Thursday, February 14, 2019

Formal Criminal Complaint Against Your Corrupt City Of Mountain Lake City Administrator/Clerk Michael Schulte, Your Corrupt Chief Of Police Douglas Bristol, & Your Corrupt City Attorney Maryellen Shrhoff? Corrupt DNR Again Caught Illegally Releasing Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data In High-Profile Cases: Chanhthone Phongsim 17-VB-18-491 & Isouvahn Xayachack 17-VB-18-492?

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: jason.purrington@co.cottonwood.mn.us,
nick.anderson@co.cottonwood.mn.us,
nathan.gove@state.mn.us,
rahnl@windomnews.com,
vickib@mtlakenews.com,
mnelson@mountainlakemn.com,
dsavage@mountainlakemn.com,
aysker@mountainlakemn.com,
dkass@mountainlakemn.com,
Michael.kelley@courts.state.mn.us,
dkruser@mountainlakemn.com
date: Feb 14, 2019, 1:54 PM
subject: Formal Criminal Complaint Against Your Corrupt City Of Mountain Lake City Administrator/Clerk Michael Schulte, Your Corrupt Chief Of Police Douglas Bristol, & Your Corrupt City Attorney Maryellen Shrhoff
mailed-by: gmail.com


Jason Purrington, Cottonwood County Sheriff 507-831-1375:

This is my formal criminal complaint against your corrupt City of Mountain Lake City Administrator/ Clerk Michael Schulte, your corrupt Chief of Police Douglas Bristol, and your corrupt City Attorney Maryellen Shrhoff for conspiring to misuse public resources (609.52 Theft), for conspiring to engage in criminal misconduct (609.43 Misconduct of public officer or employee), for conspiring to engage in harassment (MS 609.748) and for conspiring to engage in willful refusal to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (MGDPA) (13.09 Penalties). See attached electronic Chapter 13 data request correspondence. Email me the public portion (1) of my initial complaint report (ICR) in its original searchable pdf format to: lionnews00@gmail.com.


Terry Dean, Nemmers (320) 283-5713


When can I get a copy of the investigative report? Investigation ongoing If the law enforcement agency is still investigating the crime, members of the public will not be able to get a copy of the report. They can, however, get what’s often referred to as the public portion of the report containing basic information about the case that is classified as public. Pamphlet: How do I get a copy of my police report? information for crime victims who want to make a request for law enforcement data https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/ojp/forms-documents/Documents/Getting%20copy%20of%20report.pdf


Hundreds of crappies are displayed after officials seized them from a Minnesota couple, who face charges of exceeding the limit of crappies fishers are allowed to possess. (Photo: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) Minnesota couple charged with catching hundreds of fish over limit USA Today Network Brett Molina, USA TODAY Published 2:36 p.m. ET Aug. 2, 2018 https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2018/08/02/minnesota-couple-charged-catching- 253-fish-over-limit/890513002/


Attachments: MLComplaintSigned.pdf, Mountain_Lake_Evidence.pdf, Kottom_ICR_18555431.pdf

Jason Purrington, Cottonwood County Sheriff    02-14-19
902 5th Avenue
Windom, MN 56101 507-831-1375

Emailed to: jason.purrington@co.cottonwood.mn.us, nick.anderson@co.cottonwood.mn.us, nathan.gove@state.mn.us, rahnl@windomnews.com, vickib@mtlakenews.com, mnelson@mountainlakemn.com, dsavage@mountainlakemn.com, aysker@mountainlakemn.com, dkass@mountainlakemn.com, Michael.kelley@courts.state.mn.us, dkruser@mountainlakemn.com

RE: Criminal complaint versus City of Mountain Lake City Administrator/Clerk Michael Schulte, Chief of Police Douglas Bristol, and City Attorney Maryellen Shrhoff.

This is my formal criminal complaint against your corrupt City of Mountain Lake City Administrator/ Clerk Michael Schulte, your corrupt Chief of Police Douglas Bristol, and your corrupt City Attorney Maryellen Shrhoff for conspiring to misuse public resources (609.52 Theft), for conspiring to engage in criminal misconduct (609.43 Misconduct of public officer or employee), for conspiring to engage in harassment (MS 609.748) and for conspiring to engage in willful refusal to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (MGDPA) (13.09 Penalties). See attached electronic Chapter 13 data request correspondence. Email me the public portion (1) of my initial complaint report (ICR) in its original searchable pdf format to: lionnews00@gmail.com.

