhar's victim's statement, wasn't he? And Deputy Rollins made a notation of that video recording of Larvita McFarquhar's victim's statement in Rollings' report, won't it?
P.S.S What is the status on all that readily available, free, electronic public data that you still owe me, huh?
P.S.S.S. Do you or don't you plan on correcting each and every instance of your misspelling Larvita McFarquhar's middle and last name in your records? Do you feel even the slightest amount of shame that your negligence has carried right through into Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State of Minnesota vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar?

Kumara Jayasuriya, SMSU President (507) 537-6272:

What is the status on the 02/03/2021 and 02/04/2021 Public Safety incident reports for Larvita McFarquhar that you still owe me? Have you figured out how Southwest Minnesota State University could have a surveillance system but magically and mysteriously not have proof that you actually purchased the surveillance system?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

An Automatic Reply From SMSU's Bill Mulso?

from: Mulso, Bill Bill.Mulso@smsu.edu to: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com date: Dec 17, 2021, 6:53 AM subject: Automatic reply: Chapter 13 Data Request For Public Portion Of ICR 21-17510 AKA Criminal Complaint Against City Of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross And Director Of Public Safety Jim Marshall ... mailed-by: nam04-bn8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com signed-by: SMSU.EDU security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more : Important according to Google magic.

I will be out of the office until Monday, December 20th. I will respond to emails upon my return. Thank you. 

More to come ...

Related links:

McFarquhar Tosses A Monkey Wrench Into Rigged Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State Of Minnesota Vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar By Filing A Criminal Complaint Against City Of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross And Director Of Public Safety Jim Marshall? It's ICR 21-17510, Isn't It? 12-13-21 Pre-trial Gets Booted Way Way Way Back To 04-18-22?

Demand For Sanctions & Dismissal In Rigged Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State Of Minnesota Vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar? Nemmers' Intervention Puts An End To Ridiculous "Sovereign Citizen" Paperwork AKA "Patriot Paperwork"? Nemmers' Intervention Also Turns The Tables On The Corrupt City Of Marshall and Corrupt Southwest Minnesota State University (SMSU), Doesn't It?

Friday, December 10, 2021

McFarquhar Tosses A Monkey Wrench Into Rigged Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State Of Minnesota Vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar By Filing A Criminal Complaint Against City Of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City Of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross And Director Of Public Safety Jim Marshall? It's ICR 21-17510, Isn't It? 12-13-21 Pre-trial Gets Booted Way Way Way Back To 04-18-22?

Before ICR 21-17510: 

Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State of Minnesota vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar
12/13/2021 Pre-trial (4:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Rohland, Patrick)
12/30/2021 Jury Trial (8:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Rohland, Patrick)

After ICR 21-17510:
Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State of Minnesota vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar
04/18/2022 Pre-trial (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer Rohland, Patrick) 12/13/2021 Reset by Court to 04/18/2022
05/04/2022 Jury Trial (8:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Rohland, Patrick)12/30/2021 Reset by Court to 05/04/2022

Video of Complaint

Filing My Criminal Complaint https://rumble.com/vqfr5p-filing-my-criminal-complaint.html

Filing My Formal Criminal Complaint https://rumble.com/vqdy8r-filing-my-formal-criminal-complaint.html

Lyon County Police Investigator Voicemail https://rumble.com/vqkc38-lyon-county-police-investigator-voicemail.html

 

 



42-CR-21-98 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 12/6/2021 11:56 PM
Larvita McFarquhar’s Number ICR# 21-17510



42-CR-21-98 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 12/6/2021 10:52 PM

Eric Wallen, Lyon Co. Sheriff    12-06-21
611 West Main Street
Marshall, MN 56258
(507) 537-7666                      Hand-delivered on 12-06-21
EricWallen@co.lyon.mn.us

This is my formal criminal complaint against City of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross and Director of Public Safety Jim Marshall for illegally withholding my Chapter 13.04 Subject Data 1 aka evidence aka discovery from me in Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State of Minnesota vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar pursuant to Mn Statute 609.43 Misconduct Of Public Officer Or Employee 2 . On 03-01-21 a Demand or Request for Discovery was submitted to City of Marshall City Attorney Dennis
Simpson and Assistant City of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross. As of today’s date I am missing the following data:

Pursuant to state statute Simpson, Gross and Marshall had ten (10) days 3,4 to provide me with my Chapter 13.04 Subject Data aka evidence aka discovery. It is my understanding that it is Simpson’s, Gross’ and Marshall’s known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the office to provide me with my my Chapter 13.04 Subject Data aka evidence aka discovery. As of today’s date Simpson, Gross and Marshall have willfully refused to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices act by illegally with the following readily available, free, electronic, subject data:

1. SMSU 02/04/2021 911 call and corresponding verbatim transcript 5 .
2. SMSU surveillance video 6 of Larvita McFarquhar on 02/03/2021 and 02/04/2021.
3. SMSU 02/03/2021 and 02/04/2021 Public Safety incident reports 7 aka Initial Complaint
Reports (ICRs) regarding Larvita McFarquhar.
4. Larvita McFarquhar’s 02/04/2021 phone calls to City of Marshall Police dept. and Lyon Co. Sheriff’s Office of officer/deputy assist/escort 8 at SMSU.
5. Computer-aid dispatch reports and corresponding audio of 02/04/2021 incident involving Larvita McFarquhar.
6. Recorded witness statements 9,10 , names and contact information of students and faculty in classrooms or hallways who were witnesses to the 02/03/2021 and 02/04/2021 incidents
involving Larvita McFarquhar.
7. Electronic communications Bill Mulso, SMSU vice president for government relations, communications and marketing and Mike Munford, SMSU Public Safety Director engaged in with Marshall Independent Reporter Deb Gau 11 .
I have reason to suspect this Subject data/Discovery is in the possession of City of Marshall City Attorney Dennis Simpson, Assistant City of Marshall City Attorney Matthew Gross and Director of Public Safety Jim Marshall is because gathering evidence is part of their job description 12 for a Marshall police officer. According to The Marshall Police Department Brady policy 13 and Standard of Standards Of Conduct For Peace Officers 14,15,16 indicate that the type of evidence to be preserved is exculpatory evidence or evidence that tends to prove my innocence. The Marshall Policy Department Brady policies dictates that they are required to
provide me with my missing evidence. I have reason to suspect Simpson, Gross and Marshall are illegally withholding my evidence 17 from me is because the evidence will show my actions

