Lion News

Wednesday, February 16, 2022

What Is The Status Of My Chapter 13 Data Request For Data That Stacy Schoon Alleged Was Illegally Withheld From Her In Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State Of Minnesota Vs Stacy Joy Schoon? Nemmers' Chapter 13 Data Request Triggers Motion For Missing Booking Photo & Fingerprints?

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: dbucholz@co.ottertail.mn.us,
WayneJohnsonOTC@outlook.com,
leerogness@yahoo.com,
kmortens@co.ottertail.mn.us,
bmurphy@co.otter-tail.mn.us,
bfitzgib@co.ottertail.mn.us,
Michelle Eldien meldien@co.ottertail.mn.us
date: Feb 16, 2022, 10:51 AM
subject: What Is The Status Of My Chapter 13 Data Request For Data That Stacy Schoon Alleged Was Illegally Withheld From Her In Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State Of Minnesota Vs Stacy Joy Schoon?
mailed-by: gmail.com

Dan Bucholz District 1 Commissioner 218-849-2143/218-346-3575, Wayne D. Johnson District 2 Commissioner (Vice Chair) 218-863-7500, Kurt Mortenson District 3 Commissioner 218-205-2415, Betty Murphy District 4 Commissioner (Chair) 218-640-1706, Leland (Lee) Rogness District 5 Commissioner 218-770-7066:

Why oh why Otter Tail County Sheriff Barry Fitzgibbons 218-998-8534 and Otter Tail County Attorney Michelle Eldien 218-998-8400 both willfully refused to respond to my Chapter 13 Data Request for 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal investigative data that Stacy Schoon alleged that was illegally withheld from her? Are both Fitzgibbons and Eldien mad at me because I pointed out the obvious fact that they had not obtained fingerprints nor mugshots from Stacy? Are both Fitzgibbons and Eldien mad at me because the fingerprints and the mugshots might convince Stacy to withdraw her guilty plea or appeal her criminal conviction? Do you think that might be a motive for both Fitzgibbons and Eldien to willfully refuse to respond to me?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.03 13.03 ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT DATA. § Subdivision 1. Public data. All government data collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated by a government entity shall be public unless classified by statute, or temporary classification pursuant to section 13.06, or federal law, as nonpublic or protected nonpublic, or with respect to data on individuals, as private or confidential. The responsible authority in every government entity shall keep records containing government data in such an arrangement and condition as to make them easily accessible for convenient use. Photographic, photostatic, microphotographic, or microfilmed records shall be considered as accessible for convenient use regardless of the size of such records.
56-CR-20-926 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 2/14/2022 8:41 AM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF OTTER SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT State of Minnesota, MOTION FOR FINGERPRINTING Plaintiff, vs. Court File No. 56-CR-20-926 Atty. File No. 20F-119V Stacy Joy Schoon, Defendant. TO: Stacy Joy Schoon: Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 299C.10, subd. 1(a), the State requests that pursuant to a request by the Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Department that the Court order that the above-named Defendant, be fingerprinted for her arrest of April 13, 2019 for Financial Card Fraud Use – No Consent. The State would request an in-person hearing date so that Defendant may appear for fingerprinting. Date: February 14, 2022 /s/Matthew C. Spielman Matthew C. Spielman: 0398760 Assistant County Attorney 121 W. Junius Fergus Falls, MN 56537 (218) 998-8400 mspielma@co.ottertail.mn.us 1

Barry Fitzgibbons, Sheriff 218-998-8534 & Michelle Eldien, County Attorney, 218-998-8400:

What is the status on my Chapter 13 Data Request for the hoarder Stacy Schoon?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. How many people with mental problems do you take advantage of in a single week?

Government entities should respond in one of three ways 1. Provide access to the data (and copies when requested) 2. Inform you the data are classified as not public (must give statute section) 3. Inform you the data do not exist • Not responding is not a proper response. Minnesota Department of Administration - Information Policy Analysis Division - Can I ask for that? Government Data Practices Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 page 12.

A response five weeks later is neither prompt nor reasonable. Although the Department did not provide information about its data practices policies and procedures, in instances like this one, those procedures ought to provide for a response within a matter of days, not weeks. Advisory Opinion 95-042. October 31, 1995; Minnesota Department of Children, Families and Learning. October 31, 1995 | Inspection, Response to data requests, Statutory construction (Ch. 645)
https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/opinions/library/?id=36-267796

It should be noted that Stacy Wilde and Jeff Wilde do not currently reside in the same residence, but they share a joint checking accont. Page 2. Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office Follow Up Investigation Report 19035893 Offense Category: Financial Transaction Card Fraud-609.821 subd 2 (1) Complainant: Stacy Ellen Wilde Deputy: Detective Jon Karger #325. Report of Karger.DOCX Throughout the investigation, I made contact with Security State Bank Customer Service Specialist Carla Ahrends. Ahrends explained to me that after receiving the report of fraudulent activity, she was only able to file charge backs on no more than 35 transactions in the last 90 days. As there were more than 35 transactions within the last 90 days, she was only able to attempt charge backs for an approximate amount of $3371. Page 2. Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office Follow Up Investigation Report 19035893 Offense Category: Financial Transaction Card Fraud-609.821 subd 2 (1) Complainant: Stacy Ellen Wilde Deputy: Detective Jon Karger #325. Report of Karger.DOCX A few days after initially speaking with Carla Ahrends, I visited with her again. Page 3. Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office Follow Up Investigation Report 19035893 Offense Category: Financial Transaction Card Fraud-609.821 subd 2 (1) Complainant: Stacy Ellen Wilde Deputy: Detective Jon Karger #325. Report of Karger.DOCX

I have spoken with Jeff Wilde. Jeff Wilde stated that he has known Stacy Schoon for the last six or seven years and has known her through friends. Jeff stated that Stacy Schoon used to bartend in Underwood. Jeff stated a couple years ago he used to hang around her. In a later conversation, Jeff told me that he never did date Stacy Schoon although Stacy Schoon would tell people that she was dating Jeff. Jeff Wilde suspected that Stacy got his credit card information when they were in Mazatlán in March 2019. She would have been in his hotel room, and he kept his debit card in the hotel room. Page 3. Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office Follow Up Investigation Report 19035893 Offense Category: Financial Transaction Card Fraud-609.821 subd 2 (1) Complainant: Stacy Ellen Wilde Deputy: Detective Jon Karger #325. Report of Karger.DOCX Jeff Wilde stated that Stacy Schoon had no permission to use his credit card information. Jeff reiterated this upon me re-contacting him after I had interviewed Stacy Schoon. Page 3. Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office Follow Up Investigation Report 19035893 Offense Category: Financial Transaction Card Fraud-609.821 subd 2 (1) Complainant: Stacy Ellen Wilde Deputy: Detective Jon Karger #325. Report of Karger.DOCX

On 12/17/19 at approximately 1315 hours, the search warrant was executed at Stacy Schoon’s residence. I was assisted by Detective Eric Lien, Det. Sgt. Robert Huckeby and Deputy Colby Palmersheim. Deputy Keith Rogal was involved for a short time also. Page 3. Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office Follow Up Investigation Report 19035893 Offense Category: Financial Transaction Card Fraud-609.821 subd 2 (1) Complainant: Stacy Ellen Wilde Deputy: Detective Jon Karger #325. Report of Karger.DOCX