On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 10:24 AM and on Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 8:13 AM I electronically submitted Chapter 13 data requests to the City of Mountain Lake in order to obtain some readily available, free, electronic, public data. See attached Mountain_Lake_Evidence.pdf. The data I was seeking was for was directly and indirectly related to Chanhthone Phongsim and Isouvahn Xayachack (2,3,4,5,6,7). I have received some but not all of the readily available, free, electronic, public data. I have reason to suspect that the preliminary audio statements for Chanhthone Phongsim and Isouvahn Xayachack are being illegally withheld from me along with the current Mountail Lake Police Department policy and procedure manual and the work-related continuing education for Mountain Lake police officer Emily Mathiowetz and Mountain Lake Chief of Police Douglas Bristol. Instead, I have received communications from the City of Mountain Lake which I consider harassing, threatening and intimidating (8,9).

“We will not tolerate terroristic threats or harassing behavior. Therefore, any future requests must be in writing and on our city forms. Communication regarding data request shall not be made by e-mail or by personal celluar phone calls to council members or city employees.” January 29, 2019 harassing and intimidating email from City of Mountain Lake City Attorney Maryellen Shrhoff Maryellen Suhrhoff. muskelaw@qwestoffice.net

Means Motive Opportunity: I have reason to suspect that your corrupt City of Mountain Lake City Administrator/Clerk Michael Schulte, your corrupt Chief of Police Douglas Bristol, and your corrupt City Attorney Maryellen Shrhoff are illegally withholding the readily available, free, electronic, public data for Chanhthone Phongsim and Isouvahn Xayachack because they know or should know that the Department of Natural Resources has a well-documented history of illegal searches & seizures and a well-documented history of illegally releasing confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal investigative data to the media in high-profile cases (10,11,12).

I also have reason to suspect the reason why the preliminary audio statements (13), the current policy and procedure manual and the work-related continuing education data are being illegally withheld is

Page 1 of 5

because the data would prove that the search of suspects who needed a court interpreter could not have given voluntary consent to search (14) on the late night raid by the DNR and Mountain Lake police. Finally, I have reason to suspect that is why the case was plead down to a petty misdemeanor in order to prevent an Omnibus hearing from being held. Which would explain why the computerized City of Mountain Lake (15,16) is willfully refusing to fail back onto their Minnesota Government Data Practice Act training (17,18,19,20,21,22) and to provide me with the data in a timely manner.

FYI: This is also my POST Board complaint and my complaint to Chief Judicial Officer Michelle A. Dietrich

FYI2: I’ve attached the public portion of the initial criminal complaint that Roderick “Rick” Kottom files in response to the DNR’s illegal release of his confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal investigative data to the media in his high-profile case Case No. 69DU-CR-17-900 State of Minnesota vs Roderick Robert Kottom.

_______________________________________________________
Terry Dean, Nemmers
20179 County Road 28
Glenwood, MN 56334
(320) 283-5713

Attachments: Evidence of Chapter 13 violations Mountain_Lake_Evidence.pdf ICR of Roderick “Rick” Kottom Kottom_ICR_18555431.pdf