Page 1 of 6

42-CR-21-98 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 12/6/2021 10:52 PM

at Southwest Minnesota State University (SMSU) were a result of being provoked 18 by SMSU personnel.

I have reason to suspect the motive for the criminal misconduct is to fivefold. First, I believe Simpson‘s, Gross’ and Marshall’s motive is to either force me to plead guilty without ever receiving all my evidence or force me to go to trial without ever receiving all my evidence. The second reason is to indoctrinate me into the idea that prosecutors and law enforcement can break the law in order the enforce the law. The third reason is to indoctrinate me into the idea that I should keep my mouth shut when I see local corruption. The sixth motive is an attempt
by Simpson, Gross and Marshall to provoke 19 me in order to incite me to violence. Finally, I believe the last part of the motive is to cover up the fact that SMSU President Kumara Jayasuriya forced my 16 year old daughter S.C.M out of SMSU without a court order after S.C.M obtained a doctor’s note pursuant to section 8. Exempt individuals of the Emergency Executive Order 20-81.
____________________________________________
Larvita McFarquhar
106 E. Railroad St.
Lynd, Minnesota 56157

Note: See attached February 22, 2021 Demand for Discovery signed by Larvita McFarquhar

Footnotes:
1. 13.04 Rights Of Subjects Of Data. Subd. 3. Access to data by individual. Upon request to a responsible authority or designee, an individual shall be informed whether the individual is the subject of stored data on individuals, and whether it is classified as public, private or confidential. ... The responsible authority or designee shall comply immediately, if possible, with any request made pursuant to this subdivision, or within ten days of the date of the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays, if immediate compliance is not possible. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.04 

2. 609.43 Misconduct Of Public Officer Or Employee. A public officer or employee who does any of the following, for which no other sentence is specifically provided by law, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both: (1) intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law; or https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609.43
3. However, notwithstanding the attorney conduct concerns, the County’s obligation under the Data Practices Act to comply immediately or in ten business day with a data subject’s request is clear. (The Commissioner has also previously opined that the existence of litigation between a data requester and an entity does not relieve the entity of its data practices responsibilities. See Advisory Opinions 96-038 and 97-005.) As the Commissioner noted in Advisory Opinion 03-030:. Advisory Opinion 18-005, May 21, 2018; Carver County,
May 22, 2018 | Data subjects, Response to data requests, Requests for data
https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/opinions/library/?id=36-340460
4. Independent School District 709, Duluth Public Schools, did not respond appropriately to a

Page 2 of 6

42-CR-21-98 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 12/6/2021 10:52 PM

March 2, 2018, data request from a data subject pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.04, because it did not provide any data to the requester in 10 business days. Advisory Opinion 18-010 https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/opinions/library/#/detail/appId/1/id/347419
5. Subd. 4. Audio recording of 911 call. The audio recording of a call placed to a 911 system for the purpose of requesting service from a law enforcement, fire, or medical agency is private data on individuals with respect to the individual making the call, except that a written transcript of the audio recording is public, unless it reveals the identity of an individual otherwise protected under subdivision 17. A transcript shall be prepared upon request. The person requesting the transcript shall pay the actual cost of transcribing the call,
in addition to any other applicable costs provided under section 13.03, subdivision 3. The audio recording may be disseminated to law enforcement agencies for investigative purposes. The audio recording may be used for public safety and emergency medical services training purposes. 13.82 Comprehensive Law Enforcement Data. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.82
6. Non-violent disruptive demonstrations A. In the event that a demonstration blocks access to University facilities or interferes with the operation of the University: ii. The Director will consider having a photographer or video camera
available for verification/documentation purposes and notify Marshall PD of the situation. Southwest Minnesota State University Training Bulletns 600-12 Civil Disturbance or Demonstrations.
7. II. Training Format b. Initial Training: d. Phase III: Advanced iv. ICR Writing / Simplex Alarm protocol. IV. Use of the Master Keys b. In the event that you discover misuse of the master keys, you should: iii. Fill out an ICR. 400-01 Employee Guidelines. Employee Guidelines and Performance Expectations. Southwest Minnesota State University Public Safety Policy Manual.
8. https://www.facebook.com/larvita.mcfarquhar/videos/4155977071096399/ Larvita Mcfarquhar 351 Comments 102 Shares 7.4K Views · about 10 months ago Larvita Mcfarquhar February 3
9. 304.5.2 Special Deployment Considerations. The CED shall not be used to psychologically torment, elicit statements or to punish any individual. Policy 304. Conducted Energy Device Marshall Police Department Policy Manual
10. 305.6.2 Witness Identification And Interviews. Because potential witnesses to an officer-involved shooting or death may become unavailable or the integrity of their statements compromised with the passage of time, a supervisor should take reasonable steps to promptly coordinate with criminal investigators to utilize available law enforcement personnel for the following: 1. When feasible, a recorded statement should be obtained from those persons who claim not to have witnessed the incident but who were present at the time it occurred. Policy 304 Officer-Involved Shootings and Deaths. Marshall Police Department Policy Manual
11. Bill Mulso, vice president for government relations, communications and marketing at SMSU, confirmed there was an incident Wednesday morning when McFarquhar entered a classroom on campus. Mulso said McFarquhar disrupted a class in progress, and after a second classroom disruption later that morning, she was issued a trespassing notice. Lynd restaurant owner served with trespassing notice McFarquhar escorted from SMSU building after not wearing mask Local News Feb 4, 2021 Deb Gau Reporter 