Prior to the search, I visited with Stacy Schoon alone at her residence. Page 3. Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office Follow Up Investigation Report 19035893 Offense Category: Financial Transaction Card Fraud-609.821 subd 2 (1) Complainant: Stacy Ellen Wilde Deputy: Detective Jon Karger #325. Report of Karger.DOCX EVIDENCE / RECORDINGS: Recorded interview with Stacy Schoon Recovered items as noted and entered into evidence Financial records from Security State Bank Cellebrite report (copies provided to records) Page 5 Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office Follow Up Investigation Report 19035893 Offense Category: Financial Transaction Card Fraud-609.821 subd 2 (1) Complainant: Stacy Ellen Wilde Deputy: Detective Jon Karger #325. Report of Karger.DOCX
On Monday, October 28, 2019, at 1456 hours, I Officer Estep, was dispatched to the Fergus Falls Police Department at the address of 122 West Junius Avenue to meet with a party who had came to report a theft. When I arrived at the police department minutes later, I met with Stacy Wilde. Stacy had informed me that she has had money taken from her checking account via online purchases on Amazon. While speaking with Stacy I learned the following: Stacy and her husband share a checking account. They noticed that charges had been showing up in their account since July of 2019. Page 1. Fergus Falls Police Department Incident Report Incident Number: 19035893 Offense Category: Theft Location Of Offense: 128 East Washington Avenue Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Date/Time Reported: 10/28/2019 Officer(S) Assigned: Officer Matthew Estep #105 Additional Officers: Detective Andy Renner #128 SUBJECT: Stacy Ellen Wilde DOB: 06/10/1971 24796 County Highway 88 Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Phone: 218-205-112. Report of Estep.DOCX

When speaking to Stacy on November 1, 2019, she informed me that they now believe it is closer to $7,000.00 and that the bank was reimbursing them for approximately 30 of the transactions, with an approximate value of $3,300.00. Stacy believes there is approximately 60 fraudulent transactions total. Page 2. Fergus Falls Police Department Incident Report Incident Number: 19035893 Offense Category: Theft Location Of Offense: 128 East Washington Avenue Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Date/Time Reported: 10/28/2019 Officer(S) Assigned: Officer Matthew Estep #105 Additional Officers: Detective Andy Renner #128 SUBJECT: Stacy Ellen Wilde DOB: 06/10/1971 24796 County Highway 88 Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Phone: 218-205-112. Report of Estep.DOCX

On Wednesday, November 6, 2019, I spoke with Stacey Wilde who had more information for me pertaining to this case. Stacey informed me that an Amazon employee disclosed to her husband that the last package from the fraudulent account was sent to the address of 27875 County Road 124. The package was addressed to “Stacey Schoon.” Stacy did inform me that Stacey Schoon went to Mexico in March with a group of people, including her husband. Stacy stated that she believes Schoon stole her husband’s card information while in Mexico. Page 2. Fergus Falls Police Department Incident Report Incident Number: 19035893 Offense Category: Theft Location Of Offense: 128 East Washington Avenue Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Date/Time Reported: 10/28/2019 Officer(S) Assigned: Officer Matthew Estep #105 Additional Officers: Detective Andy Renner #128 SUBJECT: Stacy Ellen Wilde DOB: 06/10/1971 24796 County Highway 88 Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Phone: 218-205-112. Report of Estep.DOCX

Details: On 12/17/2019, I, Sergeant Robert Huckeby #308, assisted Detective Jon Karger #325 in executing a search warrant at the residence of Stacy Schoon. Part of my participation in the execution of the warrant was collecting the magnetic cell phone holder in the Ford F150 pickup and taking photographs that item as well as the F150 pickup. Stolen Property/Estimate Of Damages To Property Section Description Serial Number Make/Model/Brand Value Evidence / Recordings: Digital Photographs Magnetic cellphone holder was given to #325 Status: Forward with Detective Karger’s reports Detective Sergeant Robert Huckeby #308 Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office RH: asl 12/20/19@1100hours ADM1 Job#66356. Otter Tail County Sheriff’s Office Follow Up Investigation Report 19035893 Offense Category: Theft Incident Number: Complainant: Deputy: Detective Sergeant Robert Huckeby #308 Report of Huckeby.DOCX

More to come ...

Wednesday, February 9, 2022

Who Wants To Submit A Chapter 13 Data Request For The 13.82 Subdiv. 7 Criminal Investigative Data That Stacy Schoon Alleged That Otter Tail County Attorney Michelle Eldien Was Illegally Withholding From Her? Restitution Affidavit Amount Starts At $10,835.72? After Schoon Filed Complaint Against Public Defender Porter Amount Drops To $5,837.07? Final Amount Is $2,466.07? Did The So-Called Victims Perjure Themselves Over $8,369.65 Or More?

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com to: dbucholz@co.ottertail.mn.us, WayneJohnsonOTC@outlook.com, leerogness@yahoo.com, kmortens@co.ottertail.mn.us, bmurphy@co.otter-tail.mn.us, Michelle Eldien meldien@co.ottertail.mn.us, bfitzgib@co.ottertail.mn.us date: Feb 9, 2022, 10:40 AM subject: Chapter 13 Data Request For Data That Stacy Schoon Alleged Was Illegally Withheld From Her In Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State Of Minnesota Vs Stacy Joy Schoon mailed-by: gmail.com

Hey do you remember that complaint that Stacy Schoon signed against her backstabbing public defender Matthew Porter? You know the one where Schoon was allegeding that Porter was conspiring with Otter Tail County Attorney Michelle Eldien to illegally withhold her evidence from her Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State Of Minnesota Vs Stacy Joy Schoon? Did you know that I am going to request the data that Schoon was alleging that Eldien was illegally withholding from her? Do you know what I am thinking? I'm thinking that Eldien and Otter Tail County Sheriff Barry Fitzgibbons with all sorts of wild and crazy excuses why they can't email/file share that readily available, free, electronic public data to me, aren't I?

Do you remember me telling you about Jessica Hartger and Jeremy Boles filing their complaints against their public defenders in the court's Register of Actions in their respective cases in the First Judicial District? You remember that Both Hartger and Boles were allegeding similar misconduct by their public defenders as Schoon was allegeding against her public defender? Did you know that both Hartger and Boles were able to get new public defenders? Maybe that explains why your corrupt judicial officer Johnathan R. Judd willfully refused to allow Schoon to file her complaint against Porter into her Register of Actions?

Do you find it troubling that magically and mysteriously absolutely no mention of Schoon's admitted Hoarding disorder was ever mentioned during her plea hearing(s)? Maybe that explains why oh why Schoon was never required to undergo a psych evaluation? Because during the pysch eval Schoon might let it slip about her valid complaint against Porter? That would be pretty embarrassing for Eldien that Stacy was forced to take a plea deal because her evidence was being illegally withheld from her, correct? Plus, Schoon probably would have balked at the plea deal if a psych evaluation was part of the deal, right? Maybe that explains why oh why no mention of Schoon getting fingerprints or a mughsot was mentioned during Schoon's plea hearings?