Footnotes:
1. When can I get a copy of the investigative report? Investigation ongoing If the law enforcement agency is still investigating the crime, members of the public will not be able to get a copy of the report. They can, however, get what’s often referred to as the public portion of the report containing basic information about the case that is classified as public. Pamphlet: How do I get a copy of my police report? information for crime victims who want to make a request for law enforcement data https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/ojp/forms-documents/Documents/Getting%20copy%20of%20report.pdf
2. Case No. 17-VB-18-491 State of Minnesota vs Chanhthone Phongsim Female DOB: 04/01/1958 Charges: 1. Fishing - Take or possess fish over limit Phongsim, Chanhthone Statute: 6262.0200 Level: Petty Misdemeanor Date: 05/20/2018 Disposition: 11/05/2018 Convicted Level of Sentence: 11/05/2018 Convicted of a Petty Misdemeanor 07/25/2018 Request for Interpreter Index # 2 07/25/2018 Modified Interpreter Hearing Information 08/22/2018 Request for Interpreter Index # 11
3. Case No. 17-VB-18-492 State of Minnesota vs Isouvahn Xayachack Male DOB: 10/02/1947 Charges: 1. Fishing - Take or possess fish over limit Xayachack, Isouvahn Statute: 6262.0200 Level: Petty Misdemeanor Date: 05/20/2018 Disposition: 10/29/2018 Convicted Level of Sentence: 10/29/2018 Convicted of a Petty Misdemeanor 07/25/2018 Request for Interpreter Index # 2 08/22/2018 Request for Interpreter Index # 6 3. Hundreds of crappies are displayed after officials seized them from a Minnesota couple, who face charges of exceeding the limit of crappies fishers are allowed to possess. (Photo: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) Minnesota couple charged with catching hundreds of fish over limit USA Today Network Brett Molina, USA TODAY Published 2:36 p.m. ET Aug. 2, 2018 https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2018/08/02/minnesota-couple-charged-catching-253-fish-over-limit/890513002/
4. A husband and wife from Mountain Lake recently were cited by DNR Enforcement for a crappie overlimit of more than 250 fish, according to the report from a CO.# (Photo courtesy of Minnesota

Page 2 of 5


DNR) Fishing husband, wife cited for being over the limit – to the tune of 250-plus crappies August 1, 2018 Tim Spielman, Outdoor News https://www.outdoornews.com/2018/08/01/fishing-husband-wife-cited-for-being-over-the-limit-to-the-tune-of-250-plus-crappies/
5. A Minnesota couple was cited for hauling in 273 crappie fish—the state limits 10 crappies per person. The May 20 incident could force the married couple to pay fines and restitution of up to $3,000, officials confirmed. Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Couple Nabbed For Hauling In More Than 250 Crappie Fish Over Legal Limit By ML Nestel, Newsweek On 8/1/18 at 4:51 PM https://www.newsweek.com/minnesota-couple-haul-250-crappie-fish-legal-limit-1053083
6. Miller, conservation officer Mike Gruhlke and Mountain Lake police officer Emily Mathiowetz responded by tracing one of the vehicles to an apartment in Mountain Lake. They knocked on the door and asked the husband and wife for permission to inspect their freezer. Couple from southern Minnesota busted for 253 crappies over the limit Husband, wife in southern Minnesota facing charges. By Tony Kennedy Star Tribune August 2, 2018 — 5:52pm
7. Department of Natural Resources teamed up with Mountain Lake Police to track down their Toyota minivan after an anonymous tipster phoned the state’s 24-hour Turn In Poachers or TIP hotline number, accusing them of hauling away an obscene amount of crappies. Minnesota Couple Nabbed For Hauling In More Than 250 Crappie Fish Over Legal Limit By ML Nestel, Newsweek On 8/1/18 at 4:51 PM
8. 20. By making another person feel fearful, guilty, or ashamed, the manipulator is in a position to gain control over the other individual's affects, thoughts, and behaviors by substituting his own beliefs. This is the basic mechanism of gaslighting whether used in everyday life, in psychotherapy situations, or in the thought-reform and mind-control manipulations of cult leaders. Some advertising and many social interactions in which one person attempts to gain control over another are based on this principle.” Gaslighting, The Double Whammy, Interrogation and Other Covert Control in Psychotherapy & Analysis, Theo L. Dorpat (Maryland: 2004), Page 7.
9. The various types of gaslighting have in common two defining features. The first is an attempt to impair or destroy an individual's confidence in his or her psychic abilities. After this first aim has been achieved, the second aim is to attain control over the feelings, thoughts, and behaviors of the victim. By making another person feel fearful, guilty, or ashamed, the manipulator is in a position to gain control over the other individual's affects, thoughts, and behaviors by substituting his own beliefs. This is the basic mechanism of gaslighting whether used in everyday life, in psychotherapy situations, or in the thought-reform and mind-control manipulations of cult leaders. Some advertising and many social interactions in which one person attempts to gain control over another are based on this principle.” Gaslighting, The Double Whammy, Interrogation and Other Covert Control in Psychotherapy & Analysis, Theo L. Dorpat (Maryland: 2004), Page 7.
10. Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson Male DOB: 12/17/1943 Charges: Johnson, Ronald Wayne 1. Hunting - Gross Overlimits of Wild Animals (Not applicable - GOC) Statute: 97A.338 Level: Gross Misdemeanor Date: 12/16/2012 Disposition: 02/16/2016 Dismissed Level of Sentence
11. Mr. Karpan: I do have one request. Um, I've not asked for this before, I'm not sure how to handle it, but the Department of Natural Resources as they've done in the past has seen fit to do a press release, and officer Osborne has answered questions for the newspaper. My client – all the facts of the case are in the Echo Press, on the radio and in sporting magazines. Not only are there quotes in there that aren't - - I mean I know the State has a right to release incident data I think it's called. Under Chapter 13.82, investigative data is not to be released. Well, there are pictures allegedly of my client's fish all over the Echo Press. Everybody in town is talking about it. I don't know if I'll have to make a change of venue motion eventually. I'll have to see how this plays out in a few months. But under 13.82, there's no way the DNR is supposed to be releasing pictures of evidence to the newspaper. It prejudices my client. It prejudices all of us. It makes it impossible to get a fair trail. So I'm asking the Court to order the Department of Natural Resources to not discuss this case any further until it's done.
The Court: Mr. Hochsprung?
Mr. Hochsprung: Your Honor, I did not authorize the Department of Natural Resources to disclose