Page 3 of 6

42-CR-21-98 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 12/6/2021 10:52 PM

https://www.marshallindependent.com/news/local-news/2021/02/lynd-restaurant-owner-served-with-trespassing-notice/
12. City of Marshall Job Description Position Title: Police Officer Date: December 2010 Division: Public Safety FLSA Status Non-exempt; Part-time Accountable to: Sergeant Union Status LELS Hay Points 317. ... Summary of Position To protect and promote public safety throughout the City through enforcement of all federal, state and local laws; the preservation of public peace; the protection of life and property; the prevention of crime; and the detection and apprehension of violators of the law. Assist in the judicial process by reporting the facts of the investigation to the prosecuting attorneys, and by testifying in court. ... Essential Duties
and Responsibilities ... 3. Gather information relating to the investigation of crime and non-criminal incidents. Prepare detailed written/typed reports for the use of prosecutors, Courts, Probation, Human Service, Detective’s Division, the State of MN, and other agencies. 4. Review Offense Reports, I.C.R.’s memos, e-mails, and other pertinent information to keep abreast of recent activity and complaints to assist in the prevention of future criminal activity. ... 7. Testify in court as to the facts and results of investigations.
13. 605.2 Policy The Marshall Police Department will conduct fair and impartial criminal investigations and will provide the prosecution with both incriminating and exculpatory evidence as well as information that may adversely affect the credibility of a witness. In addition to reporting all evidence of guilt, the Marshall Police Department will assist the prosecution by complying with its oblgation to disclose information that is both favorable and material to the defense. The Department will identify and disclose to the prosecution potentially exculpatory information as provided in this policy. Page 396. Policy
605 Brady Material Disclosure Marshall Police Department Policy Manual.
14. 320.1.1 Standards Of Conduct For Peace Officers. The Marshall Police Department adopts the Professional Conduct of Peace Officers model policy established and published by the Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training Board (POST) (Minn. Stat. § 626.8457). This model policy applies to all peace officers of this department. See attachment: MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf The provisions of this policy are in addition to collective bargaining agreements or any other applicable law (see generally Minn. R. 6700.1500). The Department shall report to POST any data regarding the investigation and disposition of cases involving alleged misconduct of officers (Minn. Stat. § 626.8457, Subd. 3). Policy 320 Standards of Conduct
Marshall Police Department Policy Manual
15. A. Principle One Peace officers shall conduct themselves, whether on or off duty, in accordance with the Constitution of the United States, the Minnesota Constitution, and all applicable laws, ordinances and rules enacted or established pursuant to legal authority. 1. Rationale: Peace officers conduct their duties pursuant to a grant of limited authority from the community. Therefore, officers must understand the laws defining the scope of their enforcement powers. Peace officers may only act in accordance with the powers granted to them. 2. Rules a) Peace officers shall not knowingly exceed their authority in the enforcement of the law. b) Peace officers shall not knowingly disobey the law or rules of
criminal procedure in such areas as interrogation, arrest, detention, searches, seizures, use of informants, and preservation of evidence, except where permitted in the performance of duty under proper authority. Page 490. Professional Conduct Of Peace Officers Model Policy MN STAT 626.8457 Attachment MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf Marshall Minnesota Police Department Policy Manual Policy Manual.
16. B. Principle Two Peace officers shall refrain from any conduct in an official capacity that

Page 4 of 6

42-CR-21-98 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 12/6/2021 10:52 PM

detracts from the public’s faith in the integrity of the criminal justice system. 1. Rationale: Community cooperation with the police is a product of its trust that officers will act honestly and with impartiality. The peace officer, as the public’s initial contact with the criminal justice system, must act in a manner that instills such trust. 2. Rules a) Peace officers shall carry out their duties with integrity, fairness and impartiality. ... c) Peace officers shall truthfully, completely, and impartially report, testify and present evidence, including exculpatory evidence, in all matters of an official nature. d) Peace officers shall take no action knowing it will violate the constitutional rights of any person. Page 490, 491. Professional Conduct Of Peace Officers Model Policy MN STAT 626.8457 Attachment MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf Marshall Minnesota Police Department Policy Manual Policy Manual.
17. Spoliation Any erasure, interlineation, or other alteration made to Commercial Paper, such as a check or promissory note, by an individual who is not acting pursuant to the consent of the parties who have an interest in such instrument. A spoliator of evidence in a legal action is an individual who neglects to produce evidence that is in her possession or control. In such a situation, any inferences that might be drawn against the party are permitted, and the withholding of the evidence is attributed to the person's presumed knowledge that it would have served to operate against her. West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Spoliation+of+evidence
18. Since you, as a prosecutor, are a minister of justice and not an attorney for miscreant officers, you must develop a strategy for dealing with these occasional incidents of misbehavior. The ways that an officer can fall short of the highest standards of excellence are numberless, but excessive zeal in the performance of their duties is one way. A common subtype of the overzealous officer is the serial resisting arrest victim. Some officers can retire after and never make a case against anyone for resisting arrest. Other officers cannot get through a shift without making a case. Serial resisting arrest victims fall into three main types: those who lack interpersonal skills necessary to obtain suspect compliance, those who verbally bait suspects, and those who are so thin-skinned that they overreact to suspect noncompliance. Seldom should so encounter an officer who purposely set out falsely convict as suspect of resisting arrest. Sometimes an officer will have unintentionally mishandled a situation, and you are burdened with a case where the defendant is technically guilty of the crime, but the victim precipitation issues make a make a conviction unlikely. Quick-witted officers who always have a quip on the tip of their tongue frequently let fly with those quips at the most inopportune times, resulting in black eyes, bruises and a questionable case against a defendant who, again is technically guilty, but was goaded into acting out. Finally, there are officers who are so quick to take offense that they will arrest at the drop of a hat for the most inconsequential misbehavior. A certain degree of noncompliance comes with the officer's territory, and the officer should have sufficient judgment to decline to arrest at all in de minimis situations. These types of cases are relatively easy to spot, and when one of them comes across your desk, you must handle it appropriately. Rubber stamping the officer's decision can sometimes be appropriate, but more often you must make the unpleasant decisions to dismiss the charges, to file reduced charges, or to accept reduced pleas. George R. Dekle, Sr, Prosecution Principles: A Clinical Handbook
(Thompson/West:2007), Page 20-21.
19. E. Principle Five Peace officers shall treat all members of the public courteously and with respect. 1. Rationale: Peace officers are the most visible form of local government.