Did you know that the amount on the Restitution affidavit for Schoon's case was originally $10,835.72? Oh, and then after Schoon filed her complaint it magically and mysteriously went down to $5,837.07? Can you guess the amount of restitution at the time of Schoon's Plea Hearings? If you guessed $2,466.07, then you are correct, aren't you? Doesn't that sound like the so-called victims made false claims of at least $8,369.65 in their Restitution affidavit? Wouldn't that be perjury on the part of the so-called victims? So you can see why both Otter Tail County Attorney Michelle Eldien and Otter Tail County Sheriff Barry Fitzgibbons would have a motive to illegally withhold this data from me, can't you? I'll keep you updated, okay?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

Minnesota Judicial Branch Logo Minnesota Judicial Branch Minnesota Court Records Online (MCRO) https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch Case Details Case Number: 72-CR-20-85 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs JEREMY JAMES BOLES 08/10/2021 Correspondence 15 pages 07-09-21 Jeremy Boles signed complaint to First Judicial District Chief Judicial Officer Kathryn Messerich Case Details Case Number: 19HA-CR-19-2768 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Jessica Danielle Hartger 06/22/2021 Correspondence 8 pages 06-01-21 Jessica Hartger’s signed complaint to First Judicial District Chief Judicial Officer Kathryn Messerich

My attorney has told me and I understand that a judge generally will not accept a plea of guilty from someone who claims to be innocent. However, I understand that the judge may accept my Alford guilty plea despite my claim of innocence, so long as I agree the state’s evidence is sufficient for a jury to find me guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, if I have a trial. With this principle in mind, I acknowledge that: ... d. I may be required to successfully complete treatment for my conduct underlying the offense to which I am pleading. If I am required to successfully complete such treatment and I refuse to admit my guilt in treatment, I may be discharged from treatment. Failure to complete such treatment may result in my incarceration, civil commitment for treatment, or both. Alford Addendum to Petition to Enter Plea of Guilty Pursuant to Rule 15 https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/Appellate/Supreme%20Court/Rules%20of%20Crim%20Proc%20Forms%20Appendix/15-appendixG.pdf

6. I have / I have never been a patient in a mental hospital. 7. I have / have not talked with or been treated by a psychiatrist or other person for a nervous or mental condition. Petition To Enter Plea of Guilty In Felony Case Pursuant To Rule 15 https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/Appellate/Supreme%20Court/Rules%20of%20Crim%20Proc%20Forms%20Appendix/15-appendixA.pdf

I then explained to Stacy that I had a search warrant to search the contents of her residence. Stacy stated that she is a hoarder and her house is full of items. She stated that there was no room to stand near the front door of the residence and that is why she met with me outside. I did explain that we still would need to search her residence. At that time, I requested assistance from other officers in the search. While inside the residence, I provided Stacy Schoon a copy of the search warrant. It appeared she reviewed the search warrant for several minutes and stated that the items listed in the search warrant were or had been at her residence. Upon being inside the residence, it was extremely difficult to walk from one side of the room to another due to the amount of hoarding that had taken place inside the residence. Involved officers rummaging through extreme amount of debris, requested that Stacy Schoon retrieve the items listed in the search warrant. There were a number of items that were disposed of, mostly used or had been consumed that we were not able to retrieve. As mentioned earlier, a number of these items were consumables or grocery items. Stacy Schoon stated that the prepaid Visa gift cards listed in the search warrant were used for vehicle gas and groceries and there’s no balance remaining. OTTER TAIL COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE FOLLOW UP INVESTIGATION REPORT INCIDENT NUMBER: 19035893 OFFENSE CATEGORY: Financial Transaction Card Fraud-609.821 subd 2 (1) COMPLAINANT: Stacy Ellen Wilde DEPUTY: Detective Jon Karger #325

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/hoarding-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20356056 Hoarding disorder Overview Signs and symptoms may include: Excessively acquiring items that are not needed or for which there's no space Persistent difficulty throwing out or parting with your things, regardless of actual value Feeling a need to save these items, and being upset by the thought of discarding them Building up of clutter to the point where rooms become unusable Having a tendency toward indecisiveness, perfectionism, avoidance, procrastination, and problems with planning and organizing. Risk factors include: Personality. Many people who have hoarding disorder have a temperament that includes indecisiveness. Family history. There is a strong association between having a family member who has hoarding disorder and having the disorder yourself. Stressful life events. Some people develop hoarding disorder after experiencing a stressful life event that they had difficulty coping with, such as the death of a loved one, divorce, eviction or losing possessions in a fire.

Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation Policy Statement It is the policy of the Board of Public Defense that discrimination, harassment, and retaliation in the workplace be prohibited. Discrimination or harassment based on sex, race, color, creed, religion, national origin, age, veteran status, marital status, sexual orientation, disability, or status with regard to public assistance will not be tolerated. It is the responsibility of Board of Public Defense employees to strive to create an environment free of harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. All Board employees are expected to treat other employees and the public with dignity, and respect and to comply with this policy. ... 4. Retaliation Retaliation includes, but is not limited to, intentionally engaging in any form of intimidation, reprisal or harassment against an individual because he or she made a complaint under this policy or assisted or participated in any manner in an investigation, or process under this policy, regardless of whether a claim of discrimination or harassment is substantiated; or associated with a person or group of persons who are disabled or are of a different race, color, creed, religion, sexual orientation or national origin. Retaliation may occur whether or not there is a power or authority differential between the individuals involved. State of Minnesota Board of Public Defense General Office Policies –Revised May 2019

D. The defense does not have to request the information, the prosecutor has the obligation to turn it over. United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). E. “Under Brady, the suppression by the State, whether intentional or not, of material evidence favorable to the defendant violates the constitutional guarantee of due process." Walen v. State, 777 N.W.2d 213, 216 (Minn. 2010). Brady/Giglio Policy Office Of The Otter Tail County Attorney Date Issued/Revised: July 20, 2020

Barry Fitzgibbons, Sheriff 218-998-8534 & Michelle Eldien, County Attorney, 218-998-8400:

1. Audio/video recorded statements and associated transcripts of Stacy Wilde, Jeff Wilde and Carla Ahrends for Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State of Minnesota vs Stacy Joy Schoon DOB: 10/04/1979

2. Data indicating that Stacy Joy Schoon and or her public defender Matthew Porter received the audio/video recorded statements and associated transcripts of Stacy Wilde, Jeff Wilde and Carla Ahrends for Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State of Minnesota vs Stacy Joy Schoon DOB: 10/04/1979.

3. Pleadings - 09/09/2020 Discovery Disclosure Index # 12 and 03/04/2021 Discovery Disclosure Index # 20 for Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State of Minnesota vs Stacy Joy Schoon DOB: 10/04/1979.

4. Pleadings - 8/24/2021 Discovery Disclosure Index # 10, 09/23/2021 Discovery Disclosure Index # 11, 09/29/2021 Discovery Disclosure Index # 12, 10/08/2021 Discovery Disclosure Index # 14 for Case No. 56-CR-21-1817 State of Minnesota vs Heather Leah Morris DOB: 11/09/1982.

5 . Pleadings - 02/08/2022 Petition to Enter Guilty Plea Index # 43 (Judicial Officer: Judd, Johnathan R ) for Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State of Minnesota vs Stacy Joy Schoon DOB: 10/04/1979.

6. Data indicating that Stacy Schoon was ordered to turned herself in to the Otter Tail County Sheriff's Office or other law enforcement agency for mugshot and fingerprints for Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State of Minnesota vs Stacy Joy Schoon DOB: 10/04/1979

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

Tunnel vision may have already led investigators at this point to prematurely but confidently conclude that the innocent suspect is guilty. Confirmation bias then leads investigators to seek out information and evidence that affirms this belief and to reject or discount information and evidence that does not. Richard A. Leo, Police Interrogation and American Justice, (Cambridge: 2008), Page 264.

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.03 13.03 Access To Government Data. Subd. 12. Pleadings. Pleadings, as defined by court rule, served by or on a government entity, are public data to the same extent that the data would be public if filed with the court.