Page 3 of 5

anything to the paper. Um, I can talk with Mr. Osborne or whoever about that, but I don't have any information about that. State of Minnesota vs. Ronald Wayne Johnson Rule 5/Rule 8 Hearing. Court File No. 21-CR- 13-51. February 11, 2013.
12. Seek Truth and Report It – Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable. Give voice to the voiceless. Minimize Harm – Recognize that legal access to information differs from an ethical justifica- tion to publish or broadcast. Be Accountable and Transparent – Expose unethical conduct in journalism, including within their organizations. Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics
13. C. Searching Dwellings and Buildings 1. A search warrant is always required to search dwellings and non-public areas of buildings, absent consent or exigent circumstances. Without a search warrant, officers may legally search a dwelling or building in the following circumstances: a. Hot Pursuit; b. Protect and Preserve Life; c. To Prevent the Destruction of Evidence; d. Serving an Arrest Warrant; e. Consent Search; e. When applicable, officers shall property inventory: · Photographs documenting damages; · Consent to Search form; and/or · Audio and/or video recording of consent granted. http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/police/policy/mpdpolicy_9-200_9-200
14. Officers conducting all criminal investigations will, whenever possible, record oral victim and witness statements in lieu of written statements. Statement evidence obtained during an initial investigation can be very powerful evidence in determining the course of an investigation; ultimately impacting charging decisions and convictions. Policy 325 Preliminary Investigation/Required Reports Duluth Police Department Policy Manual http://www.duluthmn.gov/media/326959/RELEASE_20150316_T181919_Duluth_PD_Policy_Manual.pdf
15. ORI: MN0170100; County: Cottonwood; Agency Type: Law Enforcement; Name: Mountain Lake Police Dept; Module: Citation; Date Deployed: 4/6/2016; Last Adapter Used: Zuercher; ORI: MN0170100; County: Cottonwood; Agency Type: Law Enforcement; Name: Mountain Lake Police Dept; Module: Incident Referral; Date Deployed: 5/8/2016; Last Adapter Used: eCharging; ORI: MN017011A; County: Cottonwood; Agency Type: Prosecuting Authority; Name: Mountain Lake City Attorney; Module: Complaint; Date Deployed: 11/4/2015; Last Adapter Used: eCharging; 2016 BCA Agency Deployment Report
16. eCharging: Prosecutor electronically signs complaint; Benefits: Keeps process electronic; Overview: Instantaneous data transmission, no redundant data entry, reduced error rate, high transparency of workflow, less paper, no vehicles/fuel Benefits: Reduced time, reduced costs, more accurate data, and improved public safety Minnesota Criminal Complaint Process Comparison of Manual and eCharging Systems and Benefits CONTACT: Jill Oliveira 651-793-2726. eCharging benefits - March 2011.doc
17. 13.03 Access to Government Data. Subdivision 1. Public data. ... The responsible authority in every government entity shall keep records containing government data in such an arrangement and condition as to make them easily accessible for convenient use.
18. Mn Stat. 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data. Subd. 3. Access to data by individual. Upon request to a responsible authority or designee, ... The responsible authority or designee shall comply immediately, if possible, with any request made pursuant to this subdivision, or within ten days of the date of the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays, if immediate compliance is not possible.
19. Independent School District 709, Duluth Public Schools, did not respond appropriately to a March 2, 2018, data request from a data subject pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.04, because it did not provide any data to the requester in 10 business days. Signed: Matthew Massman Commissioner. Advisory Opinion 18-010 July 31, 2018; ISD 709, Duluth Public Schools.
19. The Commissioner cannot opine on the proper application of the ethical rules governing the conduct of attorneys; that is strictly within the purview of the Courts. For further guidance, the Commissioner refers the County to the comments to Rule 4.2, in particular Comment 4. However,