Page 5 of 6

42-CR-21-98 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 12/6/2021 10:52 PM

Therefore, peace officers must make a positive impression when interacting with the public and each other. 2. Rules a) Peace officers shall exercise reasonable courtesy in their dealings with the public, other officers, superiors and subordinates. b) No peace officer shall ridicule, mock, deride, taunt, belittle, willfully embarrass, humiliate, or shame any person to do anything reasonably calculated to incite a person to violence. Page 492-493. Professional Conduct Of Peace Officers Model Policy MN STAT 626.8457 Attachment MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf Marshall Minnesota
Police Department Policy Manual Policy Manual.

Page 6 of 6

More to come...

Related Links:

Demand For Sanctions & Dismissal In Rigged Case No. 42-CR-21-98 State Of Minnesota Vs Larvita Maria Elen Mcfarquhar? Nemmers' Intervention Puts An End To Ridiculous "Sovereign Citizen" Paperwork AKA "Patriot Paperwork"? Nemmers' Intervention Also Turns The Tables On The Corrupt City Of Marshall and Corrupt Southwest Minnesota State University (SMSU), Doesn't It?

Monday, November 22, 2021

DNR Data Practices Compliance Official Barbara Damchik-Dykes 651.259.5345 Reported To MN Department Of Natural Resources Policy And Planning Section Manager Anthony Alongi After Damchik-Dykes Harasses Nemmers Over Request For Entire DNR Policy & Procedure Manual & After Damchik-Dykes Illegally Releases Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data For High-Profile Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State Of Minnesota Vs Michael A Sysa; Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State Of Minnesota Vs David Alekseevich Sysa And Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State Of Minnesota Vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich To Media Outlets And To Nemmers?


from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: kristi.coughlon@state.mn.us
date: Nov 14, 2021, 1:02 PM
subject: Citations For Michael Sysa 22 Oak Grove Minnesota David Sysa 23 Oak Grove Yevgeniy Simonovich 29 Elk River
mailed-by: gmail.com

Kristi Coughlon Phone: 218-308-2647:

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:

1. Citations for Michael Sysa 22 Oak Grove Minnesota, David Sysa 23 Oak Grove and Yevgeniy Simonovich 29 Elk River.
2. Press releases that were sent "Courtesy of the Minnesota DNR" to the Bemidji Pioneer and/or Forum News Service for Citations for Michael Sysa 22 Oak Grove Minnesota, David Sysa 23 Oak Grove and Yevgeniy Simonovich 29 Elk River.
Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/newsroom/media-contacts.html DNR news media contacts Media Inquiries Northwest Region – Bemidji Kristi Coughlon Phone: 218-308-2647 Email: kristi.coughlon@state.mn.us (link sends email)

\BAUDETTE, Minn. — Three anglers have been charged for keeping too many walleyes and saugers on Lake of the Woods after conservation officers found them with 48 fish over their limit Sunday. Charged with possessing over their limit of walleyes and saugers were Michael Sysa, 22, Oak Grove, Minnesota; David Sysa, 23, Oak Grove; and Yevgeniy Simonovich, 29, Elk River, Minnesota.

https://www.twincities.com/2021/11/12/mn-anglers-had-48-over-limit-in-lake-of-the-woods-fish-bust/ MN anglers had 48 over limit in Lake of the Woods fish bust Seventy-two walleyes and saugers confiscated Nov. 7, 2021, were donated to the Warroad Senior Living Center in Warroad, Minnesota. (Courtesy of the Minnesota DNR) By Brad Dokken | bdokken@gfherald.com | Forum News Service PUBLISHED: November 12, 2021 at 12:39 p.m. | UPDATED: November 14, 2021 at 9:03 a.m.

https://www.bemidjipioneer.com/northland-outdoors/7278486-DNR-officers-seize-72-fish-in-Lake-of-the-Woods-walleye-and-sauger-bust DNR officers seize 72 fish in Lake of the Woods walleye and sauger bust – In addition to the 26 fish in the livewell, there were six walleyes and 10 saugers in the cooler with fish caught that day, and 17 walleyes and 13 saugers in the second cooler with fish the group had kept the previous day – 72 fish total. Written By: Brad Dokken | 2:30 pm, Nov. 11, 2021 The 72 walleyes and saugers were confiscated Sunday, Nov. 7, 2021, and donated to the Warroad Senior Living Center in Warroad, Minnesota, for residents' consumption. Contributed / Minnesota DNR Three anglers have been charged for keeping too many walleyes and saugers on Lake of the Woods after conservation officers found them with 48 fish over their limit Sunday, Nov. 7. Charged with possessing over their limit of walleyes and saugers were Michael Sysa, 22, Oak Grove, Minnesota; David Sysa, 23, Oak Grove; and Yevgeniy Simonovich, 29, Elk River, Minnesota.