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal investigative data. Except for the data defined in subdivisions 2, 3, and 6, investigative data collected or created by a law enforcement agency in order to prepare a case against a person, whether known or unknown, for the commission of a crime or other offense for which the agency has primary investigative responsibility are confidential or protected nonpublic while the investigation is active. Inactive investigative data are public unless the release of the data would jeopardize another ongoing investigation or would reveal the identity of individuals protected under subdivision 17. Images and recordings, including photographs, video, and audio records, which are part of inactive investigative files and which are clearly offensive to common sensibilities are classified as private or nonpublic data, provided that the existence of the images and recordings shall be disclosed to any person requesting access to the inactive investigative file. An investigation becomes inactive upon the occurrence of any of the following events: ... Subd. 15. Public benefit data. Any law enforcement agency may make any data classified as confidential or protected nonpublic pursuant to subdivision 7 or as private or nonpublic under section 13.825 or 626.19 accessible to any person, agency, or the public if the agency determines that the access will aid the law enforcement process, promote public safety, or dispel widespread rumor or unrest.

On Monday, October 28, 2019, at 1456 hours, I Officer Estep, was dispatched to the Fergus Falls Police Department at the address of 122 West Junius Avenue to meet with a party who had came to report a theft. When I arrived at the police department minutes later, I met with Stacy Wilde. Stacy had informed me that she has had money taken from her checking account via online purchases on Amazon. While speaking with Stacy I learned the following: Stacy and her husband share a checking account. They noticed that charges had been showing up in their account since July of 2019. Page 1. Fergus Falls Police Department Incident Report Incident Number: 19035893 Offense Category: Theft Location Of Offense: 128 East Washington Avenue Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Date/Time Reported: 10/28/2019 Officer(S) Assigned: Officer Matthew Estep #105 Additional Officers: Detective Andy Renner #128 SUBJECT: Stacy Ellen Wilde DOB: 06/10/1971 24796 County Highway 88 Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Phone: 218-205-112. Report of Estep.DOCX

More to come ...

Monday, February 7, 2022

Is Stacy Schoon Being Coerced Into Pleading Guilty? Will Judicial Officer Judd Ask Schoon Specific Questions About Schoon's Complaint Against Public Defender Porter Prior To Take Her Guilty? Who Wants To Watch The Zoom Hearing Today For Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State Of Minnesota Vs Stacy Joy Schoon??

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: kenh@fergusfallsjournal.com,
zach.stich@fergusfallsjournal.com,
mary.pat.maher@state.mn.us,
debra.mueske@courts.state.mn.us,
OttertailCourt OttertailCourt@courts.state.mn.us,
Kathryn.Ouren@courts.state.mn.us,
sjschoon sjschoon@gmail.com
date: Feb 7, 2022, 12:36 PM
subject: Is Stacy Schoon Being Coerced Into Pleading Guilty? Will Judicial Officer Judd Ask Schoon Specific Questions About Schoon's Complaint Against Public Defender Porter Prior To Take Her Guilty?
mailed-by: gmail.com

Ken Harty, Publisher 218-739-7019 & Zach Stich, Editor - Daily Journal 218-739-7030:

Are you attending the Zoom Sentencing hearing for Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State of Minnesota vs Stacy Joy Schoon? The Zoom instruction are below, aren't they? Do you remember that complaint that I sent you that was signed by Stacy Schoon against her backstabbing public defender Matthew Porter? Did you ever contact Stacy and ask her if she was coerced into dropping her complaint? Did you ever contact Seventh Judicial District Court Administrator Debra Mueske to see if and when she ever responded to Schoon's valid complaint? You remember don't you that Porters' bosses were coming up with crazy excuses not to investigate Schoon's complaint? Porter's bosses were claiming that they weren't sure if the signature on Schoon's complaint was valid while at the same time not contacting Schoon to verify the signature on the complaint, right? Did you ask Mueske if she used the same crazy excuse to avoid investigating Schoon's valid complaint? Did you know that Mueske never returned my emails nor my phone calls? Sounds like a cover-up, doesn't it? Oh, did you know that Schoon admitted to being a hoarder? Do you think that Porter is using Schoon's condition to manipulate and coerce her into pleading guilty? You remember that judicial officer Johnathan R Judd aided and abetted Porter by not allowing Schoon to place her valid complaint into the court record, don't you? If Judd was actually doing his job and had a fair court, then he would make sure that he asked Schoon specific questions about the allegations that she raised in her complaint prior to her pleading guilty, right? Are you going to watch Schoon's hearing to see that Judd asks Schoon if she has been coerced into dropping her complaint against Porter or not? Hmm? Inquiring minds want to know, don't they?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

https://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp SPJ Code of Ethics Seek Truth and Report It Ethical journalism should be accurate and fair. Journalists should be honest and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information. Journalists should: Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable. Give voice to the voiceless.

Minnesota Judicial Branch Logo Minnesota Judicial Branch Minnesota Court Records Online (MCRO)
https://publicaccess.courts.state.mn.us/DocumentSearch
Case Details Case Number: 72-CR-20-85 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs JEREMY JAMES BOLES 08/10/2021 Correspondence 15 pages 07-09-21 Jeremy Boles signed complaint to First Judicial District Chief Judicial Officer Kathryn Messerich
Case Details Case Number: 19HA-CR-19-2768 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs Jessica Danielle Hartger 06/22/2021 Correspondence 8 pages 06-01-21 Jessica Hartger’s signed complaint to First Judicial District Chief Judicial Officer Kathryn Messerich

Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 12/6/2021 State of Minnesota Otter Tail County District Court Seventh Judicial District Court File Number: 56-CR-20-926 Case Type: Crim/Traf Mandatory Notice of Remote Zoom Hearing FILE COPY State of Minnesota vs Stacy Joy Schoon You are notified this matter is set for a remote hearing. This hearing will not be in person at the courthouse. Hearing Information February 07, 2022 Plea Hearing 2:30 PM The hearing will be held via Zoom and appearance shall be by video and audio unless otherwise directed with Judicial Officer Johnathan R Judd, Otter Tail County District Court. If you fail to appear a warrant may be issued for your arrest. The Minnesota Judicial Branch uses strict security controls for all remote technology when conducting remote hearings. You must: • Notify the court if your address, email, or phone number changes. • Be fully prepared for the remote hearing. If you have exhibits you want the court to see, you must give them to the court before the hearing. Visit https://www.mncourts.gov/Remote-Hearings.aspx for more information and options for joining remote hearings, including how to submit exhibits. • Contact the court at 218-560-7045 if you do not have access to the internet, or are unable to connect by video and audio. • If you cannot afford to hire a lawyer and would like to apply for a court-appointed attorney before this appearance visit https://pdapplication.courts.state.mn.us or scan the QR code to start the application. To join by internet: 1. Type https://zoomgov.com/join in your browser’s address bar. 2. Enter the Meeting ID and Meeting Passcode (if asked): MNCIS-PAN-104 STATE Notice of Remote Zoom Hearing 4/21Meeting ID: 160 2905 5649 Passcode: 790939 3. Update your name by clicking on your profile picture. If you are representing a party, add your role to your name, for example, John Smith, Attorney for Defendant. 4. Click the Join Audio icon in the lower left-hand corner of your screen. 5. Click Share Video. To join by telephone (if you are unable to join by internet): Be sure you know how to mute your phone when you are not speaking and unmute it again to speak. 1. Call Toll-Free: 1-833-568-8864 2. Enter the Meeting ID and Meeting Passcode: Meeting ID: 160 2905 5649 Passcode: 790939 Para obtener más información y conocer las opciones para participar en audiencias remotas, incluido cómo enviar pruebas, visite www.mncourts.gov/Remote-Hearings. Booqo www.mncourts.gov/Remote-Hearings oo ka eego faahfaahin iyo siyaabaha aad uga qeybgeli karto dacwad-dhageysi ah fogaan-arag, iyo sida aad u soo gudbineyso wixii caddeymo ah. To receive an eReminder for future court dates via e-mail or text, visit www.mncourts.gov/Hearing-eReminders.aspx or scan the QR code to enroll. Dated: December 6, 2021 cc: Kathryn A. Ouren Otter Tail County Court Administrator 121 W. Junius Ave. Fergus Falls MN 56537 218-560-7045 Matthew Spielman Matthew Calvin Porter MNCIS-PAN-104 STATE Notice