Page 4 of 5

notwithstanding the attorney conduct concerns, the County’s obligation under the Data Practices Act to comply immediately or in ten business day with a data subject’s request is clear. (The Commissioner has also previously opined that the existence of litigation between a data requester and an entity does not relieve the entity of its data practices responsibilities. See Advisory Opinions 96-038 and 97-005.) As the Commissioner noted in Advisory Opinion 03-030: ... Opinion: Based on the facts and information provided, the Commissioner’s opinion on the issue is as follows: Carver County did not respond appropriately to a March 14, 2018, data request from a data subject because it did not provide access to the data within ten business days, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.04. Signed: Matthew Massman Commissioner Dated: April 21, 2018. Advisory Opinion 18-005 May 21, 2018; Carver County May 22, 2018.
21. A response five weeks later is neither prompt nor reasonable. Although the Department did not provide information about its data practices policies and procedures, in instances like this one, those procedures ought to provide for a response within a matter of days, not weeks. October 31, 1995 Minnesota Department of Administration Data Practices Advisory Opinion 95-042.
22. Government entities should respond in one of three ways 1. Provide access to the data (and copies when requested) 2. Inform you the data are classified as not public (must give statute section) 3. Government entities should respond in one of three ways 1. Provide access to the data (and copies when requested) 2. Inform you the data are classified as not public (must give statute section) 3. Inform you the data do not exist • Not responding is not a proper response. Minnesota Department of Administration - Information Policy Analysis Division - Can I ask for that? Government Data Practices Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 page 12 Minnesota Department of Administration - Information Policy Analysis Division - Can I ask for that? Government Data Practices Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 page 12.

Page 5 of 5

Response #1:

from: Nick Anderson Nick.Anderson@co.cottonwood.mn.us
to: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
date: Feb 14, 2019, 1:54 PM
subject: Automatic reply: Formal Criminal Complaint Against Your Corrupt City Of Mountain Lake City Administrator/Clerk Michael Schulte, Your Corrupt Chief Of Police Douglas Bristol, & Your Corrupt City Attorney Maryellen Shrhoff
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important according to Google magic.


I will be out of the office on wednesday, thursday and friday. I will have limited access to email, but will respond as best I can. If something needs immediate attention please contact the office.
sorry for the inconvenience.


Response #2:

from: Kelley, Michael Michael.Kelley@courts.state.mn.us
to: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
date: Feb 14, 2019, 1:54 PM
subject: Automatic reply: [EXTERNAL] Formal Criminal Complaint Against Your Corrupt City Of Mountain Lake City Administrator/Clerk Michael Schulte, Your Corrupt Chief Of Police Douglas Bristol, & Your Corrupt City Attorney Maryellen Shrhoff
mailed-by: smtpb.courts.state.mn.us
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important according to Google magic.


I am out of the office with limited access to email. I will respond to your message as soon as I can.
Thanks.


More to come . . .

Related links:

Witness Intimidation & Harassment By Judicial Officer Rachel C. Sullivan? Judicial Officer Sullivan & St Louis County Personnel Conspire To Provoke Witness Rick Kottom In Hopes Of Inciting Kottom To Violence?

Kottom Tosses Another Monkey Wrench Into Rigged 69DU-CR-17-900? Kottom's 07-01-18 Complaint To Chief Judicial Officer Sally L. Tarnowski?