from: MN_Data Request (DNR) datarequest.dnr@state.mn.us
to: "lionnews00@gmail.com" lionnews00@gmail.com
date: Nov 15, 2021, 11:41 AM
subject: data practices request
mailed-by: state.mn.us
signed-by: state.mn.us
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important according to Google magic.

Dear Mr. Nemmers,
 
Attached is the incident report you requested from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The name of a juvenile has been redacted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 84.0873.
 
Please note that there is no press release associated with this data. This completes your data practices request in full.
 
Kind Regards,
 
Barbara
 
Barbara Damchik-Dykes
Data Practices Compliance Official | OSD
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
500 Lafayette Road
Saint Paul, MN 55155
Phone: 651.259.5345
Fax: 651.296.0902
mndnr.gov

Attachment: 21026876-R_Redacted.pdf

 


from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: "MN_Data Request (DNR)" datarequest.dnr@state.mn.us
date: Nov 18, 2021, 6:55 AM
subject: Re: data practices request
mailed-by: gmail.com

Barbara Damchik-Dykes, Data Practices Compliance Official 651.259.5345:

Thanks for the incident reports. Where are the citations that I requested? 

"Citations for Michael Sysa 22 Oak Grove Minnesota, David Sysa 23 Oak Grove and Yevgeniy Simonovich 29 Elk River."


Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:
1. Current Minnesota Department of Natural Resources policy and procedure manual.
2. Redacted warning issued to the juvenile in ICR# 21026876.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

CO Huener and I discussed with the group that [Redacted] as a juvenile, would not be charged for possessing an over limit of walleye/sauger. We told Michael, David, and Yevgenity that they would each be charged for possessing over limit of walleye/sauger, and that the restitution for the 48 fish over the legal limit would be divided amongst the three of them- 16 fish each. The three agreed to this. Michael, David and Yevgenity were each charged/cited for possessing over limit of walleye/sauger, as well as restitution for 16 walleye per person. All walleye/sauger (72 total) were seized, as well as both coolers. A seizure receipt was issued. A warning was documented for [Redacted] for possessing over limit of walleye/sauger. End of Report. C. Sura 648. Department of Natural Resources Incident Report ICR# 21026876. Reported: 11-08-2021 0958. Officer Assigned: Sura, Cory Badge No. 648 Primary: Yes. Officer Assigned: Huener, Ben Badge No: 538 Primary: No.


from: MN_Data Request (DNR) datarequest.dnr@state.mn.us
to: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
date: Nov 19, 2021, 10:08 AM
subject: RE: data practices request
mailed-by: state.mn.us
signed-by: state.mn.us
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important mainly because you often read messages with this label.

Good morning. We will work on getting the data you have requested, including citations and warning.
 
You have requested a current copy of the DNR policy and procedure manual. Are you looking for a particular policy or procedure? We don’t have a singular policy or procedure manual.
 
Barbara
 
Barbara Damchik-Dykes
Data Practices Compliance Official | OSD
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
500 Lafayette Road
Saint Paul, MN 55155
Phone: 651.259.5345
Fax: 651.296.0902
mndnr.gov


from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: "MN_Data Request (DNR)" datarequest.dnr@state.mn.us
date: Nov 19, 2021, 10:28 AM
subject: Re: data practices request
mailed-by: gmail.com

Barbara Damchik-Dykes, Data Practices Compliance Official 651.259.5345:

I asked for the complete policy and procedure manual so I can compare it to the complete policy and procedure manual that I currently have in my possession.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 20-283-5713

VII. STORAGE OF PHOTOGRAPHS AND RECORDINGS A. Media containing recordings and photos shall be marked for identification, guarded against degradation and overwriting, and stored in a secure location. B. Officers taking digital images for evidentiary purposes shall download the images onto the officer’s computer and shall immediately copy the images to a write once CD-ROM. This CD-ROM shall be known and labeled as the “archive copy”. 1. Officers shall not release archive copies (or original video or audio tape recordings) from their custody. Officers shall honor legitimate requests for access to evidentiary media by making and providing a copy of the media to the prosecuting attorney or the division’s data practices responsible authorities. 2. The existence of evidentiary photos or recordings shall be disclosed in any citation notes or reports prepared about the incident. O-11-06, PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE STANDARDS Page 4 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE


from: MN_Data Request (DNR) datarequest.dnr@state.mn.us
to: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
date: Nov 22, 2021, 9:49 AM
subject: RE: data practices request
mailed-by: state.mn.us
signed-by: state.mn.us
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important mainly because you often read messages with this label.

Dear Mr. Nemmers,
 
Attached are the citations you requested. Some data has been redacted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 13.82. Data for the verbal warning involving a minor has been redacted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 84.0873.
 
Again, can you be more specific regarding the policy and procedure that you are requesting? Are you seeking policy related to DNR Enforcement citations? If you are more specific, it would be helpful for me to provide the policy that you are seeking.
 