Mary Pat Maher Executive Assistant Minnesota Board on Judicial Standards 651- 296-3999:

Is it or isn't it a judicial officer's job to take advantage of people with mental conditions in their court? Is that why Otter Tail County Judicial Officer Johnathan R Judd willfully refused to allow Stacy Schoon to file her complaint against her public defender Matthew Porter into the Register of Actions for Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State of Minnesota vs Stacy Joy Schoon? Judd is taking advantage of Schoon's tendencies of indecisiveness, perfectionism, avoidance, procrastination, isn't he? Judd knows or should know that Schoon proclaimed her innocence in her complaint, right? So Judd should be asking a lot of specific question of why Schoon suddenly wants to plead guilty, shouldn't he?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

https://www.mncourts.gov/About-The-Courts/Overview/JudicialDirectory/Bio.aspx?jid=1890 Judge Johnathan Judd Otter Tail County Courthouse Seventh Judicial District (218) 560-7045 Seventh Judicial District Judicial Officers Judge Johnathan Judd Appointed/Elected: Appointed on Mar. 1, 2021, by Governor Tim Walz. Current term expires Jan. 2023. Education: University of North Dakota School of Law Political science and history degrees, North Dakota State University Past Employment: Mayor City of Moorhead Part-time contract, Minnesota Board of Public Defense Prosecutor, Clay County Attorney’s office Private practice Assistant Public Defender, Minnesota Board of Public Defense Director of Multicultural Affairs, Concordia College Minnesota Department of Commerce Law clerk, Judge Gerald J. Seibel, Morris, MN Professional and Community Activities: Adjunct instructor, Criminal Justice Department, Minnesota State University Moorhead Various City of Moorhead commissions and committees

Kathryn Ouren, Court Administrator 218-560-7045 & Debra Mueske, District Administrator 320-656-3650:

Is or isn't judicial officer Johnathan R. Judd going to ask Stacy Schoon if she was coerced into dropping her complaint against her backstabbing public defender Matthew Porter? Why isn't Schoon's complaint against Porter in the Register of Actions for Schoon's case Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State of Minnesota vs Stacy Joy Schoon? Why are similar complaints found in the First Judicial District Registers of Actions for 72-CR-20-85 Case Title: State of Minnesota vs JEREMY JAMES BOLES and State of Minnesota vs Jessica Danielle Hartger but not for Stacy Schoon? Hmm? Inquiring minds want to know, don't they?

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

More to come ...

Thursday, January 6, 2022

How About We Submit A Chapter 13 Data Request For The Steele Co. And The Freeborn Co. Contracts AKA Retainer Agreements With Koch & Garvis, LLC For Hanson V Thiele AKA Hanson V Freitag Et Al? Did Assistant Attorney General Ed Stackmeyer Engage In A Sanctionable Activity? Are Sheriff's Thiele & Freitag Worried They Might be Sued For Deisel Therapy? Let's Ask, Shall We?

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: tom.jensen@co.freeborn.mn.us,
pat.martinson@co.freeborn.mn.us,
andrew@uptownlawyer.com,
Scott.Golberg@co.steele.mn.us,
catherine.piepho@co.steele.mn.us
date: Jan 6, 2022, 11:42 AM
subject: Chapter 13 Data Request For Steele Co. And Freeborn Co. Contracts AKA Retainer Agreements With Koch & Garvis, LLC For Hanson V Thiele AKA Hanson V Freitag Et Al
mailed-by: gmail.com

Andrew Stanton Garvis, attorney for Steele Co. Sheriff Lon Thiele & Freeborn Co. Sheriff Kurt Freitag 612-827-8101:

1. Koch & Garvis, LLC signed contract/retainer agreement with Steele County for legal services for Hanson v. Thiele aka Hanson v. Freitag et al.
2. Koch & Garvis, LLC signed contract/retainer agreement with Freeborn County for legal services for Hanson v. Thiele aka Hanson v. Freitag et al.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. Would it or wouldn't it be a sanctionable offense for Assistant Attorney General Ed Stackmeyer to waste the court's valuable time by filing frivolous filings in Hanson v. Thiele aka Hanson v. Freitag et al? Was it or wasn't it Stackmeyer's duty to notify the Steele & Freeborn County Attorneys instead of the City of Albert Lea City Attorney?
P.S.S. Are you or clients worried that Hanson v. Thiele aka Hanson v. Freitag et al would be amended or a separate action might be initiated to address the diesel therapy treatment that Melissa Hanson was allegedly subjected to by your clients? Hmm? Inquiring minds want to know, don't they?
P.S.S.S. Will it or won't it affect the credibility of your clients when they both have a well-documented history of willfully refusing to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act? Hmm? Inquiring minds really want to know, don't they?

https://www.yourdictionary.com/diesel-therapy Diesel-therapy noun A form of punishment in which prisoners are shackled and transported long distances for days or weeks.

https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/data/types/contracting/ Can requests for public data be made to the private contractor? Yes, if the public data are not available from the government entity or if it is specified in the contract that the private contractor will reply to data requests (Minnesota Statutes, section 13.05, subdivision 11(b)). The private party must fulfill data requests consistent with the time limits and copy cost requirements of the Data Practices Act (Advisory Opinion 10-024). The government entity continues to be responsible in making decisions about data classification. Unless the contract specifies otherwise, the government entity retains ultimate responsibility for responding even if the data are maintained by the private contractor (Advisory Opinions 09-022 and 09-003).
https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/data/types/contracting/

CASE 0:21-cv-02651-NEB-LIB Doc. 2 Filed 12/15/21 Page 1 of 1 The Office of Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison helping people afford their lives and live with dignity and respect • www.ag.state.mn.us December 15, 2021 U.S. Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois United States District Court 515 West 1st Street Room 412 Duluth, MN 55802-1397 Re: United States District Court District of Minnesota Hanson v. Thiele Court File No. 21-CV-02651 (NEB/LIB) (Attorney Substitution) Dear Magistrate Judge Brisbois: Please find, as an attachment to this letter, a letter, dated December 15, 2021, to the Albert Lea City Attorney's Office, asking that office to file a Notice of Appearance in this case on behalf of Respondent. Sincerely, s/Ed Stockmeyer ED STOCKMEYER Assistant Attorney General (651) 757-1247 (Voice) ( 651) 297-4348 (Fax) ed.stockmeyer@ag.state.mn.us Attachment cc: Kelly Martinez, Albert Lea City Attorney (w/attachment) Melissa L. Hanson 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1400, St. Paul, MN 55101-2131 Office: (651) 296-3353 • Toll Free: (800) 657-3787 • Minnesota Relay: (800) 627-3529 An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity • Printed on 30% Post-Consumer Material Paper