Kottom Criminal Complaint Tosses Huge Monkey Wrench Into 69DU-CR-17-900 Trial? St. Louis Co. Attorney Mark S. Rubin, St. Louis Co. Attorney Criminal Division Head Gary W. Bjorklund, St. Louis Co. Assistant County Attorney Christopher Pinkert, Dept Of Natural Resources (DNR) Colonel Rodmen Smith, DNR Administrative Manager Captain Alex Gutierrez & MN DNR Data Practices Compliance Official Sheila Deyo All Named In Kottom Complaint? DNR & Corrupt Prosecutors Have Well-Documented History Of Trying Cases In Court Of Public Opinion, Don't They? Confidential/Nonpublic Criminal Investigative Data Illegally Released To Lap-Dog Media, Right?

Update On DNR's Illegal Search & Seizure At Indiana Fisherman's Upper Cormorant Lake Cabin? David Deckard, Oklahoma, Chair Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Notified Of Corrupt MN DNR's History Of Obstructing Justice? Does the Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Encourage Or Discourage Due Process Violations? Inquiring Minds Want To Know, Don't They? Anthony Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1798) Clifford Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1800) & Ryan Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1802) Exposing CO Joseph Stattelman's Breaking & Entering Of Cabin?

Corrupt DNR Conspires With Hacks At KARE 11 TV To Rig Case No. 69DU-CR-17-901 State Of Mn VS Douglas Anthony Marana & Case No. 69DU-CR-17-900 State Of MN VS Roderick Robert Kottom? DNR Illegally Releases Confidential Data Yet Again, Right? Do You Remember Former DNR Col Rodmen Illegally Releasing 03-CR-15-1798, 03-CR-15-1800, 03-CR-15-1801, 03-CR-15-1802, 03-CR-15-1803 & 03-CR-15-1804 Confidential Data To WCCO-TV Hack Bill Hudson?

DNR's Major Greg Salo Not Fazed By CO Osborne's Coercive Invasion Of Johnson's Home? Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson Still Maliciously Prosecuted By Former Pope Co. Assistant Attorney/Douglas Co. Attorney Chad "The Felon" Larson? Larson And DNR Have A Well-Documented History Of Home Invasion, Don't They?

Update On DNR's Illegal Search & Seizure At Indiana Fisherman's Upper Cormorant Lake Cabin? David Deckard, Oklahoma, Chair Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Notified Of Corrupt MN DNR's History Of Obstructing Justice? Does the Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact Encourage Or Discourage Due Process Violations? Inquiring Minds Want To Know, Don't They? Anthony Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1798) Clifford Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1800) & Ryan Emmons (CASE NO. 03-CR-15-1802) Exposing CO Joseph Stattelman's Breaking & Entering Of Cabin?

DNR Caught Sending Confidential Criminal Investigative Data To Brainerd Dispatch (Forum Communication Company)? Indiana Fisherman Victims Of Illegal Search & Seizure? Missing Audio? Nemmers' Call To Detroit Lakes Newspaper Editor Nathan Bowe (Forum Communication Company) Forces 08/31/2015 Arraignment To Be Reset By Court To 09/28/2015? (Nemmers Threw A Monkey Wrench Into 03-CR-15-1798, 03-CR-15-1800, 03-CR-15-1801, 03-CR-15-1802, 03-CR-15-1803, 03-CR-15-1804, Didn't He? Thank You, Jesus!) Sounds Like Ronald Johnson's Rigged Case No. 21-CR-13-51, Doesn't It?

Echo Press Editor (Forum Communications Company, Right?) Al Edenloff Conspired With Corrupt DNR Officer Shane Osborne To Rig Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson? Court Documents Reveal Corrupt Editor Edenloff Knowingly Willingly & Intentionally Published Confidential Chapter 13.82 Criminal Investigative Data? Former Corrupt Douglas Co. Attorney & Current Corrupt Defense Attorney Chris Karpan Filing A Loony Appeal That Doesn't Address Illegal Search By His Buddy DNR Officer Osborne? No Surprise, Right?

DNR Invades Ronald Wayne Johnson's Home Without Probable Cause? Johnson Is A Victim Of DNR Home Invasion, Isn't He? Case No. 21-CR-13-51 State of Minnesota vs Ronald Wayne Johnson Maliciously Prosecuted By Chad "The Felon" Larson? "The Felon" Larson Has A Well-Documented History Of Covering Up Illegal Home Invasions, Doesn't He? Sounds Like Pope Co Home Invasion Of Nemmers' Home, Doesn't It? DNR's CO Shane Osborne Tampered With Audio To Cover Up Home Invasion?