Thank you,
 
Barbara

Attachments: Citation-Number-89062021009812_Redacted.pdf, Citation-Number-89062021009813_Redacted.pdf, Citation-Number-Notes-89062021009814_Redacted.pdf, Citation-Number-Notes-89062021009815-Verbal_Redacted.pdf


from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: "MN_Data Request (DNR)" datarequest.dnr@state.mn.us
date: Nov 22, 2021, 10:32 AM
subject: Re: data practices request
mailed-by: gmail.com

Barbara Damchik-Dykes, Data Practices Compliance Official 651.259.5345:

Please provide me with the name and contact information of the individual in your chain of command who has direct supervisory powers over you. I want to discuss with them why you can't fall back onto your expensive and time-consuming work-related continuing education to provide me with the entire/complete current Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Directives aka policy and procedure manual.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

VIII. PRINCIPLE FIVE Conservation Officers shall treat all members of the public courteously and with respect.3. No Conservation Officer shall ridicule, mock, deride, taunt, belittle, willfully embarrass, humiliate, or shame a person, or do anything reasonably calculated to incite a person to violence. A-4-99, CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER Page 5. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE DIRECTIVE NUMBER: A-4-99 SUBJECT: CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 1999 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Rescinds Directive 61-96 REFERENCE: Minnesota Statute Sec 626.8457, 43A.38, 43A.39; Directive A-3-98; C.L.E.A. 26.1; State Electronic Mail and Internet Policy; POST Model Conduct Policy DISTRIBUTION: All Division Employees NUMBER OF PAGES: 31


from: MN_Data Request (DNR) datarequest.dnr@state.mn.us
to: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
cc: "Alongi, Anthony (DNR)" anthony.alongi@state.mn.us
date: Nov 22, 2021, 10:42 AM
subject: RE: data practices request
mailed-by: state.mn.us
signed-by: state.mn.us
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important mainly because you often read messages with this label.


Dear Mr. Nemmers,
 
I am forwarding this email chain to my supervisor, Anthony Alongi, who is copied on this email. Please feel free to contact him directly about your concerns with my customer service.
 
Kind Regards,
 
Barbara

from: Alongi, Anthony (DNR) anthony.alongi@state.mn.us
to: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
date: Nov 22, 2021, 11:01 AM
subject: RE: data practices request
mailed-by: state.mn.us
signed-by: state.mn.us
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important mainly because you often read messages with this label

Mr. Nemmers,
 
I’ve reviewed the communication chain below. When you have a moment, please reply with any additional information or concerns you may have regarding the services you’ve received, so that I can review as complete a picture of what is happening as possible. Thank you,
 
Anthony Alongi
Section Manager, Policy and Planning
MN Department of Natural Resources


from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: "Alongi, Anthony (DNR)" anthony.alongi@state.mn.us
date: Nov 22, 2021, 11:20 AM
subject: Re: data practices request
mailed-by: gmail.com

Anthony Alongi, Section Manager, Policy and Planning MN Department of Natural Resources:

I actually have a couple of concerns. First of all, why am I being repeatedly harassed over my request for your entire/complete current Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Directives aka policy and procedure manual? Second, why is your Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesBarbara Damchik-Dykes Data Practices Compliance Official Barbara Damchik-Dykes illegally releasing confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal investigative data to media outlets for Citation No. 89062021009812 Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State of Minnesota vs Michael A Sysa; Citation No. 89062021009813 Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State of Minnesota vs David Alekseevich Sysa and Citation No. 89062021009814 Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State of Minnesota vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich? Finally, will I be able to get a copy of your Notice to individuals 13.055 Subd. 2. Notice to individuals that are sent to Michael A Sysa, David Alekseevich Sysa and Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich?

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:
1. Names and contact information for DNR personnel who investigate DNR Data Breaches.
2. DNR policy and procedure for Internal Affairs/Administrative investigations.
3. Direct phone number for Anthony Alongi, Section Manager, Policy and Planning MN Department of Natural Resources.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

Mr. Karpan: I do have one request. Um, I've not asked for this before, I'm not sure how to handle it, but the Department of Natural Resources as they've done in the past has seen fit to do a press release, and officer Osborne has answered questions for the newspaper. My client – all the facts of the case are in the Echo Press, on the radio and in sporting magazines. Not only are there quotes in there that aren't - - I mean I know the State has a right to release incident data I think it's called.
Under Chapter 13.82, investigative data is not to be released. Well, there are pictures allegedly of my client's fish all over the Echo Press. Everybody in town is talking about it. I don't know if I'll have to make a change of venue motion eventually. I'll have to see how this plays out in a few months.
But under 13.82, there's no way the DNR is supposed to be releasing pictures of evidence to the newspaper. It prejudices my client. It prejudices all of us. It makes it impossible to get a fair trail. So I'm asking the Court to order the Department of Natural Resources to not discuss this case any further until it's done.
The Court: Mr. Hochsprung?
Mr. Hochsprung: Your Honor, I did not authorize the Department of Natural Resources to disclose anything to the paper. Um, I can talk with Mr. Osborne or whoever about that, but I don't have any information about that. State of Minnesota vs. Ronald Wayne Johnson Rule 5/ Rule 8 Hearing. Court File No. 21-CR- 13-51. February 11, 2013.

VII. STORAGE OF PHOTOGRAPHS AND RECORDINGS A. Media containing recordings and photos shall be marked for identification, guarded against degradation and overwriting, and stored in a secure location. B. Officers taking digital images for evidentiary purposes shall download the images onto the officer’s computer and shall immediately copy the images to a write once CD-ROM. This CD-ROM shall be known and labeled as the “archive copy”. 1. Officers shall not release archive copies (or original video or audio tape recordings) from their custody. Officers shall honor legitimate requests for access to evidentiary media by making and providing a copy of the media to the prosecuting attorney or the division’s data practices responsible authorities. 2. The existence of evidentiary photos or recordings shall be disclosed in any citation notes or reports prepared about the incident. O-11-06, PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE STANDARDS Page 4 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE DIRECTIVE NUMBER: O-11-06 SUBJECT: PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE STANDARDS EFFECTIVE DATE: May 5, 2006 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Rescinds Directives 45-88, O-11-02 REFERENCE: Minnesota Statute Secs. 97A.221- .231; 626.04 13.82, Subd 20; Directives O-4, O-5 (pending) DISTRIBUTION: All Conservation Officers NUMBER OF PAGES: 8.