CASE 0:21-cv-02651-NEB-LIB Doc. 2-1 Filed 12/15/21 Page 1 of 1 The Office of Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison helping people afford their lives and live with dignity and respect • www.ag.state.mn.us December 15, 2021 Kelly Martinez Albert Lea City Attorney City Hall 221 East Clark Street Albert Lea, MN 56007 Re: Hanson v. Thiele Court File No. 21-CV-02651 (NEB/LIB) Dear Ms. Martinez: Enclosed please find a federal Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and accompanying documents in a case handled by the Albert Lea City Attorney. Because your office has an interest in these prosecutions, we are forwarding this matter to you. We generally do not handle these cases. Accordingly, we ask that you file a Notice of Appearance, letting the United States District Court know that you are the attorney of record for Respondent. By copy of this letter I am advising the Court that the Attorney General's Office does not represent the Respondent in this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or would like any sample habeas motions or briefs. Sincerely, s/Ed Stockmeyer ED STOCKMEYER Assistant Attorney General (651) 757-1247 (Voice) (651) 297-4348 (Fax) ed.stockmeyer@ag.state.mn. us Enclosures cc: Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois (w/o encl.) Melissa L. Hanson (w/o encl.) 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1400, St. Paul, MN 55101-2131 Office: (651) 296-3353 • Toll Free: (800) 657-3787 • Minnesota Relay: (800) 627-3529 An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity • Printed on 30% Post-Consumer Material Paper

Thomas Jensen, Freeborn County Administrator 507-377-5115 & Pat Martinson, Freeborn Auditor - Treasurer 507-377-5121:

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:
1. Appointment of Freeborn County Minnesota Government Data Practice Act Responsible Authority and Compliance Official.
2. Signed contract/retainer agreement with Koch & Garvis, LLC for legal services for Hanson v. Thiele aka Hanson v. Freitag et al.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. Does Freeborn County have any plans to illegally withhold Melissa Hanson's Chapter 13.04 Subject Data from her? Hanson's Chapter 13.04 Subject Data would substantiate allegation of diesel therapy aka torture being inflicted upon Hanson, correct?
P.S.S. Can you explain to me why oh why Freeborn Co. Sheriff Kurt Freitag is willfully refusing to respond to my most recent Chapter 13 Data Request? Can you also explain why Freeborn Co. Sheriff Kurt Freitag is illegally withholding data from me aka deputy data related to the 02-03-21 COVID-19 superspreader event hosted by City of Albert Lea City Attorney Kelly Martinez? (Agency ALPD Albert Lew PD Incident # 202100003681 Case# CALL FOR SERVICE Activity ALARM Alarm, Burlary Or Robber Priority 2 ASAP Common Place City Hall Blotter: city attorney office alarm 210 no bwc all 10-2 326 bwc 102 BWC 209bwc 211 BWC)

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.03 13.03 ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT DATA. Subd. 3. Request for access to data. Subd. 12. Pleadings. Pleadings, as defined by court rule, served by or on a government entity, are public data to the same extent that the data would be public if filed with the court.

Hanson was initially booked into the Freeborn County Jail, but then was moved to the Steele County Jail the day after her sentencing. Monday morning, following obtaining her signature on a writ of habeas corpus, Hanson was moved back to Freeborn County Jail, which made the original writ of habeas corpus, filed for Steele County, invalid. A second was filed on Tuesday, involving both counties of Steele and Freeborn, rather than just Steele. The circumstances surrounding her transfer are unknown. The habeas corpus now lists both Sheriff Kurt Freitag, with Freeborn County, and Sheriff Lon Thiele, with Steele County. EXCLUSIVE: Lisa Hanson Files Writ of Habeas Corpus with United States District Court of Minnesota December 15, 2021 Hayley Feland
https://theminnesotasun.com/2021/12/15/exclusive-lisa-hanson-files-writ-of-habeas-corpus-with-united-states-district-court-of-minnesota/

318.1.1 STANDARDS OF CONDUCT FOR PEACE OFFICERS The Freeborn County Sheriff's Office adopts the Professional Conduct of Peace Officers model policy established and published by the Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training Board (POST) (Minn. Stat. § 626.8457). This model policy applies to all peace officers of this office. See attachment: MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf The provisions of this policy are in addition to collective bargaining agreements or any other applicable law (see generally Minn. R. 6700.1500). The Office shall report annually to POST any data regarding the investigation and disposition of cases involving alleged misconduct of deputies (Minn. Stat. § 626.8457, Subd. 3). Page 154. Policy 318 Standard of Conduct Freeborn County Sheriff's Office Freeborn Cnty SO Policy Manual

A. PRINCIPLE ONE Peace officers shall conduct themselves, whether on or off duty, in accordance with the Constitution of the United States, the Minnesota Constitution, and all applicable laws, ordinances and rules enacted or established pursuant to legal authority. 1. Rationale: Peace officers conduct their duties pursuant to a grant of limited authority from the community. Therefore, officers must understand the laws defining the scope of their enforcement powers. Peace officers may only act in accordance with the powers granted to them. 2. Rules a) Peace officers shall not knowingly exceed their authority in the enforcement of the law. b) Peace officers shall not knowingly disobey the law or rules of criminal procedure in such areas as interrogation, arrest, detention, searches, seizures, use of informants, and preservation of evidence, except where permitted in the performance of duty under proper authority. c) Peace officers shall not knowingly restrict the freedom of individuals, whether by arrest or detention, in violation of the Constitutions and laws of the United States and the State of Minnesota. d) Peace officers, whether on or off duty, shall not knowingly commit any criminal offense under any laws of the United States or any state or local jurisdiction. Page 685. Attachment MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf Freeborn Cnty SO Policy Manual Freeborn Cnty SO Policy Manual

Scott Golberg, Steele Co. Administrator 507.444.7431 & Catherine Piepho, Treasurer 507-444-7420:

Chapter 13 data request: Please email/file share me the following readily available, free, electronic, public data in its original searchable pdf format from your respective offices pursuant to 13.03 Subd. 3(e) and Gen. Rules Prac. Rule 14:
1. Appointment of Steele County Minnesota Government Data Practice Act Responsible Authority and Compliance Official.
2. Signed contract/retainer agreement with Koch & Garvis, LLC for legal services for Hanson v. Thiele aka Hanson v. Freitag et al

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. Does Steele County have any plans to illegally withhold Melissa Hanson's Chapter 13.04 Subject Data from her? Hanson's Chapter 13.04 Subject Data would substantiate allegation of diesel therapy aka torture being inflicted upon Hanson, correct?
P.S.S. Can you explain to me why oh why your Steele Co. Sheriff Lon Thiele would illegally withhold the jail rosters from me that correspond to Melissa Hanson's stay at the Steele Co. jail?