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.82 13.82 COMPREHENSIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT DATA. Subd. 7. Criminal investigative data. Except for the data defined in subdivisions 2, 3, and 6, investigative data collected or created by a law enforcement agency in order to prepare a case against a person, whether known or unknown, for the commission of a crime or other offense for which the agency has primary investigative responsibility are confidential or protected nonpublic while the investigation is active. Inactive investigative data are public unless the release of the data would jeopardize another ongoing investigation or would reveal the identity of individuals protected under subdivision 17. Images and recordings, including photographs, video, and audio records, which are part of inactive investigative files and which are clearly offensive to common sensibilities are classified as private or nonpublic data, provided that the existence of the images and recordings shall be disclosed to any person requesting access to the inactive investigative file. An investigation becomes inactive upon the occurrence of any of the following events:

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.43 13.43 PERSONNEL DATA. Subdivision 1.Definition. As used in this section, "personnel data" means government data on individuals maintained because the individual is or was an employee of or an applicant for employment by, performs services on a voluntary basis for, or acts as an independent contractor with a government entity. § Subd. 2.Public data. (a) Except for employees described in subdivision 5 and subject to the limitations described in subdivision 5a, the following personnel data on current and former employees, volunteers, and independent contractors of a government entity is public: (1) name; employee identification number, which must not be the employee's Social Security number; actual gross salary; salary range; terms and conditions of employment relationship; contract fees; actual gross pension; the value and nature of employer paid fringe benefits; and the basis for and the amount of any added remuneration, including expense reimbursement, in addition to salary; (2) job title and bargaining unit; job description; education and training background; and previous work experience; (3) date of first and last employment; (4) the existence and status of any complaints or charges against the employee, regardless of whether the complaint or charge resulted in a disciplinary action; (5) the final disposition of any disciplinary action together with the specific reasons for the action and data documenting the basis of the action, excluding data that would identify confidential sources who are employees of the public body; (6) the complete terms of any agreement settling any dispute arising out of an employment relationship, including a buyout agreement as defined in section 123B.143, subdivision 2, paragraph (a); except that the agreement must include specific reasons for the agreement if it involves the payment of more than $10,000 of public money; (7) work location; a work telephone number; badge number; work-related continuing education; and honors and awards received; and (8) payroll time sheets or other comparable data that are only used to account for employee's work time for payroll purposes, except to the extent that release of time sheet data would reveal the employee's reasons for the use of sick or other medical leave or other not public data.

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.055 13.055 DISCLOSURE OF BREACH IN SECURITY; NOTIFICATION AND INVESTIGATION REPORT REQUIRED. Subd. 2. Notice to individuals; investigation report. (a) A government entity that collects, creates, receives, maintains, or disseminates private or confidential data on individuals must disclose any breach of the security of the data following discovery or notification of the breach. Written notification must be made to any individual who is the subject of the data and whose private or confidential data was, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired by an unauthorized person and must inform the individual that a report will be prepared under paragraph (b), how the individual may obtain access to the report, and that the individual may request delivery of the report by mail or e-mail. The disclosure must be made in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, consistent with (1) the legitimate needs of a law enforcement agency as provided in subdivision 3; or (2) any measures necessary to determine the scope of the breach and restore the reasonable security of the data. (b) Notwithstanding section 13.15 or 13.37, upon completion of an investigation into any breach in the security of data and final disposition of any disciplinary action for purposes of section 13.43, including exhaustion of all rights of appeal under any applicable collective bargaining agreement, the responsible authority shall prepare a report on the facts and results of the investigation. If the breach involves unauthorized access to or acquisition of data by an employee, contractor, or agent of the government entity, the report must at a minimum include: (1) a description of the type of data that were accessed or acquired; (2) the number of individuals whose data was improperly accessed or acquired; (3) if there has been final disposition of disciplinary action for purposes of section 13.43, the name of each employee determined to be responsible for the unauthorized access or acquisition, unless the employee was performing duties under chapter 5B; and (4) the final disposition of any disciplinary action taken against each employee in response.



from: Alongi, Anthony (DNR) anthony.alongi@state.mn.us
to: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
date: Nov 22, 2021, 12:08 PM
subject: RE: data practices request
mailed-by: state.mn.us
signed-by: state.mn.us
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important mainly because you often read messages with this label.

Good morning,
 
Since your inquiry appears to relate to recent, current, and/or potential litigation, our team will engage the appropriate internal personnel and get back to you on a reasonable timeline. Meanwhile, with the understanding that I will not discuss such litigation over the phone, my direct phone number is 651.259.5556. I am available to discuss employee performance. That said, I believe I have the information I need regarding your assessment of the staff in question.
 
As noted, the other parts of your inquiry will get appropriate treatment, and either I or someone else from this agency will be in touch in the coming days to provide you with as much information as we can legally and practically provide. Thank you,
 
Anthony Alongi
Section Manager, Policy and Planning
MN Department of Natural Resources










More to come ...