321.1.1 STANDARDS OF CONDUCT FOR PEACE OFFICERS The Steele County Sheriff's Office adopts the Professional Conduct of Peace Officers model policy established and published by the Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training Board (POST) (Minn. Stat. § 626.8457). This model policy applies to all peace officers of this office. See attachment: MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf The provisions of this policy are in addition to collective bargaining agreements or any other applicable law (see generally Minn. R. 6700.1500). The Office shall report annually to POST any data regarding the investigation and disposition of cases involving alleged misconduct of deputies (Minn. Stat. § 626.8457, Subd. 3). Page 155. Policy 321 Steele County Sheriff's Office Steele County SO Policy Manual

A. PRINCIPLE ONE Peace officers shall conduct themselves, whether on or off duty, in accordance with the Constitution of the United States, the Minnesota Constitution, and all applicable laws, ordinances and rules enacted or established pursuant to legal authority. 1. Rationale: Peace officers conduct their duties pursuant to a grant of limited authority from the community. Therefore, officers must understand the laws defining the scope of their enforcement powers. Peace officers may only act in accordance with the powers granted to them. 2. Rules a) Peace officers shall not knowingly exceed their authority in the enforcement of the law. b) Peace officers shall not knowingly disobey the law or rules of criminal procedure in such areas as interrogation, arrest, detention, searches, seizures, use of informants, and preservation of evidence, except where permitted in the performance of duty under proper authority. c) Peace officers shall not knowingly restrict the freedom of individuals, whether by arrest or detention, in violation of the Constitutions and laws of the United States and the State of Minnesota. d) Peace officers, whether on or off duty, shall not knowingly commit any criminal offense under any laws of the United States or any state or local jurisdiction. Page 569. Attachment MN POST Professional Conduct of Peace Officers Model Policy.pdf Steele County SO Policy Manual Steele County SO Policy Manual

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/42939573/Hanson_v_Thiele
Hanson v. Thiele
Minnesota District Court
Judge: Nancy E Brasel
Referred: Leo I Brisbois
Case #: 0:21-cv-02651
Nature of Suit 530 Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus - General
Cause 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Case Filed: Dec 13, 2021
Docket
Docket last updated: 7 hours ago
Wednesday, January 05, 2022
4 notice Notice of Appearance Wed 01/05 11:15 AM
NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew S Garvis on behalf of All Defendants. (Garvis, Andrew)
Wednesday, December 15, 2021
2 misc Letter to Magistrate Judge Wed 12/15 9:33 AM
LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Lon Thiele Attorney Substitution .(Stockmeyer, Edwin)
Att: 1 Cover Letter Attorney Substitution
Tuesday, December 14, 2021
3 cmp Amended Petition (in a Civil Case) Wed 12/15 12:08 PM
AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Lon Thiele and Sheriff Kurt Freitag filed by Melissa Lynn Hanson. No summons requested. (MKB)
Att: 1 Attachment,
Att: 2 Exhibit(s) A,
Att: 3 Exhibit(s) B,
Att: 4 Exhibit(s) C,
Att: 5 Exhibit(s) D,
Att: 6 Exhibit(s) E,
Att: 7 Exhibit(s) F
Monday, December 13, 2021
1 cmp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Mon 12/13 12:48 PM
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing fee $5, receipt number 34641016375) filed by Melissa Lynn Hanson. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd/4th Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (NAH)
Att: 1 Exhibit(s) A,
Att: 2 Exhibit(s) B,
Att: 3 Exhibit(s) C,
Att: 4 Exhibit(s) D,
Att: 5 Exhibit(s) E,
Att: 6 Exhibit(s) F,
Att: 7 Civil Cover Sheet

Attachments: Automatic reply Chapter 13 Data For Melissa Hanson Related Data Freitag Subjecting Prisoner Lisa Hanson To Diesel Therapy122921_1008am.pdf, Chapter 13 Data For Melissa Hanson Related Data Freitag Subjecting Prisoner Lisa Hanson To Diesel Therapy122921_1007am.pdf, Why Is Nemmers Still Being Harassed By Steele County Over Readily Available Free Electronic Data For Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus123021_729am.pdf

More to come ...

Tuesday, January 4, 2022

Who Wants To Ask DNR Commissioner Sarah Strommen Why DNR Personnel Harassing Are Nemmers For Exposing Illegal Release Of Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data For State Of MN VS Michael Sysa 39-VB-21-468, David Sysa 39-VB-21-469 And Yevgeniy Simonovich 39-VB-21-470? Why Don't We Ask Lake of the Woods County Attorney Jim Austad If He AUthorized The Data Breach?

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: Barb.Naramore@state.mn.us,
Sarah.Strommen@state.mn.us,
jim_a@co.lotw.mn.us,
"Alongi, Anthony (DNR)" anthony.alongi@state.mn.us,
"MN_Data Request (DNR)" datarequest.dnr@state.mn.us
date: Jan 4, 2022, 10:37 AM
subject: Why Are DNR Personnel Harassing Nemmers For Exposing Illegal Release Of Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data For State Of MN VS Michael Sysa 39-VB-21-468, David Sysa 39-VB-21-469 And Yevgeniy Simonovich 39-VB-21-470?
mailed-by: gmail.com

Sarah Strommen, DNR Commissioner & Barb Naramore, Deputy DNR Commissioner 651-259-5033:

Can you explain to me why oh why I am being harassed by your miscreant DNR Data Practices Compliance Official Barbara Damchik-Dykes 651.259.5345 and Policy and Planning MN Department of Natural Resources Section Manager Anthony Alongi 651.259.5556? Why are they retaliating against me for exposing a DNR data breach? When am I going to receive the current policy and procedure manual (You call them Directives, don't you?) that I requested way, way, way, way, way back in November? When is that data showing up in my email inbox? And when am I going to receive the DNR's data that indicates that you notified Michael A Sysa (Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State Of Minnesota vs Michael A Sysa) David Alekseevich Sysa (Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State Of Minnesota vs David Alekseevich Sysa) and Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich (Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State Of Minnesota vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich) of the DNR's illegal release of their confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. criminal investigative data to members of the media? Five (5) minutes from never?

1. Data indicating that either Jim Austad, Lake of the Woods County Attorney or his office personnel authorized the MN DNR to illegally release Michael A Sysa's (Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State Of Minnesota vs Michael A Sysa) David Alekseevich Sysa's (Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State Of Minnesota vs David Alekseevich Sysa) and Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich's (Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State Of Minnesota vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich) confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. criminal investigative data to members of the media.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713

Mr. Karpan: I do have one request. Um, I've not asked for this before, I'm not sure how to handle it, but the Department of Natural Resources as they've done in the past has seen fit to do a press release, and officer Osborne has answered questions for the newspaper. My client – all the facts of the case are in the Echo Press, on the radio and in sporting magazines. Not only are there quotes in there that aren't - - I mean I know the State has a right to release incident data I think it's called. Under Chapter 13.82, investigative data is not to be released. Well, there are pictures allegedly of my client's fish all over the Echo Press. Everybody in town is talking about it. I don't know if I'll have to make a change of venue motion eventually. I'll have to see how this plays out in a few months.
But under 13.82, there's no way the DNR is supposed to be releasing pictures of evidence to the newspaper. It prejudices my client. It prejudices all of us. It makes it impossible to get a fair trail. So I'm asking the Court to order the Department of Natural Resources to not discuss this case any further until it's done.
The Court: Mr. Hochsprung?
Mr. Hochsprung: Your Honor, I did not authorize the Department of Natural Resources to disclose anything to the paper. Um, I can talk with Mr. Osborne or whoever about that, but I don't have any information about that. State of Minnesota vs. Ronald Wayne Johnson Rule 5/ Rule 8 Hearing. Court File No. 21-CR- 13-51. February 11, 2013.