Related links:

Update: Formal Criminal Complaint Against Your Corrupt City Of Mountain Lake City Administrator/Clerk Michael Schulte, Your Corrupt Chief Of Police Douglas Bristol, & Your Corrupt City Attorney Maryellen Shrhoff? Corrupt DNR Again Caught Illegally Releasing Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data In High-Profile Cases: Chanhthone Phongsim 17-VB-18-491 & Isouvahn Xayachack 17-VB-18-492? Public Portion Of Initial Criminal Complaint Arrives? Case SO19020069?

Formal Criminal Complaint Against Your Corrupt City Of Mountain Lake City Administrator/Clerk Michael Schulte, Your Corrupt Chief Of Police Douglas Bristol, & Your Corrupt City Attorney Maryellen Shrhoff? Corrupt DNR Again Caught Illegally Releasing Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data In High-Profile Cases: Chanhthone Phongsim 17-VB-18-491 & Isouvahn Xayachack 17-VB-18-492?

Witness Intimidation & Harassment By Judicial Officer Rachel C. Sullivan? Judicial Officer Sullivan & St Louis County Personnel Conspire To Provoke Witness Rick Kottom In Hopes Of Inciting Kottom To Violence?

Kottom Tosses Another Monkey Wrench Into Rigged 69DU-CR-17-900? Kottom's 07-01-18 Complaint To Chief Judicial Officer Sally L. Tarnowski?

Kottom Criminal Complaint Tosses Huge Monkey Wrench Into 69DU-CR-17-900 Trial? St. Louis Co. Attorney Mark S. Rubin, St. Louis Co. Attorney Criminal Division Head Gary W. Bjorklund, St. Louis Co. Assistant County Attorney Christopher Pinkert, Dept Of Natural Resources (DNR) Colonel Rodmen Smith, DNR Administrative Manager Captain Alex Gutierrez & MN DNR Data Practices Compliance Official Sheila Deyo All Named In Kottom Complaint? DNR & Corrupt Prosecutors Have Well-Documented History Of Trying Cases In Court Of Public Opinion, Don't They? Confidential/Nonpublic Criminal Investigative Data Illegally Released To Lap-Dog Media, Right?

Update On DNR's Illegal Search & Seizure At Indiana Fisherman's Upper Cormorant Lake Cabin? David Deckard, Oklahoma, Chair Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Notified Of Corrupt MN DNR's History Of Obstructing Justice? Does the Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Encourage Or Discourage Due Process Violations? Inquiring Minds Want To Know, Don't They? Anthony Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1798) Clifford Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1800) & Ryan Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1802) Exposing CO Joseph Stattelman's Breaking & Entering Of Cabin?

Corrupt DNR Conspires With Hacks At KARE 11 TV To Rig Case No. 69DU-CR-17-901 State Of Mn VS Douglas Anthony Marana & Case No. 69DU-CR-17-900 State Of MN VS Roderick Robert Kottom? DNR Illegally Releases Confidential Data Yet Again, Right? Do You Remember Former DNR Col Rodmen Illegally Releasing 03-CR-15-1798, 03-CR-15-1800, 03-CR-15-1801, 03-CR-15-1802, 03-CR-15-1803 & 03-CR-15-1804 Confidential Data To WCCO-TV Hack Bill Hudson?

DNR's Major Greg Salo Not Fazed By CO Osborne's Coercive Invasion Of Johnson's Home? Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson Still Maliciously Prosecuted By Former Pope Co. Assistant Attorney/Douglas Co. Attorney Chad "The Felon" Larson? Larson And DNR Have A Well-Documented History Of Home Invasion, Don't They?

Update On DNR's Illegal Search & Seizure At Indiana Fisherman's Upper Cormorant Lake Cabin? David Deckard, Oklahoma, Chair Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Notified Of Corrupt MN DNR's History Of Obstructing Justice? Does the Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Encourage Or Discourage Due Process Violations? Inquiring Minds Want To Know, Don't They? Anthony Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1798) Clifford Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1800) & Ryan Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1802) Exposing CO Joseph Stattelman's Breaking & Entering Of Cabin?

DNR Caught Sending Confidential Criminal Investigative Data To Brainerd Dispatch (Forum Communication Company)? Indiana Fisherman Victims Of Illegal Search & Seizure? Missing Audio? Nemmers' Call To Detroit Lakes Newspaper Editor Nathan Bowe (Forum Communication Company) Forces 08/31/2015 Arraignment To Be Reset By Court To 09/28/2015? (Nemmers Threw A Monkey Wrench Into 03-CR-15-1798, 03-CR-15-1800, 03-CR-15-1801, 03-CR-15-1802, 03-CR-15-1803, 03-CR-15-1804, Didn't He? Thank You, Jesus!) Sounds Like Ronald Johnson's Rigged Case No. 21-CR-13-51, Doesn't It?

Echo Press Editor (Forum Communications Company, Right?) Al Edenloff Conspired With Corrupt DNR Officer Shane Osborne To Rig Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson? Court Documents Reveal Corrupt Editor Edenloff Knowingly Willingly & Intentionally Published Confidential Chapter 13.82 Criminal Investigative Data? Former Corrupt Douglas Co. Attorney & Current Corrupt Defense Attorney Chris Karpan Filing A Loony Appeal That Doesn't Address Illegal Search By His Buddy DNR Officer Osborne? No Surprise, Right?

DNR Invades Ronald Wayne Johnson's Home Without Probable Cause? Johnson Is A Victim Of DNR Home Invasion, Isn't He? Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson Maliciously Prosecuted By Chad "The Felon" Larson? "The Felon" Larson Has A Well-Documented History Of Covering Up Illegal Home Invasions, Doesn't He? Sounds Like Pope Co Home Invasion Of Nemmers' Home, Doesn't It? DNR's CO Shane Osborne Tampered With Audio To Cover Up Home Invasion?