VIII. PRINCIPLE FIVE Conservation Officers shall treat all members of the public courteously and with respect. A. Rationale Conservation Officers are one of the most visible forms of state government. Therefore, Conservation Officers must make a positive impression when interacting with the public and each other. B. Rules 3. No Conservation Officer shall ridicule, mock, deride, taunt, belittle, willfully embarrass, humiliate, or shame a person, or do anything reasonably calculated to incite a person to violence. A-4-99, CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER Page 6. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE DIRECTIVE NUMBER: A-4-99 SUBJECT: CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 1999 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Rescinds Directive 61-96 REFERENCE: Minnesota Statute Sec 626.8457, 43A.38, 43A.39; Directive A-3-98; C.L.E.A. 26.1; State Electronic Mail and Internet Policy; POST Model Conduct Policy DISTRIBUTION: All Division Employees NUMBER OF PAGES: 31

Monday, November 22, 2021 DNR Data Practices Compliance Official Barbara Damchik-Dykes 651.259.5345 Reported To MN Department Of Natural Resources Policy And Planning Section Manager Anthony Alongi After Damchik-Dykes Harasses Nemmers Over Request For Entire DNR Policy & Procedure Manual & After Damchik-Dykes Illegally Releases Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data For High-Profile Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State Of Minnesota Vs Michael A Sysa; Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State Of Minnesota Vs David Alekseevich Sysa And Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State Of Minnesota Vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich To Media Outlets And To Nemmers? http://lionnews00.blogspot.com/2021/11/dnr-data-practices-compliance-official.html

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.055 13.055 DISCLOSURE OF BREACH IN SECURITY; NOTIFICATION AND INVESTIGATION REPORT REQUIRED. Subd. 2. Notice to individuals; investigation report. (a) A government entity that collects, creates, receives, maintains, or disseminates private or confidential data on individuals must disclose any breach of the security of the data following discovery or notification of the breach. Written notification must be made to any individual who is the subject of the data and whose private or confidential data was, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired by an unauthorized person and must inform the individual that a report will be prepared under paragraph (b), how the individual may obtain access to the report, and that the individual may request delivery of the report by mail or e-mail. The disclosure must be made in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, consistent with (1) the legitimate needs of a law enforcement agency as provided in subdivision 3; or (2) any measures necessary to determine the scope of the breach and restore the reasonable security of the data. (b) Notwithstanding section 13.15 or 13.37, upon completion of an investigation into any breach in the security of data and final disposition of any disciplinary action for purposes of section 13.43, including exhaustion of all rights of appeal under any applicable collective bargaining agreement, the responsible authority shall prepare a report on the facts and results of the investigation. If the breach involves unauthorized access to or acquisition of data by an employee, contractor, or agent of the government entity, the report must at a minimum include: (1) a description of the type of data that were accessed or acquired; (2) the number of individuals whose data was improperly accessed or acquired; (3) if there has been final disposition of disciplinary action for purposes of section 13.43, the name of each employee determined to be responsible for the unauthorized access or acquisition, unless the employee was performing duties under chapter 5B; and (4) the final disposition of any disciplinary action taken against each employee in response.

Jim Austad, Lake of the Woods County Attorney 218-634-1190:

1. Your current Lake of the Woods County Attorney's office general policy and procedure manual and prosecutor's policy and procedure manual.
2. Data indicating that either you or your office personnel authorized the MN DNR to illegally release Michael A Sysa's (Case No. 39-VB-21-468 State Of Minnesota vs Michael A Sysa) David Alekseevich Sysa's (Case No. 39-VB-21-469 State Of Minnesota vs David Alekseevich Sysa) and Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich's (Case No. 39-VB-21-470 State Of Minnesota vs Yevgeniy Sergeyevich Simonovich) confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. criminal investigative data to members of the media.

Terry Dean, Nemmers 320-283-5713
P.S. Do you remember that the evidence of your willful refusal to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act was used by me to toss a huge monkey wrench into your failed 2016 attempt to be appointed as a judicial officer?
P.S.S. Are you going to harass me with snail mail, again? Or are you going to harass me with electronic communications this time?

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/pr/subtype/cond/id/3.8/ Minnesota Court Rules PROFESSIONAL RULES Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.8 Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor The prosecutor in a criminal case shall: (f) exercise reasonable care to prevent employees or other persons assisting or associated with the prosecutor in a criminal case and over whom the prosecutor has direct control from making an extrajudicial statement that the prosecutor would be prohibited from making under Rule 3.6.

IV. PRINCIPLE ONE Conservation Officers shall conduct themselves, whether on or off duty, in accordance with the Constitution of the United States, the Minnesota Constitution, and all applicable laws, ordinances, and rules enacted or established pursuant to legal authority. A. Rationale Conservation Officers conduct their duties pursuant to a grant of limited authority. Therefore, officers must understand the laws defining the scope of their enforcement powers. Conservation Officers may only act in accordance with powers granted to them. B. Rules 1. Conservation Officers shall not knowingly exceed their authority in the enforcement of the law. 2. Conservation Officers shall not knowingly disobey the law or rules of criminal procedure in such areas as interrogation, arrest, detention, searches, seizures, use of informants, preservation of evidence, and use of force. A-4-99, CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER Page 2. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE DIRECTIVE NUMBER: A-4-99 SUBJECT: CONDUCT UNBECOMING A CONSERVATION OFFICER EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 1999 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Rescinds Directive 61-96 REFERENCE: Minnesota Statute Sec 626.8457, 43A.38, 43A.39; Directive A-3-98; C.L.E.A. 26.1; State Electronic Mail and Internet Policy; POST Model Conduct Policy DISTRIBUTION: All Division Employees NUMBER OF PAGES: 31

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/13.82 13.82 COMPREHENSIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT DATA. Subd. 7. Criminal investigative data. Except for the data defined in subdivisions 2, 3, and 6, investigative data collected or created by a law enforcement agency in order to prepare a case against a person, whether known or unknown, for the commission of a crime or other offense for which the agency has primary investigative responsibility are confidential or protected nonpublic while the investigation is active. Inactive investigative data are public unless the release of the data would jeopardize another ongoing investigation or would reveal the identity of individuals protected under subdivision 17. Images and recordings, including photographs, video, and audio records, which are part of inactive investigative files and which are clearly offensive to common sensibilities are classified as private or nonpublic data, provided that the existence of the images and recordings shall be disclosed to any person requesting access to the inactive investigative file. An investigation becomes inactive upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (a) a decision by the agency or appropriate prosecutorial authority not to pursue the case; (b) expiration of the time to bring a charge or file a complaint under the applicable statute of limitations, or 30 years after the commission of the offense, whichever comes earliest; or (c) exhaustion of or expiration of all rights of appeal by a person convicted on the basis of the investigative data. Any investigative data presented as evidence in court shall be public. Data determined to be inactive under clause (a) may become active if the agency or appropriate prosecutorial authority decides to renew the investigation.

from: Lion News lionnews00@gmail.com
to: savanna_s@co.lotw.mn.us
date: Jan 4, 2022, 10:41 AM
subject: Fwd: Why Are DNR Personnel Harassing Nemmers For Exposing Illegal Release Of Confidential 13.82 Subd. 7. Criminal Investigative Data For State Of MN VS Michael Sysa 39-VB-21-468, David Sysa 39-VB-21-469 And Yevgeniy Simonovich 39-VB-21-470?
mailed-by: gmail.com

More to come ...

Lion News

Wednesday, February 16, 2022

What Is The Status Of My Chapter 13 Data Request For Data That Stacy Schoon Alleged Was Illegally Withheld From Her In Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State Of Minnesota Vs Stacy Joy Schoon? Nemmers' Chapter 13 Data Request Triggers Motion For Missing Booking Photo & Fingerprints?

Wednesday, February 9, 2022

Monday, February 7, 2022

Is Stacy Schoon Being Coerced Into Pleading Guilty? Will Judicial Officer Judd Ask Schoon Specific Questions About Schoon's Complaint Against Public Defender Porter Prior To Take Her Guilty? Who Wants To Watch The Zoom Hearing Today For Case No. 56-CR-20-926 State Of Minnesota Vs Stacy Joy Schoon??

Thursday, January 6, 2022

Tuesday, January 4, 2022

Followers

Blog Archive

Contact Information: